Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Devin Brooks Dr. Heingar 3/29/15 Research proposal Background: Anybody who has ever had to wear braces knows how much of a pain they could be. Braces cause a lot of problems, from the constant time consuming appointments, having to eat differently, and the overall pain of having to be in them for so long. One of the most frequently asked questions among patients are “how long will I have to wear them (braces).” The answer to that question varies depending on your personal profile. The average time a person wears braces is between one to two years but again it varies. Most patients would love to be in braces for less than a year and still get the same results, so how is that possible? A surgical technique called accelerated osteogenics can reduce the time patients are in braces by 3-8. Accelerated osteogenics orthodontics or AOO focuses on enhancing the manner in which the region around the teeth and the bone that the teeth are embedded in respond to applied orthodontic forces. AOO is sometimes also referred to as Wilckodontics because of the Wilcko brothers who invented it. Roots of this technique go back 30 years but within the last 10 years it has really took off. Literature review: I want to explore the evolution of pre- surgery in orthodontics followed by orthodontic treatment.” Surgery first” or pre surgery in orthodontics wasn’t an option until the late 1960’s. In the 1990’s pre surgery was proposed by Brachvogel (Brachvogel et al., 1991) as a means to reduce fixed orthodontic treatment time (braces). Pre surgery in orthodontics has been around for almost 70 years now but wasn’t brought to the forefront until recently. Still to this day new techniques are being tested in order to fit each patient’s specific case. Prior to 1991, pre surgery was only used in server cases. Orthodontist weren’t fully aware of the benefits pre surgery presented at the time. In 1995 the Wilcko brothers created a technique that is still one of the most popular treatments in orthodontics. Accelerated osteogenics orthodontics or AOO was developed by Thomas and William Wilcko based off of Distraction osteogenesis, a technique used in orthodontics since the early 1900’s. An orthopedic surgeon named Dr. Gabriel Ilizarov popularized Distraction osteogenics by the 1950’s. Dr. Ilizarov inadvertently discovered that if a bone gets cut surgically, new bone will grow in its place eliminating the need for bone graft. Fast forward 40 years later the Wilcko brothers use his technique to reduce the time a patient has to wear braces. The Wilcko brothers would cut patients bone above the teeth therefore weakening g the bone, allowing braces to move teeth almost twice as fast. Within 20-55 days new bone forms where the bone was first originally cut. In today’s time this exact technique is still widely used. The cost for the surgery is almost as expensive as braces, costing anywhere between $4000 and $8000 depending on various factors. The surgery is minimally invasive procedure and if done properly your time in braces could be reduced as much as 8 months. Key terms: Orthodontics- The branch of dentistry dealing with the prevention and correction of irregular teeth. Braces- The use of devices to move teeth or adjust underlying bone. Accelerated osteogenics orthodontics- focuses on enhancing the manner in which the region around the teeth and the bone that the teeth are embedded in respond to applied orthodontic forces. Osteopenia- is decreased bone density. Distraction osteogenesis- Is a procedure that moves two segments of a bone slowly apart in such a way that new bone fills in the gap. Thomas/ William Wilcko- The brothers that invented Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics. Minimum Invasive Surgery- is a surgery minimizing surgical incisions to reduce trauma to the body Research question: will pre orthodontic surgery reduce the amount of time spent in braces significantly? Research method: the purpose of this experiment will be to see if Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics can reduce the time patients spend and braces while also testing their satisfaction will the procedure. I will have a group of approximately 50 people adults and children each with different teeth and jaw malfunctions. I will perform the surgery on my test group and every two weeks have them come in and record their satisfaction, pain and progress. My goal is have all 50 of my patents out of braces in less than a year while having them extremely satisfied with procedure and the results. HYPOTHESIS: I believe that for the most part I will be able to get all of my patients out of braces in less than a year. For the people with extreme mouth deformities I will have to do some extra work that will have them in braces longer. At the end of the process all of my patients will be satisfied and will recommend this surgery to anyone that wants to reduce their time in braces. Bibliography: 1) Fleming, Ps. "Surgical Adjunctive Procedures for Accelerating Orthodontic Treatment.”. Surgical Adjunctive Procedures for Accelerating Orthodontic Treatment”. Cochrane Library, Mar. 2015. Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 2) Millet, Dt. "Orthodontic Treatment for Deep Bite and Retroclined Upper Front Teeth in Children." Cochrane Library May 2006. Web. 24 Feb. 2016 3) Robertson, JS, and JE Maddux. "Compliance in Pediatric Orthodontic Treatment: Current Research and Issues." Children's Health Care 15.1 (1986): 40-40 1p. CINAHL Plus with Full Text. Web. 26 Feb. 2016. 4) Saied Elnafar, Ayman Anaam, et al. "Enamel Surface Preparations and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: " International Medical Journal 22.3 (2015): 194-198 5p. CINAHL Plus with Full Text. Web. 26 Feb. 2016. 5) Kumar, B. Saravana, et al. "Surgery Preceding Orthodontics in Bimaxillary Cases." Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences 7. (2015): S101-S106. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 6) Quan, Shi, et al. "Does Low Level Laser Therapy Relieve the Pain Caused By the Placement of the Orthodontic Separators? --A Meta-Analysis." Head & Face Medicine 11.1 (2015): 1-9. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 7) Adusumilli, Srikanth, Lohith Yalamanchi, and Pallavi Samatha Yalamanchili. "Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics: An Interdisciplinary Approach For Faster Orthodontic Therapy." Journal Of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences 6.S1 (2014): S2S5. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 8) Zawawi, Khalid H. "Acceptance Of Orthodontic Miniscrews As Temporary Anchorage Devices." Patient Preference & Adherence 8.(2014): 933-937. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 9) Zawawi, Khalid H. "Patients' Acceptance of Corticotomy-Assisted Orthodontics." Patient Preference & Adherence 9. (2015): 1153-1158. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 10) Prashant, P. S., Hemant Nandan, and Meera Gopalakrishnan. "Friction in OrthodonticsJournal Of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences 7.(2015): S334-S338. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 11) Hănțoiu, T., et al. "Clinical Evaluation Of Periodontal Health During Orthodontic Treatment With Fixed Appliances." Acta Medica Marisiensis 60.6 (2014): 265-268. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 12) "Increasing Orthodontic And Orthognathic Surgery Treatment Efficiency With A Modified Surgery-First Approach." American Journal Of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics 148.5 (2015): 838-848 11p. CINAHL Plus with Full Text. Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 13) Kim, Jeong Hwan. "Guidelines for “Surgery First” Orthodontic Treatment." (n.d.): n. pag. Guidelines for “Surgery First” Orthodontic Treatment. Private Practice, Seoul, 9 Mar. 2012Web. 28 Feb. 2016. 14) Jian F, Lai W, Furness S, McIntyre GT, Millett DT, Hickman J, Wang Y. "Initial arch wires for tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances." The Cochrane Collaboration (1993): 1-50. Web. 15) Ashby, Deborah, and Jayne E. Harrison. “[clinician Preferences and the Estimation of Causal Treatment Differences]: Comment”. Statistical Science 13.3 (1998): 230–233. Web.