Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Small Molecule Therapeutics Inhibition of PI3K/BMX Cell Survival Pathway Sensitizes to BH3 Mimetics in SCLC Danielle S. Potter1, Melanie Galvin1, Stewart Brown1, Alice Lallo1, Cassandra L. Hodgkinson1, Fiona Blackhall2,3, Christopher J. Morrow1, and Caroline Dive1,4 Abstract Most small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients are initially responsive to cytotoxic chemotherapy, but almost all undergo fatal relapse with progressive disease, highlighting an urgent need for improved therapies and better patient outcomes in this disease. The proapoptotic BH3 mimetic ABT-737 that targets BCL-2 family proteins demonstrated good single-agent efficacy in preclinical SCLC models. However, so far clinical trials of the BH3 mimetic Navitoclax have been disappointing. We previously demonstrated that inhibition of a PI3K/BMX cell survival signaling pathway sensitized colorectal cancer cells to ABT-737. Here, we show that SCLC cell lines, which express high levels of BMX, become sensitized to ABT-737 upon inhibition of PI3K in vitro, and this is dependent on inhibition of the PI3K-BMX-AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Consistent with these cell line data, when combined with Navitoclax, PI3K inhibition suppressed tumor growth in both an established SCLC xenograft model and in a newly established circulating tumor cell–derived explant (CDX) model generated from a blood sample obtained at presentation from a chemorefractory SCLC patient. These data show for the first time that a PI3K/BMX signaling pathway plays a role in SCLC cell survival and that a BH3 mimetic plus PI3K inhibition causes prolonged tumor regression in a chemorefractory SCLC patient–derived model in vivo. These data add to a body of evidence that this combination should move toward the clinic. Introduction chemotherapy remains three decades after its introduction. A better understanding of SCLC biology, improved preclinical models, discovery of druggable targets, and biomarker-led clinical trials is warranted in this dismal disease. Hallmark genetic aberrations in SCLC involve tumor suppressors TP53 and RB1 with bi-allelic losses in 100% and 93% of the cases, respectively (10), amplification of MYC family genes (19% of patients; ref. 10) and of BCL-2 (40% patients; refs. 11, 12). Commonly recurring, druggable oncogenic drivers are elusive, although mutually exclusive mutations are observed in genes within the PI3K pathway (36% of patients; ref. 13). Three landmark studies comprehensively characterized the SCLC genomic landscape, identifying alterations in genes encoding histone modifying proteins and transcription factors, including SOX2 and NOTCH family genes (10, 14, 15). These studies revealed a mutation rate of 5.5 to 8.6 coding mutations per Mb (10, 14, 15). Only 22 of 8,000 protein coding mutations were observed in >1 SCLC tumor explaining the remarkable diversity (15). Consequently, identifying novel anticancer strategies for SCLC treatment remains challenging. Given the commonly observed upregulation of BCL-2 in SCLC (11, 12), one rational combination therapy under investigation is combining BCL-2 family apoptosis regulators with PI3K/mTOR survival signal inhibitors (14, 15). The BCL-2 family subdivides into antiapoptotic proteins, proapoptotic effectors, and proapoptotic BH3-only proteins. Proapoptotic effectors, BAX and BAK, once activated form homooligomers creating pores that drive mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and release of cytochrome c (16). The antiapoptotic subfamily (BCL-2, BCL-xL, BCL-w, MCL1, and A1) prevents MOMP via interactions with proapoptotic family members. BH3-only proteins further subdivide into activators (BIM and BID) or sensitizers (BAD, BMF, HRK, NOXA, and PUMA). Activators directly activate BAX and BAK. Activators and Small cell lung cancer (SCLC), an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor with a 5-year survival rate of <5% (1), accounts for approximately 15% of newly diagnosed lung cancer cases and approximately 200,000 deaths worldwide each year (2). Surgery is performed on <5% cases, and standard of care (SOC) is platinumbased chemotherapy combined with etoposide radiation (3). Without treatment, median overall survival (OS) of SCLC patients is 2 to 4 months (4). Treatment increases median OS to 8 to 20 months (5). Although approximately 80% patients initially respond to chemotherapy, virtually all relapse with progressive disease within 3 to 18 months (5–7). The molecular mechanisms underlying this acquired drug resistance are poorly understood (8). Approximately 20% patients are classified as chemorefractory with disease progression within 90 days of completing chemotherapy (5, 7). Multiple targeted therapies have been evaluated in SCLC, none improved patient outcomes (9), and SOC 1 Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. 2Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. 3Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. 4CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom. Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/). Corresponding Author: Caroline Dive, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom. Phone: 0044-161-446-3036; Fax: 0044-161-446-3019; E-mail: [email protected] doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6); 1–13. 2016 AACR. www.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. OF1 Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 Potter et al. sensitizers antagonize antiapoptotic family members releasing BAX and BAK for activation (17–20). The BH3 mimetic ABT-737 (developed by AbbVie) binds BCL-2 and BCL-xL (with poor affinity for MCL-1) to block BCL-2 family member interactions. In vitro, ABT-737 showed impressive single-agent efficacy across SCLC cell panels and in xenograft models (21–23), although high MCL-1 expression caused resistance (21, 22). Despite promising preclinical data (21, 23), clinical trials of Navitoclax (ABT-263, bioavailable ABT-737 analogue) as a single agent were disappointing (24), and rational combination strategies are now considered critical for progress. Phosphoinositide 3-kinases, a conserved family of lipid kinases, catalyze phosphorylation of D-3 hydroxyl groups on inositol rings of phosphatidlyinositol (Ptdlns) species. Activated class IA PI3K heterodimers (p110 catalytic and p85 regulatory subunits) transduce signals regulating cell metabolism, proliferation, polarity, and survival (25) and are implicated in tumorigenesis (26). We showed that BMX, a TEC family member of nonreceptor tyrosine kinase and seldom studied PI3K downstream effector, had an antiapoptotic function in colorectal cancer cell lines where inhibition of PI3K/BMX signaling sensitized to ABT-737 (27). BMX overexpression in SCLC H446 cells decreased doxorubicin sensitivity and upregulated BCL-2 and BCL-xL, and moreover, BMX, BCL-2, and BCL-xL levels were correlated in 75% of SCLC patient samples (28). BMX expression was higher in SCLC chemoresistant H69AR compared with parental H69 cells where BMX knockdown re-sensitized to chemotherapeutics (including cisplatin and etoposide), potentially