Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Romanian Biotechnological Letters Copyright © 2010 University of Bucharest Vol. 15, No.3, 2010 Printed in Romania. All rights reserved ORIGINAL PAPER Determination of antimicrobial activity of tannic acid in pickling process Received for publication, October 23, 2009 Accepted, June 30, 2010 SELİME MENTEŞ ÇOLAK1, BİNNUR MERİÇLİ YAPICI2, ALİ NAİL YAPICI3 1 Ege University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Leather Engineering, 35100 Bornova-Izmir, Turkey. 2 Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Arts and Science, Biology Department, Basic and Industrial Microbiology Section , 17020 Canakkale, Turkey. 3 Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Biga Vocational College, 17200 Biga-Çanakkale, Turkey. Abstract In the present study, the antimicrobial efficacy of tannic acid used in the pickling stage was investigated against some microorganisms. Leather samples treated with various concentrations of tannic acid in the stage were assessed against sixteen test microorganisms by Disc Diffusion Method. The used microorganisms - bacteria, moulds and yeasts – were Bacillus cereus (ATCC 11778), Salmonella typhimurium CCM 5445, Proteus vulgaris (ATTC 6889), Enterobacter aerogenes (ATCC 13048), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATTC 27853), Escherichia coli (ATTC 25922), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538), Neisseria canis, Aspergillus niger, A. fumigatus, A. flavus, Penicillium granulatum P. granulosum, Geotricum candidum, Yarrowia lypolitica and Rhodotorula rubra (DSM 70403). The results showed that tannic acid exhibited antimicrobial activity against all bacteria, moulds and yeasts tested. It was also determined that the most effective concentration of tannic acid was 3 %. Keywords: Antimicrobial efficacy, leather industry, microorganisms, tannic acid. Introduction Raw skin is a favourable medium for microbial growth. In the absence of appropriate counter-measures, microorganisms present in the skin multiply and cause damage in its structure. In raw skin, the microorganism load can be affected by various parameters, including but not limited to water content, storage temperature and effectiveness of conservation process. During the manufacturing processes, the microbial load varies depending on many other factors, such as pH values, temperature, duration of each process, and biocides and other compounds of different chemical compositions used [1-3]. Fungicides are mainly used to protect chrome tanned leather from microorganisms when post tanning processes are delayed [4]. While biocides inhibit basic metabolic activities of the microorganisms, they may be toxic due to containing active compounds hazardous to human and environmental health. Recent studies have focused on reducing these risks by limiting the use of biocides or identifying less hazardous alternative agents [5-9]. A study on investigation of wood preservative activities of some plant extracts (Pinus brutia, Quercus ithaburensis, Quercus infectoria, Rhus coriara) as fungicide, it has been found that the extracts have greatly decreased the growth of some fungus mycelium in treated wood above 3% concentration [10]. Many studies conducted before confirm that phenolic agents are effective against pathogenic microorganism attacks [11-14]. Catechin and pyrogallol, found in vegetable tannins, are phenols toxic to microorganisms. There are two hydroxyl groups in catechin and three in pyrogallol. The number and location of hydroxyl groups in the phenolic compounds are the key factors in 5325 SELİME MENTEŞ ÇOLAK, BİNNUR MERİÇLİ YAPICI, ALİ NAİL YAPICI their toxicity to microorganisms. As the number of the hydroxyl groups increases, so does the toxicity [15]. Tannins are also toxic to fungi, bacteria and viruses and inhibit their growth [15-17]. A 1:50000 solution of acerin and similarly a 1:50000 solution of mimosa, quebracho, canaigre and babul were found to destroy viruses within 5 minutes, while a milder effect was observed for a chestnut wood, valonia and sumac solution [18]. With reference to Carson and Frish, Gustavson stated that tannic acid (TA) and digallic acid inactivate influenza viruses. In another resource, it is declared that gallic acid in carob has antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant properties [19]. Antibacterial properties of vegetable tannins have been exploited in various fields, particularly in medicine. TA, whose phenolic structure is shown in Figure 1, exhibits antioxidant, antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic properties [20-26]. The study was carried out to examine the antimicrobial properties of TA used in different concentrations in the pickling process against bacteria, moulds and yeasts. Figure 1. Molecular structure of tannic acid (TA). Experimental Material 20 pieces of whole dry-salted hair sheep skins were used in the study. Method Methodology of leather processing The detailed leather production process is presented in Table 1. Except for TA, all the chemicals used were of technical grade. TA used was of analytical grade (Merck). 5326 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2010 Determination of antimicrobial activity of tannic acid in pickling process Table 1. Processing of dry-salted hair sheep skin PROCESS Weighing Pre-soaking Drain Main Soaking Unhairing Liming Fleshing Trimming Weighing DelimingBating Add Wash Degreasing % CHEMICALS % based on raw skin weight. 500 Water o C 22 DURATION (min.) pH MA*(rpm) 240 7.0-7.5 0 500 0.5 Water 22 Non-ionic emulsifier 0.5 Bactericide 1080 7.0-7.5 4 (Run on automatic, run 10 minutes/stop 50 minutes for 24 hours). After painting solution (18 0Bé Na2S, 26 0Bé Ca(OH)2, 28 0Bé china clay) was applied onto flesh side, the skins were dehaired within 4 hours. 300 Water 20 2 Sodium sulphide 4 Lime 30 11.5-12 4 (Run on automatic, run 5 minutes/stop 55 minutes for 24 hours). Recorded as pelt weight, % based on pelt weight. 150 Water 35 1 Ammonium 45 sulphate 0.8 Bating agents 30 150 20 10 100 Water 35 5 Degreasing agent 60 200 Water 35 35 200 Water 35 35 100 Water 22 Washing Washing PicklingTanning Add Add 7 1 Add Add x 0.5 Add 8 Add 1 NaCl Formic acid (diluted 1:10) Tannic acid** Sulphuric acid (diluted 1:10) Chrome tanning agent (Powder) Basification agent 8.0 12 12 12 10 30 30 120 12 12 12 3.0 240 12 12 4.0 12 * MA: Mechanical action of leather processing drum. **: Tannic acid was only used in trials for different concentration (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 or 3%). After soaking, dehairing-liming, deliming-bating and degreasing, TA was added to the pickling float at five different ratio (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3%) based on pelt weight. The leather pieces obtained were labelled as experimental groups (E). On the other hand, leather pieces without TA added in the pickling float were marked as control group (C). At the end of the chrome tanning, an 8.0 mm sterilized stainless steel template was used to obtain leather samples from E and C groups for the microbiological analysis. Microbial test organisms: In the present study; 8 bacteria (Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Salmonella typhimurium CCM 5445, Proteus vulgaris ATTC 6889, Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 13048, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATTC 27853, Escherichia coli ATTC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Neisseria canis); 5 moulds (Aspergillus niger, A. fumigatus, A. flavus, Penicillium granulatum, P. granulosum) and 3 yeasts (Geotricum candidum, Yarrowia lypolitica and Rhodotorula rubra DSM 70403) were used as test Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2010 5327 SELİME MENTEŞ ÇOLAK, BİNNUR MERİÇLİ YAPICI, ALİ NAİL YAPICI microorganisms. Except for Rhodotorula rubra, all fungi were obtained from Basic and Industrial Microbiology Culture Collection of Ege University. Antimicrobial activity test: Nutrient agar was used for the test bacteria and Malt Extract Agar for the test moulds and yeasts. All the bacteria were incubated at 35 ± 0.1 0C for 24 h by inoculation into Nutrient Broth (Difco