Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Plant Cell Physiol. 40(4): 388-395 (1999) JSPP © 1999 Comparison of Local and Systemic Induction of Acquired Disease Resistance in Cucumber Plants Treated with Benzothiadiazoles or Salicylic Acid Yoshihiro Narusaka1, Mari Narusaka2, Takeshi Horio and Hideo Ishii National Institute of Agro-Environmental Sciences (NIAES), 3-1-1 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8604 Japan The accumulation of chitinase and its involvement in systemic acquired disease resistance was analyzed using acibenzolar-S-methyl and salicylic acid (SA). Resistance against scab (pathogen: Cladosporium cucumerinum) and the accumulation of chitinase were rapidly induced in cucumber plants after treatment with acibenzolar-S-methyl. In contrast, SA protected the plants from C. cucumerinum and the accumulation of chitinase was induced only on the treated leaves. The accumulation of chitinase in response to inoculation with the pathogen was induced more rapidly in cucumber plants previously treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl than in plants pretreated with SA or water. Thus, it appears that a prospective signal(s), that induces systemic resistance, can be transferred from leaves treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl to the untreated upper and lower leaves where systemic resistance is elicited. In contrast, exogenously applied SA is not likely to function as a mobile, systemic resistance-inducing signal, because SA only induces localized acquired resistance. noninfected leaves (Uknes et al. 1992). This inducible defense mechanism, which is known as systemic acquired resistance (SAR) plays a central role in disease resistance (Delaney et al. 1994, Ross 1961). Acquired resistance is also induced by compounds such as benzothiadiazoles, e.g., acibenzolar-S-methyl (benzo[l,2,3]thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester), which is also referred to as BTH, 3-allyloxy-l,2benzisothiazole-1,1-dioxide (probenazole), 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA), salicylic acid (SA), or certain other benzoic acid derivatives, as well as inoculation with necrotizing pathogens (Schurter et al. 1987, Watanabe et al. 1977, Metraux et al. 1991, Uknes et al. 1992, Ward et al. 1991). The SAR phenomenon suggests that a signal originates at the site of infection or treatment with various compounds and then moves throughout the plant. It has been shown that such a signal is produced in an infected or chemical-treated leaf and that detachment of this leaf before the development of the hypersensitive response blocks the induction of SAR (Dean and Kuc 1986a, b). Grafting and stem-girdling experiments with cucumber and tobacco have suggested that the SAR signal moves in the phloem (Jenns and Kuc 1979, Guedes et al. 1980, Tuzun and Kuc 1985). However, the nature of the signal is as of unknown, although it has been shown that a mobile signal leads to SA accumulation and SAR (Vernooij et al. 1994). Key words: Acibenzolar-S-methyl — BTH — Chitinase — Salicylic acid — Systemic acquired resistance. The induction of local and systemic disease resistance by prior inoculation with necrotizing pathogens was first reported by Chester (1933). Plants challenged by microbial pathogens are able to induce the expression of a set of defense-related genes, such as the genes encoding pathogenesis-related proteins (PR proteins) (Uknes et al. 1992). These genes are expressed locally as well as in distant, The cucumber plant provides a good model system for studying general disease resistance and induced disease resistance (Kuc 1982). Local and systemic increases in chitinase and/or peroxidase activity have been observed in response to inoculation with necrotizing pathogens or to treatment with SA, INA, and acibenzolar-S-methyl (Boiler and Metraux 1988, Lawton et al. 1994, Dalisay and Kuc 1995, Ishii et al. in press, Narusaka et al. in press). In the cucumber, SAR in response to inducers is correlated with the systemic accumulation of extracellular peroxidase, /?1,3-glucanase, and chitinase (Hammerschmidt et al. 1982, Boiler and Metraux 1988, Ji and Kuc 1995). The relationship between these enzymes and induced disease resistance in the cucumber has therefore been extensively investigated. Despite these investigations, however, the mode of action of the disease-resistance inducers remains unclear. We describe here the function of resistance inducers in the cucumber. A time-course study has indicated that the Abbreviations: CaMV, cauliflower mosaic virus; DIG, digoxigenin; INA, 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid; LAR, localized acquired resistance; MDS, mean disease severity; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PR proteins, pathogenesis-related proteins; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; SA, salicylic acid; SAR, systemic acquired resistance; TNV, tobacco necrosis virus. ' Corresponding author present address: Biological Resources Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), 1-2 Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8686 Japan. 2 Present address: Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Tsukuba Life Science Center, 3-1-1 Koyadai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0074 Japan. 