via downregulation of BCL-xL (29). We sought validation evidence for combining BH3 mimetics with PI3K inhibitors in SCLC and examined the role of BMX downstream of PI3K using established models and a novel patient derived Circulating tumor cell–Derived eXplant (CDX; ref. 30). Materials and Methods Cell culture and drugs COR-L103 (Anne White), NCI-H82, DMS79, NCI-H187, NCI-H146, NCI-H526, NCI-H1048, NCI-H524, and DMS114 (American Type Culture Collection) cells were cultured in RPMI media (Life Technologies) with 10% FBS (BioWest). All cell lines were incubated in a humidified atmosphere at 37 C with 5% CO2. Cell lines were authenticated using AmpFlSTR every 3 months (Applied Biosystems). ABT-737 (AbbVie), PI-103, KU-0063794 (Merck), MK-2206, and Ibrutinib (Selleck) were dissolved in DMSO (10 mmol/L; Sigma) and stored at 20 C. Navitoclax (AbbVie) was formulated in 4 C in 10% ethanol, 30% polyethylene glycol 400 (Sigma), and 60% Phosal 50 PG (American Lecithin Company). GDC-0941 (Lancrix Chemicals) was stored at 20 C in 10% DMSO, 5% Tween 20 (Sigma), and 85% sterile saline. Once formulated, Navitoclax and GDC-0941 were stored at room temperature (RT) for up to 7 days. Generation of CDX2 and CDX tumor dissociation CDX2 tumors (previously described; ref. 30) were disaggregated (gentleMACS dissociator/human tumor kit; Miltenyi Biotec) immediately after sacrifice of the mouse host when tumors reached 400 mm3. Red blood cells were lysed (RBC lysis buffer; G-Biosciences), remaining cells were filtered (through 70 mm pores), and cell viability was checked (trypan blue exclusion). CDX2 cells were maintained in the culture conditions as described above. OF2 Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 Drug concentration responses and drug treatments H1048 and DMS114 cells were seeded at 7,300 cells/well, H526 cells at 14,000 cells/well, H146 cells at 15,000 cells/well, and disaggregated CDX2 cells at 5,000 cells/well (96-well plates). Twenty-four hours after seeding, cells were treated and cultured for 72 hours. H1048 and DMS114 adherent cells were stained with sulforhodamine B (SRB), whereas H146, H526, and CDX2 cell suspensions were assessed by resazurin assay (previously described; ref. 31). To determine log GI50, log drug concentration was plotted against absorbance for nonlinear curve fit analysis (Prism, GraphPad Software). For display purposes, drug concentration was plotted versus normalized absorbance. Statistical analysis was carried out on three independent log GI50 readings and transformed to [GI50]. To assess BCL-2 family expression, PI3K or apoptotic pharmacodynamic biomarkers after drug treatment, cells were plated at 106 cells/well (6-well plate), and 24 hours later, cells were treated with [GI50] for 4 or 24 hours. Measurement of mitochondrial cytochrome c release H526, H1048, and DMS114 cells (106) were pelleted and washed in PBS after drug treatment(s). Cells were resuspended and incubated in DTEB buffer [135 mmol/L trehalose, 10 mmol/L HEPES, 20 mmol/L EDTA, 20 mmol/L EGTA, 5 mmol/L succinate acid, 0.1 % BSA, and 50 mmol/L KCl in sterile ddH2O at pH 7.5 (KOH)] and 0.002% digitonin for 15 minutes at RT. Cells were fixed with formaldehyde (1% final concentration) at RT for 15 minutes in the dark and then diluted with 2:1 with neutralizing buffer (1.7 mol/L Tris and1.25 mol/L glycine at pH 9.1) at RT for 15 minutes in the dark. Fixed cells were stained with cytochrome c antibody (1:400, Alexa 488, Clone 6 h2.b4; BD Biosciences) diluted in staining buffer [1% saponin/10% bovine serum albumins (Sigma) in sterile ddH2O] overnight at 4 C and analyzed next day by flow cytometry (BD LSRFortessa analyzer) using Diva software (BD Biosciences). In vivo efficacy of GDC-0941 and Navitoclax In vivo procedures were carried out in accordance with Home Office Regulations (UK) and the UK Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research guidelines using approved protocols (Home Office Project Licence no. 70/8252 reviewed by Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body). In vivo research was reported according to ARRIVE (Animal Research Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines (2010). H1048 xenografts were grown by s.c. injection of 5 106 cells in 0.2 mL of 1:1 RPMI:Matrigel (BD Biosciences) into the mid-dorsal flank of 8-week-old female SCID-beige mice (C.B-17/IcrHsd-PrkdcscidLystbg-J; Harlan Laboratories). Tumor fragments of passage 4 CDX2 were implanted s.c into 8-weekold female SCID-beige mice. Six mice were housed together in vented caging systems in a 12-hour light/12-hour dark environment and maintained at uniform temperature and humidity. Mice were monitored biweekly for signs of tumor growth, and once a palpable tumor formed, it was measured biweekly using callipers. Tumor volume was calculated as 0.5 (longest measurement) (shortest measurement)2. Seven days after implantation, mice bearing H1048 xenografts of 150 to 250 mm3 were randomized into 4 groups of 10 mice. Eleven weeks after implantation of CDX2 fragments, mice bearing tumors of 150 to 250 mm3 were randomized into 4 groups of 6 mice. Treatment groups for both H1048 xenograft and CDX2-bearing mice Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 PI3K/BMX Combination with BH3 Mimetic in SCLC were: vehicle, 75 mg/kg GDC-0941, 100 mg/kg Navitoclax, 75 mg/kg GDC-0941, and 1 hour later 100 mg/kg Navitoclax. Treatments were administered by oral gavage for 21 days. Tumor measurements were continued 3x a week until tumor reached four times initial tumor volume (4xITV) or the mouse had been on study for 6 months. DMS79; Supplementary Fig. S1B). The combination of PI3K/BMX inhibitors with ABT-737 was assessed in H526, H1048, and DMS114 (BMX expressing) or H146 and H524 (BMX not expressed). The H1048 SCLC cell line harbors an oncogenic activating mutation in PIK3CA, the remainder are PIK3CA wild-type (33). RNA interference siRNA SMARTpools or individual oligos (Supplementary Table S1; Thermo Scientific) were transfected into H1048 cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were transfected in 6-well plates, reseeded into appropriate culture vessels 24 hours later, and drug treated after 24 hours. PI3K/BMX pathway inhibition sensitized SCLC cell lines to ABT-737 PI-103, a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, was used to inhibit PI3K signaling (34). The TEC kinase inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765; ref. 35) was used to inhibit BMX (similar potency against Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase, its primary target). PI-103 and Ibrutinib were assessed in combination with ABT-737. All 4 SCLC cell lines were responsive to PI-103 in either the SRB assay (adherent cells), which measures cellular biomass, or the resazurin assay (suspension cells), which measures metabolic activity. PI-103 [GI50] was 175 nmol/L in H1048, 300 nmol/L in H526, 330 nmol/L in DMS114, 30 nmol/L in H146, and 449 nmol/L in H524 cells (Supplementary Fig. S2). Dephosphorylation of AKT and S6 was observed in response to PI-103 [GI50], confirming PI3K pathway inhibition in H1048, H526, and DMS114 but not in H146 cells which expressed less phospho-AKT