Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
NCHRP 17 - 50 Lead State Initiative for Implementing the Highway Safety Manual PEER EXCHANGE 2 Kim Kolody, P.E. CH2M HILL NCHRP 17-50 • Advance the wide-spread and accurate use of the Highway Safety Manual – 2 National Peer Exchanges • August 2011 (Irvine CA) • August 2012 (Baltimore MD) – HSM User Guide With the ultimate goal of FULL institutionalization Goal of HSM Implementation • Move forward – Integration of safety in the day to day activities – Support State’s Performance Goals • Institutionalize safety culture – HSM becomes a tool routinely used by transportation/road professionals – Safety is another quantified parameter Data Tools Training, Marketing Use it & Policy Champion 5 ICT Project Focus: all aspects of implementation 6 NCHRP 17-50 HSM PX 1 Focus on safety analysis tools With TRB Safety Performance 7 NCHRP 17-50 HSM PX 2 Focus on Calibration, Data, Case Studies Included Support States National Efforts • FHWA – – – – Training HSM Implementation Guide for Managers Integration Guide HSM Case Studies • AASHTO – HSM Implementation Pooled Fund – Website upgrades • NCHRP – Calibration Guide – NCHRP 17-45, 17-54 Use of the HSM • How is the HSM being applied and how is it being used incorrectly • Barriers to implementation – – – – – – – Lack of Data Lack of financial and staff resources Getting staff to see the benefits in the use of the HSM Determining primary user of the HSM Making the HSM simple and easy to use Providing competent and well informed staff Keeping momentum in times of change • Utah - Capacity Building Optimizing use of the HSM • Calibration Session – Overview of • 1) what calibration and SPF developing mean and how they differ; • 2) SPF in the context of SafetyAnalyst (Pt B) and IHSDM (Pt C) – NCHRP 20-7 (332) – User’s Guide: Calibration of HSM SPFs – State-of-Practice Survey, Lessons Learned • Data Collection and Integration – Illinois, Virginia, Louisiana, Ohio HSM in Projects • • • • • • • Florida – Case Study Pilot Projects Missouri – State wide speed limit setting policy Louisiana – Use of IHSDM on large projects Alabama – Design Exceptions Michigan – Use of HSM in RSAs California – Safety Analysis throughout the process Washington – Use of HSM with Tribal Projects Advancing Capability • IHSDM Calibration Tool • ISATe, Freeways and Interchanges Case Studies – Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania Where do we go from here? • MAP – 21 supports performance based approaches • HSM in the project evaluation and alternatives selection • HSM in the environmental process • HSM State Specific SPFs • Continue with training! • Continue to bring in more partners Questions?