Download Chemical Treatment of Ponds and Lakes

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

DNA-encoded chemical library wikipedia , lookup

Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Chemical Treatment of Ponds and Lakes
Integrated Lakes Management
Rich Daly & Sarah Denny
A peak in the pond management “tool box”
• Chemical applications
• Bacteria and Enzyme applications
• Alum applications
• Pond dye applications
• Aeration installation
• Sediment removal
•
•
•
•
•
Shoreline restoration
Native plantings
Wildlife control
Manual removal
Community education
The Good and The Bad
Why Chemical Applications are good:
1. Control invasive species
2. Cost effective
3. Quick results
Why Chemical Applications are bad:
1. Overused and misused
2. Leads to unrealistic expectations
3. Can be environmentally harmful
Chemical Treatment
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Problem and Solution Identification
Plant ID
Chemical Selection
Application
Monitoring
Step #1
What is the problem?
What is the solution?
• Chemical treatment?
– Only if other options don’t work or aren’t practical
– Only in conjunction with other management techniques
– only when appropriate to solve the problem
• Nutrient reduction?
• Light limitation? • EDUCATION
Step #3
Plant Identification
• THE MOST IMPORTANT STEP
• Hundreds of algal species
– Several of which are copper‐resistant
• Dozens of common aquatic plants
– Several different morphological characteristics
• (Rhizomes, tubers, spores, etc)
Algal Growth
Hydrodictyon (Net Algae)
Pithophora
Horse‐hair algae, very course, not slimy
COPPER RESISTANT
Spirogyra
Mostly found in the spring
Oscillatoria
Planktonic Algae
Cladophera
• Slimier than Pithophera, easier to control
Step #4
• Chemical Selection
• Two types of chemicals
– Systemic
• Pros‐ “preventative treatment”, multiple targets
• Cons‐ non‐target damage, costly, precise measurements, monitoring for target concentration, slow acting
• Ex. Flouridone and 2,4‐D
– Contact
• Pros‐ minimal non‐target damage (if applied appropriately), less costly, spot treatments
• Cons‐ will not kill root systems, will not prevent re‐growth
• Ex. Diquat and Endothal
Resources
• http://aquaplant.tamu.edu/index.htm
• http://www.mapms.org/plant_reference.pdf
• http://plants.ifas.ufl.edu/
How to Decide?
• Target plant
• Desired results
• Treatment Area
– Water volume, and size and shape of water body
• Irrigation and Water Use Restrictions
• Water Movement
Non‐Pesticide Applications
• Pond Dye
• Alum
• B&E
Step #5 Application
• READ THE LABEL
– Safety requirements
– Method of application
– Restrictions
– Storage and clean‐up
• Test the water before treatment
– DO
– Alkalinity
– pH
Fish Kills
• The vast majority of fish kills resulting from chemical applications are a results in a drop in DO, not chemical toxicity
– Decaying plant matter consumes oxygen
– Less material available to photosynthesis
• All copper compounds can be toxic to fish if used above labeled rates and can be toxic in soft or acidic waters even at label rates
How to prevent a drop in DO
• Apply early in AM
• If heavy growth, only treat ½ or 1/3 of water at a time
• Do not treat if water is less than 5mg/l DO
• Keep aeration on during the night
Monitoring
•
•
•
•
Photo Document
Watch for non‐target damage
Listen to stake holders
Determine what is a “successful” treatment