but more phospho-S6 (compared with untreated) indicating incomplete PI3K pathway inhibition (Fig. 1A). SCLC cell lines were less sensitive to Ibrutinib; [GI50] was 4 mmol/L in H1048, 15 mmol/L in H526, 12 mmol/L in DMS114, 8 mmol/L in H146, and 12 mmol/L in H524 cells (Supplementary Fig. S2). Ibrutinib treatment inhibited phosphorylation of AKT and S6 in H1048 and H526, but had a similar effect to PI-103 in H146 cells (Fig. 1A). Ibrutinib had no effect on phospho-AKT and phospho-S6 levels compared with untreated DMS114 cells (Fig. 1A). To determine whether PI3K/BMX pathway inhibition affected sensitivity to ABT-737, H1048, H526, DMS114, H146, and H524 cells were treated concomitantly with PI-103 or Ibrutinib and/or ABT-737. All cell lines exhibited a concentration-dependent response to ABT-737 alone (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Fig. S3) consistent with previous studies (21, 22). ABT-737 [GI50] was reduced significantly in a concentration-dependent manner by PI103 or Ibrutinib in H1048 and H526 but not in DMS114 and H146 cells (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Fig. S4), revealing that sensitization to ABT-737 to PI3K pathway inhibition was cell context dependent. PI3K pathway inhibition sensitized to ABT-737 irrespective of PIK3CA mutation status confirming findings in colorectal cancer cells (27). Western blotting Western blotting was performed as previously described (32). Primary antibodies used were as follows: rabbit anti-AKT, rabbit anti-pS473 AKT, rabbit anti-pT308 AKT, rabbit anti-BAX, rabbit anti-BIM, rabbit anti–cleaved caspase 3, rabbit anti-PARP, rabbit anti-S6, rabbit anti-pS235/236 S6 (Cell Signaling Technology), mouse anti–BCL-2 (Dako), rabbit anti–BCL-xL, mouse anti-BMX, mouse anti–MCL-1 (Becton Dickenson), rabbit anti-BAD (R&D Systems), mouse anti-BAK, mouse anti–a-tubulin (Merck), mouse anti-Actin, and rabbit anti-PUMA (Sigma). Phospho-kinase array BMX knockdown and inhibition of the PI3K pathway (4-hour Ibrutinib treatment) were determined by Western blot using PI3K pathway pharmacodynamic biomarkers: rabbit anti-pS473AKT and rabbit anti-pS235/236S6. Lysates from nontargeting RNAi, BMX RNAi, or Ibrutinib-treated cells were then applied to a phospho-kinase array according to the manufacturer's instructions (# ARY003B; R&D System). Statistical analysis Statistical analysis of significant differences for in vitro studies comparing treated and control groups was performed using unpaired, two-tailed t tests. Mouse survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier analysis; the log-rank test was used to compare survival distributions. One-way ANOVA multiple comparisons analysis was used to distinguish multiple drug treatment group effects on tumor-doubling time using GraphPad Prism software. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results BMX expression in SCLC Inhibition of PI3K/BMX pathway signaling sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to ABT-737 (27). We reasoned that other cancer cell types that express high levels of BMX may also employ this survival pathway, and combined PI3K inhibitor and BH3 mimetics would prove beneficial. BMX mRNA expression data (850 cancer cell lines) were obtained from the Broad Institute's Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. BMX mRNA was expressed at low levels in the majority of cancer cell lines, although for some cancer types, specific cell lines had particularly high BMX expression. Most notable was SCLC with the top three BMX-expressing cell lines (H211, H526, and CORL311; Supplementary Fig. S1A). We examined BMX protein expression across a panel of 9 SCLC cell lines; five expressed BMX (H526, H1048, DMS114, H82, and www.aacrjournals.org PI3K pathway inhibition enhanced ABT-737–induced apoptosis We sought to confirm that increased sensitivity to ABT-737 in H1048 and H526 cells treated with PI-103 or Ibrutinib was due to increased apoptosis. DMS114 cells (which showed no combination response below 10 mmol/L) were included as a negative control. The effect of PI-103 only, Ibrutinib only, ABT-737 only, PI-103 plus ABT-737, or Ibrutinib plus ABT-737 on cytochrome c release was determined by flow cytometry (Fig. 2A). As single agents, neither PI-103 or Ibrutinib caused significant mitochondrial cytochrome c release in H1048 and H526 compared with untreated cells; ABT-737 released cytochrome c in 20% of H1048 (P ¼ 0.011) and 11% of H526 cells (P ¼ 0.0007). ABT-737– induced apoptosis increased significantly when combined with Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. OF3 Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 Potter et al. Figure 1. PI3K/BMX pathway inhibition sensitized H1048 and H526 cells to ABT-737. A, Western blot of pharmacodynamic biomarkers of PI3K/BMX pathway inhibition after 4-hour treatment with pathway inhibitors. H1048 cells (0.1 mmol/L PI-103 or 4 mmol/L Ibrutinib), H526, DMS114 (0.25 mmol/L PI-103 or 8 mmol/L Ibrutinib), H146 cells (0.025 mmol/L PI-103 or 8 mmol/L Ibrutinib), or DMSO control. Data are representative of three independent experiments. B, H1048, H526, DMS114, and H146 cells were treated with PI103, Ibrutinib, or DMSO control and ABT-737 for 3 days. H1048 and DMS114 cells were assessed by SRB assay, and H526 and H146 were assessed by resazurin assay. Absorbance (SRB, 540 nm) or fluorescence (resazurin) relative to untreated (UnT) cells was determined relative to PI-103, Ibrutinib, or DMSO only–treated cells as appropriate for individual concentration response curves. Data represent mean, n ¼ 3 independent experiments in triplicate SEM. either PI-103 or Ibrutinib compared with ABT-737 alone in H1048 and H526 cells (Fig. 2A). Cytochrome c release was not detected in DMS114 cells with any single agent or combination OF4 Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 (Fig. 2A). PI-103 and Ibrutinib treatment alone did not increase cellular levels of cleaved caspase 3 or cleaved PARP in H1048 and H526 cells. ABT-737 alone did increase these apoptosis Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 PI3K/BMX Combination with BH3 Mimetic in SCLC Figure 2. PI3K/BMX inhibition increases ABT-737–induced apoptosis in sensitive SCLC cell lines. H1048 cells (0.1 mmol/L PI-103, 4 mmol/L Ibrutinib, 2 mmol/L ABT-737), H526 and DMS114 (0.25 mmol/L PI-103, 8 mmol/L Ibrutinib, 4 mmol/L ABT-737) cells were treated with single agents or ABT-737 in combination with PI-103 or Ibrutinib for 4 hours. A, cytochrome c release as a measure of apoptosis. Data are mean, n ¼ 3 independent experiments SEM. , P < 0.01; and , P < 0.001, according to two-tailed unpaired t test. B, Western blot for levels of cleaved caspase 3 and cleaved PARP. Data are representative of three independent experiments. C, Western blot of MCL1 and a-tubulin (loading control) for H1048 cells treated with 0.1 mmol/L PI-103, 4 mmol/L Ibrutinib, 0.5 mmol/L MK-2206, and 0.25 mmol/L KU0063794 or DMSO equivalent for 24 hours. D, Western blot of MCL-1 levels in H1048 cells transfected with SMARTpool siRNA targeting MCL-1 mRNA or nontargeting control 48 hours after transfection. Data are representative of three independent experiments. E, effect