388 Acquired resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA enhanced expression of the chitinase gene coincides with the level of induced systemic disease resistance. Our results show that acibenzolar-S-methyl activates the SAR signal transduction pathway in cucumber plants, resulting in the rapid induction of disease resistance in whole plants. In contrast, SA induces resistance only in the treated leaf. Materials and Methods Growth and maintenance of plants and fungi—Cultures of Cladosporium cucumerinum were maintained at 25°C on potato dextrose agar (Difco). Cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) cv. Shin-Suyo Tsukemidori were grown at 25 °C in a growth chamber with a 14 h photoperiod at a photon flux density of 60-80/iE m-2s-'. Chemical application and inoculation of the pathogen— The application of acibenzolar-S-methyl or SA at concentrations higher than 0.5 or 5 mM, respectively, caused phytotoxicity on the treated leaves, and the leaves subsequently died within 1 to 3 d (data not shown). In this study, therefore, the acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA were applied at concentrations of 0.5 mM and 5 mM, respectively. Distilled water, and 5 mM SA or 0.5 mM acibenzolar-Smethyl (50.%-water-dispersible granules, a gift from Novartis Crop Protection AG) were applied by dipping for 5 s to the 1st true leaf of cucumber plants (14 d postgermination), with the 1st true leaf having fully expanded and the leaf above (2nd leaf) having expanded from one third to one half, its full size. Twenty drops (20 fA per drop) of inoculum (5 x 105 conidia ml" 1 water) of C. cucumerinum were separately applied to the 1st true leaf and incubated at 20°C in a dew chamber for 24 h. The treated plants were grown under growth-chamber conditions until sampling of the 1st leaf at various times or until challenged inoculation with a conidial suspension of C. cucumerinum. The pathogen (1 x 105 conidia ml" 1 water containing 0.02% Tween 20) was applied as a fine mist to the entire plant at approximately 2 to 3 ml per plant 7 d after treatment of the 1st leaf. Following the challenged inoculation, the plants were maintained at 20°C in a dew chamber for 24 h and then kept in a growth chamber. Seven days after inoculation, the plants were visually assessed for symptom development. To evaluate the control efficacy against disease, each leaf was scored using the following scale according to disease development: 0, no visible lesion; 1, caused < 10 lesions; 2, caused > 10 lesions and/or deformity; 3, caused some lesions on the petiole and < 10 lesions; 4, caused some lesions on the petiole and > 10 lesions; 5, petiole snapped off; 6, leaf died. Disease scores were converted to mean disease severity (MDS) using the following formula: MDS = [(6A + 5B + 4C + 3D + 2E + F)/6G] x 100 where A, B, C, D, E, and F are the number of leaves corresponding to the scores 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively. G is the total number of leaves assessed. This experiment was performed using 10-15 plants per treatment. Expression of cucumber chitinase in Escherichia coli—The genomic DNA encoding the mature chitinase of the cucumber (CHI2, GenBank accession number M84214, Lawton et al. 1994) was amplified by PCR using Pfu DNA polymerase and primers with an in-frame Ndel site (sense), an in-frame stop codon, and a BamHl site (antisense). The resulting fragment was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, digested 389 overnight with Ndel/BamHl, and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The band of interest was excised from the gel and purified using a GENECLEAN II (Stratagene), it was then ligated into the Ndel/BamHl site of the expression vector pET16b (Novagen). The'5' splice site of the plasmid was sequenced to confirm an in-frame insertion. The plasmid was then transformed into the host strain BL21DE3 of E. coli. This strain was grown on LB medium with 200yUgmr' ampicillin at 37°C with vigorous aeration (220 rpm on a shaker) until the absorbance at 600 nm reached 0.8, at this point expression was induced by the addition of isopropyl-/?-D-thiogalactopyranoside (final concentration 1 mM), and the culture was allowed to continue for an additional 3 h. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation and stored at — 80°C until use. The frozen cell pellet was resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, — 2% Triton X-100, and broken by an ultrasonic generator. The suspension was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (18,000 xg) for 20min, and the pellet (containing recombinant protein) was then collected. The pellet was washed with PBS-2% Triton X-100 three times. Subsequently, the pellet was resuspended in washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 1 M urea, 2% Triton X100) and then incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The suspension was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (18,000 xg) for 20 min. This washing process was repeated three times. The pellet containing recombinant protein was dissolved in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, plus 6M urea. This solution was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (18,000 xg) for 20 min, and the supernatant was dialyzed at 4°C as follows: into 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, plus 