Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wikipedia , lookup
Debt settlement wikipedia , lookup
Debt collection wikipedia , lookup
First Report on the Public Credit wikipedia , lookup
Debt bondage wikipedia , lookup
Mark-to-market accounting wikipedia , lookup
Debtors Anonymous wikipedia , lookup
Household debt wikipedia , lookup
Topic No. D-23 Topic: Subjective Acceleration Clauses and Debt Classification Date Discussed: July 12, 1990 An FASB staff representative announced that the FASB staff recently responded to the following technical inquiry related to subjective acceleration clauses and debt classification. Q—Are FASB Technical Bulletin No. 79-3, Subjective Acceleration Clauses in Long-Term Debt Agreements, and FASB Statement No. 6, Classification of Short-Term Obligations Expected to Be Refinanced, inconsistent in their treatment of subjective acceleration clauses in debt agreements? A—Statement 6 permits a short-term obligation to be excluded from current liabilities provided the enterprise has the ability and intent to refinance the obligation on a long-term basis. The existence of a financing agreement that clearly allows the short-term obligation to be refinanced on a long-term basis is one means of demonstrating that ability. Statement 6 states, however, that a financing agreement can only be used as the basis for excluding the short-term obligation from current liabilities if the financing agreement cannot be cancelled by the lender based on a subjective acceleration clause. If a long-term debt agreement contains a subjective acceleration clause, the Technical Bulletin indicates that neither reclassification to current liabilities nor disclosure of the clause would be required so long as acceleration of the due date is remote. The FASB staff views the circumstances covered by Statement 6 and Technical Bulletin 79-3 as distinctly different. Under the Technical Bulletin, the lender has already loaned money on a long-term basis. To continue long-term classification requires a judgment about the likelihood of acceleration of the due date. Statement 6 covers circumstances in which the obligation is by its terms short-term. For that obligation to be excluded from current liabilities, the lender must advance new funds or refinance the short-term obligation on a long-term basis based on conditions existing on the date of the new loan or refinancing. Therefore, to classify an obligation as long-term, Statement 6 requires a higher standard for a Copyright © 2008, Financial Accounting Standards Board Not for redistribution Page 1 financing agreement that permits an enterprise to refinance a short-term obligation on a longterm basis than Technical Bulletin 79-3 requires for an existing long-term loan for which early repayment might be requested. Copyright © 2008, Financial Accounting Standards Board Not for redistribution Page 2