Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CBA FX Insightss CBA FX Insights | 29 September 2016 US Dollar: Outcome if Trump Wins What happens to the USD if Donald Trump wins? We (CBA FaX) analyse Donald Trump’s economic policies to make an assessment of what it will mean if he wins the U.S. Presidency. Trump’s economic policies are very inflationary; large income and company tax cuts, government spending and tariffs. We believe U.S. bond yields and the U.S. equity market will lift on the company tax cut, and the USD will surge higher. A 10% lift in the USD will be driven by the capital inflows chasing higher asset price returns. AUD/USD would decline 10%. Overview We do not hold a political view on the candidates in the U.S. election, and none of the authors in this publication are U.S. citizens or eligible to vote in the U.S. election. We base our economic and financial market forecasts contained in this report on Trump’s published economic policies, which are summarized in the accompanying table on page one. Richard Grace CBA Executive Director Currency & Rate Strategy & International, Economics (Author) Twitter: @commsec Produced by Commonwealth Research based on information available at the time of publishing. We believe that the information in this report is correct and any opinions, conclusions or recommendations are reasonably held or made as at the time of its compilation, but no warranty is made as to accuracy, reliability or completeness. To the extent permitted by law, neither Commonwealth Bank of Australia ABN 48 123 123 124 nor any of its subsidiaries accept liability to any person for loss or damage arising from the use of this report. The report has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular individual. For this reason, any individual should, before acting on the information in this report, consider the appropriateness of the information, having regard to the individual’s objectives, financial situation and needs and, if necessary, seek appropriate professional advice. In the case of certain securities Commonwealth Bank of Australia is or may be the only market maker. This report is approved and distributed in Australia by Commonwealth Securities Limited ABN 60 067 254 399 a wholly owned but not guaranteed subsidiary of Commonwealth Bank of Australia. This report is approved and distributed in the UK by Commonwealth Bank of Australia incorporated in Australia with limited liability. Registered in England No. BR250 and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority (FSA). This report does not purport to be a complete statement or summary. For the purpose of the FSA rules, this report and related services are not intended for private customers and are not available to them. Commonwealth Bank of Australia and its subsidiaries have effected or may effect transactions for their own account in any investments or related investments referred to in this report. CBA FX Strategy - The USD Outcome if Trump Wins We analyse Donald Trump’s economic policies to make an assessment of what it will mean if he wins the U.S. Presidency. We make the observation that Trump’s economic policies are very inflationary. Assuming Trump’s policies pass Congress, we anticipate higher U.S. bond yields, a flatter yield curve, higher U.S. equity markets and a stronger USD. Trump proposes to dramatically reduce income taxes to lift household and business spending. The U.S. economy would grow at a more rapid rate given household consumption accounts for 70% of U.S. GDP. Trump also proposes to cut the company tax rate to 15%, from its current scaled variable rate of between 15% and 35%. We believe this would result in a higher re-rating of U.S. equities as increases in net-profit-after-tax valuations surge, generating larger capital inflows into the U.S. economy. U.S. corporates would repatriate profits now subject to less tax into the U.S. economy, further lifting the USD. Trump proposes to boost infrastructure spending and abolish regulations that inhibit job growth. However, there are no details provided, and the inflationary impulse from these particular policies are likely to evolve over a period of time. Trump proposes to lift a host of environmental restrictions that inhibit energy investment. While the actual investment spending is modestly inflationary, the net impact on the oil price is uncertain because increased oil and energy supply should put downward pressure on oil prices, but the extra demand generated from Trump’s policies will be supplyabsorbing. Trump proposes to “label China as a currency manipulator”, renegotiate NAFTA and “apply tariffs and duties to countries that cheat”. All of these policies are very protectionist and would result in higher U.S. import costs, higher U.S. inflation, and lower U.S. exports even if China and other countries do not retaliate. Some trade would