Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
49-1 CHRONIC PANCREATITIS Like a Shot to the Gut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Level II Janine E. Then, PharmD, BCPS CASE SUMMARY A 35-year-old woman with no known past medical history presents with GI complaints consistent with an acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis. Initial management is directed toward alleviation of the patient’s pain and resolution of the acute process. This patient has not been on enzyme replacement therapy previously. Because there are a variety of enzyme preparations available, patient and product factors should be considered in selecting the best regimen for a particular individual. QUESTIONS Problem Identification 1.a. Create a list of this patient’s drug therapy problems. • Inadequate analgesia. • Uncontrolled nausea and vomiting. • Diarrhea, steatorrhea, and malabsorption. • Dry eyes and mucous membranes are present and are not associated with dehydration as she has a normal urine volume, BUN/SCr ratio is <20, and she has normal skin turgor. These symptoms are consistent with an autoimmune etiology of pancreatitis (eg, Sjøgren syndrome). 1.b.What subjective and objective information is consistent with the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis? • Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT results indicate inflammation of the common bile duct. • Elevated alkaline phosphatase and elevated total bilirubin consistent with inflammation of common bile duct. • Malodorous watery green stool (this may indicate steatorrhea, which does not occur until 90% of pancreatic secretory capacity is lost). • Chronic abdominal pain for several years. 1.c. What signs, symptoms, and test results indicate that the patient is experiencing an acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis? • Abdominal pain with radiation to her back. • Nausea and vomiting with increased frequency and intensity. • Increase in frequency of diarrhea and change in the consistency and fatty content of her stool. • Decreased bowel sounds. • Voluntary guarding. 1.d.Which of the patient’s problems are amenable to drug therapy? • Inadequate analgesia. • Dry eyes and mucous membranes. 1.e.What additional information is needed to satisfactorily assess the patient? • The patient has a normal WBC count and is afebrile. A WBC differential is useful to confirm a left shift and provide justification for antimicrobial therapy. Leukocytosis may be a normal physiologic stress response. While evidence supports the use of antimicrobials for severe necrotizing pancreatitis, it does not support antimicrobials as empiric treatment for acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis.1 • A triglyceride level would be useful to identify hypertriglyceridemia, which is often associated with chronic pancreatitis and acute exacerbation. Elevated triglycerides would prompt alteration in the pharmacotherapeutic care plan. • A rheumatologic and/or immunologic workup is prudent at this point given the association of chronic pancreatitis, in various forms, with immunologic deficiency (eg, Sjögren syndrome, isolated autoimmune chronic pancreatitis, irritable bowel-associated chronic pancreatitis). Serum immunoglobulins and antinuclear antibodies are a reasonable starting point. • An MRCP can be performed to aid in diagnosis and rule out structural abnormalities. An ERCP may be considered if an intervention (ie, endoscopic dilation or stenting) is deemed to be beneficial. Desired Outcome 2.What are the goals of pharmacotherapy in this case? • Chronic pancreatitis cannot be cured; treatment is directed toward alleviation of presenting symptoms. • Resolution of pain with adequate analgesia. • Control of nausea and vomiting. • Control of malabsorption and steatorrhea. • Prevention of further disease-associated complications. • Prevention of discomfort associated with dry eyes and xerostomia. Therapeutic Alternatives 3.a. What nondrug therapies could be useful in this patient? • This patient will be admitted for acute hospital care. • The patient should initially receive nothing by mouth. Cautious advancement of oral intake and transition to oral medications should be done as symptoms of pain, nausea, and vomiting resolve. • Psychological assessment may be required to identify any special needs regarding the patient’s avoidance of medical care for 15 years despite having significant recent symptoms. • Financial counseling or social work assessment to determine the patient’s insurance coverage with her new plan, and to navigate regulations around preexisting conditions and coinsurance requirements. • Sugarless mints, gum, or saliva substitutes may be helpful for xerostomia. 