Download Privacy, Confidentiality, and Privilege in Mental Health Services

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Stipulatio wikipedia , lookup

Email privacy wikipedia , lookup

United States contract law wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Necessary Secrets
Privacy, Confidentiality, and
Privilege in Mental Health Services
Gerald P. Koocher, Ph.D., ABPP
Values underlying
Confidentiality
Stigma
Trust
Privacy
Autonomy
Stigma
• Public fear and superstition
• Stereotypes associated with violence
and dangerousness
• Discrimination against mentally ill is
prohibited under the ADA of 1990
(PL101-336)and Fair Housing
Amendments Act of 1988 (PL100430), but still…
Trust
• Fundamental to the therapeutic
alliance
• “Effective psychotherapy…depends
upon an atmosphere of confidence
and trust in which the patient is
willing to make frank and complete
disclosure…”
(Jaffe v. Redmond, 1996)
Privacy
• Court decisions in regard to
procreation, death, and dying,
and mental health illustrate the
significant societal concern for
privacy
Autonomy
• Competent individuals’ right
to self-determination,
including the decision to
seek, select, or forgo health
care
Typical Exceptions to
Confidentiality
• Patient consent
• Other treatment
providers
• Reimbursement
• Disclosure to
patient
• Disclosures to
families
• Quality control and
program evaluation
• Research
• Public health
reporting
• Protection of third
parties
• Disclosures to law
enforcement
• Disclosure in court
proceedings
Definitions
• Privacy
• Confidentiality
• Privilege
– Prevents disclosure in legal
proceedings
– Established by common law, refined by
statute and case law
• Jaffee v. Redmond et al. U.S. Sup. Ct. [June 13, 1996]
Mandated Reporting
Child abuse/neglect:
– Reasonable cause to believe or reasonable
suspicion
– Sexual abuse may require additional actions
Abuse/neglect of dependent persons:
– Elderly
• May include financial abuse
– Disabled
• May allow more discretion
– Dangerous driver
Discretional Breaches
• Lawsuits (seek release)
• Ethics complaints (seek release)
• Within institution
– Treating colleagues
– Supervision
– Utilization review
– Quality assurance
Duties to Third Parties
• Obligations to payers
– Contractual versus non-contractual
• Patient’s contract
• Non-subscriber parties
• Provider’s contract
• Targets of violence
– Tarasoff and progeny
– Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 17 Cal. 3d
425, 551 P. 2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14. (1976)
• Risk assessment
• Identified target
• Protective steps
Duties to Third Parties
• Family members
– Child exceptions
• Following client’s death
– Privilege can survive death
Swidler & Berlin and James Hamilton v. United States U.S. 97-1192
– Client’s executor is “in charge”
• Anne Sexton/Martin Orne
Multiple Client Therapies
• Groups
– No privilege held in relationship to other group
members
• Couples
– What is the couple’s contract?
• Families
– What is the contract?
– What will parents allow?
– What about break-ups?
Confidentiality and Minors
• What secrets will
parents allow their
children?
• Contract at outset;
but minds can
change
• Long-term issues
– When grown children
access their own
childhood records
Subpoenas and
Court Orders
•
•
•
•
What is a subpoena?
What is a court order?
A subpoena compels a response.
Only a court order can compel a
disclosure.