Download Gi-LAN Use Cases

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Network Based Services in Mobile Networks
Context, Typical Use Cases, Problem Area, Requirements
IETF 87 Berlin, 29 July 2013
BoF Meeting on Network Service Chaining (NSC)
[email protected]
[email protected]
IETF 87 - 29 July 2013
1
Context: Mobile Networks and Service Platforms
Major Building Blocks of a LTE Service Platform
LTE Control Plane
Home Subscriber System
HSS
LTE Data Plane
Policy
& Charging
Rules
Function
PDN: Packet Data Network
Mobility Management Entity
MME
eNB
eNodeB
Cell
Aggregation
Network
Backhaul
Network
PCRF
S-GW
P-GW
Serving
Gateway
Packet
Gateway
Operator
Based
Services
SGi
Network
Services
(SGi-LAN)
Internet




SG-interface is the 3GPP reference point between P-GW and Packet Data Network.
SGi protocol structure, data content, scope not specified (equal for Gi in 3G networks).
Operator based services like, VoLTE, Mail, Web, RCS-e/Joyn, SMS, MMS not in scope.
Scope here: network services like firewalls, DPI, performance enhancement proxies
for videos, TCP optimization & header enrichment, NAT, load balancers, caching, etc.
 This class of services takes care of managing network traffic and network policing.
IETF 87 - 29 July 2013
2
Context: Principle of Typical Hard-Wired SGi-LAN Services
Current Common Approach – Logical View on Typical Use Cases
Web Service for Smartphone User
APN
Web
Proxy
LB
FW
NAT
@
Fixed-Mobile-Converged Enterprise Service
APN
Mobile
Access
Router
ACL
P-GW
MPLS VPN
Operator’s IMS offer
APN
Operator’s
IMS (VoLTE)
SBC
Video Service
APN: Access Point Name
LB: Load Balancer
FW: Firewall
ACL: Access Control List
SBC: Session Boarder Controller
IMS: IP Multimedia Subsystem
OTT: Over The Top
APN
Video
Optimizer
FW
OTT
Video Service
Service related IP interface, VLAN
IETF 87 - 29 July 2013
3
Problem: Hard-Wired SGi-LAN Services
Current Common Approach – More Physical View on Typical SGi-LAN
to Internet
GW
Router
PE
Router
IP BB
to IMS
PE
Router
TCP
Optimizer
SGi
P-GW
Router
Internet
FW/NAT
DPI
LB/NAT
Performance Enhancement
Proxy (PEP)
Video
Optimizer
Roaming
FW
HTTP
Optimizer
Caches
HTTP
Proxies
 With deployment of additional value-added services increasing number of functions required
in SGi-LAN. Some functions in dedicated devices, sometimes multiple functions in one box.
 Due to fast service introduction cycles service chains emerge, growth & change evolutionary.
 Very often static IP links, policy routing, VRFs etc. used to enforce required service sequence.
 Results in steadily increasing, handcrafted complexity and decreased visibility of functional
dependencies between service chains and underlying LAN topology. Means expensive OAM.
 Practically impossible to implement automated service provisioning and delivery platform.
IETF 87 - 29 July 2013
4
Requirement: Simplicity, Flexibility, Speed, Expandability
Vision: Service Chain Abstraction and Network Compilation
1
4
2
graphs uni- or
bidirectional
•
•
6
3
Create Service Function Topology
Define Branch Conditions
5
Compiler not yet invented creates
Configuration for Service Chains
Mediation Device
1
Abstract service
Abstract link
S1
(virtual) service engine
(virtual) forwarding device
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
•
•
•
Physical Layer
IETF 87 - 29 July 2013
Preference for Telco Cloud
Forwarding Topologies for
multiple service chains
Branching rules in services
5
Requirement: High Degree of Freedom in Chain Creation
Network provides us with sufficient Metadata to differentiate
Some metadata in P-GW state
UE:
terminal type (HTC one)
IMSI (country, carrier, user)
GTP Tunnel:
eNB-ID
time
PCRF:
user
APN (service)
QoS
policy
PCRF
Gx
Load
Probe
GTP Tunnel
P-GW
SGi
PEP
User Equipment (UE)
Probes may deliver cell load,
link loads, session loads etc.
for real time network policing
BGP-TE/LS
 We may connect all relevant service functions with all relevant sources for metadata or
 We may piggyback metadata information with the IP packets traversing a service chain.
 Piggybacking metadata seems to be more straightforward than picking them out with DPI.
IETF 87 - 29 July 2013
6
Summary:
 Market dynamics accelerate need and demand for more services at an even faster rate.
 With current approaches network service LANs and their service chains become more and
more complex, error-prone, hard to manage and hard to extend. It’s a dead end street.
 Vision is to decouple creation of service topologies and their internal branching conditions
from the creation of the associated underlying packet forwarding (overlay) network.
 Operators think in terms of an ordered sequences of network services (more precisely graphs)
selected out of a service pool and define forking conditions in the service graphs based on
metadata sets including user data, related service classes, type of user equipment in use,
network conditions etc.
 (Conditional) forwarding decisions done in a network service node may allow for more real
time flexibility than more static service topology paths in an underlying network.
 We would appreciate if IETF agrees to start a WG on Network Service Chaining analyzing
requirements and specifying solutions also supporting virtualized service environments.
IETF 87 - 29 July 2013
7