Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
AD_ 0 2 1 _ _ _ J UL 3 1 _ 0 9 . p d f Pa ge 2 1 2 3 / 7 / 0 9 , 1 1 : 1 8 AM HowtoTreat www.australiandoctor.com.au PULL-OUT SECTION inside COMPLETE HOW TO TREAT QUIZZES ONLINE (www.australiandoctor.com.au/cpd) to earn CPD or PDP points. Aetiology Assessing the obese patient Lifestyle changes Very low energy diets Pharmacotherapy The author PROFESSOR JOSEPH PROIETTO, Sir Edward Dunlop Medical Research Foundation Professor of Medicine at the University of Melbourne and Repatriation Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria. OBESITY in adults Background OBESITY is now a major health issue in Australia and around the world, and the prevalence of overweight has been rising steadily. Of great concern is that childhood obe- sity has now reached alarming rates. The multiple comorbidities associated with, or caused by, obesity make the condition an increasing burden on the health system. Public Australian Doctor presents Wealth Creation health measures attempted so far have failed to stem the rise in the prevalence of obesity, and the longterm outcomes of individualised treatments are generally poor. Why is obesity so difficult to treat? Definition and prevalence Obesity is a state in which there is cont’d next page GPs, SPECIALISTS AND PRACTICE MANAGERS… Recession Beating Strategies for doctors D EARLY BIR SPECIAL $220 Learn how to maximise earnings, seize opportunities and secure your future from one of Australia’s most experienced and well-respected financial advisors to doctors, Terry McMaster ADELAIDE Saturday 1 August SYDNEY Saturday 8 August BRISBANE Saturday 15 August MELBOURNE Saturday 22 August FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO REGISTER PLEASE VISIT www.australiandoctor.com.au/seminars OR CALL (02) 9422 2257 www.australiandoctor.com.au 31 July 2009 | Australian Doctor | 21 AD_ 0 2 2 _ _ _ J UL 3 1 _ 0 9 . p d f Pa ge 2 2 2 3 / 7 / 0 9 , 1 1 : 2 6 AM HOW TO TREAT Obesity in adults from previous page excess storage of fat in the body. Three measurements need to be made to make two complementary assessments of excess weight. • Weight (kg). • Height (m), from which can be calculated the BMI: weight divided by the square of the height 2 (kg/m ). • Waist circumference (cm). The clinical state defined by the BMI is shown in table 1. Excess fat can be deposited in different areas of the body. There is almost certainly a genetic predisposition to where fat is deposited. A dramatic example of genetic regional fat distribution is the large gluteal fat deposit in people from the Hottentot tribe in Africa. From a health point of view, two major types of fat distribution are important — central abdominal (android) and gluteal-femoral (gynoid). It is the central abdominal obesity that is generally associated with features of the metabolic syndrome. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definition of the metabolic syndrome places waist circumference as the essential feature (males 94cm, females 80cm) plus any two of the following Table 1: Clinical state according to BMI BMI (kg/m ) Clinical state <18 Underweight 18-24.9 Normal weight 25-29.9 Overweight 30-40 Obese >40 Severely (morbidly) obese 2 Table 2: Prevalence of overweight, obesity, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome in Australia Prevalence Overweight and obesity (BMI 25kg/m2) Males: 67.5% Females: 52.1% Obesity (BMI ≥30kg/m2) Males: 19.3% Females: 22.3% Diabetes Adult population (>25 years): 7.2% four features: • Triglyceride level ≥ 1.7 mmol/L. • Reduced HDL-cholesterol level (<1.03mmol/L in males and <1.29mmol/L in females). • Hypertension (blood pressure >130mmHg systolic or >85mmHg diastolic or patient receiving treatment TO understand the aetiology of obesity it is necessary to briefly explain the regulation of body weight. The central regulator of weight is the hypothalamus. The complex details of how weight is regulated are not within the scope of this article but there have been many reviews on the subject. Briefly, neurones in the arcuate nucleus produce compounds that induce hunger. These include neuropeptide Y (NPY) and agoutirelated peptide (AGRP). Adjacent neurones produce cocaine-and-amphetamineregulated transcript (CART) and alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (αMSH), which powerfully inhibit food intake. These neurones project to other areas of the hypothalamus and in turn receive signals from them and from the brainstem. Overall there is a mechanism that stimulates and one that inhibits food intake. Whether we have the drive to eat (hunger) or to Table 3: Hormones involved in regulating body weight Condition Metabolic syndrome Aetiology Adult population (>25 years): 30.7% for hypertension). • Fasting plasma glucose level ≥5.6 mmol/L or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes. The prevalence of these disorders is rising. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome in Australia are shown in table 2. Hormone Origin Function Ghrelin Stomach Stimulates hunger Leptin Adipose tissue Inhibits hunger Cholecystokinin Upper gut Induces satiety Peptide YY Lower gut Induces satiety Glucagon-like peptide 1 Lower gut Reduces hunger, slows gastric emptying Oxyntomodulin Lower gut Reduces hunger Amylin Pancreatic beta cell Reduces hunger Pancreatic polypeptide Islet cell Reduces hunger Insulin Pancreatic beta cell Reduces hunger PLEASE REVIEW PRODUCT INFORMATION BEFORE PRESCRIBING. PRODUCT INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN THE PRIMARY ADVERTISEMENT IN THIS PUBLICATION. PBS Information: Restricted benefit. For single maintenance and reliever therapy in a patient who experiences frequent asthma symptoms while receiving treatment with oral corticosteroids or inhaled corticosteroids or a combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long acting beta-2-agonist (Symbicort 400/12 is not recommended nor PBS subsidised for use in maintenance and reliever therapy). 