at 3 days of a single agent or combination on H1048 cells treated 48 hours after transfection to knock down MCL-1. Cells were assessed as in Fig. 1B. Mean, n ¼ 3 independent experiments in triplicate SEM. biomarkers that were increased further when ABT-737 was combined with either PI-103 or Ibrutinib (Fig. 2B). No cleaved caspase 3 or cleaved PARP was observed with any treatment of DMS114 (Fig. 2B). These data suggest that the increased ABT-737 sensitivity caused by PI-103 or Ibrutinib treatment in H1048 and H526 cells was due to increased apoptosis. PI-103 sensitizes to ABT-737 independent of MCL-1 The PI3K pathway regulates multiple BCL-2 family members, including BIM (36), BAD (37), and MCL-1 (38), and we hypothesized that changes in expression of these proteins could contribute to ABT-737 sensitization. The effect of PI-103, Ibrutinib, MK2206 (allosteric AKT inhibitor), and KU-0063794 (ATP competitive mTORC1/2 inhibitor) treatment on expression levels of 8 BCL-2 family members, including BIM, BAD, and MCL-1, was assessed after 24 hours of treatment in H1048, H526, and DMS114 cells. No change in expression of any of these BCL-2 www.aacrjournals.org family members after treatment with PI3K pathway inhibitors was seen (Supplementary Fig. S5A). MCL-1 is an established resistance factor of ABT-737 and Navitoclax efficacy (22, 23) and is downregulated by mTOR signaling leading to Navitoclax sensitization (39). Although PI3K pathway inhibitors did not downregulate MCL-1 in H1048 cells (Fig. 2C), the mTOCR1/2 inhibitor AZD8055 can downregulate H1048 cell MCL-1 (39). We investigated whether PI-103 treatment could further sensitize to ABT-737 when MCL-1 was reduced by RNAi cells as this would imply inhibition of PI3K signaling can sensitize to ABT-737 independently of MCL-1. As expected, MCL-1 RNAi sensitized H1048 cells to ABT-737. However, PI-103 caused a 4.1- and 9.1-fold sensitization to ABT-737 in control cells and MCL-1 RNAi cells, respectively (Fig. 2D and E and Supplementary Fig. S6A), suggesting a MCL-1–independent component to this further increase in sensitivity. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. OF5 Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 Potter et al. Figure 3. BMX RNAi does not further sensitize PI-103–treated H1048 cells to ABT737. A–C, cells were transfected with SMARTpool siRNA or individual siRNA oligos targeting BMX mRNA or nontargeting control (NT). A, fortyeight hours after transfection, cells were treated with ABT-737 for 3 days. Cells were processed as in Fig. 1B. Mean, n ¼ 3 independent experiments in triplicate SEM. B, Western blot of BMX levels 48 hours after transfection in BMX and NT RNAi cells. Data are representative of three independent experiments. C and D, forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were treated with 0.1 mmol/L PI-103 or DMSO equivalent and the indicated concentration of ABT-737 for 3 days. Cells were processed as in Fig. 1B. C, data are mean, n ¼ 3 independent experiments in triplicate SEM. D, ABT-737 GI50 values SEM. , P < 0.05 according to two-tailed unpaired t test; NS, not significant. E, phospho-antibody array showing alterations in signaling pathways in BMX RNAi (BMX), nontargeting RNAi control, and Ibrutinib-treated cells highlighting seven key phosphorylation sites. Each antibody in the phospho-antibody array was carried out in duplicate spots. F, semiquantitative analysis of phospho-antibody array data in E for the seven indicated phosphorylation sites. PI-103 does not further sensitize BMX RNAi cells to ABT-737 To determine whether BMX inhibition sensitized to ABT-737 downstream of PI3K, the effect of BMX RNAi combined with PI103 treatment on ABT-737 sensitivity was assessed in H1048 cells. Cells were transfected with SMARTpool siRNA targeting BMX mRNA or individual siRNA oligos of the SMARTpool. BMX RNAi cells were treated with ABT-737 (Fig. 3A), and BMX knockdown confirmed by Western blot (Fig. 3B). SMARTpool siRNA and oligos 1 and 3 caused a significant ABT-737 sensitization OF6 Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 (Supplementary Fig. S6B; P ¼ 0.033, 0.006, and 0.037, respectively) and gave the greatest degree of BMX knockdown (consistent with previous observations in colorectal cancer cells; ref. 27). If BMX acts downstream of PI3K, then BMX RNAi should not significantly further sensitize PI-103–treated cells to ABT-737. H1048 cells were transfected with either siRNA-targeting BMX or nontargeting control siRNA and treated concomitantly with PI-103 and/or ABT-737 (Fig. 3C). As expected, BMX RNAi and PI-103 treatments alone significantly sensitized to ABT-737. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 PI3K/BMX Combination with BH3 Mimetic in SCLC PI-103–treated cells were not significantly further sensitized to ABT-737 by knockdown of BMX (Fig. 3D and Supplementary Fig. S6C). These data suggest that BMX acts downstream of PI3K in a prosurvival signaling pathway. A phospho-kinase array carried out in BMX RNAi cells or Ibrutinib-treated cells confirmed that BMX regulates AKT/mTOR pathway signaling in H1048 cells (Fig. 3E and F). This array also suggested that BMX may regulate STAT3 in these cells (Fig. 3E and F) consistent with previous research (40). ABT-737 sensitization by PI3K pathway inhibition is AKT and mTOR dependent in SCLC We next investigated AKT/mTOR pathway signaling to determine whether inhibition sensitizes to ABT-737 in SCLC. Cell lines showed mixed sensitivity to the allosteric AKT inhibitor MK-2206, but were all responsive to the ATP competitive mTORC1/2 inhibitor KU-0063794 (Supplementary Fig. S2). The [GI50] of MK-2206 was 500 nmol/L in H1048, 250 nmol/L in H526, 8.8 mmol/L in DMS114, 12.8 mmol/L in H146, and 7 mmol/L in H524 cells. The [GI50] of KU-0063794 was 200 nmol/L in H1048, 400 nmol/L in H526, 400 nmol/L in DMS114, 350 nmol/L in H146, and 610 nmol/L in H524 cells. A decrease in AKT and S6 phosphorylation confirmed inhibition of the PI3K pathway with MK-2206 and KU-0063794 treatment in H1048, H526, and DMS114 cells (Fig. 4A; Supplementary Fig. S2). KU-0063794 treatment inhibited the PI3K pathway in H146 cells, but MK2206 treatment decreased phospho-AKT and increased phosphoS6 (Fig. 4A) consistent with what was observed with PI-103 and Ibrutinib inhibitors (Fig. 1A). All cell lines were treated concomitantly with MK-2206 and/or ABT-737, or with KU-0063794 and/or ABT-737. In H1048, H526, and H524 but not in DMS114 and H146 cells, ABT-737 [GI50] was reduced significantly in a concentration-dependent manner by MK-2206 or KU-0063794 (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Figs. S3 and S4). These data suggest that PI3K pathway inhibition can sensitize H1048 and H526 cells to ABT-737 via both BMX (Figs. 1B, 2A–C, and 3A–C) and AKT/mTOR-dependent (Fig. 4B) mechanisms, and this is cell context dependent. Effect of combined PI3K inhibition and BH3 mimetic in vivo PI-103 and ABT-737 are not orally bioavailable so GDC-0941, a clinically relevant class I PI3K inhibitor (currently in clinical trials; clinicaltrials.gov), and Navitoclax (used for phase II trials in SCLC; ref. 24) were used for in vivo studies. The combination