4 M urea for 1 h, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, plus 2 M urea for 1 h, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, plus 100 mM NaCl for 1 h, and then 1/10 PBS for 4 h. The last step was performed three times. The solution was subsequently concentrated by freeze-drying and dissolved into the PBS buffer. The recombinant protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE according to Laemmli's method (Laemmli 1970) to examine the purity of the protein. The protein band with 23-25 kDa was considered to be the recombinant cucumber chitinase. To verify that the recombinant protein was a chitinase, amino acid sequencing was performed. Following electrophoresis, the protein was electroblotted onto an Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore) by the method of Matsudaira (1987) and was then stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Bio-Rad). After the membrane was air-dried, the protein band was excised and then sequenced using a Protein Sequencer, model LF3400DT (BECKMAN). Antiserum was raised against semi-purified chitinase by Sawady Technology Co. (Tokyo, Japan). Chitinase extraction—The extraction of chitinase from cucumber leaves was performed according to the method of Dalisay and Kuc (1995). Western blotting—The cucumber proteins (20 ^g) were separated by SDS-PAGE according to Laemmli's method (Laemmli 1970) and then electrophoretically transferred onto an Immobilon-P PVDF membrane (Millipore) according to the method of Towbin et al. (1979). The chitinase on the membrane was detected with antiserum raised against chitinase, using an ECL western blotting detection system (Amersham). RNA extraction—The extraction of total RNA from the 1st and 2nd leaves was performed with the TRIzol reagent (GibcoBRL) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total RNA was purified by lithium chloride precipitation, isopropyl alcohol precipitation, and then ethanol precipitation. Northern blotting assay—The northern blotting was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Boehringer Acquired resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA 390 Mannheim). Total RNA was hybridized with digoxigenin (DIG)labeled RNA probes and developed by immunochemiluminescence according to the method described previously (Penninckx et al. 1996). DIG-labeled probes were made by run-off transcription, using the DIG RNA labeling kit of Boehringer Mannheim. The probe for the chitinase gene was synthesized using T7 RNA polymerase and the £coRI-linearized plasmid pCHI. The plasmid pCHI was constructed by cloning the cucumber chitinase gene (CHI2, GenBank accession number M84214, Lawton et al. 1994), which was obtained by PCR with chitinase-specific primers, into the EcoRl and Hindlll sites of plasmid pSPT19 (Boehringer Mannheim). 1st leaf 2nd leaf 1 Acibenzolar-S-methyl SA Inoculation with C.cucurmrinum Results Antisera to recombinant chitinase—the cucumber chitinase gene was isolated from the genomic DNA by PCR. The gene isolated was the cucumber class III chitinase gene (CHI2, GenBank accession number M84214, Lawton et al. 1994), the expression of which is induced by the application of SA or INA (Lawton et al. 1994). The N-terminal amino acids of the purified recombinant chitinase were sequenced. The N-terminal sequence obtained was: MGHHHHHHHHHHSSGHIEGRHMAGIAIYWGQNGNE. This sequence was identical to the His- Fig. 1 Accumulation of chitinase in response to treatment with acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA as well as pre-inoculation with C.cucumerinum. A suspension of each inducer was applied by dipping the 1st true leaf for 5 s or by applying 20 drops (20//I per drop) of the inoculum to the 1st leaf. The 1st and 2nd leaves were collected 1, 3, 5, and 7 d after treatment. Total proteins were then extracted from the cucumber leaves and separated by SDS-PAGE. The chitinase was detected by anti-chitinase antibodies. tag fusion cucumber class HI chitinase (Novagen Manufacturer's protocol, Lawton et al. 1994). Antiserum against Table 1 Induction of systemic resistance against C. cucumerinum in cucumber plants in response to acibenzolar-Smethyl, SA, and pre-inoculation with the pathogen" MDSC Time of detaching 1st leaf after treatment (day) 2nd leaf 3rd leaf 4th leaf Water 0 72.9 72.9 79.2 0.5 mM Acibenzolar-S-methyl 0 1 70.8 333*rf 3 33.3* 33.3* 33.3* 68.8 31.3* 33.3* 29.2* 31.3* 75.0 33.3* 33.3* 29.2* 20.8* 64.6 70.8 62.5 70.8 70.8 68.8 70.8 70.8 70.8 72.9 72.9 70.8 83.3 83.3 79.2 70.8 66.7 70.8 50.0 41.7 70.8 79.2 75.0 50.0 35.4* 72.9 70.8 66.7 45.8 33.3* Treatment * .5 7 5mM SA Q l 3 3 7 Pre-inoculation with C. cucumerinum 0 1 3 5 7 " Four plants were used for each treatment. The experiment was conducted three times, and the reported values are the means from these experiments. * A solution of acibenzolar-S-methyl or SA was applied to the 1st leaf of the cucumber either by dipping for 5 s or by applying 20 drops (20^1 per drop) of the inoculum to the 1st leaf. Seven days after induction, the entire plants were challenged with C. cucumerinum. c MDS: mean disease severity. d Means followed by an asterisk within a column are significantly different (P<0.05) from values obtained with water treatment according to the Dunn's multiple range test. Acquired resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA 391 Table 2 Effect of a foliar spray of SA solution on local protection against C. cucumerinum in cucumber plants" MDSC Treatment * 1st leaf 2nd leaf 3rd leaf 4th leaf Water 70.8 75.0 68.8 62.5 5mM SA 35.7* 33.3* 42.9* 35.7* " Four plants were used for each treatment. The experiment was conducted three times, and the reported values are the means from these experiments. 