22 | Australian Doctor | 31 July 2009 www.australiandoctor.com.au AD_ 0 2 3 _ _ _ J UL 3 1 _ 0 9 . p d f not eat (anorexia) depends which of these systems is dominating at the time. The balance of this central system is strongly influenced by circulating hormones that originate in fat, the gut and the pancreas. These are shown in table 3 and figure 1. Obesity has a complex aetiology. Studies in identical twins raised apart suggest that about 70% of the variance in body weight is genetic, while 30% is environmental. This was confirmed by adoption studies that found no relationship in body weight between adopted individuals and that of their adoptive parents. In contrast there was a statistically significant relationship between the body weight of adopted subjects and that of their biological parents. So far, more than five genes have been identified that, when mutated, can lead to massive obesity. These include: • Leptin. • The leptin receptor. • Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC). • Prohormone convertase (the enzyme that cleaves Pa ge 2 3 2 3 / 7 / 0 9 , 1 1 : 2 7 AM Table 4: Consequence of obesity and related conditions System Condition Metabolic Type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hyperuricaemia, insulin resistance Immunological Low-grade inflammatory state Respiratory Obstructive sleep apnoea, asthma Cardiovascular Increased risk of ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and stroke Figure 1: Weight-regulating mechanisms, with a mouse brain in the background. Cerebral cortex: conscious will Opioids Dopamine Endo-cannabinoids Gastrointestinal Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, reflux oesophagitis, gallstones Orthopaedic Back pain, osteoarthritis Dermatological Acanthosis nigricans, skin tags, intertrigo Arcuate nucleus: NPY CART AGRP αMSH Paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus: Oxytonin CRH Brainstem Lateral hypothalamus: Orexin MCH Ghrelin PYY 3-36 PP Reproductive Polycystic ovary syndrome Renal Proteinuria Oncology Increased risk of cancers of breast and bowel Psychosocial Depression, social discrimination, social isolation, binge-eating disorder, bulimia CCK Leptin Insulin FOOD INTAKE Amylin ENERGY EXPENDITURE GLP-1 Oxyntomodulin POMC to make αMSH). • The receptor for αMSH, the melanocortin-4 receptor (MCR4). AGRP = agouti-related peptide; CART = cocaine-and-amphetamine-regulated transcript; CCK = cholecystokinin; CRH= corticotropin-releasing hormone; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1; MCH = melanin-concentrating hormone; αMSH = alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone; NPY = neuropeptide Y; PP = PP peptide family; PYY3-36 = one of the two major forms of gut peptide YY Source: Adapted from Proietto J. Why staying lean is not a matter of ethics. Medical Journal of Australia 1999; 171:611-13. ©Copyright 1999. The Medical Journal of Australia — reproduced with permission. Effects on health Obesity has many health consequences that can impact on different organs (table 4). The most important of these is type 2 diabetes and its precursor, insulin resistance. The major cause of insulin resistance is excess fat accumulation in various tissues. cont’d next page ONE asthma inhaler for both maintenance * and relief? 1 *Only Symbicort 100/6 and 200/6 doses are approved for use in patients indicated for the SMART regimen. Reference: 1. SYMBICORT Approved Product Information, November 2007. Symbicort® is a registered trademark and SMARTTM is a trademark of the AstraZeneca group of companies. Registered user AstraZeneca Pty Ltd. ABN 54 009 682 311. Alma Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113. AZAE0610. H&T AZSY0940/AD. www.australiandoctor.com.au 31 July 2009 | Australian Doctor | 23 AD_ 0 2 4 _ _ _ J UL 3 1 _ 0 9 . p d f Pa ge 2 4 2 3 / 7 / 0 9 , 1 1 : 2 8 AM HOW TO TREAT Obesity in adults Assessing the obese patient expenditure can be calculated. WHEN a patient presents for management of obesity or indicates, after your initiative, that they are ready to attempt to lose weight, the following structured set of procedures should be routinely undertaken. Examination History A thorough history should be taken that documents some of the following information: • Age of onset of obesity. • Precipitating factors (if any). • Peak weight and lowest adult weight. • Previous weight-loss attempts. • Maximum weight previously lost and how. • Previous use of pharmacotherapy for obesity. • Past medical history. • Family history of obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease. • Systems review: — cardiovascular system: for example, chest pain, shortness of breath, orthopnoea, swelling of ankles — respiratory system: especially symptoms of obstructive sleep apnoea — CNS: any headaches — GI system: reflux oesophagitis — arthritis — in females: symptoms and signs suggestive of polycystic ovary syndrome (irregular periods, acne, hirsutism, infertility). • Social history. It is my practice not to take a detailed dietary history. Generally the information obtained is not accurate. If a patient has stable weight, caloric intake equals energy expenditure. As there is a linear relationship between weight and energy expenditure, caloric intake can be calculated from the patient’s weight. There are tables available from which energy A targeted examination follows. This includes: • Measurement of height and weight, from which can be calculated BMI. Measure waist circumference in men and waist and hip circumference in women. • Blood pressure after a few minutes’ rest. • Neck circumference. • Look for acanthosis nigricans in hands and neck and for skin tags on the neck (these are markers of insulin resistance). • Examine the heart, with particular attention to cardiac murmurs, as previous weight-loss medications caused valve lesions in some patients. • Listen to the lungs. • Examine the abdomen, with particular attention to the possible presence of hepatomegaly and a fatty apron. • In older patients it is important to check for peripheral vascular disease. Investigations Request investigations. As a matter of routine these should include: • Fasting glucose. • Lipids (total cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol). • Uric acid. • LFTs. • Electrolytes, urea and creatinine. • Any other investigations suggested by the history. Note that endocrine conditions associated with weight gain, such as hypothyroidism and Cushing’s syndrome, generally do not result in marked weight gain, so thyroid function tests and urinary free or salivary cortisol do not need to be measured routinely. Similarly it can be assumed that all obese patients are insulin resistant, so measuring insulin levels has limited clinical value. Management FOR many years it has been advocated that weight loss should be achieved by a change in lifestyle with a reduction in caloric intake and an increase in physical activity. For some time there was controversy regarding whether the diet should be high in protein, low in fat or high in complex carbohydrates. However recent evidence suggests that the composition of the diet is not important, provided it leads to a decrease in caloric intake.1 There is a large body of literature suggesting that