was well tolerated in SCID-beige mice with an average body weight decrease of 5.3% after 21 days of treatment which rapidly recovered after treatment ceased (Supplementary Fig. S7). The combination efficacy was assessed in mice bearing H1048 xenografts. Mice bearing H1048 xenograft reached 4xITV in 9 and 14 days for vehicle and single-agent GDC-0941 or Navitoclax, respectively. When GDC-0941 and Navitoclax were combined, there was a significant increase in days taken for tumor growth to reach the specified end point (32 days) compared with either drug alone or the vehicle group (Vehicle, P¼0.0001; GDC-0941, P¼0.001; Navitoclax, P ¼ 0.001 according to log-rank test; Fig. 5A–C). The combination significantly increased tumor-doubling time compared with vehicle and either drug alone (Fig. 5D). Navitoclax alone caused increased level of apoptosis compared with vehicle control after 24 hours, which was further enhanced by combining with GDC-0941 (Fig. 5E and F). GDC-0941, alone or in combination with Navitoclax, caused downregulation of phospho-S6 www.aacrjournals.org after 4 hours of treatment, consistent with its primary pharmacology (Fig. 5E and G). The clinical relevance of long-established SCLC cell lines is open to question (41), and SCLC patient–derived xenografts (PDX) have been demonstrated to better reflect the underwhelming clinical results seen with single-agent Navitoclax (42). To expand our results to a model that more accurately effects patients tumors, we assessed efficacy of GDC-0941 and Navitoclax in a SCLC CDX2 derived from circulating tumor cells (CTC) enriched prior to the donor patient's chemotherapy (30). This is a high hurdle for drug development as SCLC cells that derived the model had already invaded tissue, were disseminating, and were tumorigenic in the mouse. CDX mouse models mirror the subsequent chemotherapy response of the donor patient (30). CDX2 was derived from a chemorefractory patient whose disease progressed throughout treatment. Treatment of CDX2 with cisplatin/etoposide delayed tumor growth by only 19 days (30). Initial ex vivo culture experiments suggested that disaggregated CDX2 cells were sensitive to ABT-737 and that sensitivity was enhanced by cotreatment with PI-103 (Fig. 6A). The efficacy of GDC-0941 and Navitoclax alone and in combination was assessed in mice bearing CDX2 tumors. The combination caused the greatest effect compared with either drug alone or vehicle (Vehicle, P ¼ 0.0002; GDC-0941, P ¼ 0.0003; Navitoclax, P ¼ 0.033 according to log-rank test; Fig. 6B–D). In the combination group, no tumors reached 4xITV over the experimental time course, and mean maximum tumor regression was 94%. Navitoclax alone had a significant effect on tumor growth compared with vehicle and GDC-0941 (Vehicle, P ¼ 0.0005; GDC-0941, P ¼ 0.010 according to log-rank test; Fig. 6D), although only one tumor failed to reach 4xITV over the experimental time course. Mean maximum tumor regression was 80%, but tumors began to regrow as soon as the Navitoclax treatment was ceased, whereas in the combination group, tumors began to regrow only approximately 30 days after treatment cessation (Fig. 6B), and one mouse in the combination group had no detectable tumor at end of the experiment (Fig. 6C). GDC-0941 caused a significant decrease in phospho-S6 at 4 hours, and the combination caused more apoptosis at 24 hours after treatment (Fig. 6E–G). These data suggest that combined GDC0941 and Navitoclax is more efficacious in vivo than either drug alone and could prove a beneficial rational combination in SCLC patients, including chemorefractory patients. Discussion Improved outcomes for SCLC patients remain elusive, despite numerous clinical trials of targeted therapeutics. New approaches that extend progression-free survival after initially successful chemotherapy and alternatives to chemotherapy in chemorefractory SCLC are urgently required. We demonstrate that inhibition of PI3K pathway signaling can increase the sensitivity of SCLC cells (H1048 and H526) to a BCL-2/BCLxL targeting BH3 mimetic via increased apoptosis. Our data in SCLC cell lines in vitro were recapitulated in vivo in the H1048 xenograft and a newly developed CDX from a chemorefractory patient (43). These data provide additional weight to an increasing body of evidence to suggest SCLC clinical trials of combined PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibitors and BH3 mimetics are warranted. There appear to be, however, multiple PI3K downstream effector signaling networks and modulation of different BCL-2 family proteins that affect PI3K/mTOR inhibitor/BH3 mimetic synergy that are cell context dependent. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. OF7 Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 Potter et al. Figure 4. AKT/mTOR pathway inhibition sensitized H1048 and H526 cells to ABT-737. A, Western blot for pharmacodynamic biomarkers of PI3K pathway signaling in H1048 cells (treated with to 0.5 mmol/L MK-2206 and 0.25 mmol/L KU-0063794), H526 cells (treated with to 0.25 mmol/L MK-2206 and 0.4 mmol/L KU0063794), DMS114 cells (treated with 8 mmol/L MK-2206 and 0.4 mmol/L KU0063794), and H146 cells (treated with 8 mmol/L MK-2206 and 0.4 mmol/L KU0063794) or DMSO control for 4 hours. Data are representative of three independent experiments. B, H1048, H526, DMS114, and H146 cells were exposed to the indicated concentration of either MK-2206 and KU-0063794 or DMSO equivalent and the indicated concentration of ABT-737 for 3 days. Cells were processed as in Fig. 1B. Data are mean, n ¼ 3 independent experiments in triplicate SEM. In our study, increased sensitivity to combined PI3K inhibition and BH3 mimetic was dependent on BMX, AKT, and mTOR downstream of PI3K. Our data suggest for the first time that BMX can regulate AKT/mTOR pathway activity in SCLC. Both inhibition of BMX using Ibrutinib (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. S4B) OF8 Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 and reduction of BMX level by RNAi (Fig. 3E and F Supplementary Fig. S4B) reduced activation of pathways downstream of BMX, including AKT and mTOR, consistent with on target effects. The mechanism by which BMX regulates AKT/mTOR signaling in SCLC is not yet clear, but precedents that link BMX to AKT/mTOR Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 PI3K/BMX Combination with BH3 Mimetic in SCLC Figure 5. Effect of GDC-0941 and Navitoclax in combination in vivo in the H1048 xenograft model. A, mean relative tumor growth (10 animals per treatment group) up to the day the first animal in that treatment group reached the predefined 4 initial tumor volume (ITV) endpoint. B, relative tumor volumes for individual animals within each treatment group. C, Kaplan–Meier survival curve with endpoint of 4 ITV. GDC-0941/ Navitoclax combination was significant compared with all other treatment groups, P < 0.0001 calculated by log-rank test. D, tumordoubling time for vehicle, GDC-0941, Navitoclax, and GDC-0941/Navitoclax groups. GDC-0941/Navitoclax combination tumor-doubling time was significant compared with all other treatment groups; , P < 0.0001 according to