3.b. What feasible pharmacotherapeutic alternatives are available for treating this acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis? • Analgesics. Pain is the predominant symptom causing patients to seek treatment. Both opioid and nonopioid agents are used. Copyright © 2017 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chronic Pancreatitis Heather M. Teufel, PharmD, BCPS • Diarrhea, steatorrhea, and malabsorption. CHAPTER 49 49 • Uncontrolled nausea and vomiting. 49-2 SECTION 4 Gastrointestinal Disorders Adjunctive agents, such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and gabapentin, may also be considered, although TCAs may exacerbate this patient’s xerostomia. Although pain may be intermittent during the acute exacerbation, it is a disabling symptom that is challenging to manage. Because of the nature of the illness, physical dependence, pseudoaddiction, and psychological addiction are real concerns. Opioid tolerance and physical dependence are to be expected with long-term opioid use and should not be confused with psychological dependence. Patients need to have aggressive pain management included in the treatment plan for acute exacerbation. The use of oral agents is limited by the severity of pain, gastric irritation, and the need to keep the patient NPO. Patients will usually require parenteral analgesics for acute pain control and can be transitioned to oral therapy as tolerated. ✓Morphine is now recommended as first-line therapy in evidence-based pain management guidelines for patients who require strong opioid therapy. It does lead to a histamine release and may cause flushing and hypotension. Caution should be used in hemodynamically unstable patients. ✓Hydromorphone is an acceptable alternative agent due to less flushing and hypotension. Place in therapy may depend upon institution preferences. ✓Meperidine is no longer recommended as first-line therapy. Although meperidine does not exhibit as profound of an effect on pressure in the sphincter of Oddi or the ductal system, its active metabolite normeperidine is a central nervous system (CNS) irritant. The metabolite can accumulate and cause CNS toxicity ranging from dysphoria to seizures. Meperidine should be reserved for short-term treatment in patients who have experienced prior therapeutic response or those with allergies or therapy-limiting intolerance to other opioids such as morphine or hydromorphone. It is contraindicated in patients with renal impairment or patients taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Meperidine should be used cautiously in patients with a history of seizures. It should not be used for more than 48 hours or in doses in excess of 600 mg per 24-hour period. ✓Butorphanol and nalbuphine are mixed opioid agonist/ antagonists that are not as potent as pure opiate agonists but cause less sedation and euphoria. Either agent could be considered in patients who are elderly, have substance abuse problems, or have respiratory compromise. ✓Ketorolac is an injectable nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that does not produce euphoria, respiratory depression, or sedation. When combined with an opioid agonist, it may allow for lower narcotic doses in some patients. However, ketorolac can cause gastric irritation, bleeding complications, and renal impairment. It should be used with caution in patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding, patients with or at risk for advanced renal disease, and patients with thrombocytopenia. For optimum effect, ketorolac should be given on a scheduled basis rather than as needed. The duration of therapy should not exceed 5 days. The oral formulation of ketorolac or other oral NSAID agents should not be considered while the patient remains NPO. ✓Ibuprofen is available in an injectable formulation and may be considered for the treatment of acute pain seen in pancreatitis. It must be further diluted to a concentration of <4 mg/mL and infused over at least 30 minutes. Similar to ketorolac, ibuprofen should be avoided in patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding, Copyright © 2017 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. patients with or at risk for renal impairment, patients with thrombocytopenia, and patients with heart failure. Patients may benefit from taking ibuprofen on a scheduled basis for a period of time especially if they are requiring opioid therapy to control their pain. ✓Acetaminophen is also available in an injectable formulation. It may be administered undiluted over 15 minutes. Patients experience more of a benefit from taking acetaminophen on a scheduled basis than taking it as needed. ✓COX-2 selective inhibitors may provide analgesia and target the overexpression of COX-2 seen in chronic pancreatitis. Celecoxib is the only agent available in