Download CUPS2008 - New Dualism Archive

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
NB: slides need to be advanced manually!
A Critical Point for Science?
Lecture to the Cambridge University Physics Society
March 5th., 2008
Brian D. Josephson
TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory
Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
1
Basic themes:
• Current physics implicitly assumes matter is
fundamental, life and mentality being secondary
• There are reasons for thinking that such a picture
may be incomplete, leading to error
• A new conceptual foundation reverses the order of
things, making life and mentality more basic than
matter.
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
2
Wheeler’s picture
(see The Goldilocks Enigma by Paul Davies)
• Cosmos > Life > Mind > Cosmos
Picture based on ‘participatory observers’
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
3
Thanks to:
Samantha
Parton
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
Stu
Kauffman
Steve
Rosen
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
Tethys
Carpenter
4
Picture Credits
Parton and Rosen: Brian Josephson
Carpenter: Simon Keynes
Kauffman:
http://www.science.tamu.edu/story3.asp?storyID=465
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
5
Physics has always presumed matter
Newtonian mechanics
e-m theory/classical mechanics
Basic QM
Quantum field theory
String/M theory
• Matter (‘things’) features at every stage
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
6
What is/may be left out
•
•
•
•
Observer problem
Life (complementarity)
Higher cognitive capacities
Paranormal phenomena
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
7
Observer issue
What we see is not what we get (from the
theory)
[many worlds problem: the statistical
interpretation helps only if one avoids
looking too closely!]
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
8
Life issue
Measuring a biosystem may change its
properties (Bohr)
QM provides no clear specification for
dealing with ‘unprepared systems’;
there is no clarity regarding ‘quantum
organisation’.
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
9
Higher-capacities problem
Again, there is little clarity as to how one
might explain, e.g.:
• Mathematical insight
• Musical appreciation
• ESP, etc.
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
10
Gravity problem
• Gravity can’t be fitted into Standard
Model
• Extending this to fit makes ‘What You
See’ still further from ‘What You Get
From The Theory’ (many extra
dimensions)
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
11
The epicycle saga
• Epicycles gave quantitatively correct
results but were ultimately seen not to
be the right approach: ‘magnitudes are
not everything!’
• Might science similarly be wrong re
mind and life?
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
12
Which is more fundamental?
• Usual view: matter is more fundamental,
and life emerges from it
• Alternative: life, mentality etc. emerge
from a more fundamental level of
existence
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
13
Wheeler’s picture
• Cosmos > Life > Mind > Cosmos
Picture based on ‘participatory observers’
Problem: idea too vague
Remedy: find a more advanced
formulation of the idea!
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
14
How to make life/mind fundamental?
• Start with a fundamental theory of life
Use this as the basis for everything
(instead of starting with a conventional
theory)
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
15
The spinoff, given a proper theory:
• ‘Mind’ would decide what a universe
should be like, not ingenious schemes
dreamt up by physicists following the
latest bandwaggon!
• Mind decides on basis of what would
best support life, > biofriendly universe.
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
16
The Critical Point
Origin of critical-point idea: Samantha Parton on musical
creativity (from interview with Triste magazine):
“when you stare into that space and that deepness, you get
close to the place where things begin, and that's a [good]
place to be … [for making music]”
Tc
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
17
Then ...
… an article by Stuart Kauffman et al. in
Nature reminded me that I had in my
office a copy of Kauffman’s book ‘The
Origins of Order’!
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
18
A different order of things
• Kauffman proposes that life happens at
‘the edge of chaos’, a situation poised
between order and disorder
• Bohm refers to ‘unmanifest order’
becoming manifest
• Rosen refers instead to ‘apeiron’, a
‘primal chaos’, from which order springs
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
19
Some key concepts
•
•
•
•
•
Edge of chaos
Structures
Differential stability
Attractor
‘Smart systems’
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
20
Smart systems
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Stable
Cooperate to form smart complexes
‘do things’, compute (= I/O + dynamics)
Communicate, make requests, anticipation
Mutual support in a group
Societies live longer
Melt-freeze strategy at edge of chaos
Development of specialisations
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
21
Manifestations of mind
• Direct; or
• Indirect via universes
mind
universe
manifestations
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
22
Minds and universes
•
•
‘Deep’ life can use mind to build
universes
Mind needs universes that
a)
b)
It knows how to build (symmetry?)
Are useful
•
Elegance as such is not of interest!
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
23
Space and time
• Space: a resource that things can move
around in, provides proximity,
separation, place
• Scientist time: a resource that assists
synchronisation, ‘being on time’: time
like that shown by a clock, not ‘actual
time’
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
24
Space and time are non-trivial!
Space: act of becoming separate
Time: cycles
Space and time represent organisation
(Rosen, after Heidegger)
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
25
Space-time going cheap!
Space-time
Universes are created, and organised — somehow!
(cf. flocking of birds, termites’ nests)
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
26
ESP
universe level
space
M1
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
M2
deep level
(‘pre-space’)
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
27
Creativity
• Can all of creativity (e.g. higher maths,
subtle music) be understood
biologically?
• Does it instead come from our deeper
source?
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
28
Source of music?
• Place where things begin
• Comprehensible ‘germs’
• Like a gene, function in a computer
program
• Elementary components that can
perform tasks and which we can learn
to combine
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
29
What are the components of mind?
• Atoms of mind are the units of intelligence,
elementary ideas, are ‘physical’ at this deep
level, come from self-organisation.
• Ideas are systems with a specific inner
dynamics, manifesting in their ability to
organise and to create.
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
30
In conclusion
• We have proposed an extension of
science
• Where will this lead?
• Will strange, taboo ideas become a
respectable part of science?
Telepathy, ‘memory of water’, ‘cold fusion’?
Scientific theology, intelligent design?
Occult Sciences Tripos? CU Institute of Astrology?
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
31
References (books)
• Stuart Kauffman: the Origins of Order
• Paul Davies: the Goldilocks Enigma
• Steven Rosen: the Self-Evolving
Cosmos
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
32
References (web)
• Video lecture: Can the Physicists' Description of
Reality be Considered Complete?
• Limits to the Universality of Quantum Theory
• Beyond Quantum Theory: a realist psychobiological
interpretation of physical reality (with Michael Conrad
and Dipankar Home)
• String Theory, Universal Mind and the Paranormal
• What can Music tell us about the Nature of the Mind:
a Platonic Model (with Tethys Carpenter)
• “The place where things begin”: Samantha Parton
interview in Triste magazine
Mar. 5, 2008/CUPS
A Critical Point for Science / Brian Josephson
33