group support is important and that exercise should always be a component of the weight loss program. In addition to lifestyle modification some others have advocated use of low or very-low-energy diets and/or pharmacotherapy. However, the ‘Holy Grail’ of obesity management is not achieving weight loss but successfully preventing weight regain. There is overwhelming evidence that most people who lose weight eventually regain it. Some can maintain weight loss for longer than others, possibly because of their personality type or their enthusiasm for vigorous exercise. Nonetheless, if viewed at five years after the initial weight loss, most have regained all the weight lost. Why would someone who is very motivated to lose weight, regain the weight after working hard to achieve weight loss? There is now growing evidence that weight is strongly defended. In the previous section, the circulating hormones that influence hunger were discussed. Table 3 (page 22) shows that the vast majority of circulating regulators inhibit food intake, with only one (ghre- 24 The ‘Holy Grail’ of obesity management is not achieving weight loss but successfully preventing weight regain. account these facts is destined to long-term failure. Thus it does not matter which type of program is used to achieve weight loss — commercial weight loss centres, mixed reduced-calorie diets, low-carbohydrate diets, diet plus exercise, diet plus behaviour modification or very-lowenergy diets can all be used to achieve weight loss, provided there is a period where energy intake is less than energy expenditure. But how do we prevent weight regain? This is where we need more assistance and is the area of major failure. Lifestyle changes lin) so far found to stimulate hunger. It has been shown that after weight loss, leptin, insulin and cholecystokinin levels decrease while ghrelin level rises, leading to increased drive to eat. Also, it has been long known that energy expenditure decreases after weight loss. This is due to the combination of reduced body mass and reduced metabolic rate, possibly partly due to thyroxine (T4) being converted to the inactive reverse triiodothyronine (reverse T3) instead of the active hormone triiodothyronine (T3). It is not known if the rate of weight loss influences these hormonal adaptations, but there seems to be no evidence to indicate that that these hormonal changes can be modulated by type of diet. Any program that does not take into | Australian Doctor | 31 July 2009 A recent large study has shown that the type of diet an individual follows does not affect the success of achieving weight loss.1 The important fact is to reduce energy intake below energy expenditure; the larger the gap, the more rapid the weight loss. It is useful to discuss with patients the preferred method to achieve weight loss. In general, the full range of available strategies should be given to patients so they can make the choice that best fits in with their lifestyle and their temperament. Patients who have not made previous attempts at weight loss should be advised to follow a calorie-reduced lifestyle-change program. In contrast, a severely obese patient who has undergone many cycles of weight loss followed by weight regain may be best steered towards the very-low-calorie program described below. In general, most doctors are not qualified to give detailed dietary advice, so if the patient chooses a mixed reduced-calorie diet or a low-carbohydrate diet it is advisable to refer the patent to a qualified dietitian. If the patient chooses a verylow-energy diet, dietitian referral is not essential at this stage, as the diet is very prescriptive; however, referral will become important as the patient exits the rapid-weight-loss phase. Very low energy diets Very low energy diets (VLED) are “shakes” or bars that are composed of small quantities of carbohydrate and protein and contain essential vitamins, minerals, fatty acids and amino acids. Generally each shake or bar has 150-200 calories (600-800 kJ) and approximately one third of daily vitamin and mineral requirements. They are used to replace two or three meals per day. These diets should be considered when: • There is morbid obesity. • When there have been multiple previous attempts at weight loss with conventional diets. • When it is necessary to have rapid weight loss. • In the presence of significant comorbidities such as obstructive sleep apnoea or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. • When waiting for surgery that is conditional on losing weight. Contraindications to use of a VLED approach include: • Pregnancy. • Advanced age. • History of severe psychological disturbance. • Alcoholism or drug abuse. • Presence of porphyria. • Recent MI or unstable angina. Starting a patient on a VLED The overall strategy with these diets is to have a period of weight loss (this can last 3-12 months) followed by a vigorous weight maintenance pro- www.australiandoctor.com.au gram that includes diet, exercise, lifestyle change and, if necessary, pharmacotherapy. The VLED provides the patient with 3280 kJ (800 calorie) daily energy intake and ensures intake of all essential vitamins, minerals, essential fatty acids and amino acids. The diet has a low carbohydrate and fat content. The low carbohydrate intake leads to mild ketosis within a few days. There is increasing evidence that ketosis reduces hunger. The mechanisms are not known but it is known that ketones are easily metabolised by the brain (and the heart) and it has been shown that ketones stimulate cholecystokinin release. Provided the patient avoids carbohydrate intake during this weight loss phase, they will not experience hunger after the first week. It is therefore my view that pharmacotherapy is not necessary during this phase. In addition to the three VLED shakes or bars to replace each of the three meals, the patient is advised to have a bowl of vegetables or a salad in the evenings to provide roughage and to avoid constipation. Extra fibre may be needed if constipation occurs. It is essential to use one tablespoon of oil (preferably olive oil) on the vegetables to trigger the gallbladder to empty once daily. In very large patients some protein in the form of meat or fish is advisable once daily in addition to the VLED and the evening vegetables. Some individuals cannot face the prospect of not having at least one meal a day. In these cases, two meals can be replaced with VLED meal replacements. To achieve the ketotic state it is imperative there is no calorie intake in between meals, and the one meal a day must consist of some protein (meat, fish or egg) plus vegetables or a salad. Clearly variations on this theme are possible, such as replacing three meals during the week and having one meal on weekends or on special occasions. This is fine provided the ketosis is not broken by the ingestion of carbohydrate. When it has been decided to start a VLED regimen, the patient should be given written instructions and told of the general strategy of the program. The importance of achieving mild ketosis to suppress hunger should be emphasised and patients encouraged to avoid carbohydrate when hungry. Advise them to have lean meat or fish instead in the first week before the onset of ketosis. Great care must be taken when starting diabetic patients on a VLED if they are on any insulin-raising therapies such as sulphonylureas or insulin. A rule of thumb is to stop the sulphonylureas but continue metformin and/or thiazolidenedione. If the patient is on insulin, reduce the insulin dose to half and ask the patient to do more frequent testing for the first week and to modify insulin dose accordingly. Advice from or referral to a specialised clinic may be advisable for some patients. Follow-up After starting on a VLED the patient should be followed up every two weeks for advice and encouragement. Blood tests should be repeated midway through the VLED phase. At the end of the VLED phase, the patient is started on a maintenance program (see below). cont’d page 26 AD_ 0 2 6 _ _ _ J UL 3 1 _ 0 9 . p d f Pa ge 2 6 2 3 / 7 / 0 9 , 1 1 : 2 9 AM HOW TO TREAT Obesity in adults It is becoming increasingly clear that severe obesity is a chronic incurable condition with a biological basis. from page 24 Blood tests during a VLED Careful supervision of patients on VLED is important because of the potential for serious consequences while on these diets. There have been very few electrolyte imbalances using the modern VLED programs. I am aware of three cases of hyponatremia over the last 12 years of use, probably due to the over enthusiasm of the patients to drink water. There are many VLED products on the market and not all are suitable for the complete replacement program described here. Baseline blood tests: These include electrolytes, urea and creatinine, LFTs, fasting glucose, cholesterol/triglycerides/ HDL-cholesterol, uric acid, FBC and iron studies. Follow-up blood tests: Electrolytes should be checked every 4-6 weeks throughout the VLED regimen or earlier if required by the patient’s condition (eg, patients with renal impairment, because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance [in fact patients with severe renal failure requiring dialysis should only be treated in specialist units]). How long should a patient continue on a VLED? Usually patients continue on VLED for at least 12 weeks. However, this period is variable and depends on the patient’s ability to tolerate the VLED. It is not necessary for patients to get to the goal weight with one period of VLED use. They may have repeated periods of use separated by periods of weight maintenance. However it is my experience that it is always difficult to go back on a VLED after having been on one for some time. Hence, if the patient is willing, it is best to continue the VLED for as long as it is successful. Finishing the VLED The patient is weaned off the VLED over a period of two months. At this time the input of a dietitian familiar with the overall strategy is obtained. The patient is starting to introduce a normal diet and the type of meals chosen becomes important. The patient has two VLED meal replacements and one specified meal a day for four weeks, followed by four weeks of one VLED meal replacement and two specified meals a day for two weeks. After two months the patient should be following a diet that is low in fat but is no longer ketogenic, such as the CSIRO diet. In addition the patient is encouraged to undertake as much exercise as he or she can do. Any exercise is beneficial to health but to be sustained it should fit in easily with the patient’s lifestyle and preferably be enjoyed by the patient. The aim in this phase is weight maintenance, not 26 topiramate are effective long term. Sibutramine has a twoyear study showing effectiveness at weight maintenance at two years. At this time, the sibutramine group had on average regained 2kg while the placebo group had regained 10kg.6 Later in 2009 we will have the results of the Scout study, a five-year study on the long-term safety of sibutramine. However this study was not designed to assess efficacy at weight maintenance. There are no long-term trial data on topiramate but the epilepsy literature may inform us on both safety and efficacy as these patients are on this medication long term. Surgery weight loss. If weight loss continues it is a bonus. Patients are then followed carefully, initially at monthly intervals. If the weight loss is maintained, the lifestyle regimen is continued and gradually the interval between visits is increased to three monthly. If the weight is starting to rise again (1-2kg weight regain) or the patient reports difficulty with controlling food intake, consideration should be given to starting drug therapy to assist with maintaining weight loss. Pharmacotherapy It is becoming increasingly clear that severe obesity is a chronic incurable condition with a biological basis. As such it is legitimate to consider long-term chronic treatment for the condition. However, the problem with chronic treatment is that the long-term safety of most currently available drugs has not been proved. Noradrenergic agonists Centrally acting adrenergic agonists (phentermine [Duromine] and diethylpropion [Tenuate Dospan]) have previously been in use for many years. Diethylpropion is no longer available in Australia. These agents work by reducing hunger and possibly stimulating energy expenditure. Side effects include hypertension, impaired sleep and dry mouth. Their long-term safety has not been tested. Furthermore, when given to patients taking phentermine, fenfluramine caused cardiac valvular abnormalities in some patients. As a result, fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine were withdrawn from the market. Serotonergic agonists This class of agents includes the SSRIs, generally used for the treatment of depression. These include fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline. Of these, studies have been performed on the weight loss effects of fluoxetine only. Overall it can be concluded that fluoxetine does have an effect on food intake and | Australian Doctor | 31 July 2009 weight, but it is more modest than the