bypass through third country economies. Despite the widening in both the U.S. budget and trade deficits under the above outcomes, we think the USD will lift up to 10% before correcting lower some twelve-months later. AUD/USD would decline by up to 10% as the USD increases and China’s economy slows by up to 1.0% as exports fall. If the Democrats control the Congress, the impact on currencies would be less. 29 September 2016 2 CBA FX Strategy - The USD Outcome if Trump Wins We the People On Tuesday 8 November, American voters will elect a new President and members of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate. The U.S. election results will be known Wednesday morning 9 November Sydney time. Recent polls suggest Hillary Clinton is still the favourite to win the U.S. Presidency, but her lead is shrinking rapidly in favour of Donald Trump (chart 1). 2016 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL OPINION POLLS ODDS OF WINNING THE US PRESIDENCY (Source: FiveThirtyEight.com) The U.S. House of Representatives will most likely remain under Republicans’ control according to most polls (http://www.270towin.com/2016-house-election). However, the Senate is up for grabs with 24 Republicans and 10 Democrats facing re-election. Currently, Republicans have control of Congress with 247 seats in the House of Representatives (total of 435 seats) and 54 seats in the Senate (total of 100 seats). Trumpanomics is inflationary For the purposes of our economic analysis, we take Trump’s policies at face value. Whether Trump can deliver any of his policy proposals in part or in full will depend on the make-up of the next Congress (discussed below). We make the initial assumption that all of Trump’s policies make it through Congress, and analyse the economic effects of Trump’s policy proposals. We do not take a position on the fairness, ethics or practicality of Trump’s policy proposals. We acknowledge that our analysis is simple because detail on Trump’s policies are not available, and his policy positions are subject to change. In brief, Trump’s policies are shown in the table on page one. The most critical question for us is whether Trump’s policies cause U.S. inflation to increase, decrease or stay the same? In our judgement, we consider Trump’s policy proposals would increase U.S. inflation in two ways -First, through demand pull inflation. The very large cuts in tax would stimulate spending, particularly by U.S. consumers. The reduction or removal of regulation would stimulate business expansion, particularly in energy. The increase in spending on infrastructure, the military and veterans would increase government spending Chart 2 29 September 2016 3 CBA FX Strategy - The USD Outcome if Trump Wins Demand pull inflation in the current economic environment is “good inflation” because it reflects more spending. There is a partial offset to demand pull inflation if the Chinese and Mexican governments (assuming tariffs go up under a renegotiated NAFTA) retaliate by imposing tariffs on U.S. exports. Mexico and China are the U.S.’s second and third largest export destinations. Second, through cost push inflation. The increase in tariffs on imports from China and Mexico increases costs for U.S. businesses and U.S. consumers. The reduction in illegal immigration slows growth in the U.S. labour supply and increases wage costs for U.S. businesses. Currently, the U.S. unemployment rate is 4.9%, and the U.S. economy is not far from full employment. Cost push inflation is “bad inflation” because it reflects higher input costs. There is a partial offset to cost push inflation if Trump’s proposed reduction of energy regulations increases energy supply, leading to lower energy prices. Overall, we consider demand pull inflation will accentuate cost push inflation and lead to a net increase in U.S. inflation (chart 3). Chart 3 Exactly how much U.S. inflation increases, and when, is very difficult to predict. An observation of the current U.S. economic environment is helpful to illustrate this: despite low unemployment, inflation in wages and prices have been soft because of low inflation expectations, very poor growth in productivity, and some excess capacity. Faster U.S. inflation under a Trump Administration will mean the U.S. Fed Funds rate will go up faster, and by more, if Trump wins. We anticipate the U.S. yield curve would be higher but flatter under a Trump Administration as U.S. short-term rate rise more than long-term rates U.S.