the United States. COX-2 selective inhibitors are considerably more costly than traditional NSAIDs, have no advantage over nonselective agents in patients without risk factors for NSAID-associated complications, and may increase the risk of cardiovascular complications (eg, myocardial infarction and stroke) in predisposed individuals. The lack of clinical evidence and lack of an injectable form argue against use in this patient. ✓TCAs may target concomitant depressive symptoms and neuropathic pain in patients presenting with symptoms of both depression and chronic pancreatitis.2,3 Use in this patient may be limited by the anticholinergic adverse effects of TCAs. ✓Gabapentin and pregabalin have been used to target neuropathic pain. At this time pregabalin has only been used in short-term studies and it is unknown if it is appropriate for long-term pain management.2,4 • Antiemetics. Nausea and vomiting contribute to dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, and poor nutritional status. There are a variety of agents available as both the injectable and rectal forms for convenient and flexible administration. ✓Promethazine, prochlorperazine, and trimethobenzamide are commonly used. Any of these agents in an appropriate dose would be acceptable. ✓Metoclopramide may be effective in minimizing nausea and vomiting, but it has prokinetic effects and may not be acceptable as first-line therapy. The adverse effect profile may also be unacceptable in some patients due to motor effects. ✓Nausea should be treated cautiously mostly through IV fluids and bowel rest. Once nausea has resolved, enteral nutrition should be reintroduced. If treatment for nausea is necessary, no one antiemetic medication has been shown to be superior to another. • IV fluids. Vomiting, diarrhea, nasogastric aspiration, and decreased oral intake may contribute to dehydration and electrolyte disturbances. Maintenance of fluid balance is essential to prevent further organ system compromise. Repletion of intravascular volume deficits is best accomplished with lactated Ringer’s or other isotonic fluid. Dextrose-containing solutions should be used cautiously with careful attention to blood glucose monitoring. If hypokalemia is present, it should be corrected by adding potassium chloride to maintenance fluids. • Nutrition supplementation. During acute exacerbations, oral intake should be reintroduced slowly. Enteral nutrition is preferred and can be accomplished through a nasogastric tube. Consideration may be given to postpyloric feeding and formulations that contain medium-chain triglycerides if tolerance remains a concern.5 In patients unable to tolerate enteral feeding for more than a week or with signs malnutrition parenteral nutrition may be considered. 49-3 • Insulin. Insulin release in response to a glucose load is impaired early in the disease process. Consistent nutrition and correction of malabsorption may assist with glucose control. Regular human insulin or rapid-acting insulins such as insulin lispro or aspart are acceptable choices to be used with a sliding scale. These insulins have a shorter onset of action and a shorter duration of effect. 3.c. What additional care is required for a patient who has not seen a physician in about 15 years? • Additional care for such a patient could be extensive but should be limited to her current situation right now; less urgent care that she did not receive in previous years can be addressed on an outpatient basis after her acute illness has resolved and she has been discharged from the hospital. For example, vaccination assessment, Pap test and complete pelvic examination, complete lipid profile, and skin cancer screen are suggested after the patient is discharged and follows up with a primary care physician. Optimal Plan 4.What drug, dosage form, and duration of therapy are best for this patient? Analgesia: • Examples of reasonable regimens for the initial treatment of pain in this patient include: ✓Parenteral morphine 2–10 mg every 2–4 hours as determined by individual patient needs. ✓Morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) 3 mg loading dose with a 1 to 2 mg PCA dose and a 10-minute lockout period. If the patient requires frequent bolus dosing without pain relief, careful consideration of a basal rate or additional analgesics may be necessary. ✓Parenteral hydromorphone 0.5 mg every 1–2 hours as needed is an alternative to morphine. It should be reserved for refractory pain or for patients who are not tolerating morphine. ✓Parenteral hydromorphone PCA 1 mg IV loading dose followed by 0.4 to 0.6 mg PCA dose with a 10-minute lockout period. If the patient requires frequent bolus dosing without pain relief, careful consideration of a basal rate may be necessary. • All opioid