effects that were seen with either dexfenfluramine or fenfluramine. Orlistat This agent’s action is to inhibit intestinal lipase. It has been shown that orlistat (Xenical) reduces fat absorption by 30%. In a one-year clinical study, weight loss of 9kg was reported in the orlistat group, compared with 5-6kg for the placebo-treated group.2 Both groups were treated with diet and exercise in addition to the tablets. In a two-year, double- blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial conducted in 15 European centres, 743 patients were randomised to treatment with orlistat 120mg or placebo three times daily.3 At one year there was a significantly higher degree of weight loss with orlistat compared with placebo. The orlistat-treated group had a 10.2% decrease from initial body weight, compared with 6.1% for placebo. A slight weight increase occurred in all groups during the second year, when physician visits were less frequent. The XENDOS (XENical in the Prevention of Diabetes in Obese Subjects) study, published in 2004, reported that orlistat was safe for long-term use and that at four years, it reduced the risk of developing diabetes by 37.3% in the whole group of study subjects and by 45% in those who had impaired glucose tolerance at the start. At 12 months, subjects randomised to orlistat had lost 10.6kg compared to the placebo group who lost 6.2kg (p <0.001). At four years, the orlistat-treated group had regained 4.8kg while the placebo group had regained 3.2kg.4 As can be expected from an agent that works to inhibit fat absorption, orlistat has the potential to cause steatorrhoea. In clinical trials, most patients had only one or two episodes of fatty stool, generally in the early part of treatment. This suggests that the patients learnt that they developed steatorrhoea if they ate more than 30g of fat a day. That patients can recognise if they have eaten more than 30g of fat per day is one of the beneficial effects of this agent. Another possible side effect is a deficiency of vitamins. In two-year studies mean levels of vitamins A, D, E and K and of betacarotene all remained within the normal reference range in each treatment group, despite the values being generally marginally lower in the treatment groups, compared with placebo. Vitamin supplementation was given to any patient whose levels were below the normal range. Sibutramine Sibutramine (Reductil) is a tertiary amine whose secondary and primary amine metabolites inhibit both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake. Originally developed as an antidepressant, it was soon noted in clinical trials that it was more active in causing weight loss than in relieving depression. Because of its dual action, sibutramine acts like the combination of phentermine (an adrenergic agonist) and fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine (serotonin agonists). Animal studies have shown that activating both adrenergic and serotinergic neurones has a more powerful effect to reduce food intake than each agent alone. Controlled studies have shown that sibutramine produces dose-related weight loss with optimal doses of 1015mg/day. Weight loss with sibutramine over six months is 3-5kg better than with placebo, an effect that is maintained for at least 12 months. Because of its adrenergic action, sibutramine may increase heart rate and blood pressure. However, clinical studies have shown that the effect on blood pressure is not marked. Other side effects include dry mouth, constipation and insomnia. Sibutramine is a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) so it cannot be used in conjunction with other SNRIs or SSRIs. It is theoretically possible that the combination may increase serotonin levels, leading to valve lesions or pulmonary hypertension. www.australiandoctor.com.au However, studies on this question are needed, as these agents are reuptake inhibitors and not stimulators of serotonin release. Topiramate Topiramate (Topamax) is an anti-epileptic drug currently available in Australia on authority prescription for difficult-to-control epilepsy and for migraine prophylaxis. It was found that the drug has a powerful effect in suppressing appetite, with the common side effect of weight loss. Several studies to assess the use of topiramate in the management of obesity were undertaken, proving its efficacy; however, development for this indication is not proceeding presently.5 The effective dose for weight loss seems to be 25100mg/day. Side effects include depression, difficulty concentrating, closed-angle glaucoma (rare) and paraesthesia (common). Suicidality is a concern with agents that can cause depression, and care must be taken to assess the patient’s mood. Topiramate can be considered for use ‘off-label’ in the management of severely obese patients in whom sibutramine is contraindicated (eg, arrhythmia or pulmonary hypertension). Weight maintenance It is my view that pharmacotherapy is not necessary for weight loss but is essential for weight maintenance after weight loss, to counter the physiological adaptations that occur that lead to weight regain. For weight loss all the available agents may have a role if necessary, but for weight maintenance the only two agents that should be considered are sibutramine and topiramate (off-label use). This is because there are no data on the longterm safety for phentermine and diethylpropion, and orlistat does not address the main reason for pharmacotherapy — the control of hunger. It must be stated that while appetite suppressants are the appropriate class of agents that are needed, we still await evidence that sibutramine and If the above medical approach fails and the patient has a BMI >40kg/m 2, or >35kg/m 2 in conjunction with significant obesity-related comorbidities, consideration should be given to bariatric surgery. In Australia the most common procedure has become laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. The only other procedure performed routinely is Roux en Y gastric bypass. This procedure is generally done as an open operation but in some experienced centres it is performed laparoscopically. Some centres are now performing the sleeve gastrectomy but it is too early to know the longterm effectiveness of this less aggressive procedure. Gastric balloons are available but can only be seen as a temporary measure, possibly to achieve enough weight loss to make the more definitive procedure safer. This is because they need to be removed after six months. Bariatric procedures are complex to manage both before and after surgery and must be done within a multidisciplinary