Download Finisar Presents: Optics, Optical Fibers, and Transceivers

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Finisar Presents:
Optics, Optical Fibers, and Transceivers
Optics 101
March 2011
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
Optics, Optical Fiber, & Transceivers
‹
Part 1 – Optics
ƒ Reflection & Refraction
ƒ Index of refraction
‹
Part 2 – Optical Fiber
ƒ Fiber construction
ƒ Multi mode fiber
ƒ Single Mode fiber
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
2
Optics, Optical Fiber, & Transceivers
‹
Part 3 - Optical
p
Transceiver
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Transceiver module architecture & construction
Transmitter
Receiver
Optical sub-assemblies (OSA)
Tx / Rx performance figures of merit
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
3
Optics, Optical Fiber, & Transceivers
‹
Part 4 –Power Budget,
g , References
ƒ Power (link) budgets
ƒ References
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
4
Why Fiber Optics?
‹
Bandwidth is a compelling reason
1970’s – Copper cable, 672 simultaneous data streams, with 2 km spacing
between amplification points
Today – With a single fiber, in excess of 130,000 simultaneous data streams,
with 60 km spacing between amplification points
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
5
Why fiber optics?
ƒ Low loss - Flat attenuation (loss) across frequency
ƒ Electromagnetic immunity - No radiation or absorption of
electromagnetic energy
ƒ Light weight - Copper co-ax cable can weigh 9 times as much
as fiber cable
ƒ Small size - A smaller diameter fiber cable provides more
bandwidth than a larger copper cable
ƒ Safety - No electrical hazard
hazard, no spark potential
ƒ Security - Extremely difficult to “fiber tap”
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
6
Part 1 – Optics
‹
Reflection and Refraction
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
7
Optics - Reflection & Refraction
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
“Speed of light” = 3 x 105 km/sec (186,000 miles per
second) in a vacuum
Light travels at different speeds in different materials;
speed is material dependent
Different wavelengths of light travel at different speeds in
the same material; speed is wavelength dependent
Light traveling at an angle from one material to a different
material changes direction
This change of direction is known as refraction
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
8
Optics - Refraction
n1
n2
Light traveling at an angle from one material to a different
material changes direction
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
9
Optics - Refraction
n1
n2
‹
‹
Light traveling at an angle from one material to a different
material changes direction
For a given material, different wavelengths of light travel at
diff
different
t speeds;
d speed
d iis wavelength
l
th d
dependent
d t
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
10
Optics - Index of Refraction
‹
Index of refraction n, n = c/v, where:
ƒ c = velocity
l it off light
li ht iin ffree space
ƒ v = velocity of light in a specific material
‹
Index of refraction for selected media:
Material
Index (n)
Light Velocity (km/s)
1.0
300,000
1.0003
300,000
Water
1.33
225,000
Fused Quartz
1.46
205,000
Glass
1.5
200,000
Silica
1.52
198,000
Vacuum
Air
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
11
Optics – Refraction and Reflection
‹
‹
‹
greater than
critical angle
For n1 greater than n2:
Incident light at the critical
angle is not refracted into
material
i l n2
2
critical angle
n1
n2
Incident light greater than the
critical angle does not pass
into material n2, but is
reflected within material n1
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
12
Optics - Reflection
Example:
θc = 80.6°
80 6°
n1 = 1.48, n2 = 1.46
θc = arcsin (1.48 / 1.46)
n1
θ2 = 90°
n2
θc = 80.6°
80 6°
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
13
Optics - Reflection
‹
Where index of refraction n1 is greater than n2, total
internal reflection will occur if θ is greater that the
“critical angle”
n1
n2
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
14
Optics - Reflection Example
Cladding n2
Core n1
Cladding n2
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
15
Part 1 – Q&A
Q: Why is fiber so attractive?
A: Bandwidth
Q: Name one advantage of fiber over copper, besides bandwidth
A: Low loss, EM immunity, light weigh, small size, no electrical hazard,
secure
Q: What is the speed of light in a vacuum?
A: 300,000 km/hr or 186,000 miles per second
Q: Light traveling thru material n1, which is greater than n2, does not
refract from n1 into n2, but reflects back into n1. What is this called?