dose adjustments should be individualized based on a thorough patient assessment using a pain scale. An appropriate pain management strategy should include the evaluation of scheduled versus as-needed dosing. The use of scheduled dosing may help to achieve desired analgesia with less drug use. Therapy duration should be reviewed with the initiation of dose-tapering strategies in patients at risk for withdrawal syndromes. • If the patient is experiencing neuropathic pain, the addition of a TCA, gabapentin, or pregabalin may decrease the need for opioids. The use of TCAs in this patient may worsen her xerostomia and alternative agents may be preferred. Antiemetics: • Parenteral or rectal promethazine 12.5–25 mg every 4–6 hours as needed for nausea and vomiting may be used. Therapy should be initiated cautiously at the lower end of the dosing range with dose increases as clinically indicated and tolerated. Promethazine can be sedating and may cause anticholinergic effects, including xerostomia, which may not be tolerated in this patient. Extravasation of promethazine injection can cause severe tissue injury and necrosis. • Prochlorperazine may be administered parenterally at a dose of 2.5–10 mg every 3–4 hours or 25 mg rectally twice daily as needed for nausea and vomiting. It is also sedating and may cause hypotension on administration. • Antiemetics can have additive sedative effects when combined with opioids. Patients should be closely monitored when both therapies are required. Nutrition: • After the nausea has been controlled, clear liquids should be tried. If tolerated, the diet should be advanced slowly as she continues to tolerate nutrition. If unable to tolerate eating, discuss placement of a nasogastric tube and the initiation of tube feeds at a low rate with the patient. The tube feeding could contain medium-chain triglycerides to lessen the need for PES and improve tolerance. • Some experts recommend advancing the feeding tube into the duodenum, past the sphincter of Oddi to minimize stimulation of the pancreas. • If the patient does not tolerate enteral feeding due to severe abdominal pain, nausea, and/or vomiting, parenteral nutrition may be initiated. Parenteral nutrition shall only be utilized if the patient is expected to have inadequate nutrition for more than 7 days. • Enteral or parenteral nutrition shall provide 25–30 kcal/kg per day with 1–2 g/kg per day of protein. IV lipid emulsion is contraindicated if the patient has hypertriglyceridemia. • Parenteral nutrition increases the patient’s risk for infection, hyperglycemia, thrombosis of the central line, and electrolyte abnormalities. • Patients who have had a prolonged course of decreased nutrition should be monitored closely for refeeding syndrome. Potassium, magnesium, and phosphorus should be monitored at least twice daily when reinitiating nutrition. Thiamine may be administered to decrease the risk of Wernicke’s encephalopathy. • Multivitamins are supplemented in total parenteral nutrition solution. The patient should start ADEK vitamin PO once daily when the total parenteral nutrition is discontinued. Glucose control: • Subcutaneous rapid- or short-acting insulin adjusted by sliding scale is one method of maintaining glucose control when it is unknown how much insulin will be required. Bedside glucose checks should be performed every 4–6 hours while on Copyright © 2017 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chronic Pancreatitis • Lipid-soluble vitamin replacement. This patient should receive vitamins A, D, E, and K (ADEK tablets) to replace the lipidsoluble vitamins lost with steatorrhea. • If the patient’s acute pain is not controlled despite use of opiates, one may consider addition of adjunctive therapy with a parenteral NSAID (ketorolac or ibuprofen) or parenteral acetaminophen. CHAPTER 49 • Pancreatic enzyme replacement. Use of oral pancreatic enzyme replacement should be evaluated when nausea and vomiting are controlled and oral nutrition is initiated. There are various pancreatic enzyme supplements (PES) commercially available. All contain different amounts of amylase, lipase, and protease enzymes and dosing should be titrated to effect. The normal starting dose is lipase 500 units/kg/meal and titrated based on the amount of steatorrhea the patient experiences. 