one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons. E–G, pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Twenty SCID-beige mice were 6 implanted with 5 10 H1048 cells and randomized into 8 groups of 5 mice when tumors size reached between 3 150 and 250 mm . Group 1 and 5 vehicle only, group 2 and 6 GDC-0941 only, group 3 and 7 Navitoclax only, and group 4 and 8 GDC-0941, and 1 hour later Navitoclax. Groups 1 to 4 were culled 4 hours after dosing, and groups 5 to 8 were culled 24 hours after dosing. E, tumors were stained for either cleaved caspase 3 (CC3, 24 hours) or phosphoS235/236-S6 (pS6, 4 hours). Scale bar, 50 mm. F and G, semiquantitative analysis of IHC for CC3 and pS6, respectively. , P < 0.05; , P < 0.01; and , P < 0.001. signaling exist in other cell types (43, 44). Addressing the mechanistic role for BMX in regulating this signaling axis may aid in development of predictive biomarkers as well as unveil a new therapeutic opportunity for the treatment of SCLC. We observed a significant increase in apoptosis 4 hours after combined drug treatment in vitro, suggesting that drug synergy www.aacrjournals.org most likely involves posttranslational modification(s) due to PI3K inhibition. BMX was identified as the tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates BAK, keeping it in the inactive conformation (45). BMX inactivation by PI3K/BMX inhibitors could therefore lead to BAK dephosphorylation in SCLC. In this theoretical model, addition of ABT-737 by antagonism of BCL-2, BCL-xL, Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. OF9 Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 Potter et al. Figure 6. Effect of GDC-0941 and Navitoclax in combination in CDX2 derived from CTCs from a chemorefractory SCLC patient. A, CDX2 tumors were disaggregated and 24 hours later treated with indicated concentration of drug for 3 days. Cells were analyzed as in Fig. 1B. Data are mean, n ¼ 3 independent experiments SEM. B, CDX2 mean relative tumor growth curves. All groups were treated every day for 21 days (orange arrow indicates last day of dosing), and the predefined endpoint was 4 initial tumor volume (4 ITV) or when the mouse had been on study for 6 months. No animals reached 4 ITV in the GDC0941/Navitoclax combination group. C, relative tumor volumes for individual animal within each treatment group. D, Kaplan–Meier survival curve for predefined endpoint of 4x ITV. GDC-0941/ Navitoclax combination was significantly compared with all other treatment groups (Vehicle, P < 0.0002; GDC-0941, P <0.0003; Navitoclax, P < 0.033 according to log-rank test). E, pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Animals were culled 4 or 24 hours after administration of a single dose of indicated compounds. Tumors were stained for either cleaved caspase 3 (CC3) or phosphoS235/236-S6 (pS6). Scale bar, 50 mm. F and G, semiquantitative analysis of IHC for CC3 and pS6, respectively. , P < 0.05; , P < 0.01; and , P < 0.001. or BCL-w would release BIM to activate available dephosphorylated BAK, resulting in BAK homo-oligomerization, MOMP, cytochrome c release, and apoptosis, and this warrants further investigation. Depending on cellular context, upregulation of PI3K signaling may allow cells to sustain proliferation without growth factors and resist cell death, two hallmarks of cancer (46, 47). OF10 Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 Of the two cell lines which were sensitized to ABT-737 by PI3K or BMX inhibition, only H1048 has a known activating PI3K pathway mutation (although we cannot rule out that H526 cells have activated PI3K signaling via a mechanism yet to be determined). Although CDX2 does not harbor known PI3K pathway mutations, one copy of chromosome 10 has been lost (30), which could decrease PTEN expression and Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 PI3K/BMX Combination with BH3 Mimetic in SCLC increase PI3K signaling (Supplementary Fig. S8 shows CDX2 expression of BMX and PI3K/AKT pathway components). BMX is important in mutant PIK3CA-induced transformation via phosphorylation (on Y705) and activation of STAT3 causing homo- and hetero-dimerization to activate STAT3 transcriptional regulator function (40). Consistent with this function of BMX, we observed decreased phospho-STAT3 (Y705 and S727) in BMX-depleted and Ibrutinib-treated H1048 cells (Fig. 3E and F). mTOR can phosphorylate and activate STAT3 (on S727; ref. 48). One hypothesis therefore is that PI3K/BMX/mTOR inhibition sensitizes to ABT-737 via repression of STAT3. STAT3 is a key regulator of BCL-xL expression, a key target of ABT-737 (49). However, no treatment effects on BCL-xL expression were noted by 24 hours (Supplementary Fig. S4A). PI3K pathway inhibition-mediated sensitization to ABT-737 has been shown in other cancer types, including our study in colorectal cancer cell lines, which showed this occurs via a PI3K/BMX pathway–dependent but AKT/mTOR-independent route (27). PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway–dependent sensitization to ABT-737/Navitoclax has been seen in non–small cell lung cancer (50) and lymphoma (51) cell lines. Two recent studies demonstrate that PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition sensitizes to BH3 mimetics in SCLC, consistent with our observations. There are both similarities and differences in the mechanism(s) underpinning the combination synergies observed between the two prior studies and the results we present here. Gardner and colleagues showed that mTOCR1 inhibitor rapamycin increased efficacy of ABT-737 in H146 cells and in several PDX models (52). In the Gardner and colleagues (15) study, rapamycin prevented ABT-737–mediated downregulation of BAX resulting in increased BAX-dependent apoptosis. BAX protein levels were not decreased in H1048, H526, or DMS114 cells after treatment with PI3K pathway inhibitors (PI-103, MK2206, or KU-0063794) in our study (Supplementary Fig. S4A), consistent with observations of Faber and colleagues in H1048 cells and in a PDX model using the TORC1/2 inhibitor AZD8055 (39). Moreover, we saw no synergy in H146 cells treated with ABT-737 plus any of the PI3K pathway inhibitors we examined. In our hands, PI-103, Ibrutinib, and MK-2206 resulted in mTOR pathway activation (increased pS6) in H146. Faber and colleagues report a different mechanism to explain how AZD8055 sensitizes to Navitoclax in SCLC cell lines, xenografts, a PDX, and a genetically engineered model (14). They demonstrated in H1048 cells that AZD8055 sensitizes to Navitoclax, consistent with our finding for all PI3K pathway inhibitors in the same cell line (Figs. 1B and 4B). However, they showed that sensitization was via MCL-1 downregulation, which was not observed in H1048 cells or any cell line used in our study (Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. S4A), or in the cell line panel and PDX studied by Gardner and colleagues (15), Faber and colleagues address this issue suggesting that as an mTORC1/2 ATP competitive inhibitor, AZD8055 is uniquely capable of downregulating MCL-1, unlike rapamycin (14). This explanation does not reconcile our data using KU-0063794 which is also an mTORC1/2 ATP competitive