Laboratories, MI, USA). One millilitre of inoculum containing 106 bacterial cells/mL was spread on Mueller Hinton Agar (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, UK) plates. Mould and yeast cultures were incubated at 25 ± 0.1 0C for 48 h in Malt Extract Broth (Difco Laboratories). Same quantity of inoculum containing 106 mould or 108 yeast cells/mL was spread on Malt Extract Agar [27, 28]. Then, E and C leather samples were placed on the plates. After the plates were kept at +40C for 2 h, they were incubated at 35 ± 0.1 0C for 24 h for bacteria and at 25 ± 0.1 0C for 48h for moulds and yeasts. At the end of the incubation period, the diameters of inhibition zones occurred on the medium were evaluated in millimetres. The experiments were run in triplicate. Results and discussion In the study, all of the leather samples treated with different concentrations of TA (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3%) showed an inhibition zone against the bacteria, moulds and yeasts tested. There was no inhibition zone in any of control samples. Inhibition zone diameters of leather samples were determined to be larger for some microorganisms at 3% TA concentration [Table 2]. The highest antimicrobial activity with 24 mm of inhibition zone was observed versus Proteus vulgaris in this concentration. Salmonella typhimurium, Enterobacter aerogenes and Neisseria canis species also exhibited high inhibition zone (16 mm). In terms of sensitivity, S.aureus, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and E. coli respectively followed them. Phenolic agents inhibit bacterial growth and protease activity by damaging its cell wall and cytoplasm [29,15], causing the rapid destruction of the vegetative structure of bacteria and more slowly of the spores [30]. Therefore, it was revealed that TA added into the pickling process exhibited antibacterial activity against different bacteria species with various degrees. Yeasts Moulds Bacteria Table 2. Inhibition zones of bacteria, moulds and yeasts. * Bacillus cereus Salmonella typhimurium Proteus vulgaris Enterobacter aerogenes Pseudomonas aeruginosa Escherichia coli Staphylococcus aureus Neisseria canis Aspergillus niger Aspergillus fumigatus Aspergillus flavus Penicillium granulatum Penicillium granulosum Geotricum candidum Yarrowia lypolitica Rhodotorula rubra (0,1% TA) 12 14 21 11 12 11 14 15 10 9 10 10 10 10 11 11 Inhibition zones (mm)* Experimental Groups (E) (0,5% TA) (1% TA) (2% TA) (3% TA) 13 14 14 14 15 16 16 16 22 22 24 24 14 14 15 16 12 12 13 14 12 12 12 13 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 16 10 11 11 14 10 11 11 11 10 10 11 12 11 11 12 12 10 11 12 14 10 10 11 12 11 12 12 13 11 12 13 13 Control Group** (C) -*** - : Values, including diameter of the chrome tanned leather sample (8.0 mm), are means of three replicate ** : No tannic acid was used. *** : No inhibition zone was observed. 5328 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2010 Determination of antimicrobial activity of tannic acid in pickling process The efficacy of tannic acid against the test moulds was found out relatively similar to each other. A. niger and P. granulosum, frequently encountered moulds in tanneries, were determined as the most sensitive species against the tannic acid. In the 3% TA concentration, their inhibition zone was found to be 14 mm in diameter. In addition, A.flavus and P. granulatum were detected as sensitive moulds with a 12 mm inhibition zone in the concentration. The inhibition zones for the yeasts were observed as similar to those of moulds rather than those of bacteria. The most sensitive test yeasts were found as Yarrowia lypolitica and Rhodotorula rubra with 13 mm inhibition zone in 3% TA concentration. It is well known in literature that compounds found in the structure of plant extracts, such as tannic acid, gallic acid, ellagic acid, catechin and essential oils have antimicrobial effect [31-36]. Actually, TA exhibited antimicrobial activity not only against bacteria but also against moulds and yeasts tested in our study. In general, it was observed that the