Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Private International Law Sciences Po Paris Spring 2017 Case studies Giuditta Cordero-Moss, Ph.D., Dr.Juris Professor, Oslo University Choice of law • An Italian seller and a US buyer enter into a sales contract • Which law governs the contract? • If there is a governing law clause • Which PIL regulates the parties’ choice of law? • If there is no governing law clause • Which PIL regulates the choice of law? Qualification • One of the disputed issues is whether a claim is time barred • Under US law, the claim is time barred • Under Italian law the claim is not time barred • Which law shall determine the qualification of the matter? • If the court is in California • If the court is in Italy • What is the result of the qualification? • If the court is in Italy and the seller is Italian • If the court is in Italy and the Seller is US Which conflict rules? • A company registered in Germany has its main seat in the USA. A dispute arises about the validity of a decision by the Board of Directors. • According to German PIL, matters of company law have to be decided according to the company law of the country where the main seat is located. • According to USA PIL, matters of company law have to be decided according to the company law of the country where the company is registered. • Which conflict rules shall the German court apply? Which court? • Norwegian seller • Italian buyer • Delivery of the goods to be made in Norway • The goods do not comply with contract, buyer pays only part of the price • Which court has jurisdiction? • If the seller sues to obtain payment • If the buyer sues to obtain specific performance Effects of the parties’ choice • Governing law clause chooses Italian law • The Norwegian party invokes Norwegian rules on limitation of actions, that are mandatory • Norwegian court • Shall the court apply mandatory rules of its own law, or shall it apply only the chosen law? Scope of the parties’ choice • Governing law clause chooses Norwegian law • The Italian party alleges it lacks legal capacity according to Italian law • Norwegian court • Shall the court apply only the chosen law, or shall it apply also the laws of each of the parties? Place of performance • Swap agreement between Norwegian and German bank • Place of performance of monetary obligations: • German law: debtor’s place • Norwegian law: creditor’s place • How do you define place of performance? Which court? • Norwegian producer buys from a Swedish supplier spare parts to be included in its products • The Swedish supplier buys some components from Germany, assembles them in its plant in Sweden and sells them to the Norwegian producer • The spare parts are assembled in the Norwegian producer’s products and sold worldwide • The components from Germany are defective, therefore the spare parts the Swedish producer sells to the the Norwegian producer are defective • • Which court has jurisdiction on the Norwegian producer’s claim against the German sub-supplier? Which court? • Norwegian producer negotiates with a potential Swiss buyer • The buyer obtains a prototype, breaks off the negotiations and has the products manufactured in China • Where can the producer bring action against the potential buyer? Which law? • Norwegian producer sends its raw materials for processing to a Russian plant • According to the tolling agreement, the property of the materials is at all time with the Norwegian producer • The Russian plant uses the materials in its possession as security for a loan it takes with a Russian bank • The Russian bank is not aware that the materials are not the property of the Russian’s borrower • The loan is defaulted, and the Russian bank exercises its security rights on the materials • Which country’s law governs?