setting that offers comprehensive follow-up. Prevention Obesity is one condition for which prevention is better than cure. Given the growing evidence that weight is defended by vigorous physiological mechanisms, it is likely that secondary prevention will not be successful. We must therefore focus on primary prevention in children. Monogenic forms of obesity, such as leptin deficiency or melanocortin-4 mutations cannot be prevented. However, possible epigenetic obesity precipitated by the intrauterine environment (maternal malnutrition in the first trimester or over-nutrition in the last trimester) or the food that we feed our babies can all be modified. Future research will determine all the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms leading to obesity. In the meantime, parents can help their children by encouraging physical activity (eg, school sport) and avoid feeding them high-fat/highsugar foods. AD_ 0 2 7 _ _ _ J UL 3 1 _ 0 9 . p d f Pa ge 2 7 2 3 / 7 / 0 9 , 1 1 : 3 0 AM Overall summary cise should be first attempted for maintenance, but the patient must be monitored carefully, as significant weight regain is disheartening. A weight regain of only 1-2kg should be the trigger to offer the patient pharmacotherapy to assist with hunger control. The first choice is currently sibutramine and, if contraindicated, the second choice is topiramate. If medical therapy fails, bariatric surgery should be considered. OBESITY is a chronic organic condition that, once established, is difficult to reverse. There are many roads to weight loss, including low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets, commercial weight-loss programs, doctor-supervised VLED programs and pharmacotherapy. The best road should be selected in consultation with the patient. When the realistic target is reached, lifestyle change involving diet and exer- Practice points • Have a good set of scales that can accurately measure at least 250kg. • Have an extra-long tape measure to assess waist circumference. • Learn about the biology of body weight regulation. • If you have a practice nurse, train them to weigh the patient and measure waist circumference. • Familiarise yourself with the contraindications of sibutramine and topiramate. • Do not discharge the patient, as obesity is chronic and requires long-term follow-up. What not to miss Evidence-based practice forget to stress the role and reason for the development of ketosis. • Check if the patient has depression or is taking antidepressants. If so, consider early referral for bariatric surgery, especially if there have been many previous attempts at weight loss. Sibutramine is contraindicated if the patient is taking an SNRI or SSRI and topiramate can cause depression. • In the clinical assessment, do not fail to seek evidence of obstructive sleep apnoea. • Make sure to ask about previous weight-loss attempts and outcomes. • Always assess the patient for diabetes, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. • If choosing a VLED or low-carbohydrate diet approach to weight loss, do not 2-4 • Pharmacological agents can assist with weight loss. • Twin and adoption studies have concluded that most of the variance 7-9 in body weight in the population can be attributed to genetic factors. • Very few obese subjects can maintain weight loss for more than 3-5 10 years. • There are co-ordinated physiological changes that encourage 9-11 weight regain after weight loss. 14 • Bariatric surgery is currently the best therapy for severe obesity. Author’s case study MRS AB, 66, was referred to the weight-control clinic in February 2007 for management of obesity. She said she had been obese all her life, with a gradual increase in weight. She had held her presenting weight for the previous six years. Her peak weight was 131kg and her lowest weight as an adult was 100kg. In the past she had tried various diets, commercial weight-loss centres and over-the counter alternative therapies obtained from her local pharmacist. None of these approaches had been very successful. She gave a past history of right knee osteoarthritis and right hip pain. Both of her parents and one brother were obese but there was no family history of diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease or stroke. On systematic questioning she denied chest pain but had some shortness of breath on exertion and possibly some orthopnoea. She had a history of swelling of her ankles but no claudication. She was a non-smoker. Surprisingly, there was no history suggestive of obstructive sleep apnoea. In particular she gave no history of snoring, frequent waking or excessive daytime somnolence. There was no history of reflux oesophagitis or polycystic ovary syndrome. She was taking meloxicam 7.5mg for pain and was also taking ‘metabolism boost’, fish oil, celery, glucosamine, calcium and magnesium. She is a retired nurse, married and lives with her husband. Examination revealed: • Weight: 131.7kg. • Height: 1.66m. 2 • BMI: 47.8kg/m . • Waist circumference: 143cm. • Hip circumference: 148cm. References Figure 2: Weight loss rate and long-term maintenance with the assistance of sibutramine. Dates: 1 = 9/2/2007; 11 = 16/11/2007; 21 = 14/4/2009 Weight loss 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 Visit number • Pulse: 84 beats per minute and regular. • Blood pressure: 138/90 mmHg. Mrs AB had an android body shape. Cardiovascular and respiratory examinations were normal. Abdominal examination revealed a fatty apron but there was no tenderness under the right costal margin. Organs could not be palpated. Peripheral examination was normal, including examination of her peripheral pulses. She had evidence of osteoarthritis in the knees. Investigations showed: • Fasting glucose: 5.8mmol/L. • Total cholesterol: 6.1mmol/L. • Triglycerides: 0.8mmolL. • HDL-cholesterol: 1.74mmol/L. • LDL-cholesterol: 4.0mmol/L. • Electrolytes, urea and creatinine: all normal. • LFTs: all normal. Because Mrs AB had made many previous attempts at losing weight using conventional diets, she was started on the unit’s VLED program, as described above. She was also advised to start taking fibre, as she had a tendency to constipation, and was referred to a respiratory physician for more careful assessment of obstructive sleep apnoea, despite her denial of symptoms. Figure 2 shows the rate of weight loss since her initial presentation. She achieved weight loss at a steady rate, reaching a nadir of 101kg in May 2008. Sibutramine was started at visit 16 because she had a 2kg weight gain and she reported starting to feel hungry. Mrs AB was first seen by the respiratory physician in March 2007, when she admitted to snoring and having fragmented sleep. A sleep study was organised that con- A weight regain of only 1-2kg should be the trigger to offer the patient pharmacotherapy to assist with hunger control. firmed severe obstructive sleep apnoea. She was offered treatment with a mandibular advancement splint or continuous positive airway pressure but she declined. When reviewed in August 2007, having lost 23kg, she reported sleeping better. The plan is to continue lifestyle changes and sibutramine indefinitely and to review her at regular intervals. www.australiandoctor.com.au 1. Sacks FM, et al. Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. New England Journal of Medicine 2009; 360:859-73. 2. Finer N, et al. One-year treatment of obesity: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2000; 24:306-13. 3. Sjöström L, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of orlistat for weight loss and prevention of weight regain in obese patients. European Multicentre Orlistat Study Group. Lancet 1998; 352:167-72. 4. Torgerson JS, et al. XENical in the prevention of diabetes in obese subjects (XENDOS) study: A randomised study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:155-61. 5. Astrup A, Toubro S. Topiramate: a new potential pharmacological treatment for obesity. Obesity Research 2004; 12(Suppl):167S-73S. 6. James WP, et al. Effect of sibutramine on weight maintenance after weight loss: a randomised trial. STORM Study Group. Sibutramine Trial of Obesity Reduction and Maintenance. Lancet 2000; 356:2119-25. 7. Stunkard AJ, et al. The body-mass index of twins who have been reared apart. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 322:1483-87. 8. Bouchard C. The response to long-term overfeeding in identical twins. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 322:1477-82. 9. Sorensen TI, et al. Correlations of body mass index of adult adoptees and their biological and adoptive relatives. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1992; 16:22736. 10. NHMRC Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Overweight & Obesity in Adults, Children & Adolescents including a Guide for General Practitioners. 2000. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/subjects/clinical.htm 11. Geldszus R, et al. Serum leptin and weight reduction in female obesity. European Journal of Endocrinology 1996; 135:659-62. 12. Chearskul S, et al. Effect of weight loss and ketosis on postprandial cholecystokinin and free fatty acid concentrations. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2008; 87:1238-46. 13. Cummings DE, et al. Plasma ghrelin levels after diet-induced weight loss or gastric bypass surgery. New England Journal of Medicine 2002; 346:1623-30. 14. O’Brien PE, et al. Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006; 144:625-33. Further reading • Sumithran P, Proietto J. Safe year-long use of a very-low-calorie diet for the treatment of severe obesity. Medical Journal of Australia 2008; 188:366-68. • Woods SC, et al. Central control of body weight and appetite. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2008; 93:S37S50. Declaration of a potential conflict of interest Professor Joseph Proietto is chairman of the Optifast medical advisory board for Nestlé and a member of the Reductil medical advisory board for Abbott. cont’d next page 31 July 2009 | Australian Doctor | 27 AD_ 0 2 8 _ _ _ J UL 3 1 _ 0 9 . p d f Pa ge 2 8 2 3 / 7 / 0 9 , 1 1 : 3 1 AM HOW TO TREAT Obesity in adults GP’s contribution DR LIZ MARLES Redfern, NSW Case study FOR the past eight years Jan, 54, has been trying to lose weight through a succession of diets and regular walking. The past three years have been particularly difficult, as she had an extended worker’s compensation claim for back pain, during which time she was unable to earn any additional overtime in her work as a welfare officer. She became quite depressed, and her exercise program evaporated. After starting her on escitalopram her mood improved and she made a concerted effort to get back into walking her dog. Earlier this year she was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and at this point made a decision that she really needed to address her weight, suggesting that “perhaps surgery might be the go”. This is not the first time Jan has taken a surgical approach. Twenty years ago she had gastric banding surgery and lost 40kg, achieving a weight of 68kg. This was maintained for about seven years, but then her weight started to rise again. Acknowledging that she has a stressful job, Jan describes herself as a “stress eater”. She is not keen on attending WeightWatchers, and has had trouble sticking to any particular dietary advice. In addition to the diabetes and recurrent back pain, Jan also suffers from reflux oesophagitis and possibly sleep apnoea (although this has not formally been diagnosed). Is surgery appropriate, given her previous history of gastric stapling? Surgery may now be more difficult and the risk benefit ratio would need to be carefully assessed. Referral to an experienced bariatric surgeon for an opinion is an option. At 121kg she has a BMI of 45kg/m 2. She also has mildly elevated LFTs and ultrasound showed a “fatty liver”. Questions for the author What approach would you take to Jan’s weight loss? Given that Jan has now developed significant comorbidities it is important that she How to Treat Quiz attempt weight loss again. The previous surgery may make further surgery difficult and/or dangerous. Considering this past history, I would offer Jan the approach detailed in the article, with a VLED followed by lifestyle and pharmacotherapy if required. Should this approach fail, a surgical opinion should be sought. She was recommended to lose weight before the gastric stapling — what is the purpose of this? It has been shown that 2-4 weeks of a VLED before surgery significantly reduces liver size and reduces intraabdominal fat, making surgery easier and safer. General questions for the author Is a regular program of brisk walking for 30 minutes a day sufficient exercise to lead to weight loss? On its own, without concomitant energy restriction, the impact of this amount of exercise would be small. Are there special precautions in undertaking meal replacement with a product such as Optifast in patients with type 2 diabetes? VLEDs can have a dramatic impact on glycaemia, so any patient using insulin or sulfonylureas must be warned about the risk of hypoglycaemia. My rule of thumb when initiating these diets in someone with diabetes is to