A: Total internal reflection
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
16
Part 2 – Optical Fiber
‹
‹
‹
Fiber construction
Multi mode fiber
Single mode fiber
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
17
Optical Fiber
‹
Concentric layers
ƒ Core
ƒ Cladding
ƒ Jacket
‹
The index of refraction, n, of the core (n1) is greater than
the cladding (n2)
Jacket
Cladding
Core
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
Cross-section view
18
Optical Fiber
‹
Two p
primary
y types
yp of fiber
ƒ Multi mode fiber
ƒ Single mode fiber
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
19
Multi mode fiber
Core is 50 μm to 62.5 μm, cladding is 125 μm (point of reference: human
hair is about 100 μm)
‹ Multiple
M lti l light
li ht modes
d propagate
t thru
th the
th fiber.
fib
Diff
Differentt modes
d ttravell
different paths, some longer than others, resulting in a spreading of the light
pulse - modal dispersion
‹
Cladding
Cl
ddi
core
cladding
‹
M d l di
Modal
dispersion
i iis a performance
f
lilimiting
iti ffactor
t iin multi
lti mode
d fib
fiber
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
20
Dispersion – pulse spreading
‹
‹
‹
Input pulses are separate and distinct
Output pulses exhibit pulse spreading, leading to pulse
overlapping; pulses become indistinguishable from each other
Bandwidth of the fiber decreases as dispersion
p
increases
Input pulses
1
2
Output pulses
3
Spreading caused by dispersion
1
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
2
3
Signal loss
21
Single mode fiber
‹
‹
Core is approx. 9 μm, cladding is 125 μm
Core is sized proportionately (9 μm) to the wavelength (1100 nm and
above) as to only propagate one mode efficiently
cladding
core
cladding
‹
Modal dispersion does not exist in single mode fiber
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
22
Dispersion in single mode fiber
‹
Chromatic (material) dispersion
ƒ Chromatic dispersion is the result of different
wavelengths traveling at different speeds
1310 nm
1309.5 nm
Chromatic (material)
dispersion is a
performance limiting
factor in single mode
fiber
1310.5 nm
Laser emission
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
23
Attenuation
Attenuation is the loss of optical power as light travels thru the fiber
‹
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Varies with wavelength
g
Constant across frequency (unlike copper cable)
To minimize attenuation, use a source (laser) that emits in the low-loss
region of the fiber
8
6
4
2
Attenuation (d
dB/km)
Atten
nuation (d
dB/km)
multi mode fiber
single mode fiber
4
3
2
1
850
1310
Wavelength (nm)
850
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
1310
Wavelength (nm)
24
Attenuation – two primary contributors
‹
Scattering
ƒ
ƒ
‹
Loss off optical
L
ti l energy d
due tto iimperfections
f ti
iin fib
fiber
Light becomes multi-directional
Absorption
ƒ
Impurities in the fiber absorb optical energy
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
25
Summary – fiber, dispersion, and attenuation
‹
Multi mode fiber
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
‹
Single mode fiber
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
‹
Modal dispersion is the performance limiting factor
Chromatic (material) dispersion exists, but is not significant
Multi mode fiber is used for short distance links (up to 500 meters at
850 nm and Gigabit frequencies) due to bandwidth limitation caused
b modal
by
d l di
dispersion
i
Modal dispersion does not exist
Chromatic (material) dispersion is a performance limiting factor
Single mode fiber is used for long distance links (up to 80+ km), at
1310 nm and 1550 nm
Multi mode and single mode fibers and transceivers are
generally not interchangeable
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
26
Part 2 – Q&A
Q: What are the two primary types of optical fiber?
A: Multi mode and single mode
Q: What color is the jacket of single mode fiber?
A: Yellow
Q: How many modes propagate thru a single mode fiber?
A: One
Q: In what fiber does modal dispersion become a performance limiting factor?
A: Multi mode fiber
Q: What happens if n1 is LESS THAN n2?
