Download Philosophy 115 Lecture 7 Still more fallacious reasoning

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Critical Thinking
Lecture 5b
More Fallacies
By David Kelsey
Ad Hominem
•
To commit this fallacy is to think that some consideration about a person refutes
the claims that he or she makes.
•
Confusing the person and the claim:
–
Criticizing the person not the claim itself
Ad Hominem again
•
A personal attack ad hominem:
–
claiming that because someone has
certain negative features it follows
that a claim she makes is false.
–
Examples
•
Inconsistency ad hominem:
–
to hold that what someone says is
false because it is inconsistent with
something else she has said or
done.
–
Examples
Circumstantial &
Positive ad hominem
•
Circumstantial ad hominem:
–
holding that because a person’s
circumstances are a certain way it
follows that some claim she makes
is false.
–
Priest example
•
Positive ad hominem:
–
holding that the claim a person
makes follows from some positive
consideration about the person.
Poisoning the Well
• To poison the well
– an in advance ad hominem.
– For example,
Genetic Fallacy
•
When one tries to refute a claim based on its origin or history she has
committed the genetic fallacy.
– Belief in God’s existence
– Genetic fallacy vs. Circumstantial ad Hominem
Straw Man
•
Straw man fallacy:
– trying to refute a claim or argument by distorting it or oversimplifying it or
misrepresenting it in such a way that it can be easily refuted.
– Reconfiguring a claim
– Knocking down a straw man
– Knocking down a straw man is easy business but knocking down a good
argument is not.
False Dilemma
•
False dilemma
–
–
limits considerations to a choice between only two alternatives although other
reasonable alternatives are available.
The form of a false dilemma:
–
Using a false dilemma for the purpose of deception
–
Example:
Perfectionist fallacy
•
Perfectionist fallacy
–
Rejecting a policy or claim because it isn’t perfect.
–
A kind of false dilemma
–
Example:
Line Drawing Fallacy
•
The Line-Drawing fallacy
–
insisting that a conceptual line must be drawn at a particular point when drawing such
a line isn’t necessary.
–
Examples:
•
•
•
–
Rich
Bald
Excessive force
Line drawing and Vagueness
Slippery Slope
•
Slippery Slope:
–
Claiming that if we let some thing X occur it follows that something else Y will occur, yet
there is no reason to think that if X occurs so must Y.
–
Causation and slippery slope arguments
–
Example:
• Hand gun laws
Misplacing the Burden of Proof
•
Misplacing the burden of proof:
– Misplacing the burden of proof on the wrong side of an issue.
– The 2 sides of an issue
– Example:
• Should we go to war with Iraq?
The burden of proof
•
To say the burden of proof rests on a claim:
–
This just means that if one is to hold this position, then she must support it with
argumentation.
–
Example:
• Iraq again
–
Temporal Priority
Where does the burden lie?
• Placing the burden
– Plausibility:
• Example:
– Affirmative:
• Example:
The burden of proof #3
•
Special Circumstances:
– Under special circumstances the burden of proof is placed on a particular
side of an issue.
– The court:
Appeal to ignorance
•
Appeal to ignorance
– claiming that we should believe that some claim is true because no one has
proved it false.
– Example:
Begging the Question
•
One begs the question when one of the premises of her argument
assumes the truth of the conclusion.
•
Examples:
– Abortion
– An argument for God’s existence
•
Circular reasoning