4 A solution of SA or distilled water was sprayed on the entire plants. After 7 d, treated plants were challenge-inoculated with C.cucumerinum. c MDS: mean disease severity. d Means followed by an asterisk within a column are significantly different (.P<0.05) from values obtained with water treatment according to the Dunn's multiple range test. the recombinant chitinase that was diluted 25,000-fold could detect the 23-25 kDa protein band in the proteins extracted from the cucumber leaves treated with SA by western blotting (data not shown). The protein band was identical to the size of the cucumber class III chitinase (Lawton et al. 1994). Western blotting assay—Figure 1 illustrates the rapid accumulation of a chitinase in the 2nd leaves within 3 d after acibenzolar-S-methyl treatment. This accumulation in the 2nd leaves was also detected at 5 d after preinoculation with C. cucumerinum (Fig. 1). In contrast, the accumulation of chitinase was observed only in the treated leaves when the 1st leaves were treated with SA, indicating that SA induces the accumulation of chitinase only locally. The level of disease suppression occurring in response to each treatment is shown in Table 1. Chemical application and disease suppression—The acibenzolar-S-methyl treatment induced the systemic protection of cucumber plants from C. cucumerinum (Table 1). However, this systemic protective effect was not observed in response to the treatment with SA (Table 1). To determine the timing for the induction of SAR, the 1st leaves, which had previously been treated with chemicals or C. cucumerinum, were detached at various times Water 1st Water 1st SA 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th after treatment and subsequently challenge-inoculated with C. cucumerinum. The results indicated that for the induction of SAR, the 1st leaves must be attached to the plants for 5 to 7 d after the pre-inoculation with C. cucumerinum (Table 1). In contrast, the 1st leaf needs to be attached for only 1 d or less after the acibenzolar-S-methyl treatment. On cucumber plants treated with SA on the 1st leaf, however, systemic protection was not observed in the upper leaves even 7 d after the treatment (Table 1). To analyze the acquired resistance induced by exogenously applied SA, the entire cucumber plants, on which the 1st and 2nd leaves had expanded and the 3rd leaves had just emerged from the bud and started to open while the 4th leaves were still unfolded, were sprayed with a 5 mM SA solution (approx. 2 to 3 ml per plant). After 7 d of treatment, the cucumber plants were inoculated with C. cucumerinum. SA significantly induced a (P<0.05) local protective effect on the treated leaves and suppressed disease development (Table 2). After 7 d of SA treatment, the accumulation of chitinase was detected in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th leaves (Fig. 2). To analyze the systemic acquired resistance induced by Acibenzolar -S-methyl 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th leaf position leaf position Fig. 2 Accumulation of chitinase in response to SA treatment. A solution of 5 mM SA or distilled water was applied as a fine mist to the entire plant at approximately 2 to 3 ml per plant. The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th leaves were collected 7 d after treatment. Total proteins were then extracted from the cucumber leaves and separated by SDS-PAGE. The chitinase was detected by anti-chitinase antibodies. Fig. 3 Accumulation of chitinase in response to applying acibenzolar-S-methyl to the 3rd leaf of the cucumber plant. Twenty drops (20 /A per drop) of a suspension of acibenzolar-S-methyl or distilled water was applied on the upper surface of the 3rd leaf, which has expanded to one third of its full size. The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th leaves were collected 7 d after treatment. Total proteins were then extracted from the cucumber leaves and separated by SDS-PAGE. The chitinase was detected by anti-chitinase antibodies. Acquired resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA Table 3 Effect of acibenzolar-S-methyl application to the 3rd leaf of cucumber plants on disease development of C. cucumerinum" Treatment * MDS' 2nd leaf 3rd leaf 1st leaf 4th leaf Water 86.7 76.7 70.0 73.3 0.5 mM Acibenzolar-S-methyl 33.3 *d 29.2* 33.3* 29.2* " Four plants were used for each treatment. The experiment was conducted three times, and the reported values are the means from these experiments. * Twenty drops (20 /A per drop) of acibenzolar-S-methyl solution or distilled water were applied to the 3rd leaf. After 7 d, entire plants were challenge-inoculated with C. cucumerinum. c MDS: mean disease severity. d Means followed by an asterisk within a column are significantly different (P<0.05) from values obtained with water treatment according to the Dunn's multiple range test. acibenzolar-S-methyl, the 3rd leaves on cucumber plants for which