-China relations under Trump Trump proposes to “label China a currency manipulator” and impose a 45% punitive tariff rate on all Chinese imports. Under this scenario, China’s exports to the U.S. could fall as much as 80%. Given 4.6% of China’s GDP is exports to the U.S. economy, China’s GDP could decline by some 3.4%. We anticipate China’s real GDP growth will slow from 6.7% to 5.7% as U.S. tariffs imposed on China are offset by Chinese domestic stimulus measures. The slowing in China’s economy would have some flow-on economic implications to the rest of Asia, including Australia. If the Chinese government decides to take a similarly restrictive trade stance on U.S. exports to China, and levies a 45% tariff on U.S. imports into China, then we anticipate U.S. exports to China would also fall by 80%, from US$111bn per year to US$22bn. This would result in a further large increase in the U.S. trade deficit, which would be already under widening pressure from faster U.S. consumption demanding greater imports. We also believe that the Chinese government could consider imposing tighter capital account controls to curtail the repatriation of some US$77.5bn in U.S. direct investments, currently held in China. This would be one offset to our expectation that there would be a large net capital inflow back into the U.S. economy. Under the above scenario, the disruption to world trade and the global economy could be quite significant because of the very large global supply chains in the production of internationally traded goods. These global supply chains are particularly large across Asia. We may also see some offsetting trade pass through third countries in an attempt to get around country-specific tariffs. If large tariffs are not imposed on China’s exports to the U.S., China is still likely to face stricter U.S. trade restrictions over intellectual property protection, subsidies to state owned enterprises (SOEs), and unfair practices in government procurement as well as on environmental and labour standards. 29 September 2016 4 CBA FX Strategy - The USD Outcome if Trump Wins In a very diplomatic way, at a press conference in Beijing in March 2016, China’s premier Li Keqiang said ‘no matter who gets into the White House, the underlying trend of China-U.S. ties will not change. The relationship between the two countries has always moved forward despite points of disagreement.’ We don’t anticipate the Chinese authorities will dramatically sell their U.S. Treasury holdings. There will already be upward pressure on USD/CNY from a stronger USD and a slower growing Chinese economy, and this will generate a competitive depreciation for China. All things equal, China’s USD assets (deposits and Treasury bills) will increase in value. Nevertheless, we anticipate U.S.-China trade tensions to increase under a Trump Administration. If a trade war develops between the U.S. and China, it will be harmful to both countries and bring major disruptions to the global economy. It will be important for the U.S. to recognise that they are already running a sizable trade surplus in services with China, at US$28bn per year, second only to Canada (chart 4). Chart 4 Further, U.S. exports of services to China have been growing at an average rate of 17% per year over the past five years. The likelihood is the U.S. trade services surplus with China will increase even more rapidly without the imposition of U.S. tariffs because China’s urban middle class is expected to double over the next decade. Furthermore, China has already passed the “Lewis turning point”, where labour costs are China is set to rise rapidly, which would make Chinese exports less competitive, narrowing the U.S. merchandise trade deficit with China. USD to lift under a Trump Administration After some initial volatility on the uncertainty, we expect the USD to lift under a Trump Administration for the following five reasons – (1) Higher U.S. inflation and higher U.S. interest rates will generate a real appreciation in the USD. U.S. interest rates will go up faster and more, under a Trump Administration, generating a relative rise in U.S. interest rate differentials (chart 5) and a flatter yield curve (chart 6). Chart 5 Chart 6 29 September 2016 5 CBA FX Strategy - The USD Outcome if Trump Wins (2) Capital inflows will increase under a Trump Administration because the cut in the company tax rate will generate a surge in U.S. equity indices and offshore residents will be looking to purchase U.S. equities that are now generating significantly higher net profits after tax because of the large cut in the company tax rate. The “re-rating” of U.S. equity markets will generate a capital inflow into the U.S. economy similar to that which occurred under the late 1990s “dot com” period (chart 7). Chart 7 Chart 8 (3) Capital inflows will increase under a Trump Administration because the cut in the company tax rate will generate repatriation of U.S. profits back into the U.S. economy. The cut in the U.S. company tax rate from as high as 35% down to 15% will be lower than the tax rate in most offshore locations. We witnessed a similar USD appreciation when the U.S. government introduced the 2004 American Job Creation Act, which contained large tax credits for U.S. companies bringing back offshore