Download AS and A-level Sociology Transcript Globalisation in sociology

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Index of sociology articles wikipedia , lookup

Sociology of culture wikipedia , lookup

Third culture kid wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Podcast 2: AS and A-level
Sociology
Transcript: Globalisation in sociology
Hello and welcome to AQA’s sociology podcast aimed at supporting your teaching of our new AS and
A-level Sociology specifications. This podcast aims to give you an overview and guidance on delivering
the concept of globalisation to your AS and A-level students.
The first thing to point out is that the concept of globalisation is now important in each topic area of the
specifications. In the legacy specification globalisation was only part of some topic areas, such as
Crime and deviance and Global development, but now integrating it into your teaching of topics such as
Education, and Families and households may well be something you haven’t done before. This podcast
will focus first on the concept of globalisation itself, and then on ways in which you can incorporate it
into your new schemes of work.
Globalisation became a popular idea, both in sociology and more widely, towards the end of the
twentieth century. There were several reasons for this, including advances in travel and in
communications and media technology; distant parts of the world were brought into greater contact with
each other. It became clear that many issues and problems, including economic and environmental
ones, were global in scale and that governments and people of the world would have to work together.
The idea that we all share one small planet became popular, helped by, for example, the famous
‘Earthrise’ image of the planet from space.
While the term globalisation is new, global or international approaches are nothing new in sociology; the
founding fathers all looked well beyond their home countries. It has become conventional to talk about
globalisation having three main aspects: cultural, political and economic. While the cultural aspects are
the ones that are most central to sociology’s traditional concerns, globalisation is best studied in an
interdisciplinary way, drawing on other social sciences.
Most sociologists agree that what we can call generic globalisation has been happening. There is plenty
of evidence in, for example, the global origins of the food and other products we consume, our
awareness of events and life in distant places and the ease and low cost of communications. But
beyond this there are disagreements. There are continuing linked debates about globalisation: about
how it should be defined, how long it has been going on, who benefits from it and who loses out,
whether overall it’s a good thing or not and whether it can be slowed or reversed. Due to the different
positions sociologists take on these issues and the different combinations of views possible, it’s not as
easy to classify the positions of sociologists and others as it sometimes is with other topics.
Broadly speaking, however, we can say that there are globalists, those who see globalisation as a new
and overwhelmingly important development of our age, transforming social life; and others, sometimes
referred to as traditionalists, who are more sceptical and see globalisation today as the latest stage in a
long historical process and one which has not gone as far as the globalists claim.
Globalists tend to see globalisation as the global spread of capitalism. Some globalists are neo-liberals.
Advocates of the free market argue that bringing the whole world into the capitalist system will create
growth and that through the ‘trickle down’ effect even poorer people in poorer countries will see their
lives improve. But there are also those who take a radical view, negative globalists, who see the global
spread of capitalism as only leading to intensified exploitation of people and degradation of the
environment. For them, globalisation means a growing global divide between rich and poor. Capitalism
takes with it as it spreads globally, a materialistic, consumerist lifestyle which will wipe out traditional
values; this is the cultural imperialist view. Your students may be interested here in attempts such as
the New Economics foundation’s happy planet index or Bhutan’s gross national happiness to try to
measure the well-being of societies by looking beyond the material.
Not all see globalisation as inevitably having positive or negative effects. If globalisation is a juggernaut,
as a common metaphor suggests, perhaps we can steer it in a direction we choose.
Transformationalists see globalisation as changing the world but not in pre-determined ways. For
example, where the global pessimists see Western or American culture obliterating all in its path, they
point to the hybrid and creole adaptations, to the popularity of, for example, aspects of Eastern culture
in the West such as Bollywood, yoga, ‘ethnic’ jewellery and clothing, and Japanese children’s
characters such as Pokemon. They suggest that what happens when two cultures meet may be a
dynamic blending or transformation.
Many writers on globalisation emphasise that its effects can be seen locally, this is referred to as
glocalisation. The complexity of globalisation can be seen in the way that although there is evidence of
the creation of a homogenised global culture, there is also evidence of heterogeneity, with greater
interaction between cultures and greater diversity. To take a well-used example, McDonalds can spread
globally so that its golden arches are recognised everywhere, but it has to adapt what it sells and the
way it operates to local conditions; in India for example where for Hindus cows are sacred, there is no
market for beef burgers.
Globalisation has met with resistance. In both more and less economically developed countries, many
people want to retain what they see as their traditional culture and identity, resisting the influence of
American or Western culture, of the English language and so on and asserting their local culture and
language. This has been particularly noticeable in the Middle East and parts of Africa where rejection of
Western influence has been accompanied by assertions of an Islamic identity (rather than on identity
based on nation state or ethnicity). Elsewhere, people develop strong collective identities. In Scotland
and Catalonia, British and Spanish identities respectively have weakened. Manuel Castells has usefully
suggested three types of collective identity in the globalised world today: legitimate identities, such as
citizenship, promoted by states but excluding for example non-citizens; resistance identities, where
marginalised groups reject the stigmatisation of their identity; and project identities, where alternative
identities are constructed. The latter include global movements such as environmentalism, which give
people around the world a shared ‘green’ identity.
Globalisation has not been a smooth or continuous process, and some writers have suggested that
globalisation slowed or even halted in the early twenty first century. The global economic downturn
since 2008 has affected international trade and reined in the global ambitions of some corporations.
Terrorism and concerns about climate change may slow down international travel. The world’s
countries often fail to act together in the face of global threats and the United Nations is a long way from
being a world government.
Globalisation is an established aspect of the second year of the A-level topics such as Beliefs, Global
Development, Mass Media, Crime and Deviance and Stratification and Differentiation, and it’s likely