49-4 SECTION 4 nutrition support. An example of an acceptable sliding scale regimen follows. • If blood glucose level is: ✓≤150 mg/dL → give 0 units regular insulin ✓151–200 mg/dL → give 3 units regular insulin ✓201–250 mg/dL → give 6 units regular insulin ✓251–300 mg/dL → give 9 units regular insulin ✓301–350 mg/dL → give 12 units regular insulin Gastrointestinal Disorders ✓351–400 mg/dL → give 15 units regular insulin ✓>400 mg/dL → call prescriber Enzyme replacement: • A number of different pancreatic enzyme replacement products are available (refer to the textbook chapter on pancreatitis for more detailed information). A common starting dose is based on the lipase component of 500 units/kg/meal with half of the mealtime dose administered with snacks.6 The dose may be titrated every few days based on the patient’s clinical symptoms and stool fat content. Many patients will require several capsules with each meal and snacks that may affect patient compliance. Doses of lipase >6000 units/kg/meal are associated with increased risk of colonic stricture and are not recommended.6 • Theoretically, delivery of sufficient enzyme should eliminate malabsorption. In reality, it is rarely possible to eliminate steatorrhea, but improvement in fat absorption is achievable in most patients. • Patient factors that should be considered when selecting a dosing regimen for enzyme replacement therapy include dietary habits, concurrent medications that could alter intestinal pH, gastric emptying function, and concurrent medications that could alter GI motility. A simple regimen should be selected to maximize the likelihood of patient adherence. Patients often find it difficult to comply with even a simple regimen. • Product factors that should be considered when selecting a regimen include differences in enzyme content, potency, product formulation, and bioavailability. Cost is also an important consideration, since the patient will likely require lifelong therapy. Unfortunately, all these products are relatively expensive. Xerostomia: • When sugarless mints or gums are not sufficient to stimulate saliva production, a saliva substitute may be used. • Pilocarpine 5 mg by mouth three to four times daily or cevimeline 30 mg three times daily may also be considered. However, diarrhea is a common adverse effect and may prevent use in this patient’s situation. The underlying etiology of xerostomia should be explored pending the results of the autoimmune testing as the above agents are used for xerostomia in the setting of Sjøgren syndrome. Dry eyes: • Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose—one to two drops in each eye as needed for dryness. Outcome Evaluation 5.What clinical and laboratory parameters are necessary to evaluate the therapy for achievement of the desired therapeutic outcome and to detect or prevent adverse events? • Effectiveness of analgesics: A thorough baseline pain assessment using a pain scale should be performed on initiation of Copyright © 2017 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. therapy. This assessment should include a discussion with the patient to identify an acceptable level of pain and desired level of pain control. Further assessment using these desired targets will provide a rational basis for dose modification of analgesic therapy. Sleep patterns and the use of as-needed analgesics for breakthrough pain should also be included as part of the follow-up pain assessment. This information should be included in the decision for dose modification of the analgesic or the addition of adjunctive therapy for sleep and/or anxiety. • Adverse effects of analgesics: The patient should be monitored for decreases in respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and wakefulness. Focused attention should be paid to these parameters early in therapy. The opirate-narïve, elderly, and otherwise compromised patients may be especially at risk for opioid-related adverse events. The occurrence of opioidassociated nausea and vomiting may prompt the need for antiemetic therapy. Itching may simply be a histamine-mediated reaction that can be treated with antihistamines. If accompanied by rash or other evidence of an allergic reaction, a change in therapy may be warranted. Constipation is an expected event with opioid use. Laxatives should be considered early in therapy and included as clinically indicated. • Effectiveness of antiemetics: The patient should be monitored for subjective symptoms as well as objective evidence of emesis. • Adverse events of antiemetics: Initiation of therapy at the low end of the dosing range with careful titration should minimize the potential for adverse events. CNS and respiratory depression are more prevalent with higher and cumulative doses. Extrapyramidal symptoms have been reported with promethazine and prochlorperazine. • Effectiveness of nutritional support: Monitoring of nutrition support includes serum electrolytes, prealbumin, nitrogen balance, metabolic parameters, and fluid status (eg, intake and output). Normalization of these parameters is desirable. Changes in these parameters guide adjustment in nutrition regimen. A positive weight change toward the targeted goal is desirable. • Adverse effects of