the 1st and 2nd leaves had expanded and the 3rd leaves had expanded to one third, their full size were treated with 20 drops (20 fA per drop) of 0.5 mM acibenzolar-S-methyl. After 7 d of treatment, the accumulation of chitinase was detected in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th leaves (Fig. 3). At this time, the entire plants were inoculated with C. cucumerinum, and systemic protection against C. cucumerinum was observed 7 d after the inoculation (Table 3). The first leaves on the cucumber plants were treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl, SA, or water (dipping for 5 s). After 1 h of treatment, the entire plants were inoculated with C. cucumerinum and the subsequent accumulation of the chitinase was examined at various times. The accumulation of chitinase was detected in the untreated 2nd leaves more rapidly when plants were treated with acibenzolarS-methyl than with either SA or water (Fig.4A). In addition, the accumulation of chitinase in the 2nd leaves was more rapidly induced in the plants inoculated with the pathogen after acibenzolar-S-methyl treatment than in the controls, i.e., the plants not inoculated with the patho- Acibenzolar-S-methyl Water 12 24 36 48 0 12 24 36 48 gen (Fig.4B). Timing of mRNA accumulation—A chitinase mRNA accumulated in the 2nd leaves 3 d after the treatment of the 1st leaves with acibenzolar-S-methyl (Fig. 5). In contrast, the accumulation in the 2nd leaves was first detected 5 d after the preinoculation with C. cucumerinum. For cucumber plants treated with SA in the 1st leaf, however, the accumulation of the chitinase mRNA was observed only in the 1st leaves even at 7 d after treatment. The disease suppression in response to each treatment is shown in Table 1. The data show that induced resistance correlates with the accumulation of a chitinase mRNA. Discussion The induction of chitinase activity occurs in different plant species in response to infection, treatment with fungal cell wall preparations, or the stress-related hormone ethylene, as well as to treatment with simple organic and inorganic compounds. The relationship between chitinase and disease resistance in the cucumber has been extensively investigated. It has been reported that the systemic pro- B SA 12 24 36 48 h 0 24 48 72 0 24 48 72 h Fig. 4 Induction of chitinase in cucumber plants in response to inoculation with C. cucumerinum after treatment with acibenzolarS-methyl and SA (A) and the induction of chitinase in cucumber plants in response to water-treatment (a) or inoculation with C. cucumerinum (b) after treatment with acibenzolar-S-methyl (B). The first leaves on cucumber plants were treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl, SA, or distilled water. One hour after treatment, the entire plants were inoculated with C. cucumerinum or were treated with water, and the subsequent accumulation of the chitinase in 2nd leaves was detected at several time points after the inoculation. Total proteins were then extracted from the cucumber leaves and separated by SDS-PAGE. The chitinase was detected by anti-chitinase antibodies. Acquired resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA 393 sufficient to explain its accumulation in the upper leaves. The export of SA from leaves inoculated with various necrotizing pathogens and its appearance in the phloem Acibenzolar-S-mettiyl have been confirmed in tobacco and the cucumber (Metraux et al. 1990, Rasmussen et al. 1991, Yalpani et al. 1991). The physicochemical properties of SA make it well SA suited for long-distance phloem transport (Yalpani et al. 1991). Molders et al. (1996) have previously reported that Inoculation with [14C]SA is transported from cotyledons to 1st leaves after C. cucumerinum tobacco necrosis virus (TNV) inoculation in cucumber plants. In addition, a large amount of SA synthesized in Fig. 5 The accumulation of mRNA in cucumber plants follow- the TNV-inoculated leaf is translocated to the upper unining treatment with acibenzolar-S-methyl or SA, or following pre- oculated leaves in tobacco plants (Shulaev et al. 1995). inoculation with C. cucumerinum. Cucumber tissues were harvested at the indicated time following treatment, and total RNA Moreover, exogenously applied SA leads to typical SAR was extracted from these tissues. The northern blot was hybrid- responses such as increased resistance to viral infection ized with DIG-labeled antisense RNA probes for chitinase. (reviewed by Malamy and Klessig 1992, van Loon and Antoniw 1982, White 1979, Ye et al. 1989). Direct eviduction of chitinase corresponds with the observed in- dence for the role of SA as a signalling molecule in the duced resistance to cucumber anthracnose, but only a development of SAR has arisen from experiments with transgenic tobacco plants that overexpress the salicylate slight correlation with the activity of chitinase (Irving and Kuc 1990, Dalisay and Kuc 1995). Metraux et al. (1988) and hydroxylase gene (nahG) from Pseudomonas putida Smith-Becker et al. (1998) have reported that chitinase (Gaffney et al. 1993). This enzyme catalyzes the conversion provides a useful molecular and biochemical marker for of SA to catechol, which has no SAR-inducing activity, the induction of systemic acquired resistance in the cu- and thus reduces the concentration of active SA in