Download Questions may be weighted

A new Intermediate
construction frameworks
Edward Currie and Mark Thomas
Framework Managers
Complementary frameworks
for capacity
• Issues with SEaL framework with interest in smaller projects
(especially D&B)
• Analysis showed problem most acute for projects £1m to £4m
• Hence two complementary frameworks
 SCF (SE) for projects > £4m
 8 contractors
 ICF (Hampshire) for projects £0.5m to £4m
 10 contractors
• Exactly the same operating model
• Details of the new Major Works Framework @
• www.southerconstrutionframework.org.uk
SE SUB REGIONAL
FRAMEWORKS
Tier 3 (LCF)
3 Lots (18 contractors)
£1 to £1.5m
Tier 2 £750k to £6.5m (11 contractors)
Tier 3 £1 to £750k (11 contractors)
Tier 2 (ICF)
1 Lot (10 contractors)
£0.5m to £4m
Tier 3 (Minor
Works)
Work in progress
Tier 2 £750k to £5m (8 contractors)
Tier 3 £50k to £750k (8 contractors)
Tier 4 £1 to £50k (6 contractors)
Principles – 2 stage approach
Design
Contractor selected
from framework on
OHP, PC fee,
construction staff
cost, design & ability
to meet client brief
and project budget
Integrated team
develop designs and
costs, maximise
efficiency within
budget whilst
finalising package
procurement with
tier 2 and 3
Construction
Construct to agreed
lump sum
This framework approach has been tried
and tested since HCC’s first framework in
2004 for the Nursing Care Programme
Learning – Feedback from
previous users
• Frustration with the template approach to the
Framework Tender
• Complications with Preliminary pricing tied to
templates
• Preconstruction time based, not output based
• Lack of transparency in preconstruction
• No market intelligence
• Contractor performance variable
• Lack of enforcement of framework requirements
New Framework Features
• Specified Contractor duties
 Framework Director
 Framework Account Manager
• Not to exceed rates for OHP, Preconstruction,
construction and design
• Faster contractor selection process
• Minimum standards of contractor performance across a
range of project, performance and social value KPI’s
• Designed to help authorities implement key initiatives
such as BIM and Project Bank Accounts through signed
charters
What was included in The
Framework Tender
Specified
• Roles
• Duties
• Deliverables
10 Contractors:
Amiri, Beard, Interserve,
Kier, Lakehouse, Midas
Longcross, Osborne,
Raymond Brown, Stirland
The Mini Competition
Process
Opportunity pipeline published – M2i
Project details published on procurement portal (sets not to exceed price)
MC 1 run through procurement portal
Framework manager / project officer short list to 3
Project Officer issues and runs MC2
Principles of Mini Competition 1
Confirmation of (Questions may be weighted):
•
Preference for type of project
•
Ability to deliver (capability)
•
Capacity of contractor and supply chain
•
Ability to add value
Self scored responses to pre-set criteria,
supported by word limited written evidence.
Evaluated by framework manager, who agrees
outcome with project officer.
Outcome of Mini Competition 1
Preferred outcome is for three contractors to
proceed to MC2.
• Sensitive to contractor right to appeal
• Sensitive to officer view on self scoring
• May be more than three in MC2
Framework Manager to feed back to
unsuccessful contractors
Cost – 30% weighting
• OHP %
• Pre construction fee%
• Construction fee %
• Design fee %
• If applicable and appropriate, may
include Preliminary items
Rates may not exceed the tender
percentages from the price point, but may
be less, and will be converted to lump
sums based on the construction value
Sub categories not weighted –
single commercial score
Principles of Mini Competition 2
Principles of Mini Competition 2
Technical – 70% weighting, with the following question areas:
• QA and performance (Continuous Improvement)
• Design Management & Development
• Supply Chain Management
• Handover and Aftercare
• Social Responsibility – Mandatory question
• Financial Control – Mandatory question on cost plan
• Framework delivery – Project delivery
• Programmes of Work
Questions may be weighted
Award and feed back
• Project Officer to award
Agreed costs
Agreed programme
Pre construction agreement
• Project Officer to feed back to
unsuccessful contractors
Key gateways
Managing performance
• Minimum standards of performance
 Cost predictability
 Time predictability
 Team performance scores
 Defects at handover
 SME spend
 Health and safety
Who we are
Keith Heard
Senior Programme Manager
Edward Currie
Regional Programme Manager
L. Howell
M. Thomas
N. Midmer
C. Henderson
Vacancy
T. Moss
K Larrive
Framework Team
Contact Details
T: 01962 845942
E: [email protected]