Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The New DP Last time -- Post WW 2 global changes – Long decline of DP (150 years!) – Decline accelerated after WW 2 ... – then accelerated again in the 1970s ... The New DP Result up to now (and still continuing) is de facto abolition (halt to executions) in over half of all countries in the world ... Plus -- abolition increasingly embedded in International Law and constitutions. (part of evolution of human rights doctrine) The New DP Zimring and Hawkins Politics of DP and patterns: – On again - off again abolition – Leadership from the front – Modernization (urbanization, etc.) (a global developmental process) The New DP Similar processes in the US before the “conservative turn” (from mid-1970s on) – – – – On again - off again abolition The Civil Rights Movement The Moratorium Campaign The end of executions in the 1960s (leadership from the front) – and then Furman v. Georgia 1972 The New DP Furman v. Georgia 1972 (context for tonight) – – – – Applied to all state DP statutes Commuted all sentences (600-700) DP Arbitrary, Capricious, Discriminatory DP an embarrassment, no policy purpose The New DP Only legal argument supporting DP was “states rights” - historically identified with the South – and racism and discrimination!! Voting rights Schools Jobs Even marriage!! Public Facilities Housing The New DP Court didn’t rule DP itself unconsti application of DP was unconsti Thurgood Marshall’s history of the DP identified problems with application The New DP Discrimination Minorities and immigrants -any offense against white victims Juries, representation, lack of appeals, commutes denied, etc. Every pattern was discriminatory!! The New DP Other issues: – – – – – – – Shoddy trials and mistakes Cost of trials - who pays? What crimes? Women? Juveniles? MR/MI? If no deterrent, why do it?? The New DP New DP reading: Furman majority - 5 pre-Nixon appointees Dissenters - 4 Nixon appointees Background -Federal intervention starting in the 1950s The New DP 1940s - Truman integrated military 1950s - Brown v. Board of Educ 1960s - Civil Rights, Voting, Housing, Public facilities, etc. Legal “Modernization” – but mostly imposed by Federal Govt The New DP Then Nixon’s “Southern strategy” (“strict constructionism”) (First 2 appt - Carswell & Haynesworth) Split Court -- pre-Nixon vs. new court - Civ Rights, women, abortion, etc. Furman right in the middle of all this! The New DP The response to Furman 1972-76 - Backlash and new DP laws (South!) - Georgia and Furman - “model law” - Fifth new justice - new majority!! (John Paul Stevens!!) The New DP Gregg v. Georgia 1976 “New improved DP” -- 7 - 2 vote Court promised to fix problems. Rejected mandatory death sentences, upheld state laws with 3 reforms The New DP Three reforms: – Guided discretion – Bifurcation – Automatic review Then a strange twist in 1977 -an “accident of history” - Gary Gilmore The New DP Coker v. Georgia 1977 (“fourth reform”) The case & underlying meaning – Rape, DP, and discrimination – Almost all southern B/W cases The New DP Strickland v. Wash 1984 By now Supreme Court dominated by conservatives (Nixon, Ford, Reagan appointees) Problem of inadequate representation (esp. south and appointed attys) (Note: ABA recommendations) The New DP McCleskey v. Kemp 1987 Problem of racial discrimination Georgia data the Baldus study Patterns of discrimination B/W overrep B/B underrep The New DP Herrera v. Collins 1993 Innocence and new evidence after deadlines Texas case The New DP Felker v. Turpin 1996 Bill Clinton supported the DP Republican congress elected in 1994 Anti-terrorism and Effective DP Act Limiting appeals to “one bite at the apple” “Fast tracked” by conservative court The New DP The Failure of Reform In Gregg, the Supreme Court promised to fix the problems with the DP. As the Court (and the country!) became more conservative, the Court abandoned reform, and let DP return to old problems. The New DP Coker - last reform (eliminated worst racism) Strickland - no reform McCleskey - no reform Herrera - no reform Felker - no reform The New DP “Stalemate” and the “Broken System” Last irony - as conservative political grip tightened, the DP started a long decline!! Two recent court cases - MR & Juvs Decreasing death sentences and executions Five states abolish the DP outright Public support decreasing The New DP Calif DP: – Long history – Abolition – Reinstatement – Broken system