nutrition support: Abnormalities in serum electrolytes, glucose, triglycerides, liver function tests, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine could occur. Prealbumin and transferrin can be monitored to demonstrate short-term improvement. In addition to laboratory values, the patient should be monitored for elevated residuals, elevated temperature (which may indicate infection), and signs and symptoms of electrolyte imbalances, organ failure, fluid overload (eg, monitor intake and output), and pulmonary or peripheral edema. Diarrhea should also be monitored to ensure absorption of enteral feeds. If the patient experiences significant, noninfectious diarrhea while on enteral feeds, addition of an antidiarrheal such as loperamide may be considered. • Adverse effects of insulin: Insulin must be used with caution, as unpredictable hypoglycemia may occur with small doses. The secretion of glucagon and insulin is impaired in patients with long-standing chronic pancreatitis. Blood glucose levels should be monitored routinely and insulin adjusted based on the results. • Effectiveness of PES: Stool is examined for changes in fecal fat as indicated by decreasing odor and normalization of consistency. Dosage should be titrated to the minimum required. • Adverse effects of PES: Impaired folic acid absorption, increased uric acid levels, nausea, dyspepsia, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea may occur. 49-5 • Adverse effects of saliva substitutes: None; proper dental care is required. • Effectiveness of pilocarpine: Sensation of dry mouth should decrease. Patient should notice greater ease in swallowing. • Adverse effects of pilocarpine: Flushing, headache, tachycardia, urinary frequency, diarrhea, and blurred vision. • Adverse effects of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: None. Patient Education 6.Ms Jane wants information on her inpatient medication regimen and the nurse refers her to you, the floor-based pharmacist. What information will you provide to enhance her understanding of the medications, maximize compliance with the new medication regimen, enhance the chance of success, and minimize adverse effects? • Continue to eat a low-fat diet (dietary fat <20 g per day). • Eat small, frequent meals, such as six meals per day. • If taking pancreatic enzyme replacement capsules with entericcoated spheres, swallow them whole; do not crush or chew them before swallowing. • Take the required number of tablets (or capsules) with all meals and snacks. • Pancreatic enzymes may cause nausea, upset stomach, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea. • You will probably need to continue your enzyme therapy indefinitely. • For pain control we have started you on morphine PCA. If you are experiencing pain, please press the button and it • Contact your doctor if you notice any change in your stool color, consistency, or odor. • You will not need to be on insulin at home. I have discussed the symptoms of high blood sugar with you. Contact your doctor if you notice any symptoms of high blood sugar. • Use sugarless mints or lozenges as needed to decrease symptoms associated with dry mouth. Saliva substitutes as needed will further alleviate symptoms that are not otherwise controlled. It is important to maintain routine dental care because your lack of saliva will predispose you to dental caries (cavities). REFERENCES 1. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS. American College of Gastroenterology Guideline: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:1400–1415. 2. DiMagno MJ, DiMagno EP. Chronic pancreatitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2012;28:523–531. 3. Berry AJ. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy during pancreatic insufficiency. Nutr Clin Pract 2014;29:312–321. 4. Puylaert M, Kapural L, Van Zundert J, et al. Pain in chronic pancreatitis. Pain Pract 2011;11:492–505. 5.Trikudanathan G, Vavaneethan L, Vege SS. Modern treatment of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2012;41:63–76. 6.Giuliano CA, Dehoome-Smith ML, Kale-Pradhan PB. Pancreatic enzyme products: digesting the changes. Ann Pharmacother 2011;45:658–666. Copyright © 2017 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chronic Pancreatitis • Effectiveness of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: Sensation of dry eyes should decrease. will deliver a dose of the analgesic. If you feel that you are requiring multiple doses of the medication without adequate control of your pain, let us know and we can adjust the dosing. Morphine may cause constipation; please continue to monitor your stools. CHAPTER 49 • Effectiveness of saliva substitutes: Sensation of dry mouth should decrease. Patient should notice greater ease in swallowing.