Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Assessing Energy Savings Potential of Products and Technologies
Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Assessing Energy Savings Potential of Products and Technologies 2004 APPA Customer Connections Conference Rob Penney WSU Energy Program The Need for Product Energy Assessments The Need Utilities need unbiased information about products & technologies when designing energy market transformation programs Utility staff are deluged by questions from vendors and customers but lack time and/or ability to assess products Some are uncomfortable with potential liability The Need More and more “smart devices” (integrated circuit logic to monitor and control lighting, motors, HVAC), which are difficult to test/verify Marketing may be misleading: • Devices for other purposes (e.g., “power conditioning”) marketed as saving energy • Exaggerated energy saving claims • Application-specific products marketed as universally effective • Testing and case studies may not be useful The Need Not cost-effective for each utility to assess a new product or technology Vendors with legitimate products lack easy and timely access to utility staff Expose “Snake oil” manufacturers quickly so conservation resources are wisely invested Encourage manufacturers to improve—and better document—energy performance of products The Need Unbiased information speeds market transformation: • Encourages utilities to incorporate promising technologies into conservation / market transformation programs, saving regional energy • Manufacturers with promising products gain market share more quickly • Avoid investing limited market transformation resources into products with unproven performance The PTR Service in the Pacific Northwest The PTR Service Product and Technology Review (PTR)—service development began in 2002 Lighting products assessed by Lighting Design Lab; others by WSU Energy Program Funded primarily by Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance Lighting Lab also supported by Seattle City Light, Puget Sound Energy, Snohomish County PUD, BC Hydro, and Tacoma Power Selecting Products to Review Nomination by NW utilities, BPA, state energy offices, or Oregon Energy Trust Selection Criteria: • Commercial and industrial technologies—either new technology not in common use in NW or older technology now marketed as having significant energy savings • Little unbiased information available • Significant electricity saving potential PTR Process Gather independent test data, engineering studies, case studies, manufacturer’s literature Assess validity of test data, case studies, engineering principles Search literature for product references Share utility information and experiences through listserv Motivating Manufacturers Communicating the Results Manufacturer/distributor contact info Product function and applications Energy saving claims Non-energy benefits Independent testing results & case studies Cost Alternative products and strategies Suggestions for further research and testing Disclaimer Fact Sheet Disclaimer Outlines intent and scope of assessment: • Not to be construed as an endorsement • Does not guarantee product performance • Assessment includes information from the manufacturer The Liability Issue Potential for litigation is a concern Steps taken to limit liability: • Perform secondary research only • Have manufacturer sign liability waiver • Carefully document and record process • Include disclaimer in fact sheet Assessments Completed MicroPlanet: home/business voltage regulators ArticMaster: refrigerant management system Energy Director: peak demand management Fan Saver: Walk-in cooler fan controller WindTree: small rooftop wind generator Assessments Proposed Nominations being considered: • A motor voltage controller • Ceramic coatings • Polarized refrigerant additive • Fan controller for walk-in coolers • A radiant heater • Power conditioning devices Possible Future Directions Depending on funding, the PTR service could: • Collaborate with other organizations • Perform primary research • Proactively identify products for review • Expand focus of review to include performance, power quality, reliability, training required, etc. • Explore impacts of the service on utility incentive programs, manufacturer documentation, etc. Summing It Up Our Vision Products with predictable and reliable energy savings are more quickly adopted Utilities and customers avoid unwise investment in products less likely to provide energy savings Manufacturers with promising products are able to gain market share and more investors Manufacturers improve testing and documentation of energy savings Our program expands through collaboration Information Wanted Share experiences of your assessment program or refer me to someone else’s Explore opportunities for collaboration and information sharing Share suggestions for Getting additional funding More effectively assisting utilities Avoiding liability Resources Pacific Northwest utilities contact: 1-800-872-3568 [email protected] www.EnergyIdeas.org Western utilities contact: The Power Line 1-800-769-3756 [email protected] www.wapa.gov/es/ Contact Information Rob Penney Senior Energy Engineer WSU Energy Program (360) 956-2053 [email protected]