profits into the U.S. economy. Today, U.S. offshore profits account for a much larger share of the U.S. economy (3.8% of GDP) compared to 2004 (1.8% of GDP), so the appreciation impact on the USD could be even larger (chart 8). Trump’s proposed reducedregulation would presumably also encourage more U.S. businesses to bring manufacturing back into the U.S. economy. (5) We anticipate an initial narrowing in the U.S. trade deficit as the “easily imposed” Trump policies of labelling “China as a currency manipulator” are quickly implemented, helping to support the initial USD lift. China accounts for US$472 billion (or 21%) of U.S. imports. Presumably Trump’s renegotiation of NAFTA would also result in reduced imports from Mexico, which accounts for US$113 billion (or 13%) of U.S imports (chart 9). Chart 9 Chart 10 Collectively, China and Mexico are the first and third largest U.S. import partners, accounting for 54% of the U.S. trade deficit (chart 10). We anticipate the legislative bills necessary to pass the U.S. income tax cuts would take a little longer to implement. Hence, over a twelve-month period, we would anticipate the initial narrowing in the U.S. trade deficit to reverse and widen for two reasons: (i) because a reasonable proportion of U.S. exports contain imports into the U.S. production process, and; (ii) because Trump’s polices of cutting the income tax rates and boosting infrastructure spending would result in an increase in consumption and capital imports, widening the trade deficit. This is a typical pattern of behaviour in the U.S. trade deficit when the U.S. economy grows faster than the rest of the world, and would remain so even if selected tariffs are introduced (chart 11). 29 September 2016 6 CBA FX Strategy - The USD Outcome if Trump Wins Chart 11 Chart 12 Increased U.S. domestic energy investment should lower the U.S. energy import bill requirements as locally-sourced energy needs are substituted. But we anticipate there would still be a net widening in the U.S. trade deficit based on stronger U.S. consumption (chart 12). Chart 13 Chart 14 (5) The U.S. terms of trade should technically lift under a Trump Administration because higher U.S. tariffs should result in overseas companies lowering their export prices (i.e. generating lower U.S. import costs) in order to partly offset the imposed tariff by the U.S. government. The actual tariff itself is not calculated in the U.S. terms of trade equation. The income collected from the U.S. tariff would go to the U.S. government. We also anticipate the increased U.S. domestic energy investment would lower the volume of U.S. energy imports, which would end up generating a positive impact in the U.S. terms of trade equation. The net increase in the U.S. terms of trade would assist the appreciation of the USD (chart 13). We anticipate the initial twelve-month appreciation in the USD would be in the order of 10%, taking the real USD trade-weighted index to fresh cyclical highs. However, the medium-term widening in the U.S. trade deficit, and the real appreciation in the USD would slow the U.S. economy and lead to a reassessment of the extent of Fed interest rate increases. This in turn would slow and reverse the USD appreciation after a twelve-month period (chart 14). The inevitable widening in the U.S. budget deficit from the Trump tax cuts may result in a U.S. sovereign ratings downgrade. However, similar with the USD impact from the previous U.S. sovereign ratings downgrade, we don’t expect this would result in a dampening effect on the USD. USD scenarios under two different Congress outcomes The above outlines what we believe would happen to the USD if Trump could successfully implement his policies. But the post-election make-up of the U.S. Congress will determine which policies Trump can implement. We envisage different outcomes for the USD, depending on how the U.S. Congress is made up in the post-election period. 29 September 2016 7 CBA FX Strategy - The USD Outcome if Trump Wins Scenario 1 – a “Trump light” Administration: In this scenario, Trump is elected President, but the Democrats win the Senate. This is moderately USD bullish because Trump would have difficulty passing all his pro-growth economic policies. Scenario 2 – a “Full-Metal Trump” Administration: In this scenario, Trump is elected President and Republicans remain in control of Congress. This is the most USD bullish scenario because Trump will face significantly less obstacles in implementing his economic and foreign policy platforms. It is important to recognise that Trump is unlikely to get all of his rather radical policies through the Congress. Passage of bills through the Senate is also likely to take some time. Hence, the inflationary impact of Trump’s policies would take some time to flow through to the real economy and generate the real appreciation on the USD. We are also