Download at 2 years

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Lung Cancer
R. Zenhäusern
Lung cancer: Epidemiology

Most common cancer in the world
– 2./ 3. most cancer in men / women

1.2 million new cases / year

1.1 million deaths / year

Incidence
– Men 1940-80: 10  70/100000/J
– Women 1965-: 5  30/100000/J
Lung cancer: Epidemiology

13% of cancers,
18% of cancer deaths
Switzerland 3500 new cases / year
80% die during the first year

Prognosis remains dismal:



– five-year survival 10-14%
EVOLUTION OF CANCER DEATH RATES
80
Lung
Males
Rate per 100,000 Male Population
70
60
50
40
30
Prostate
Colon and rectum
20
Pancreas
Stomach
Esophagus
Bladder
10
0
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
Year
US data/Adapted from Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1994.
EVOLUTION OF CANCER DEATH RATES
Rate pe r 10 0,0 00 Female Pop ulation
80
Females
70
60
50
40
30
Lung
Bre ast
20
Colon and rectum
Ova ry
Pancreas
Uterus
Stoma ch
10
0
193 0
194 0
195 0
196 0
197 0
198 0
199 0
Yea r
US data/Adapted from Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1994.
Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer


75 % of all lung cancers
Majority of patients present with
stage III and IV
NSCLC: Histology

Squamos-cell carcinoma
20-25%

Adenocarcinoma
40%

Large cell carcinoma
10%
LUNG CANCER: 2-YEAR SURVIVAL
By stage and histologic type
47%
46%
43%
40%
Stage I
Stage II
Stage III
14%
12%
13% 13%
8%
6% 5%
Squamous cell
Adenocarcinoma
Large cell
4%
Small cell
Adapted from Rosenow and C arr
NSCLC: Staging

Staging Locoregional Disease:
– Chest x-ray and chest CT scan
(including liver and adrenal glands)
– No evidence of distant metastatic disease:
FDG-PET ist recommended
– Biopsy of mediastinal LN ist recommended:
CT-scan > 1.0 cm or positive on PET
neg. PET scanning does not preclude biopsy
ASCO Guideline 2004;22:330
NSCLC: Staging

Staging Distant Metastatic Disease:
– No evidence of distant metastatic disease on
CT scan of the chest: PET ist recommended
– A bone scan is optional
– Resectable primary lung lesion and bone lesion
on PET/bone scan: MRI/CT and biopsy
– Brain: CT or MRI if symptoms, patients with
stage III considered for aggressive local Th.
– Isolated adrenal mass: biopsy
– Isolated liver mass: biopsy
ASCO Guideline 2004;22:330
Staging of Lung Cancer
Stage
Local
TNM
IA
T1 No Mo
IB
T2 No Mo
IIA
T1 N1 Mo
Locally advanced
IIB
T2-3 No-1 Mo
IIIA
T1-2 N2 Mo
T3 N1-2 Mo
IIIB
AnyT N3 Mo
Advanced
IIIB
T4 any N Mo
IV
M1
1y OS
5y OS
94%
87%
89%
67%
57%
55%
73%
64%
39%
23%
32%
3%
37%
20%
7%
1%
Local NSCLC: Stage I, II





Standard of care = Surgery
Relapse rate
35%-50% in St. I
Relapse rate
40%-60% in St. II
Adjuvant radiotherapy ?
Adjuvant chemotherapy ?
Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Port meta-analysis Trialist Group. Lancet 1998;352:257
– 9 randomised trials of postoperative RT versus surgery
(2128 patients)
–
–
–
–
21% relative increase in the risk of death with RT
Reduction of OS from 55% to 48% (at 2 years)
Adverse effect was greatest for Stage I,II
St.III (N2): no clear evidence of an adverse effect
Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Conclusion
– Postoperative RT should not be used outside of a
clinical trial in Stage I, II lung cancer, unless
surgical margins are positive and repeated
resection is not feasible.
Adjuvant Chemotherapy



Undetectable microscopic metastasis at diagnosis
Individual trials have not shown a significant benefit
Meta-analysis BMJ 1995;311:899:
– Alkylating agents had an adverse effect
– Cisplatin-based therapy:
13% reduction in risk of death (not significant)
Postoperative Chemo- and Radiotherapy





ECOG-Trial: 488 patients with stage II, IIIA
RT alone (50.4 Gy) versus
RT + 4x Cisplatin/Etoposid
Median survival
TRM
Local recurrence
39 vs 38 months (ns)
1.2 vs 1.6%
13 vs 12%
Keller et al. NEJM 2000;343:1217
Cisplatin-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy
(International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaboratvie Group)

