* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Probing the first stars through the abundance of metal poor stars
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Probing the first stars with metal poor stars T. Sivarani Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore Chemical abundances of metal poor stars Probing the first stars – Stellar archeology Looking for the fossil records of early star formation and Galaxy evolution In metal poor systems of Milky way and its satellite galaxies. Complementary to high redshift observations (IGM, GRB, SNs) Nature of First stars Early IMF Formation of Milky way Connection between halo stars and satellite dwarf galaxies halo stars and globular clusters Epoch of the first stars Low Metallicites in Perspective Sun Reid 2000 Definitions [Fe/H] = log(N(Fe)/N(H)) –log(N(Fe)/N(H))ʘ [Fe/H] = 0.0 Solar metallicity [Fe/H] = -1.5 Halo or (PopII) [Fe/H] ~ -2.5 Metal poor Globular clusters [Fe/H] < -2.5 Extreme metal poor (EMP) stars [Fe/H] < -5.0 Hyper metal poor (HMP) stars [C/Fe] > 0.7-1.0 Carbon enhance metal poor (CEMP) stars Metal poor DLA ~ -3.0 (Kobayashi et al. 2011) Metal poor LLS < -4.0 (Fumagali et al. 2011) Chemical tagging as tool to probe the First stars Fe-peak – SN Ia, core collapse SN, PISN (Massive and low mass stars) Alpha elements (Mg, Ca) – Core collapse SN (massive stars) s-process – AGB stars (0.8-3Msun), weak s-process in massive stars r-process – Core collapse SN (10-25 Msun) carbon – primarily low mass AGBs, fast rotating massive star wind(only in low metallicities) Nitrogen – RGB, AGB stars, massive star winds (solve the problem of primary nitrogen in IGM) Metallicity distribution of the early Halo stars Komiya et al. 2007 Pair Instability SuperNovae Heger & Woosley 2001 Carbon enhancement at low metallcities Aoki et al. (2000,2004, 2008) , Sivarani et al (2003), (2006), Lucatello et al. (2004), Goswami et al.(2005), Cohen et al.(2006), Jonsell et al (2007) [C/Fe] ~1000 EMP stars are observed in the Galactic halo. 12~25% of EMP stars show carbon enhancement (CEMP). -5 -4 -3 -2 [Fe/H] SDSS Sample SDSS calibration stars ~ 30,000 Z < 10 kpc Kinematics and abundances were derived [C/Fe] Carollo et al (2012) Sivarani, Carollo, Beers & Lai 2012 Increasing carbon rich stars at low [Fe/H] Z > 5kpc - to avoid contamination from milky way metal weak thick disk stars CEMP frequency at different Galactic scale height IMF depends on another parameter other than metallicity, Carollo et al (2012) The CMB influence the IMF of EMP stars? At low redshift, Z = Zmin = 10 K is set by metal and dust cooling. But at high z, the CMB itself is the minimum gas temperature! z = 5, 10, 20 T_CMB = 16, 30, 57 K M_c = 2, 6, 17 Msun Thus stars formed early in MW history, at z>5,should be affected Enhanced AGB fraction at low metallicity and at larger distances from the Galactic plane Tumlinson 2006 AGB yields at Z = 10^-4 (Lugaro et al 2004, Karakas & Lattanzio (2008) HBB burning AGB stars in the Halo Sivarani et al. (2007) Carbon in the inner and outer halo of the Galaxy CEMP fraction in ultra faint dwarf satellite galaxies Lai et al. 2011 Zucker et al. 2006 Carbon at high redshifts DLA at z=2.3 [Fe/H] = -3.0, [C/Fe] = 1.53 AGBs can not contribute to IGM earlier than z=1.8 (Kobayashi et al. 2011) Faint SN (with fallback)? (Nomoto et al.) Massive star wind (Meynet et al.) - Nitrogen has to be high IGM abundances Primary nitrogen production at high redshifts Globular cluster and Halo connection Globular clusters Lowest metallicity ~ -2.5 C-poor N-rich r-process similar to halo Na-O anticorrelation pollution of hydrogen burning products Halo •Extended tail ~ -5.0 many stars < -2.5 •C-normal/C-rich Indo-SA collaboration • Search for metal poor stars with 1-2m facilities in India: Target selection: GALEX, SDSS, 2MASS and WISE UVIT will be ideal with MgIIhk narrow band filter Identifying milkway substructure with UVIT: Dwarf satellites, halo streams Combining the classification based on the broad band SEDs and narrow band filters to identify over densities in RV. Identification of High velocity stars. Follow up metal poor stars: SALT RSS spectrograph -C,N, Fe-peak, alpha abundancesNH lines (3380A), CH 4350, MgH, CaII Triplet R=1000 s-process and r-process (R=10000) Multi object capabilities will be ideal to study metal poor stars in the dwarf satellites and globular clusters and streams. Indo-SA collaboration HRS at SALT • Origin of r-process – universality of r-process • U and Th abundances – cosmic chronometry • Primordial Lithium abundances - Lithium in inner and outer halo stars •Beryillum abundances in outer halo stars probing the pre-galactic magnetic fields •Oxygen, s-process and isotopic ratios NIR spectroscopy: Flourine, 17O/18O ratios massive versus IM pollution in GCs. Pb enhancement Signature of EMP AGB star CS29497-030 [Fe/H] = -2.7 [Pb/Fe] = 2.9 Binary 342 days S-process enhancement in the early Galaxy Sivarani et al. 2004 Summary Stellar archeology is an ideal tool to study, • The milestones of Early star formation First stars Transition of Top heavy to normal mode – CMB based IMF •Chemical and kinematical origin of early galaxy. •Primordial Lithium •Cosmic ray spallation and magnetfields – Beryillium 1-2m telescopes in India and UVIT Thank you! Conclusions CMB would have provided a temperature floor for the minimum gas temperature. Influenced the majority of stars formed at redshifts between z = 3-6, and probably even to higher redshift. Five signatures of CMB-regulated star formation are: 1) Higher supernova rate than predicted at high redshift 2) Systematic discrepancy between direct and indirect measurements of the high redshift star formation rate 3)Lack of surviving globular clusters that formed at high metallicity and high redshift 4) More rapid rise in the metallicity of cosmic gas than is predicted by current simulations 5) Enhancement in the abundances of α elements such as O and Mg at metallicities −2 [Fe/H] −0.5. Gradual change in the CMB-IMF evolution? Metallicities in perspective Fumagali et al (2011) S-process enhancement at low metallicities CEMP stars > -2.5 have 80% enhanced in s-process ==> AGB CEMP < -2.5 – no s-process elements ==> massive stars Further investications needed to confirm additional contribution of carbon below < -2.5 Critical metallicity Population III z~20-30 (Barakana & Loeb 2001) Mass ~106M☉ EMP star formation Zcri~10^-4 Population II Mgas~1011M☉ Talk by Komiya @first stars-III Santa Fe Outer halo – UFD satellites? Frebel & Bromm (2010) Bootes dwarf galaxymore metal Poor than the dsph, shows enhanced carbon and alpha Elements similar to MW halo Lai et al. 2011 CEMP star in SEGUE-1 System Norris et al. 2011 41 27/11/11 Pols 2007 Pols 2007 Pols 2007 Pols 2007