assuming some of Trump’s stated policies such “a return to the gold standard” and “a lift in the minimum wage” are not enacted, because these policies are not currently on his website. Impact on AUD/USD under a Trump Administration We anticipate AUD/USD could decline by up to 10% over a twelve-to-eighteen month period because of a stronger USD, weaker China and Asian economies, and some downward pressure to Australian energy commodity export prices (chart 15). Chart 15. AUD/USD may receive some offsetting support as U.S.led global equity markets lift (supported by the cut in the U.S. company tax rate). AUD/USD may also receive some support from higher base metal commodity prices driven by stronger U.S. economic growth. We also believe that the decline in the AUD will reduce the chances of additional RBA rate cuts. USD & U.S. Presidents Historically, the USD has tended to appreciate when a Democrat is in the White House, rather than when a Republican is in the White House (chart 16). The USD spiked up during Ronald Reagan’s (Republican) first term in office (1980-1984), which involved large tax cuts, largely because Fed Chair Paul Volker was raising interest rates aggressively to tackle runway U.S. inflation. Chart 16. Chart 17 29 September 2016 8 CBA FX Strategy - The USD Outcome if Trump Wins During Reagan’s second Presidential term (1984-1988) the USD fell sharply, triggered by the September 1985 Plaza Accord (the international agreement to depreciate the USD). Historically the USD has not performed particularly well when the same party (either the Replication or Democrat party) was in control of both the White House and the Congress (House of Representatives and Senate) (chart 17). Between 1993-1995 (during the 103rd Congress), Democrats controlled both the White House and Congress, and the USD major trade-weighted index fell by roughly 6%. Between 2003-2007 (the 108th and 109th Congress) Republicans controlled the White House and Congress, and the USD major trade-weighted index declined by about 19%. Richard Grace Global Markets Research | Foreign Exchange Strategy: Strategy +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND DISCLAIMER The information contained in this report is made available for persons who are sophisticated investors or professional investors (as those terms are defined by section 708(8) or (10) and (11) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)). Please view our website at http://www.commbank.com.au/corporate/research.html. The Commonwealth Bank of Australia ABN 48 123 123 124 AFSL 234945 (“the Bank”) and its subsidiaries, including Commonwealth Securities Limited ABN 60 067 254 300 AFSL 238814 (“CommSec”), Commonwealth Australia Securities LLC, CBA Europe Ltd and Global Markets Research, are domestic or foreign entities or business areas of the Commonwealth Bank Group of Companies (CBGOC). CBGOC and their directors, employees and their representatives are referred to in this Appendix as the “Group”. Financial markets products have an element of risk. The level of risk varies depending on the product’s specific attributes and how it is used. Potential investors should note that the product discussed in the report may be sophisticated financial products which involve dealing in derivatives. Unless you are familiar with products of this type, this product may not be suitable for you. The Bank will enter into transactions on the understanding that the customer has: made his/her own independent decision to enter into the transaction; determined that the transaction is appropriate; ensured he/she has the knowledge to evaluate and capacity to accept the terms, conditions and risks; and is not relying on any communication from Commonwealth Bank as advice. In the UK and Europe: This report is made available in the UK and Europe only for persons who are Eligible Counterparties or Professional Clients, and not Retail Clients as defined by Financial Conduct Authority rules. The Commonwealth Bank of Australia and CBA Europe Ltd are both registered in England (No. BR250 and 05687023 respectively). Commonwealth Bank of Australia: Authorised and regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority.Subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. CBA Europe Ltd: Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. In Singapore: The information in this report is made available only for persons who are Accredited Investors or Expert Investor in terms of the Singapore Securities and Futures Act. It has not been prepared for, and must not be distributed to or replicated in any form, to anyone who is not an Accredited Investor or Expert Investor. If you are an Accredited Investor or Expert Investor as defined in Regulation 2(1) of the Financial Advisers Regulations ("FAR"), the Bank is obliged to disclose to you that in the provision of any financial advisory services to you, we are exempted under Regulations 33, 34 and 35 of the FAR from complying with the business conduct provisions of sections 25 (Obligation to disclose product information to clients), 27 (Recommendations by licensees) and 36 (Disclosure of interests in securities) respectively, of the Financial Advisers Act ("FAA"). In Japan: This document is made available only for institutional customers. Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Tokyo Branch is a licensed banking business authorized by Japan Financial Services Agency. In Hong Kong: The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in Hong Kong. You are advised to exercise caution in relation to the offer. If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this document, you should obtain independent professional advice. The provision of this document to any person in the Hong Kong does not constitute an offer of securities to that person or an invitation to that person to acquire, apply, or subscribe, for the issue of, or purchase, securities unless the recipient is a person to whom an offer of securities may be made in Hong Kong without the need for a prospectus under section 2 and the Seventeenth Schedule of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong) (“Companies Ordinance”) pursuant to the exemptions for offers in respect of which the minimum consideration payable by any person is not less than HK$500,000 or its equivalent in another currency. Neither this document nor any part of it is, and under no circumstances are they to be construed as, a prospectus (as defined in the Companies Ordinance) or an advertisement of securities in Hong Kong. The products have not been, nor will they be, qualified for sale to the public under applicable Hong Kong securities laws except on a basis that is exempt from the prospectus requirements of those securities laws. Minimum Investment Amount for Hong Kong Investors: HK$500,000 In New Zealand The information contained in this document is made available in New Zealand only for persons who are wholesale investors as defined in the Financial Markets Conduct Regulations 2014. In the USA for products other than Equities: The Bank is authorized to maintain a Federal branch by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. This document is made available for informational purposes only. The products described herein are not available to retail investors. NONE OF THE PRODUCTS DESCRIBED ARE DEPOSITS THAT ARE COVERED BY FDIC INSURANCE. This product is not suitable for investment by counterparties that are not “eligible contract participants” as defined in the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and the regulations adopted thereunder; or (ii) entities that have any investors who are not “eligible contract participants.” Each hedge fund or other investment vehicle that purchases the products must be operated by a registered commodity pool operator as defined under the CEA and the regulations adopted thereunder or a person who has qualified as being exempt from such registration requirement. CBA cannot execute swaps with any US person unless our counterparty has adhered to the ISDA Dodd Frank protocol. This report was prepared, approved and published by Global Markets Research, a division of Commonwealth Bank of Australia ABN 48 123 123 124 AFSL 234945 (the “Bank”) and is distributed in the United States by the Bank’s New York Branch and its Houston Representative Office. If you would like to speak to someone regarding securities related products, please contact Commonwealth Australia Securities LLC (the “U.S. Broker–Dealer”), a broker–dealer registered under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) at 1 (212) 336-7737. The information contained herein is not intended to be an exhaustive discussion of the strategies or concepts mentioned herein or tax or legal advice. Investments and strategies are discussed in this report only in general terms and not with respect to any particular security or securities transaction, and any specific investments may entail significant risks including exchange rate risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and prepayment risk among others. There also may be risks relating to lack of liquidity, volatility of returns and lack of certain valuation and pricing information. International investing entails risks that may be presented by economic uncertainties of foreign countries as well as 29 September 2016 9 CBA FX Strategy - The USD Outcome if Trump Wins the risk of currency fluctuations. Investors interested in the strategies or concepts described in this report should consult their tax, legal or other adviser, as appropriate. This report is not intended to provide information on specific securities. The Bank’s New York Branch and its Houston Representative Office provides its clients access to various products and services