Randomised trial of 3-4 cycles of cisplatin-based
CT vs observation in patients with St. II, III LC
CT
no CT
5-Y. DFS
39.4%
34.3%
p <0.03
5-y. OS
44.5%
40.4%
p <0.03
IALT. NEJM 2004;350:351
Overall Survival (Panel A) and Disease-free Survival (Panel B)
The International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group, N Engl J Med 2004;350:351360
Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Conclusion:
– One should consider the use of adjuvant
platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with
stage I,II or IIA NSCLC
Locally advanced NSCLC


Thoracic irradiation is the mainstay of
treatment for inoperable stage III disease
Its curative potential is extremely poor
5-year survival rates 3-5%
Locally advanced NSCLC

A meta-analysis of 22 randomised studies
showed a beneficial effect of CT added to
RT
– 10% reduction in risk of death per year
– Small absolute survival benefit:
4% after 2 years
2% after 5 years
NSCLC Collaborative Group. BMJ 1995;311:899
Combined chemotherapy and radiation


Sequential strategies
– Primary CT
– Primary and adjuvant CT
C C.. R R R R R
C C.. R R R R R C C
– Daily CT
C C C C C
R R R R R
C..
R R R R R
Concomitant Strategies
– Intermittent CT

Combined Strategies
– Primary and concomitant CT
C C C C C
R R R R R
C..
R R R R R
C...
C C.. R R R R R
Therapeutic Strategies

Sequential CT–RT
+ CT in standard dose
 of micrometastasis
 volume of primary tumor
- longer treatment time
delay of RT

Concomittant C-RT
+ Improvement of local
control
(radiosensitisation)
- greater toxic effects
Reduced dose of CT
Sequential chemo- and radiotherapy


Studies performed in the 1980s did not show an
advantage
Three large phase III trials gave pos. Results
– Dillman etal. NEJM 1990;329:940
– Sause et al. JNCI 1995;87:198
– Le Chevalier et al. JNCI 1992;8:58
Sequential chemo- and radiotherapy
Dillman etal. NEJM 1990;329:940 (CALGB 8433)
2 cycles of Cis / Vbl  RT (60 Gy/6 w)
R
RT (60 Gy/6 w)
Results: Sequential CT and RT
Med. S
2y-S 3y-S 7y-S (%)
CT-RT
14 mo
26
23
17
RT
10 mo
13
11
6
Dillman etal. NEJM 1990;329:940
Dillman et al. JNCI 1996;88:1210
Results: Sequential CT and RT

US intergroup trial
Sause W. JNCI 1995;87:198
n=458
Sause W. Chest 2000;117:351
RT
2x Cis/Vbl
hyper RT

MS (mo)
11.4
13.2
12
5y-S (%)
5
8
6
French trial
Le Chevalier JNCI 1992;8:58
N=353
3x CT  RT vs RT
3y-S
12% vs 4%
Concomitant Chemo- and Radiotherapy

Simultaneous CT / RT
is beneficial in:
– Head and neck cancer
– Anal cancer
– Cervical cancer

Cisplatin is effective
as a radiosensitiser
– 6-8 mg/m2 daily
– 30 mg/m2 weekly
– 70 mg/m2 3-weekly
Concomitant CT-RT: EORTC Trial

Schaake-Koning C. NEJM 1992;326:524
331 patients randomised to one of three regimens:
– RT alone: 30 Gy in 10 fractions, 3-week rest period,
25 Gy in 10 fractions
– RT + daily cisplatin (6-8 mg/m2)
– RT + weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2)
EORTC Trial: Results
2-year Survival



RT alone:
RT + daily cisplatin:
RT + weekly cisplatin:
13%
26%
18%
Schaake-Koning C. NEJM 1992;326:524
INOPERABLE NSCLC
Survival after radiotherapy and cisplatin
100
Radiotherapy
90
Radiotherapy + cisplatin weekly
80
Radiotherapy + cisplatin daily
Survival (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
1
2
Year of Study
3
4
Adapted from NEJM.1992;326:524-530.
Sequential versus concomitant CT-RT

Japanese study:
Furuse K et al. JCO 1999;17:2692
n= 320

MS (mo)
5y-DFS
-2 cycles MVC  RT 56 Gy
13.3
19%
-MCV/RT-10 days rest-MVC/RT
16.5
27%
RTOG 9410:
n=611
2xCVRT(60Gy) vs CV/RT
Curran WJ. ASCO 2003;22:a621
OS:
4 vs 25%
p= 0.046
Neoadjuvant Therapy

Pancoast`s tumor, vertebral invasion
– Combined neoadjuvant CT-RT should be considered

