Download SFM L08 - WordPress.com

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Modified Dietz method wikipedia , lookup

World Community Grid wikipedia , lookup

Project finance wikipedia , lookup

Corporate finance wikipedia , lookup

Internal rate of return wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
STRATEGIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
MEASURING RETURN ON INVESTMENTS
KHURAM RAZA
ACMA, MS FINANCE
First Principle and Big Picture
What is a project?
Capital Budgeting?
The process of identifying, analyzing, and selecting
investment projects whose returns (cash flows) are
expected to extend beyond one year.
Project analyzed in capital budgeting has three criteria:
a large up-front cost,
cash flows for a specific time period, and
a salvage value at the end, which captures the value of
the assets of the project when the project ends.
What is a project?
Defined broadly then, any of the
following decisions
Independent
Project
would qualify as projects:
 Major strategic decisions to enter new areas of business
Mutually
 Acquisitions of new equipment
, building or other firms
Exclusive
Projects
 Decisions on new ventures
within existing businesses or
markets
 Decisions that may change theproject
wayto existing ventures and
generate
revenues
projects are run
 Decisions on how best to deliver a service that is
necessary for the business to run smoothly.
project to
reduce costs
Measuring Returns: The Choices
Basic characteristics of relevant project flows
 Cash (not accounting income) flows
 Operating (not financing) flows
 After-tax flows
 Incremental flows
Principles that must be adhered to in the estimation
 Ignore sunk costs
 Include opportunity costs
 Include project-driven changes in working capital
net of spontaneous changes in current liabilities
 Include effects of inflation
Potential Problems
Under Mutual Exclusivity
Ranking of project proposals may create
contradictory results.
A. Scale of Investment
B. Cash-flow Pattern
C. Project Life
A. Scale Differences
Compare a small (S) and a large (L) project.
END OF YEAR
NET CASH FLOWS
Project S
Project L
0
-$100
-$100,000
1
0
0
2
$400
$156,250
Profitability Index (PI)
PI is the ratio of the present value of a
project’s future net cash flows to the
project’s initial cash outflow.
CF1
PI =
(1+k)1
+
CF2
CFn
+...+
2
(1+k)
(1+k)n
ICO
A. Scale Differences
Calculate the PBP, IRR, NPV@10%, and
PI@10%.
Which project is preferred? Why?
Project
IRR
S
L
100%
25%
NPV
$ 231
$29,132
PI
3.31
1.29
B. Cash Flow Pattern
Let us compare a decreasing cash-flow (D) project and
an increasing cash-flow (I) project.
END OF YEAR
NET CASH FLOWS
Project D
Project I
0
1
-$1,200
1,000
-$1,200
100
2
500
600
3
100
1,080
Cash Flow Pattern
Calculate the IRR, NPV@10%, and
PI@10%.
Which project is preferred?
Project
D
I
IRR
23%
17%
$198
$198
NPV
1.17
1.17
PI
C. Project Life Differences
Let us compare a long life (X) project and a
short life (Y) project.
END OF YEAR
NET CASH FLOWS
Project X
Project Y
0
1
-$1,000
0
-$1,000
2,000
2
0
0
3
3,375
0
Project Life Differences
Calculate the PBP, IRR, NPV@10%, and
PI@10%.
Which project is preferred? Why?
Project
IRR
X
Y
50%
100%
NPV
PI
$1,536
$ 818
2.54
1.82
Another Way to Look at Things
1.
Adjust cash flows to a common terminal
year if project “Y” will NOT be replaced.
Compound Project Y, Year 1 @10% for 2 years.
Year
CF
0
–$1,000
1
$0
Results: IRR* = 34.26%
2
$0
3
$2,420
NPV = $818
Replacing Projects with Identical Projects
2.
Use Replacement Chain Approach (Appendix B) when
project “Y” will be replaced.
0
1
–$1,000
$2,000
–1,000
–$1,000
$1,000
Results:
2
$2,000
–1,000
$1,000
IRR = 100%
3
$2,000
$2,000
NPV* = $2,238.17
Capital Rationing
Capital Rationing occurs when a constraint (or
budget ceiling) is placed on the total size of
capital expenditures during a particular
period.
Example: Julie Miller must determine what
investment opportunities to undertake for Basket
Wonders (BW). She is limited to a maximum
expenditure of $32,500 only for this capital
budgeting period.
Available Projects for BW
Project
A $
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
ICO
500
5,000
5,000
7,500
12,500
15,000
17,500
25,000
IRR
18%
25
37
20
26
28
19
15
NPV
$
50
6,500
5,500
5,000
500
21,000
7,500
6,000
PI
1.10
2.30
2.10
1.67
1.04
2.40
1.43
1.24
Choosing by IRRs for BW
Project ICO
C
F
E
B
IRR
NPV
PI
$ 5,000
37% $ 5,500 2.10
15,000
28
21,000 2.40
12,500
26
500 1.04
5,000
25
6,500 2.30
Projects C, F, and E have the
three
largest IRRs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth is
$27,000 with a $32,500 outlay.
Choosing by NPVs for BW
Project ICO
F $15,000
G
17,500
B
5,000
IRR
NPV
28%
19
25
PI
$21,000 2.40
7,500 1.43
6,500 2.30
Projects F and G have the
largest NPVs.
two
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth is
$28,500 with a $32,500 outlay.
Choosing by PIs for BW
Project ICO
IRR
NPV
PI
F
$15,000
28%
$21,000 2.40
B
5,000
25
6,500 2.30
C
5,000
37
5,500 2.10
D
7,500
20
5,000 1.67
G
17,500
19
7,500 1.43
Projects F, B, C, and D have the four largest PIs.
The resulting increase in shareholder wealth is $38,000
with a $32,500 outlay.
Summary of Comparison
Method Projects Accepted
PI
F, B, C, and D
NPV
F and G
IRR
C, F, and E
Value Added
$38,000
$28,500
$27,000
PI generates the greatest increase in shareholder
wealth when a limited capital budget exists for a
single period.