A The light refracts into the cladding,
A:
cladding and does not propagate thr
thru the core
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
27
Part 3 – Optical Transceivers
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Module architecture
Transmitter
Optical sub assemblies
Transmitter characteristics
Transmitter eye pattern
Receiver
Receiver characteristics & eye pattern
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
28
Basic Module Architecture
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
29
Transceiver Architecture
‹
‹
‹
Differential signaling used to minimize EM emissions to
prevent:
ƒ Crosstalk – coupling of (e.g.) Tx signal to Rx circuit in
module, which reduces sensitivity of receiver
ƒ EMI – electromagnetic interference affecting the
customer’s box; undesirably high emissions from the
transceiver
Laser Driver IC converts differential input signal into a
current capable of driving the laser
TOSA converts electrical signal to light (laser) and couples
the light into optical fiber via lens
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
30
TOSA Architecture
TOSA Port
Cross-Section
Fiber Bore
Coupling Lens
Fiber Stop
Header/Can Assembly
fitted with window
(aka “Laser”)
Laser Die
(sealed inside can)
Electrical Leads (die is wire bonded
to the tops of leads inside can)
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
31
Laser characteristics
light L
current I
I th
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
32
Laser driver output current
time t
current swing
g
current I
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
33
Laser driver and laser performance
L
Tx
data “1”
P
Tx = fiber-coupled optical power
Pave = average optical power
ave
data “0”
0”
Ith
I
t
I
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
34
Laser output as digital optical signal
L
Tx
data “1”
P
L
1
1
1
ave
data “0”
0”
0
Ith
1
I
0
0
941 ps bit period
for 1.0625
1 0625 Gb/s
0
Time
t
I © 2011 Finisar Corporation
35
Building an eye pattern
L
Tx
data “1”
P
L
ave
data “0”
0”
Ith
I
Time
t
I
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
36
Building an eye pattern
L
Tx
data “1”
P
L
ave
data “0”
0”
Ith
I
Time
t
I
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
37
Transmitter eye pattern
Pave
OMA
Jitter
‹
Average power (Pave)
‹
Optical modulation amplitude (OMA, in μW)
‹
Jitt (i
Jitter
(in ps))
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
38
Transmitter eye pattern
Jitter
‹ Jitter
ƒ
ƒ
Deterministic jitter– caused by dispersion in fiber
fiber, and
inadequate bandwidth of transceiver components
Random jitter– caused by thermal noise, shot noise in
components
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
39
Transmitter eye pattern - mask
‹
Objective – no “mask
mask hits
hits”
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
40
Transmitter Characteristics
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Tx Power = fiber-coupled optical power
Optical Modulation Amplitude (OMA) = difference in power
between “1” and “0” bits
“Eye
Eye Diagram”
Diagram = useful mathematical construct for
assessing digital signal quality, comprising 1000s (or more)
of bits overlapped in time to one bit period
Jitter = “thickness” of 0-to-1 and 1-to-0 transitions in eye
diagram; an indication of instability in the bit period
Eye Mask = keep out zone in eye diagram for error free
transmission
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
41
ROSA Architecture
‹
‹
Optical signal
from fiber enters
ROSA
Lens couples
p
light to
photodiode
(detector)
‹ Pre-Amp IC (TIA)
boosts signal from
detector
‹
Post amp IC (on the pcba) further boosts signal and provides
host de
device
ice with
ith the differential o
output
tp t voltage
oltage signal
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
42
Receiver Characteristics
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Rx Amplitude – peak to peak voltage output
Rx Jitter – analogous to Tx jitter
Signal Detect / Loss of Signal (SD / LOS)
BER (Bit Error Rate) = # bits in error per # bits
transmitted. E.g., 1 error in 10^12 bits means BER = 10^12
Sensitivity = minimum received optical power that yields
BER required by application
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
43
Receiver electrical eye pattern
Rx
amplitude
Jitter
‹
Rx amplitude (mV)
‹ Rx jitter (ps)
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
44
Part 3 – Q&A
Q: The transceiver has two interfaces – what are they?
A: Electrical and optical
Q: True or false - the OSA’s contain a telescoping lens
A: False – they contain a ball lens
Q: True or false – the laser is “always on”
A: True.
True The low signal point has the laser operating above Ith.