Tumors with ipsilateral mediastinal spread (N2)
– Poor survival with surgery alone
– 2 small randomised trials showed a benefit of
neoadjuvant combined CT-RT
– Roth et al. JNCI 1994;86:673
– Phase II trials report good results of neoadjuvant CT§
SAKK Studies

SAKK 16/00
– Preoperative CRT vs CT in NSCLC stage IIIA
– CT: 3 cycles docetaxel and cisplatin (D1,22,43)
– RT: 3 weeks of RT (44 Gy in 22 fractions)

SAKK 16/01
– Preoperative CRT in NSCLC pts with operable
stage IIIB disease
– The same regimen as 16/00
Metastasis
40-50% at diagnosis
70% during follow-up
Chremotherapy for NSCLC

Old agents

New agents
– Cisplatin
– Docetaxel
– Carboplatin
– Paclitaxel
– Etoposid
– Vinorelbine
– Vinblastin
– Gemcitabine
– Irinotecan
NSCLC: chemotherapy combinations

Regimes

Results

Response rate 19%
– Cisplatin+Gemcitabine

Median survival 8 months
– Cisplatin+Docetaxel

– Cisplatin+Paclitaxel

– Carboplatin+paclitaxel
(n=1155 pts.)
1-year survival
2-year survival
33%
11%
Schiller et al. NEJM 2002;346:92
New agents:
Induction CT followed by
concomitant CT-RT
Induction
(2 cycles)
Concomitant
Vinorelbine
Cisplatin
25 mg/m2 D1,8,(15)
80 mg/m2 D1
Paclitaxel
Cisplatin
225 mg/m2 D1
80 mg/m2 D1
135 mg/m2 D1
80 mg/m2 D1
Gemcitabine
Cisplatin
1250 mg/m2 D1,8
80 mg/m2 D1
600 mg/m2 D1,8
80 mg/m2 D1
(2 cycles)
15 mg/m2 D1,8
80 mg/m2 D1
CALGB study 9431: Vokes et al. JCO 2002;20:4191
New agents:
Induction CT followed by
concomitant CT-RT
RR(CT) RR(CT-RT)
1yS
2yS
3yS
(%)
V+C
44% 73%
65
40
23
P+C
33% 67%
62
29
19
G+C
40% 74%
68
37
28
CALGB study 9431: Vokes et al. JCO 2002;20:4191
Conclusion: Combined-Modality Therapy for
Stage III Disease


Adding CT to radiation therapy improves survival and alters
the course of this disease
Phase III studies suggest improvement in both local control
and survival with concomitant CT-RT

Combined CT-RT should be the standard of care of patients
with good PS and minimal weight loss

The absolute gain from combined CT-RT is still modest

The role of surgery following induction CT-RT is for patients
with unresectable Cancer is being explored
Small-cell Lung Cancer
(SCLC)

15-20% of all lung cancer

Incidence: 15/100000/year

Men : women = 5 : 1
SCLC





Rapid local and metastatic spread
Mediastinal lymph node metastasis in most
cases
Median Survival in untreated patients 2-3
months
Superior vena caval obstruction and
paraneoplastic syndromes (SIADH, Cushing)
Association with smoking
SCLC Staging

Limited Disease

Extensive Disease
Confined to:
– One hemithorax
– Mediastinum
– Ipislateral hilar
and supraclavicular
nodes
– Malignant pleura
and pericard
effusion
– Contralateral hilar
and supraclavicular
nodes
SCLC Therapy

No surgery; SCLC is a systemic disease

Chemotherapy is the standard of care
– Cisplatin+Etoposid

Limited stage SCLC: Bimodality therapy
with chemotherapy and radiotherapy
SCLC Therapy

The addition of thoracic RT significantly improves
survival in patients with LS-SCLC
– Meta-analysis. Pignon et al. NEJM 1992;327:1618
– 14% reduction in the mortality rate
– 5.4% benefit in terms of OS at 3 years

Early use of RT with CT improves cure rates
SCLC Therapy


The actuarial risk of CNS metastasis developing
2 years after CR of SCLC is 35%-60%
Prophylactic cranial Irradiation is recommended
for pts. With LS-SCLC in CR
– Meta-analysis:
Auperin et al. NEJM;1999:341:475
– PCI: 5.4% greater absolute survival at 3 years
SCLC Results

Limited Disease:
–
–
–
–
–
Remission rate
CR
Median Survival
2-year Survival
5-year Survival
80-90%
50-60%
18-20 months
40%
15-25%
SCLC Results

Extensive Disease:
–
–
–
–
Remission rate
CR
Median Survival
2-year Survival
70-80%
20-30%
8-10 months
< 10%
Related documents