plants. cumber. More recently, direct evidence of the potential role Transgenic NahG plants do not accumulate SA in reof PR proteins containing chitinase in plant defense has sponse to pathogen infection, and they do not show an been obtained by functional experiments demonstrating SAR response (Delaney et al. 1994). Nevertheless, recent evidence suggests that SA may not be the induction signal that the overexpression of pathogenesis-related genes can lead to an enhanced resistance to certain pathogens. For for primary long-distance SAR and that the production of example, a rice chitinase cDNA driven by the cauliflower this systemic signal is not dependent on SA accumulation mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter has been introduced (Vernooij et al. 1994). Instead, SA may be required in uninto the cucumber (Tabei et al. 1998), with the resulting infected tissues for transduction of the translocated signal transgenic cucumber showing high resistance against into gene expression and resistance (Vernooij et al. 1994). This study has demonstrated that acibenzolar-SBotrytis cinerea (Tabei et al. 1998). In the present study, the accumulation of chitinase was detected in cucumber methyl induces the expression of the chitinase gene and plants under disease-suppression conditions after treat- disease resistance both locally and systemically (Fig. 5, ment with acibenzolar-S-methyl (Table 1, Fig. 1). Then, in Table 1,3). Furthermore, it has also been shown that exthe following analysis, chitinase was used as a marker for ogenously applied SA functions as an inducer of chitinase and disease resistance only locally (Fig. 5, Table 1). These SAR in the cucumber. results suggest two hypotheses: (1) SA is transported It has previously been reported that SAR is induced in throughout the tissues and accumulates in these tissues response to treatment with acibenzolar-S-methyl (Friend- systemically. In this study, however, exogenously applied rich et al. 1996) and SA (Rasmussen et al. 1995) in plants. SA did not induce SAR. Therefore, SA does not appear to It is known that treating 1st leaves with these compounds be a signalling molecule for SAR. (2) SA is not transinduces a systemic protection on the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th ported from treated leaves to untreated leaves. If SA is not leaves without causing any stress signs or damage. SAR transported systemically, SA is not a signalling molecule implies the existence of a signal molecule produced in in- for SAR. Therefore, exogenously applied SA stimulates fected tissue that moves throughout the plant to activate signalling pathways for localized acquired resistance (LAR) resistance (Ross 1966). Because the concentration of SA in treated leaves but does not induce those for SAR. In rises dramatically after pathogen infection, it has been contrast, acibenzolar-S-methyl rapidly induces SAR. More proposed that SA may act as a signal molecule in the in- importantly, in cucumber plants treated with SAR-inducduction of SAR (Enyedi et al. 1992, Malamy et al. 1990, ing chemicals, a prospective mobile signal(s) for SAR, Metraux et al. 1990, Rasmussen et al. 1991, Uknes et al. which might contain SAR-inducing chemicals and/or their 1993, Yalpani et al. 1991). To induce SAR in whole plants, metabolites, is systemically transferred to untreated leaves SA must be exported from the treated leaf in amounts 1st leaf 1 0 1 3 If 2nd leaf 5 7 " 0 1 3 5 7 'day Acquired resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA 394 within several hours to several days after treatment. Subsequently, the prospective mobile signal(s) induces disease resistance systemically. Although SAR is in general thought to be induced several days post infection with necrotizing pathogens (Dempsey and Klessig 1995), acibenzolar-S-methyl induced systemic disease resistance appeared within 24 h after the treatment (Table 1). In cucumber plants previously treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl, chitinase was rapidly induced after attack of the pathogen (Fig.4A). The accumulation of chitinase occurred 12 h more rapidly than in the control (Fig. 4A), and this may be a critical step in the containment of the pathogen. This period immediately after the attack of the pathogen might be important in determining whether protection will be successful in the induced plants. During the 24 h following challenge inoculation with Colletotrichum lagenarium, electronopaque epidermal walls develop in protected leaves (Xuei et al. 1988), and the rate of lignification also increases (Dean and Kuc 1987, Hammerschmidt and Kuc 1982). Interestingly, the induction of chitinase was detected the 1st and 2nd leaves when the 3rd leaves were treated with acibenzolar-S-methyl, i.e., a mobile signal was transported from treated leaves not only to upper but also to lower leaves (Fig. 3). Although the action mechanism(s) and SAR-signal(s) of acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA in restricting disease development are unclear as of yet, the systemic induction of chitinase suggests that these compounds rapidly trigger the plant's immune system to induce and activate these mechanisms. Further study should be undertaken to clearly determine the induction signal for acquired resistance in plant defense as well as the mechanism for the induction of systemic resistance. In addition, it is necessary to characterize the LAR and SAR signal and the signaling pathway(s). This work was partly funded by Japan Science and Technology Corporation. References Boiler, T. and Metraux, J.