continue insulin sensitisers (metformin, thiazolidenediones) or acarbose or insulin-secretion-stimulating compounds that require elevated glucose levels to work (sitagliptin, exenatide) but to stop sulfonyureas. If a patient is using insulin I do not stop it completely, as these patients are often insulin deficient. I halve the dose and ask the patient to check their blood glucose level more often when they start the diet. The dose of insulin can then be adjusted over the next week based on the patient’s glucose response to the diet. INSTRUCTIONS Complete this quiz online and fill in the GP evaluation form to earn 2 CPD or PDP points. We no longer accept quizzes by post or fax. The mark required to obtain points is 80%. Please note that some questions have more than one correct answer. Obesity in adults — 31 July 2009 1. Which THREE statements about the prevalence of obesity and related conditions in Australia are correct? a) About two-thirds of men are overweight or obese b) About one-half of women are overweight or obese c) The prevalence of diabetes in adults is about 7% d) The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in adults is about 15% 2. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria for the metabolic syndrome include central obesity, plus two out of four additional features. Which THREE of the following additional features are correct? a) Triglyceride level ≥1.7mmol/L b) HDL-cholesterol level of <1.2mmol/L in males and <1.5mmol/L in females c) Blood pressure ≥130mmHg systolic or ≥85mmHg diastolic d) Fasting plasma glucose level ≥5.6mmol/L 3. Which TWO statements about regulation of body weight are correct? a) Studies suggest that about 30% of the variance in body weight is genetic, while 70% is environmental b) Among the circulating hormones that influence hunger, only glucagon-like peptide 1 has been found to stimulate hunger c) After weight loss, changes in circulating regulatory hormone levels lead to an increased drive to eat d) Energy expenditure decreases after weight loss 4. Which THREE statements about the clinical assessment of obese adults are correct? a) Assessment should include measurement of height and weight b) Assessment should include measurement of waist circumference in men and waist and hip circumference in women c) A waist circumference of ≥94cm in men and ≥80cm in women meets the central obesity criterion for the metabolic syndrome d) Assessment should include examination for acanthosis nigricans, which is indicative of dyslipidaemia 5. Which TWO statements about the investigation of patients presenting for management of obesity are correct? a) Routine investigations should include electrolytes, urea, creatinine and LFTs b) Routine investigations should include uric acid c) Routine investigations should include screening for Cushing’s syndrome d) All obese patients should have their insulin levels measured 6. Which THREE statements about diet and lifestyle changes in the management of obesity are correct? ONLINE ONLY www.australiandoctor.com.au/cpd/ for immediate feedback a) Patients who have not made previous attempts at weight loss should be advised to follow a calorie-reduced lifestyle-change program b) A recent large study has shown that the type of diet an individual follows does not affect the success of achieving weight loss c) It is best for the GP to choose the weightloss strategy for an individual to follow d) If detailed dietary advice is required, referral to a dietitian is advisable 7. Which TWO statements about very low energy diets (VLEDs) are correct? a) A VLED may be considered when there is morbid obesity despite multiple previous weight loss attempts with conventional diets b) The VLED provides the patient with a daily energy intake of 1000 calories c) After starting on a VLED the patient should be followed up once monthly d) Blood tests must be performed at baseline and electrolytes should be monitored during the VLED regimen 8. Which TWO statements about the VLED are correct? a) Patients are advised to have a bowl of vegetables or a salad in the evenings while on the VLED b) In very large patients some protein in the form of meat or fish is advisable once daily in addition to the VLED c) Patients should avoid all oils while on the VLED, to maintain a low fat intake d) If patients feel hungry on the VLED, they can have a small carbohydrate snack once a day 9. Which THREE statements about pharmacotherapy in the management of obesity are correct? a) Side effects of centrally acting adrenergic agonists for the management of obesity such as phentermine include hypertension b) Orlistat reduces fat absorption by 50% c) Sibutramine works by inhibiting both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake d) Long-term safety of most currently available drugs for the management of obesity has not been proved 10. Which TWO statements about surgery in the management of obesity are correct? a) Bariatric surgery should be considered in 2 patients with a BMI >40kg/m for whom medical therapy has failed b) Bariatric surgery should be considered in 2 patients with a BMI >30kg/m in conjunction with significant obesity-related comorbidities who have failed medical therapy c) In Australia gastric balloons have become the most common bariatric procedure d) Patients undergoing bariatric procedures require management in a multidisciplinary setting CPD QUIZ UPDATE The RACGP now requires that a brief GP evaluation form be completed with every quiz to obtain category 2 CPD or PDP points for the 2008-10 triennium. You can complete this online along with the quiz at www.australiandoctor.com.au. Because this is a requirement, we are no longer able to accept the quiz by post or fax. However, we have included the quiz questions here for those who like to prepare the answers before completing the quiz online. HOW TO TREAT Editor: Dr Wendy Morgan Co-ordinator: Julian McAllan Quiz: Dr Wendy Morgan NEXT WEEK Acute abdominal pain is one of the most common reasons for a child presenting to their GP. Such a visit may challenge even an experienced clinician, especially when dealing with a distressed preschool-age child accompanied by anxious parents. Next week’s How to Treat looks at the assessment and management of children with acute abdominal pain. The author is Associate Professor Andrew J A Holland, associate professor of paediatric surgery, the University of Sydney, and consultant paediatric surgeon, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead and Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW. 28 | Australian Doctor | 31 July 2009 www.australiandoctor.com.au