Q: T or F -The optical output signal is the inverse of the laser driver output signal
A: False
Q: How much jitter is enough?
A: Jitter is a detrimental attribute – the less,
less the better
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
45
Part 4 –Power Budget, References
‹
‹
Power budget
g
References
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
46
Power budget
‹
The difference between minimum transmitter output and
minimum receiver sensitivityy
Tx output power:
Max = -4 dBm
Mi = -9.5
Min
9 5 dB
dBm
Rx sensitivity:
Max = 0 dBm
Mi = -18
Min
18 dB
dBm
‹
Transceiver power budget is -9.5 - (-18) = 8.5 dB
‹
From this we subtract all the link losses, and need to have
margin remaining
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
47
Power budget
Fiber (100m)
Fiber (100 m)
Switch
Splice
Server
Bandwidth check: (using multi mode fiber @ 850 nm & 1 Gb/sec) – 500
MHz/km / 1000 Mhz = 500 m ; we’re ok at 200 m
Losses:
Fiber: 2.4
2 4 dB/km; @ 200m =
Splice:
2 connectors @ .3 dB each =
.5
5 dB
.3 dB
.6 dB
Total =
1.4 dB
Conclusion: p
power budget
g of 8.5 dB leaves plenty
p
y of margin
g
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
48
Power budget
Fiber (500m)
Fiber (500 m)
Switch
Splice
Server
Bandwidth check: (using multi mode fiber @ 850 nm & 1 Gb/sec) – 500
MHz /1000 m x 1000 m = 1000 meters in example – link is bandwidth
limited!! Max frequency
q
y is 500 MHz!
Losses:
Fiber: 2.4 dB/km; @ 500m =
Splice:
2 connectors @ .3 dB each =
Total =
1.2 dB
.3 dB
.6 dB
2.1 dB
Conclusion: Link is bandwidth limited; loss is irrelevant unless we
operate the link at 500 M instead of 1Gig
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
49
Power budget
‹
To achieve longer links
ƒ Use single mode fiber – bandwidth is limited not by
modal dispersion, but by chromatic dispersion
ƒ Use
U a llaser with
ith narrow spectral
t l width,
idth which
hi h results
lt
in low chromatic dispersion. Attenuation & power
budget become the link limiting factors up to roughly
80km
ƒ Use a receiver having greater sensitivity
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
50
Power budget
‹
Typical 850 nm multi mode transceiver specifications
ƒ
Tx average power
-7
7 dBm
ƒ
Rx sensitivity
-21dBm
ƒ
Power budget (link budget)
14 dB
Loss (dB)
Power Remaining (%)
10
10.0
20
1.0
30
0.1
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
51
Power budget
ƒ
Longer link budget transceivers (using DFB lasers, APD
d t t )
detectors)
ƒ
Tx average power
0 dBm
ƒ
Rx sensitivity
-30
30 dBm
ƒ
Power budget (link budget)
30 dB
Loss (dB)
Power Remaining (%)
10
10.0
20
1.0
30
0.1
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
52
References
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
Schelto’s Physical Page www.schelto.com
IEEE / Fibre Channel – Physical Interface Standard www.t11.org
GBIC standard ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/OEmod/
Tutorials,, industryy information www.lightreading.com
g
g
search for
“tutorials”
Technician's Guide to Fiber Optics – Third Edition Donald J. Sterling,
Jr.,, Delmar Publishers
Finisar Corporation www.finisar.com
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
53
Part 4 – Q&A
Q: What is the recommended maximum distance for a multi mode link operating at
850 nm and 1.0625 Gb/s?
A: 500 meters
Q: How much light (of the 100% optical signal output) does a fully utilized 30dB link
budget use?
A: Close to 99.9%
Q True
Q:
ue o
or False:
a se MAXIMUM
U receiver
ece e se
sensitivity
s t ty is
s key
ey to a g
greater
eate po
power
e budget
A: False
Q: Where is a great place to shop for your optical transceiver needs?
A: Finisar
Q: Have you found this session informative?
A You
A:
Y decide
d id and
d llett us kknow!!
© 2011 Finisar Corporation
54