available through the Bank and its affiliates. In the United States, U.S. brokerage products and services are provided solely by or through the U.S. Broker-Dealer. The U.S. Broker-Dealer is a wholly-owned, but non-guaranteed, subsidiary of the Bank, organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, U.S., with limited liability. The U.S. Broker-Dealer is not authorized to engage in the underwriting of securities and does not make markets or otherwise engage in any trading in the securities of the subject companies described in our research reports. Notice of Negative Consent to Qualified Institutional Buyer to Receive Institutional Debt Research The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) adopted Rule 2242 “Debt Research Analysts and Debt Research Reports” to address conflicts of interest relating to the publication and distribution of debt research reports. Rule 2242(j) exempts debt research distributed solely to eligible institutional investors (“Institutional Debt Research”) from most of the Rule’s provisions regarding supervision, coverage determinations, budget and compensation determinations and all of the disclosure requirements applicable to debt research reports distributed to retail investors. This notice serves to inform you of Commonwealth Australia Securities LLC (“CAS”) intent to distribute Institutional Debt Research to you while relying on the exemption provided under FINRA Rule 2242. You have separately certified that: I. You are, or you are authorized to act on behalf of, a Qualified Institutional Buyer (“QIB”), as defined under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. II. You: (1) are capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with regard to particular transactions and investment strategies involving a security or securities (including a debt security or debt securities); and (2) are exercising independent judgment in evaluating the recommendations of CAS, pursuant to FINRA Rule 2111. III. You agree to promptly advise CAS if any of the representations or warranties referred to in this notice ceases to be true. Based on the aforementioned certifications by you, CAS is permitted to provide Institutional Debt Research to you under the exemptions provided by FINRA 2242(j). Unless notified by you in writing to the contrary prior to your receipt of our Institutional Debt Research, we will consider you to have given your consent to the receipt of such Institutional Debt Research. All Investors: All investors: Analyst Certification and Disclaimer: Each research analyst, primarily responsible for the content of this research report, in whole or in part, certifies that with respect to each security or issuer that the analyst covered in this report: (1) all of the views expressed accurately reflect his or her personal views about those securities or issuers; and (2) no part of his or her compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed by that research analyst in the report. The analyst(s) responsible for the preparation of this report may interact with trading desk personnel, sales personnel and other constituencies for the purpose of gathering, synthesizing, and interpreting market information. Directors or employees of the Group may serve or may have served as officers or directors of the subject company of this report. The compensation of analysts who prepared this report is determined exclusively by research management and senior management (not including investment banking). Unless agreed separately, we do not charge any fees for any information provided in this presentation. You may be charged fees in relation to the financial products or other services the Bank provides, these are set out in the relevant Financial Services Guide (FSG) and relevant Product Disclosure Statements (PDS). Our employees receive a salary and do not receive any commissions or fees. However, they may be eligible for a bonus payment from us based on a number of factors relating to their overall performance during the year. These factors include the level of revenue they generate, meeting client service standards and reaching individual sales portfolio targets. Our employees may also receive benefits such as tickets to sporting and cultural events, corporate promotional merchandise and other similar benefits. If you have a complaint, the Bank’s dispute resolution process can be accessed in Australia on phone number 132221 or internationally 61 2 98417000. The Group will from time to time have long or short positions in, and buy or sell, the securities or derivatives, if any, referred to in this research report. The Group may also engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with the recommendations, if any, in this research report. Unless otherwise noted, all data is sourced from Australian Bureau of Statistics material (www.abs.gov.au). 29 September 2016 10