Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The New Outlook of the Reagan Years 1981-1988 Chapter 21 Section 1 Jimmy Carter was defeated for reelection in 1980 by a former movie star and two-term governor of California, Ronald Reagan. Reagan was elected governor of California in 1966 and reelected in 1970. Reagan won the Republican nomination easily in 1980 and went on to defeat the Democrats’ choice, President Carter, in a landslide victory. Reagan proved to be an extremely popular president. (One of the most popular in American history) As an experienced entertainer, he knew how to use the TV medium to project a pleasing personality to a mass audience. Unlike Jimmy Carter, Reagan took a firm stand on domestic issues. He believed in reducing taxes, reducing government spending on social programs, and increasing government spending on defense. His policies had a positive effect on the business and middle classes and a negative effect on the poor. Reagan- The New Federalism and Growth of Conservatism A major issue that arose under the Reagan presidency was whether it was primarily the job of the federal government or of the state government to combat crime, reform schools, and provide for general welfare. The Republican presidents elected in the 1970s and 1980s (Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and Bush) believed that the chief responsibility for social welfare lay with the state and local authorities. Nixon used the term New Federalism to describe his plan for giving the states freedom to decide how to use federal grants. Reagan adopted the same policy and urged the states to take more responsibility for solving social and economic problems. Supply-Side Economics The US inflation rate increased to 13 percent under President Carter. The problem was partly the result of government spending on the Vietnam War. It was also the result of high oil prices caused by the Arab oil embargo. The failure for Carter to find a cure for inflation was one reason why he was not elected for a second term. Reagan’s efforts to deal with inflation solved this problem only to create huge budget deficits. Reagan’s approach to the muddle was based on a theory called supply side economics. Conservatives who supported this theory believed that the economy would benefit if government spent less money and businesses spent more. Best way to accomplish this is to cut federal taxes. Businesses would then have more money to invest in productive enterprises, and consumers would receive more income from this economic boom to buy goods and services. At the same time, the government would make cuts in welfare programs, which were considered wasteful by Reagan and other conservatives. The inflation rate dropped to 6 percent in 1982 and less than 4 percent in 1983. Prosperity returned in 1984 and continued for the rest of the decade but staggering budget deficits were a new a problem. Tax Reform Act in 1986 Reagan reformed the tax system during his second term. Congress passed the Tax Reform Act in 1986. Previous tax laws had divided taxpayers into several brackets, according to their earned income. The higher the taxable income, the higher the percentage of income paid in taxes. Trickle Down Economics People with very high incomes benefited most from this reform law. Instead of being taxed at a 50 percent rate, as formerly, they paid just 28 percent. Thus a millionaire was in the same tax bracket as a person earning $30,000 a year. Question Why did Reagan and the Conservatives feel the Trickle Down Economics would help the American Economy? Budget Deficit If the government spends more than it collects in taxes, it ends the year with a deficit. The opposite result more money received than money spent is known as a surplus. To make up the difference between expenses and income, the government had to borrow millions and even billions of dollars each year. In other words the government went heavily into debt. The debt was kept at a reasonably manageable level through the early 1960s. After the Vietnam War, however, the national debt exceeded $500 billion and rapidly climbed to nearly $1 trillion when Ronald Reagan submitted his first budget to Congress in 1981. United States National Debt Clock http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/ Effects of “Reaganomics” Critics of President Reagan’s economic policy warned that “Reaganomics” (as they called the supply-side theory) would result in huge deficits. Reagan’s tax cuts of 1981 mean lower government revenues. At the same time, increased government spending for defense meant higher government expenditures. Many economists were alarmed by these run away budget deficits. They pointed out that, as deficits rose, so did the burden of paying interest on the national debt. By 1990 interest payments cost the government about $150 billion annually. Partly because of the debt burden, the government was less able to spend adequate sums for urgent national needs such as highway repair and health care. Deregulation of Business Deregulation meant removing many governmental rules that had limited and controlled business competition. The Reagan years saw a huge increase in business mergers because little was done to enforce the antitrust laws because he cut back the rule making to allow businesses greater freedoms. Environmental and Civil Rights President Reagan’s belief in reduced involvement by the federal government led to decreased support for environment measures during his administration. Reagan believed that environmental efforts would lead to higher costs for business and higher prices for consumers. Reagan signed into law to have Martin Luther King Jr,. Day be a national holiday. Effects on Minorities President Reagan’s policy of reducing government spending on social programs represented a setback for the poor during the 1980s. Major cuts in welfare and other social services in which many minorities were a part of were greatly effected. Engel v. Vitale Engel v. Vitale (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that determined that it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and require its recitation in public schools. In violation of the principle of separation of church and state. Abington School District v. Schempp Abington School District v. Schempp was a United States Supreme Court case argued on February 27–28, 1963 and decided on June 17, 1963. In the case, the Court decided 8-1 in favor of the respondent, Edward Schempp, and declared school sponsored Bible reading in public schools in the United States to be unconstitutional. The case was part of a string of Supreme Court cases ruling on the place of religion in public schools, and was both condemned by some religious conservatives and celebrated by those who supported constitutional separation of church and state. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Petitioners, three public school pupils in Des Moines, Iowa, were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the Government's policy in Vietnam. The Supreme Court decided that students could not be penalized for wearing black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. It argued that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” New Jersey vs. TLO (1985) In this case, a high school freshman in New Jersey had been found smoking in the school bathroom. She was made to open her purse. In her purse, school officials found wrapping paper for tobacco or marijuana, a list of students who owed her money, and a substantial amount of cash. The student was found to be delinquent and sentenced to one-year probation. The Supreme Court ruled that the school acted reasonably to maintain order and discipline. It held that reasonable suspicion for searches and seizures in schools need not be based on the “probable cause” provision of the Fourth Amendment. Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995) In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that a school district has the right to institute a student athletic drug policy that includes the random testing of urine for drugs. The Court held that the policy did not violate the Fourth Amendment right to privacy of the students. It notes that students athletes are already required to take medical tests prior to approval for student teams. Thus, the addition of a drug test need not be based on suspicion of drug use among individual students. The Court held that the state may exercise a greater degree of supervision over students in public schools than it could exercise over adults.