Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
OPENING REMARKS BY MR. KIMMO TIILIKAINEN, THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT OF FINLAND at the Private Sector Breakfast with the Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform and the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL) at the New Zealand Residence in New York on Saturday, 26 September 2015 Excellencies, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen. It is a great pleasure also for me to welcome you to this important discussion on the phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies, and on how we can move this issue – together. Fossil fuel subsidy reform is important not just in and of itself. We are meeting here in NY to agree on a pathway to sustainable development. The world has defined a set of key Sustainable Development Goals, and we will start working on their implementation – now. With a view to this challenge, and against the backdrop of uncertain global economic prospects, it makes no sense to lock up 550 billion USD annually in harmful fossil fuel subsidies. We are also heading very rapidly towards COP-21 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. For COP-21 to become a game-changer, a wide set of policy solutions and initiatives must align. One important piece of the puzzle is fossil fuel subsidy reform. So why then does fossil fuel subsidy reform hold so much potential? I would like to draw your attention to four key points: First of all, let’s look at economics. It makes no sense to spend so much money on subsidizing fossil fuels: 550 billion USD annually, according to the International Energy Agency. This is equivalent to four times the level of official development assistance. Removing fossil fuel subsidies frees up resources to invest in sustainable development – including the SDGs I mentioned before. Second, there are large environmental benefits to reforming fossil fuel subsidies. I already mentioned climate change. Already partial reform would decrease GHG emissions by 12% by 2020. In addition, local air pollution would decrease. Thirdly, I would also like to mention the social benefits of fossil fuel subsidy reform, typically found in our partners in the developing world. Only a small subset of fossil fuel subsidies actually benefit the poorest in society. Therefore, if these subsidies are phased out – in carefully managed ways, of course – they can be re-channeled towards social goals directly. Alternatively – and now I get to my fourth point – money freed up can also be channeled towards investments in a low-carbon future. Today, four times more financial support goes to fossil fuels than to renewable energy. While fossil fuel subsidies lock us into a high-carbon future, reform levels the playing field for clean and renewable energy solutions. To conclude, fossil fuel subsidy reform is a global challenge – and a tremendous opportunity. We all need to do our share of reform to create a fair playing field for businesses to flourish in. I know this first-hand, as in Finland we are investing strongly in cleantech and the bioeconomy. On the other hand, businesses also have a stake in speaking up in favor of fossil fuel subsidy reform, which will benefit them. Thank you and I look forward to a good discussion.