inhibitor, but did not decrease MCL-1 levels in H1048 cells (at the concentration and time-points studied). We show that enforced downregulation of MCL-1 with RNAi does indeed sensitize to ABT-737 in H1048 cells, but that sensitivity was significantly further increased by PI-103, suggesting a MCL-1– independent element for this effect (Fig. 2D and E and Supplementary Fig. S5A). www.aacrjournals.org Approximately 20% SCLC patients are classified as chemorefractory, where disease progression occurs within 3 months of ceasing chemotherapy (5, 6). We assessed combined GDC0941 and Navitoclax in CDX2 derived from CTCs enriched at baseline from a patient subsequently shown to be chemorefractory to set a 'high hurdle' for this combination. We previously showed that cisplatin (5 mg/kg day 1) plus etoposide (8 mg/kg, days 1, 2, 3) administered to mice bearing CDX2 tumors (at 200–250 mm3) regressed to approximately 50%, but regrew within the subsequent 10 days at a rate not dissimilar to vehicle-treated controls, mirroring the response and rapid relapse of the patient. Here, we show, dosing CDX2 bearing mice up to 21 days, that GDC-0941 alone slowed CDX2 growth and Navitoclax alone caused tumor regression during the dosing period, but with immediate regrowth after treatment ceased. However, the combination gave a durable regression >30 days after treatment. These data from a chemorefractory model of SCLC provide some optimism that the PI3K pathway/ BH3 mimetic combination may have impact in the most resistant cases of SCLC. Our study with that of Gardner and colleagues (52) and Faber and colleagues (39) suggest that there are different mechanisms downstream of PI3K signaling that suppress BH3 mimetic– induced apoptosis; we introduce a new component, BMX, that acts downstream of PI3K and upstream of Bcl-2 family gatekeepers of apoptosis. Overall, despite cell line and pathway inhibitor–dependent differential mechanisms, the efficacy of GDC-0941 and Navitoclax in a CDX model derived from a chemorefractory patient highlights the potential clinical utility of this combination and strongly supports initiation of a clinical trial with a BH3 mimetic and a PI3K pathway inhibitor in SCLC patients. Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. Authors' Contributions Conception and design: D.S. Potter, C.J. Morrow, C. Dive Development of methodology: D.S. Potter, C.L. Hodgkinson Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): D.S. Potter, M. Galvin, S. Brown, A. Lallo, C.L. Hodgkinson, F. Blackhall Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): D.S. Potter, A. Lallo, C.J. Morrow, C. Dive Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: D.S. Potter, M. Galvin, F. Blackhall, C.J. Morrow, C. Dive Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): D.S. Potter, C.L. Hodgkinson Study supervision: D.S. Potter, C.L. Hodgkinson, C.J. Morrow, C. Dive Acknowledgments The authors thank John Brognard, Kristopher Frese, and Stuart Williamson for constructive advice. Grant Support C. Dive received CRUK core funding (C5759/A20971). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Received October 30, 2015; revised February 24, 2016; accepted March 10, 2016; published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. OF11 Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 Potter et al. References 1. American Cancer Society. Lung cancer (small cell). 2016[cited 2016 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/ 2. Arriola E, Canadas I, Arumi M, Rojo F, Rovira A, Albanell J. Genetic changes in small cell lung carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 2008;10:189–97. 3. Hansen HH, Dombernowsky P, Hirsch FR. Staging procedures and prognostic features in small cell anaplastic bronchogenic carcinoma. Semin Oncol 1978;5:280–7. 4. Kato Y, Ferguson TB, Bennett DE, Burford TH. Oat cell carcinoma of the lung. A review of 138 cases. Cancer 1969;23:517–24. 5. Lally BE, Urbanic JJ, Blackstock AW, Miller AA, Perry MC. Small cell lung cancer: Have we made any progress over the last 25 years? Oncologist 2007;12:1096–104. 6. Huisman C, Postmus PE, Giaccone G, Smit EF. Second-line chemotherapy and its evaluation in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 1999;25:199–206. 7. Fujii M, Hotta K, Takigawa N, Hisamoto A, Ichihara E, Tabata M, et al. Influence of the timing of tumor regression after the initiation of chemoradiotherapy on prognosis in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer achieving objective response. Lung Cancer 2012;78:107–11. 8. De Ruysscher D, Pijls-Johannesma M, Bentzen SM, Minken A, Wanders R, Lutgens L, et al. Time between the first day of chemotherapy and the last day of chest radiation is the most important predictor of survival in limiteddisease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1057–63. 9. Arcaro A. Targeted therapies for small cell lung cancer: Where do we stand? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015;95:154–64. 10. George J, Lim JS, Jang SJ, Cun Y, Ozretic L, Kong G, et al. Comprehensive genomic profiles of small cell lung cancer. Nature 2015;524:47–53. 11. Ikegaki N, Katsumata M, Minna J, Tsujimoto Y. Expression of bcl-2 in small cell lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 1994;54:6–8. 12. Jiang SX, Sato Y, Kuwao S, Kameya T. Expression of bcl-2 oncogene protein is prevalent in small cell lung carcinomas. J Pathol 1995;177:135–8. 13. Umemura S, Mimaki S, Makinoshima H, Tada S, Ishii G, Ohmatsu H, et al. Therapeutic priority of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in small cell lung cancers as revealed by a comprehensive genomic analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2014;9:1324–31. 14. Peifer M, Fernandez-Cuesta L, Sos ML, George J, Seidel D, Kasper LH, et al. Integrative genome analyses identify key somatic driver mutations of small-cell lung cancer. Nat Genet 2012;44:1104–10. 15. Rudin CM, Durinck S, Stawiski EW, Poirier JT, Modrusan Z, Shames DS, et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis identifies SOX2 as a frequently amplified gene in small-cell lung cancer. Nat Genet 2012;44:1111–6. 16. Letai AG. Diagnosing and exploiting cancer's addiction to blocks in apoptosis. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:121–32. 17. Chen L, Willis SN, Wei A, Smith BJ, Fletcher JI, Hinds MG, et al. Differential targeting of prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins by their BH3-only ligands allows complementary apoptotic function. Mol Cell 2005;17:393–403. 18. Chipuk JE, Moldoveanu T, Llambi F, Parsons MJ, Green DR. The BCL-2 family reunion. Mol Cell 2010;37:299–310. 19. Chonghaile TN, Letai A. Mimicking the BH3 domain to kill cancer cells. Oncogene 2008;27Suppl 1:S149–57. 20. Kuwana T, Bouchier-Hayes L, Chipuk JE, Bonzon C, Sullivan BA, Green DR, et al. BH3 domains of BH3-only proteins differentially regulate Baxmediated mitochondrial membrane permeabilization both directly and indirectly. Mol Cell 2005;17:525–35. 21. Oltersdorf T, Elmore SW, Shoemaker AR, Armstrong RC, Augeri DJ, Belli BA, et al. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Nature 2005;435:677–81. 