antimicrobial activity slightly increased for higher TA concentrations. Therefore, it can be said that 3 % tannic acid concentration was more effective than the other concentrations. Conclusion TA is a component existent together with the other phenolic compounds in the structure of vegetable tanning agents and is not categorized as a toxic agent by the 67/548/EEC directive of the EU [37]. Many commercial biocides used in the leather industry are classified as agents hazardous to human and environment health and recent research has been carried out to reduce their rate of use or to find alternatives to them. The inhibition zones of the leather samples – obtained by adding tannic acid at different ratios (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 or 3%) in the pickling process – against various microorganism groups (bacteria, moulds and yeasts) were investigated in this study. When obtained experimental samples were compared with the control samples, it was found out that TA is effective on each of the three microorganism groups, bacteria in particular. As the amount of TA added into the pickling float increased, so did its antimicrobial effect. It is found out that 3 % tannic acid concentration was more effective than the others (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2%). Accordingly, it was concluded that tannic acid can be used in leather industry as an alternative antimicrobial agent in the pickling process. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. A.N. YAPICI, The Effect of Using a Fungicide along with Bactericide in the Main Soaking Float on Microbial Load. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7(21), 3922-3926 (2008). A.N. YAPICI, B. MERICLI YAPICI, I. KARABOZ and M. TOZAN, An in vitro Assessment of the Effectiveness of Some Bactericides on Bacteria Isolated from Soaking Float. Asian J. Chem., 21(2), 1521– 1525 (2009). S.T. BILGI, B. MERICLI YAPICI and A.N. YAPICI, Determination of Bacterial and Fungal Numbers in Floats of Pre-Tanning Operations. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8(8), 1602–1607 (2009). B.MERICLI YAPICI, and I. KARABOZ, The Effect of Various Antifungal Compounds in the Growth of Molds That Frequently Appear on Tanned Leather. JALCA, 92(2), 38-45 (1997). A.M. JANSEN, J.J.C. CHEFFER, A.B. SVENDSEN, Antimicrobial Activity of Essencial oils: a 1976-1986 Literatute review. Aspect of Test Methods. Planta Med., 40, 395-398 (1987). H.J.D. DORMAN, S.G. DEANS, Antimicrobial Agents From Plants: Antibacterial Activity of Plant Volatile Oils. J. Appl. Microbiol., 88, 308–316 (2000). E. BAYRAMOGLU, Natural and Environment –Friendly New Bactericide for Leather Industry: Essential Oil of Origanum minutiflorum. Journal of Biological Sciences, Ansinet , 5(4), 455-457 (2005). S. M. COLAK, E. EKE BAYRAMOGLU, D. ULUC, Determining the Suitability of Photosensitizers as Biocides in the Soaking Process. JALCA, 101(2), 66-72 (2006). Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2010 5329 SELİME MENTEŞ ÇOLAK, BİNNUR MERİÇLİ YAPICI, ALİ NAİL YAPICI 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. E. EKE BAYRAMOGLU, G. GULUMSER, I. KARABOZ, Ecological And Innovative Fungicide For Leather Industry: Essential Oil of Origanum minutiflorum. JALCA, 101(3) 96-104 (2006). S. SEN, H. HAFIZOGLU, M. DIGRAK, Bazı Bitkisel Ekstraktların Fungisit Olarak Odun Koruyucu Etkilerinin Araştırılması. KSU J. Science and Engineering, 5(1) (2002). A.Z. ALMAGBOUL, A.K. BASHIR, A. FAROUK, A.K.M. SALIH, Antimicrobial activity of certain Sudanese plant Used in Folkloric Medicine. Screening for Antibacterial Activity. Fitoterapia, 56, 331-337 (1985). N. ARTIZZU, L. BONSIGNORE, F. COTTIGLIA, G. LOY, Studies of the Diuretic and Antimicrobial Activity of Cynodon dactylon essencial oil. Fitoterapia, 66, 174-175 (1995). M. IKRAM, H. INAMUL, Screenning of Medicinal Plants for Antimicrobial activities. Fitoterapia, 55, 6264 (1984). A.A. IZZO, G. DI CARLO, D. BISCARDI, R. FUSCO, N. MASCOLO, F. BORRELI, F. CAPASSO, M.P. FASULO, G. AUTORE, Biological Screening of Italian Medicinal Plants for Antibacterial Activity. Phytother. Res., 9, 281-286 (1995). M.M. COWAN, Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 12, 564-582 (1999). K.T. CHUNG, T.Y. WONG, C.Y. WEI, Y.Y. HUANG, Y.Y LIN, Tannins and Human Health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 38(6), 421-464 (1998). A. SCALBERT, Antimicrobial Properties of Tannins. Phytochemistry, 30, 3875-3883 (1991). K.H. GUSTAVSON, The Chemistry of Tanning Processes, Academic Pres, New York, 1956, pp. 403. ANON, 2005, www.talasemi.