Download d Kepler Telescope Lies from NASA The Claims "NASA`s Kepler

Kepler Telescope Lies from NASA
The Claims
"NASA's Kepler planet-hunting satellite reported on Wednesday that they had identified
1,235 possible planets orbiting other stars…." (NY Times: 2/2/11) "NASA finds earth-size
Planet Candidates in the Habitable Zone." (nasa.gov/mission….) "Kepler dramatically boosts
exoplanet count…about 2000 light years from earth." (ABC Science) "Cosmic census finds
crowd of planets in our galaxy." (Yahoo!News) "…an extraordinary planet windfall, a
moment that will be written in the textbooks. It will be thought of as a watershed." (Ibid.
NYT, p.2)
Comment: Hundreds of such claims are found on the Net. ALL describe such finds AS
A FACT, a "watershed, textbook moment" for Space Science. It's all lies. Read on:
The Overriding Agenda behind the Claims
"At least 500 million of those 50 billion Milky Way planets [!!] are in the…zone where life
could exist." (ibid.Yahoo!) "Of the new exoplanet candidates, Fifty-four are in the habitable
zones…where temperatures should be moderate enough for liquid water." (Ibid. NYT)
SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Institute) folks joyfully join the chorus of praise
with: "A Landslide of Kepler Exoplanet Candidates" leads into 16 page coverage
(http://scienceblogs.com/SETI/1011/02/SETI). "…Kepler has turned science-fiction into today's
reality", said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden. "These discoveries underscore the
importance of NASA's science missions which consistently increase understanding of
our place in the cosmos."
Comment: NASA's Agenda Is Unvarying. Their tax-funded billions every year remain
wholly dedicated to their "Origins Program to Find Our Cosmic Roots."1 That Program
has established the alternate "creation model" of the Pharisee Religion.2
NASA's "Explanation" Of How the Kepler Telescope Works
1
2
NASAs Agenda.docx
10-Step Process Exp.Evol.docx
"The [Kepler] telescope sees [lie] planet's footprints as it passes across the face of its
parent star, just like a gnat flying past your computer screen will block a bit of light."
"Kepler, a space telescope, looks for planet signatures [How?] by measuring tiny
decreases in the brightness of stars caused by planets crossing in front of them [the
stars]. They see nothing... This is known as a transit." It's "…like looking at a headlight
at a great distance and trying to sense the brightness change when a flea crosses the
surface." "Kepler [exoplanet] 11 is located c. 2000 light years from Earth…."
Comment: 2000 light years is about 12000 Trillion Miles. Got it? Even if stars were
known to be "suns"--which they emphatically are not known to be3--our sun's 870,000
mile diameter would be over 700 million times smaller than we see it. And any earth-like
exoplanet ”transiting" an alleged "sun" would have to be over 100 times smaller than
700 million times. It takes 1000 x One Billion to make One Trillion. It takes 12000 Trillion
miles to make the claimed 2000 light years. Is there anyone not totally hypnotized by
the Pharisee Religion's Virtual Reality Universe4 who can believe that earth-like planets
(8000 mile diameter) have been found "transiting" a "star/sun" that is 12000 trillion miles
away…and this has been done by detecting a decrease in the light emitted by an
unresolveably small star/sun being "transited" by an unseen "exoplanet"??!
But that is not all we are asked to believe that Kepler can do! Additionally, we are told
that Kepler can reveal from these unseen "transits" 12000 trillion miles away
"gravitational interference" which enables it to "calculate their [the "exoplanets"] masses
and densities" and confirm "substantial envelopes of light gases"! And all this at a
distance 720 million times as far away as our sun!! Do we recognize an infinitely huge
crock of offal when we see such claims, or, again, are we all hypnotized to the degree
that we continue to call such "profane and vain babbling" Science??!5
Facts about Telescopes Falsify "Kepler" And All Space Science Claims
"If one could look through the 200 inch (17') telescope on Mt. Palomar, one would see
stars as nothing more than the same points of light you would see by simply walking
outside and looking up. Why are stars the sole hold out in the resolution revolution up
to now? [See Size-Structure Pt 6.docx for 16 pgs of killer facts about telescope et al lies.]
Comment: No telescope has ever shown a resolution of a star (always "imaged" as
round "suns"). Stars are Points of light. That's it. The rest is computer programmed lies6
from the "father of lies" (John 8:44)7. Think of any star point of light you can see through
3
Electric.docx
Virtual Reality Fraud.docx, Space-Science Hypnosis.docx
5
Space-Science Hypnosis.docx
6
NASAs Hanky-Panky.docx
7
Kabbala 4.docx
4
the 200 inch telescope as being the same size as you see by just looking up. Then
imagine a speck about 108 times smaller crossing a point of light with that diameter
and tell yourself that you believe the Kepler telescope can tell the speck has "transited"-not because anything is seen!--but because it registers a change in the luminosity of a
tiny point of light that is 12000 trillion miles away! And, oh yeah; it calculates the unseen
speck's "mass and density and confirms "light gasses". The gases are from NASA and
they're not light!
Anyone who is beginning to smell a very big rat in all such fact-free lies from NASA's
RELIGIOUS "Origins Program to Find Our Cosmic Roots" can find a ton of juicy fodder
for your blackberry/facebook/twitter, etc. on this site (www.fixedearth.com)
In addition to the wealth of information on phony telescopes, check out the Positional
Astronomy Library with its 185 big-bang based routines for your computer. Find out
what a farce Infrared Astronomy is. Don't miss the lies built on Mass-LuminosityMagnitude-Distance and the Apparent Magnitude & Absolute Magnitude chicanery.
Then there's Radiation of Light, an-all-time -favorite, and The Drake Equation, by Drake
the Flake.8
And don't miss the half page on The Celestial Sphere9 where it is admitted that this
stationary Earth at the Center of the Universe Model "is still the way astronomers
choose to model the observable sky". (See drawings in final pages of "Size and Structure of
the Universe According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science", Figures I thru VII.10
***
>>See more on this from 2004-2007 in "New Planet Lies"
8
Size-Structure Pt 6.docx
Size-Structure Pt 6.docx (p.9)
10
Size-Structure Pt 7.docx
9