22. Tahir SK, Yang X, Anderson MG, Morgan-Lappe SE, Sarthy AV, Chen J, et al. Influence of Bcl-2 family members on the cellular response of small-cell lung cancer cell lines to ABT-737. Cancer Res 2007;67:1176–83. 23. Shoemaker AR, Mitten MJ, Adickes J, Ackler S, Refici M, Ferguson D, et al. Activity of the Bcl-2 family inhibitor ABT-263 in a panel of small cell lung cancer xenograft models. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:3268–77. 24. Rudin CM, Hann CL, Garon EB, Ribeiro de Oliveira M, Bonomi PD, Camidge DR, et al. Phase II study of single-agent navitoclax (ABT-263) and biomarker correlates in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:3163–9. 25. Engelman JA. Targeting PI3K signalling in cancer: opportunities, challenges and limitations. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:550–62. OF12 Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 26. Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet 2006; 7:606–19. 27. Potter DS, Kelly P, Denneny O, Juvin V, Stephens LR, Dive C, et al. BMX acts downstream of PI3K to promote colorectal cancer cell survival and pathway inhibition sensitizes to the BH3 mimetic ABT-737. Neoplasia 2014;16:147–57. 28. Guo L, Chen P, Zhou Y, Sun Y. Non-receptor tyrosine kinase Etk is involved in the apoptosis of small cell lung cancer cells. Exp Mol Pathol 2010; 88:401–6. 29. Guo L, Zhou Y, Sun Y, Zhang F. Non-receptor tyrosine kinase Etk regulation of drug resistance in small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:636–41. 30. Hodgkinson CL, Morrow CJ, Li Y, Metcalf RL, Rothwell DG, Trapani F, et al. Tumorigenicity and genetic profiling of circulating tumor cells in small-cell lung cancer. Nat Med 2014;20:897–903. 31. Harrison LR, Micha D, Brandenburg M, Simpson KL, Morrow CJ, Denneny O, et al. Hypoxic human cancer cells are sensitized to BH-3 mimeticinduced apoptosis via downregulation of the Bcl-2 protein Mcl-1. J Clin Invest 2011;121:1075–87. 32. Martin-Fernandez C, Bales J, Hodgkinson C, Welman A, Welham MJ, Dive C, et al. Blocking phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in colorectal cancer cells reduces proliferation but does not increase apoptosis alone or in combination with cytotoxic drugs. Mol Cancer Res 2009;7:955–65. 33. Forbes SA, Beare D, Gunasekaran P, Leung K, Bindal N, Boutselakis H, et al. COSMIC: Exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D805–11. 34. Hayakawa M, Kaizawa H, Kawaguchi K, Ishikawa N, Koizumi T, Ohishi T, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives as novel PI3 kinase p110alpha inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 2007;15:403–12. 35. Honigberg LA, Smith AM, Sirisawad M, Verner E, Loury D, Chang B, et al. The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor PCI-32765 blocks B-cell activation and is efficacious in models of autoimmune disease and B-cell malignancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:13075–80. 36. Brunet A, Bonni A, Zigmond MJ, Lin MZ, Juo P, Hu LS, et al. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell 1999;96:857–68. 37. Datta SR, Dudek H, Tao X, Masters S, Fu H, Gotoh Y, et al. Akt phosphorylation of BAD couples survival signals to the cell-intrinsic death machinery. Cell 1997;91:231–41. 38. Letai A. Growth factor withdrawal and apoptosis: the middle game. Mol Cell 2006;21:728–30. 39. Faber AC, Farago AF, Costa C, Dastur A, Gomez-Caraballo M, Robbins R, et al. Assessment of ABT-263 activity across a cancer cell line collection leads to a potent combination therapy for small-cell lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:E1288–96. 40. Hart JR, Liao L, Ueno L, Yates JR3rd, Vogt PK. Protein expression profiles of C3H 10T1/2 murine fibroblasts and of isogenic cells transformed by the H1047R mutant of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K). Cell Cycle 2011; 10:971–6. 41. Daniel VC, Marchionni L, Hierman JS, Rhodes JT, Devereux WL, Rudin CM, et al. A primary xenograft model of small-cell lung cancer reveals irreversible changes in gene expression imposed by culture in vitro. Cancer Res 2009;69:3364–73. 42. Hann CL, Daniel VC, Sugar EA, Dobromilskaya I, Murphy SC, Cope L, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of ABT-737, a selective inhibitor of BCL-2, in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 2008;68:2321–8. 43. Zhang R, Xu Y, Ekman N, Wu Z, Wu J, Alitalo K, et al. Etk/Bmx transactivates vascular endothelial growth factor 2 and recruits phosphatidylinositol 3kinase to mediate the tumor necrosis factor-induced angiogenic pathway. J Biol Chem 2003;278:51267–76. 44. Chau CH, Chen KY, Deng HT, Kim KJ, Hosoya K, Terasaki T, et al. Coordinating Etk/Bmx activation and VEGF upregulation to promote cell survival and proliferation. Oncogene 2002;21:8817–29. 45. Fox JL, Storey A. BMX negatively regulates BAK function, thereby increasing apoptotic resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. Cancer Res 2015;75: 1345–55. 46. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000;100:57–70. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 PI3K/BMX Combination with BH3 Mimetic in SCLC 47. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011;144:646–74. 48. Yokogami K, Wakisaka S, Avruch J, Reeves SA. Serine phosphorylation and maximal activation of STAT3 during CNTF signaling is mediated by the rapamycin target mTOR. Curr Biol 2000;10:47–50. 49. Lesina M, Kurkowski MU, Ludes K, Rose-John S, Treiber M, Kloppel G, et al. Stat3/Socs3 activation by IL-6 transsignaling promotes progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and development of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 2011;19:456–69. www.aacrjournals.org 50. Qian J, Zou Y, Rahman JS, Lu B, Massion PP. Synergy between phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway and Bcl-xL in the control of apoptosis in adenocarcinoma cells of the lung. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:101–9. 51. Ackler S, Xiao Y, Mitten MJ, Foster K, Oleksijew A, Refici M, et al. ABT-263 and rapamycin act cooperatively to kill lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:3265–74. 52. Gardner EE, Connis N, Poirier JT, Cope L, Dobromilskaya I, Gallia GL, et al. Rapamycin rescues ABT-737 efficacy in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 2014;74:2846–56. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6) June 2016 Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. OF13 Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 Inhibition of PI3K/BMX Cell Survival Pathway Sensitizes to BH3 Mimetics in SCLC Danielle S. Potter, Melanie Galvin, Stewart Brown, et al. Mol Cancer Ther Published OnlineFirst March 29, 2016. Updated version Supplementary Material E-mail alerts Reprints and Subscriptions Permissions Access the most recent version of this article at: doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885 Access the most recent supplemental material at: http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2016/03/26/1535-7163.MCT-15-0885.DC1 Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal. To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on June 12, 2017. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.