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=33. G.K.B. LOPES, H.M. SCHULMAN, M. HERMES-LIMA, Polyphenol tannic acid inhibits hydroxyl radical formation from Fenton reaction by complexing ferrous ions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1472, 142–152 (1999). Jr. R.G. ANDRADE, L.T. DALVI, Jr. J.M.C. SILVA, G.K.B. LOPES, A. ALONSO, M. HERMES-LIMA, The antioxidant effect of tannic acid on the in vitro copper-mediated formation of free radicals. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 437, 1–9 (2005). L.R. FERGUSON, Role of plant polyphenols in genomic stability. Mutat.Res., 75, 89–111 (2001). K. HORIKAWA, T. MOHRI, Y. TANAKA, H. TOKIWA, Moderate inhibition of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of benzo[a]pyrene, 1,6-dinitropyrene and 3,9-dinitrofluoranthene by Chinese medicinal herbs. Mutagenesis 9, 523–526 (1994). S.C. CHEN, K.T. CHUNG, Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity studies of tannic acid and its related compounds. Food Chem. Toxicol., 38, 1–5 (2000). H. MUKHTAR, W.A. KHAN, Z.Y. WANG, D.P. BIK, D.R. BICKERS, Exceptional activity of tannic acid among naturally occurring plant phenols in protecting against 7-12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene-3-methyl-cholanthrene and N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced skin tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Res. 48, 2361–2365 (1988). C. NEPKA, E. SIVRIDIS, O. ANTONOGLOU, A. KORTSARIS, A. GEORGELLIS, I. TAITZOGLOU, P. HYTIROGLOU, C. PAPADIMITROU, I. ZINTZARAS, D. KOURETAS, Chemopreventive activity of very low dose dietary tannic acid administration in hepatoma bearing C3H male mice. Cancer Lett. 141, 57-62 (1999). C.H. COLLINS, P.M. LYRE and J.M. GRANGE, Microbiological Methods. 6th ed., Butterworths, London, 1989. NCCLS: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Suspectibility Tests. Approved Standard NCCLS Publication M2-A5, Villanova, PA, USA, 1993. R.G. ANDRADE Jr., J.S. GINANI, G.K.B. LOPES, F. DUTRA, A. ALONSO, M. HERMES-LIMA, Tannic acid inhibits in vitro iron-dependent free radical formation. Biochimie, 88, 1287–1296 (2006). G. JONES, A.T. MCALLISTER, A.D. MUIR, K.J. CHENG, Effect of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia scop.) condansed tannins on growth and proteolysis by four strain of ruminal Bacteria. ppl. Environ. Microbiol. Lett., 60:1374-1378 (1991). M. OLTEANU, Research on Wood Preservation by Tanning Materials Extracted from Chestnut, Spruce and Fir Trees. Revista Padurilor, 112, Nr:4, 5 (1997). H. AKIYAMA, K. FUJII, O. YAMASAKI, T. OONO, K. IWATSUKI. Antibacterial Action of Several Tannins Against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 48(4), 487-91 (2001). K. FUNATOGAWA, S. HAYASHI, H. SHIMOMURA, T. YOSHIDA, T. HATANO, H. ITO, Y. HIRAI, Antibacterial activity of hydrolysable tannins derived from medicinal plants against Helicobacter pylori. Microbiol Immunol., 48(4), 251-61 (2004). G.G.F. NASCIMENTO, J. LOCATELLI, P.C. FREITAS, G.L. SILVA, Antibacterial Activity of Plant Extracts and hytochemicals on Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 31, 247-256 (2000). A.M. JANSEN, J.J.C.CHEFFER, A.B. SVENDSEN, Antimicrobial Activity of Essential oils: 1976-1986 Literature review. Aspect of Test Methods. Planta Med., 40, 395-398 (1987). G. SAXENA, A.R. MCCUTCHEON, S. FARMER, G.H.N. TOWERS, R.E.W. HANCOCK, Antimicrobial constituents of Rhus glabra. J.Ethnopharmacol, 42, 95-99 (1994). (ANON), http://www.isguv.netfirms.com/msds_bilgi.htm, Safety Data for Tannic Acid, (2007). 5330 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2010