teachers have incorporated globalisation into their teaching of these topics for some years. The rest of
this podcast will therefore concentrate on the optional topics in the AS and A-level.
For Education, sociology students will benefit from being able to see the British education system in a
global context. For example, they could learn about alternative teaching methods, such as those from
China featured in the August 2015 BBC TV documentary Are Our Kids Tough Enough?: Chinese
School and they could discuss the relative methods of teaching approaches. Comparisons with other
countries can be made too as the UK government has done, in wanting to emulate Finland’s education
policies. Such comparisons can show that the basics of the UK system, the ages at which people start
and end their schooling, the reliance on testing, privatisation and marketisation and the low status of
vocational education, are not inevitable.
You could look at the UK’s ranking in PISA (the Programme for International Student Assessment) or
other international rankings. The data on the PISA website, giving test results every three years for 15
year olds in 65 different countries, is very relevant for critical sociological analysis. Students can be
guided to recognising, for example, that the UK has been less successful than some other countries in
raising the achievement of the economically disadvantaged, but that it has a good record in the
achievement of first and second generation immigrants, especially in maths.
There is also now the development of a global education market; UK universities, educational
publishers and others now seek a global market. Students can also discover how, while there has been
progress towards the Millennium development goal of primary education for all, many children are still
not in school in less economically developed countries and others leave having achieved little because
of poor quality resources and teaching. There has also been a reaction against Western style education
in some countries; for example in Afghanistan where the Taliban try to prevent the education of girls,
and in Nigeria where the extremist Islamic group Boko Haram (which is usually translated as ‘Western
education is sinful’) have targeted schools in terrorist attacks.
For Families and households, sociology students need to be able to see British families and households
in a global context. The nuclear family, often thought of as the ‘normal’ family, is far from the norm
elsewhere. Students have often learned about, for example, polygamous marriages, early on in this
topic and there is an opportunity now to expand this and to make international comparisons on, for
example, ages at which males and females marry and the number of children they have.
Globalisation is included in the specifications in the context of demographic trends. As well as
awareness of how trends in the UK have been influenced by migration (for example, immigration of
working age adults has contributed to a rise in the birth rate) students will benefit from, for example,
looking at why the UK population is expected to continue to grow, while population growth will slow or
halt in some other Western European nations. The ageing population is a Western phenomenon and
students will understand it better through comparison with countries with younger average populations
such as many in Africa. Demographic trends everywhere are affected by increasing migration, which is
a central feature of globalisation. The UK has many diaspora communities with strong links to their
countries of origin, often with significant money transfers going to family members there. Migration has
also changed in that a growing proportion of migrants are female – migration has been feminised, with
many women from poorer countries working in low paid service jobs, such as childcare and domestic
work, in the West.
For Culture and identity, globalisation is mentioned specifically in relation to identities. Cultural
influences on lifestyles and use of the internet and social media bring young people in Britain and
elsewhere into daily contact with changes arising from globalisation. More and more people have
complex hybrid identities, as a result of migration or of having families from more than one culture.
Many migrants move from country to country, without settling or assimilating, relying on diasporic
networks; they develop what Thomas Hylland Erikson calls ‘transnational identities’. Globalisation can
undermine identities based on class, ethnicity, nationality and gender as it leads to a more complex and
diverse world.
For Health, the specifications refer to the globalised health industry. Our National Health Service
illustrates the global nature of health care; from its beginnings it has depended very heavily on doctors
and nurses from other countries. There are huge differences between countries when it comes to health
care. The Ebola outbreak of 2014 showed how few doctors, nurses and hospital beds the three affected
countries (Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone) had. These countries wouldn’t have controlled Ebola
without the World Health Organisation, volunteers from other countries (including the UK) and non-profit
organisations such as Médecins Sans Frontières also known as Doctors Without Borders. Yet some
less economically developed countries, notably Cuba, have excellent health care and relatively high life
expectancy, showing that the outcomes are to some extent the result of the priorities countries set
themselves.
Another aspect of global health is the power of transnational pharmaceutical companies. ‘Big Pharma’,
as Ben Goldacre has called them in his book which exposes malpractice even to the extent of inventing
illnesses to sell more drugs. Students could also usefully consider Wilkinson and Pickett’s view of the
relationship between health and income inequality, comparing the UK with other countries.
For Work, poverty and welfare, effects of globalisation are referred to in relation to the significance of
work and worklessness and people’s life chances, but students will also benefit from studying poverty
and welfare globally. Globally wealth and income inequality have both increased over the last few
decades, as has happened in the UK. At the global level Marxists would point to the role of
transnational corporations, moving to where wages are lowest so that poor countries compete to
undercut each other. In relation to work, students can consider the ways in which employment in the UK
has been affected by the new international division of labour and the movement of production to where
costs are lower, leading to the closing down of large sections of British industry. At the same time new
jobs have been created in the UK in finance and service industries, but these jobs are highly dependent
on global connections. The experience of work has changed too, with greater standardisation, the
breaking up of work into small discrete tasks and greater surveillance; George Ritzer has described
these changes as McDonaldisation.
Whichever topic you are tackling, you’re likely to find that your students are aware of empirical evidence
and examples of globalisation from their own experiences; giving them the sociological concepts to
contextualise these can lead to a greater understanding of the ways the world is changing and to
greater insights.
Thank you for listening to this instalment in AQA’s series of sociology podcasts. We hope that this has
helped to effectively introduce concepts of globalisation to you and ideas of how you could embed it in
your topics. If you have any questions feel free to contact us by phone on 01483 477 822 or email us at
[email protected]. Thank you and goodbye.