-P. (1988) Extracellular localization of chitinase in cucumber. Physiol. Mol. Plant Palhol. 33: 11-16. Chester, K.S. (1933) The problem of acquired physiological immunity in plants. Q. Rev. Biol. 8: 275-324. Dalisay, R.F. and Kuc, J.A. (1995) Persistence of induced resistance and enhanced peroxidase and chitinase activities in cucumber plants. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 47: 315-327. Dean, R.A. and Kuc, J. (1986a) Induced systemic protection in cucumber: time of production and movement of the signal. Phytopathology 76: 966-970. Dean, R.A. and Kuc, J. (1986b) Induced systemic protection in-cucumber: the source of the signal. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 28: 227-233. Dean, R.A. and Kuc, J. (1987) Rapid lignification in response to wounding and infection as a mechanism for induced systemic protection in cucumber. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 31: 69-81. Delaney, T.P., Friedrich, L., Kessmann, H., Uknes, S., Vernooij, B., Ward, E., Weymann, K. and Ryals, J. (1994) The molecular biology of systemic acquired resistance. In Advances in Molecular Genetics of Plant-Microbe Interactions, Volume 3. Edited by Daniels, M. pp. 339347. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Dempsey, D.A. and Klessig, D.F. (1995) Signals in plant disease resistance. Bull. Inst. Pasteur 93: 167-186. Enyedi, A.J., Yalpani, N., Silverman, P. and Raskin, I. (1992) Localization, conjugation, and function of salicylic acid in tobacco during the hypersensitive reaction to tobacco mosaic virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2480-2484. Friedrich, L., Lawton, K., Ruess, W., Masner, P., Specker, N., Rella, M.G., Meier, B., Dincher, S., Staub, T., Uknes, S., Metraux, J.-P., Kessmann, H. and Ryals, J. (1996) A benzothiadiazole derivative induces systemic acquired resistance in tobacco. Plant J. 10: 61-70. Gaffney, T., Friedrich, L., Vernooij, B., Negrotto, D., Nye, G., Uknes, S., Ward, E., Kessmann, H. and Ryals, J. (1993) Requirement of salicylic acid for the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Science 261: 754-756. Guedes, M.E.M., Richmond, S. and Kuc, J. (1980) Induced systemic resistance to anthracnose in cucumber as influenced by the location of the inducer inoculation with Colletotrichum lagenarium and onset of flowering and fruiting. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 17: 229-233. Hammerschmidt, R. and Kuc, J. (1982) Lignification as a mechanism for induced systemic resistance in cucumber. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 20: 6171. Hammerschmidt, R., Nuckles, E.M. and Kuc, J. (1982) Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 20: 73-82. Irving, H.R. and Kuc, J. (1990) Local and systemic induction of peroxidase, chitinase and resistance in cucumber plants by K2HPO4. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 37: 355-366. Ishii, H., Tomita, Y., Horio, T., Narusaka, Y., Nakazawa, Y., Nishimura, K. and Iwamoto, S. (1999) Induced resistance of acibenzolar-Smethyl (CGA 245704) to cucumber and Japanese pear diseases. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. (in press). Jenns, A.E. and Kuc, J. (1979) Graft transmission of systemic resistance of cucumber to anthracnose induced by Colletotrichum lagenarium and tobacco necrosis virus. Phytopathology 7: 753-756. Ji, C. and Kuc, J. (1995) Purification and characterization of an acidic /?1,3-glucanase from cucumber and its relationship to systemic disease resistance induced by Colletotrichum lagenarium and tobacco necrosis virus. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 8: 899-905. Kuc, J. (1982) Induced immunity to plant disease. BioScience 32: 854-860. Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685. Lawton, K.A., Beck, J., Potter, S., Ward, E. and Ryals, J. (1994) Regulation of cucumber class III chitinase gene expression. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 7: 48-57. Malamy, J., Carr, J.P., Klessig, D.F. and Raskin, I. (1990) Salicylic acid: a likely endogenous signal in the resistance response of tobacco to viral infection. Science 250: 1002-1004. Malamy, J. and Klessig, D.F. (1992) Salicylic acid and plant disease resistance. Plant J. 2: 643-654. Matsudaira, P. (1987) Sequence from picomole quantities of proteins electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 262: 10035-10038. Metraux, J.-P., AhlGoy, P., Staub, T., Speich, J., Steinemann, A., Ryals, J. and Ward, E. (1991) Induced systemic resistance in cucumber in response to 2,6-dichloro-isonicotinic acid and pathogens. In Advances in Molecular Genetics of Plant-Microbe Interactions. Edited by Hennecke, H. and Verma, D.P.S. pp. 432-439. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht. Metraux, J.-P., Signer, H., Ryals, J., Ward, E., Wyss-Benz, M., Gaudin, J., Raschdorf, K., Schmid, E., Blum, W. and Inverardi, B. (1990) Increase in salicylic acid at the onset of systemic acquired resistance in cucumber. Science 250: 1004-1006. Metraux, J.-P., Streit, L. and Staub, T. (1988) A pathogenesis-related protein in cucumber is a chitinase. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 33: 1-9. Molders, W., Buchala, A. and Metraux, J.-P. (1996) Transport of salicylic acid in tobacco necrosis virus-infected cucumber plants. Plant Physiol. 112: 787-792. Narusaka, Y., Narusaka, M., Horio, T. and Ishii, H. (1999) Induction of Acquired resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and SA disease resistance in cucumber by acibenzolar-S-methyl and expression of resistance-related genes. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. (in press). Penninckx, I.A.M.A., Eggermont, K., Terras, F.R.G., Thomma, B.P.H.J., Samblanx, G.W. De, Buchala, A., Metraux, J.-P., Manners, J.M. and Broekaert, W.F. (1996) Pathogen-induced systemic activation of a plant defensin gene in Arabidopsis follows a salicylic acidindependent pathway. Plant Cell 8: 2309-2323. Rasmussen, J.B., Hammerschmidt, R. and Zook, M.N. (1991) Systemic induction of salicylic acid accumulation in cucumber after inoculation with Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Plant Physiol. 97: 1342-1347. Rasmussen, J.B., Smith, J.A., Williams, S., Burkhart, W., Ward, E., Somerville, S.C., Ryals, J. and Hammerschmidt, R. (1995) cDNA cloning and systemic expression of acidic peroxidases associated with systemic acquired resistance to disease in cucumber. Physiol. Mot. Plant Pathol. 46: 389-400. Ross, A.F. (1961) Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants. Virology 14: 340-358. Ross, A.F. (1966) Systemic effects of local lesion formation. In Viruses of plants. Edited by Beemster, A.B.R. and Dijkstra, J. pp.. 127-150. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. Schurter, R., Kunz, W. and Nyfeler, R. (1987) Process and a composition for immunizing plants against diseases. U.S. Patent No. 4,931,581, Issued June 5, 1990. Shulaev, V., Leon, J. and Raskin, I. (1995) Is salicylic acid a translocated signal of systemic acquired resistance in tobacco? Plant Cell 1: 1691-1701.. Smith-Becker, J., Marois, E., Huguet, E.J., Midland, S.L., Sims, J.J. and Keen, N.T. (1998) Accumulation of salicylic acid and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid in phloem fluids of cucumber during systemic acquired resistance is preceded by a transient increase in phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity in petioles and stems. Plant Physiol. 116: 231-238. Tabei, Y., Kitade, S., Nishizawa, Y., Kikuchi, N., Kayano, T., Hibi, T. and Akutsu, K. (1998) Transgenic cucumber plants harboring a rice chitinase gene exhibit enhanced resistance to gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) Plant Cell Rep. 17: 159-164. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. and Gordon, J. (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 4350-4354. 395 Tuzun, S. and Kuc, J. (1985) Movement of a factor in tobacco infected with Peronosproa tabacina Adam which systemically protects against blue mold. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 26: 321-330. Uknes, S., Mauch-Mani, B., Mover, M., Potter, S., Williams, S., Dincher, S., Chandler, D., Slusarenko, A., Ward, E. and Ryals, J. (1992) Acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 4: 645-656. Uknes, S., Winter, A., Delaney, T., Vernooij, B., Morse, A., Friedrich, L., Nye, G., Potter, S., Ward, E. and Ryals, J. (1993) Biological induction of systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 6: 692-698. van Loon, L.C. and Antoniw, J.F. (1982) Comparison of the effects of salicylic acid and ethephon with virus-induced hypersensitivity and acquired resistance in tobacco. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 88: 237-256. Vernooij, B., Friedrich, L., Morse, A., Reist, R., Kolditz-Jawhar, R., Ward, E., Uknes, S., Kessmann, H. and Ryals, J. (1994) Salicylic acid is not the translocated signal responsible for inducing systemic acquired resistance but is required in signal transduction. Plant Cell 6: 959-965. Ward, E.R., Uknes, S.J., Williams, S.C., Dincher, S.S., Wiederhold, D.L., Alexander, D.C., Ahl-Goy, P., Metraux, J.-P. and Ryals, J.A. (1991) Coordinate gene activity in response to agents that induce systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 3: 1085-1094. Watanabe, T., Igarashi, H., Matsumoto, K., Seki, S., Mase, S. and Sekizawa, Y. (1977) The characteristics of probenazole (Oryzemate) for the control of rice blast. / . Pesticide Sci. 2: 291-296. White, R.F. (1979) Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) induces resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco. Virology 99: 410-412. Xuei, X.L., Jalfore, U. and Kuc, J. (1988) Ultrastructural changes associated with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to disease: host response and development of Colletotrichum lagenarium in systemically protected leaves. Can. J. Bot. 66: 1028-1038. Yalpani, N., Silverman, P., Wilson, T.M.A., Kleier, D.A. and Raskin, I. (1991) Salicylic acid is a systemic signal and an inducer of pathogenesis-related proteins in virus-infected tobacco. Plant Cell 3: 809-818. Ye, X.S., Pan, S.Q. and Kuc, J. (1989) Pathogenesis related proteins and systemic resistance to blue mould and tobacco mosaic virus induced by tobacco mosaic virus, Peronospora tabacina and aspirin. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 35: 161-175. (Received October 22, 1998; Accepted January 30, 1999)