Download Common-Mode Feedback Circuits

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Control theory wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Power inverter wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Signal-flow graph wikipedia , lookup

Capacitor wikipedia , lookup

Resistor wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Transmission line loudspeaker wikipedia , lookup

Integrated circuit wikipedia , lookup

Power electronics wikipedia , lookup

Tube sound wikipedia , lookup

Electronic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

P–n diode wikipedia , lookup

Transistor wikipedia , lookup

Control system wikipedia , lookup

Amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Two-port network wikipedia , lookup

Current source wikipedia , lookup

Metadyne wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Bode plot wikipedia , lookup

Negative feedback wikipedia , lookup

Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup

CMOS wikipedia , lookup

Current mirror wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Wien bridge oscillator wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Analog Electronics — 9
•
Example: If v on is picked to be 0.2 V, V DS set to V on + 0.2V = 0.4V , V TN = 0.8V , V TP = – 0.9 V , power
supply rails at 3.0 V, (bias voltages shown below) then swing from about 0.6 V to 2.4 V.
3V
∆i = g m v d ⁄ 2
2I
I –∆ i
1.9V
I –∆ i
1.5V
gm
vd
1.4V
1.5V
2I
1V
2∆i
+
gm
CL
I + ∆i
1.4V
I –∆ i
1V
I –∆ i
gm vd
1.5V
0.5V
0V
1.5V
-
vo
I + ∆i
0V
single stage (output current is directly g m v d ) high
frequency capability
•
vo
gain = ----- = g m R o , typical gain about 1000 or 60
vd
dB. R o is high due to cascodes
•
Dominant pole, UGBW is set by load capacitance
thus larger load results in more stability
•
Set current by desired slew rate and known
capacitor load.
2∆i
vo
CL
I –∆ i
1V
I –∆ i
•
I + ∆i
0.4V
vd
gm vd
1.5V
-
1.9V
1.5V
I + ∆i
I + ∆i
3V
2I
1.9V
I + ∆i
+
2I
2I
2I
Common-Mode Feedback Circuits
•
•
Circuit and feedback often define difference mode
Common mode can drift, potentially putting circuit
into bad region of operation
•
Need common-mode correction circuit to provide
low A c , with minimal reduction of A d
•
Can sum outputs to obtain v oc . If this is not zero,
feed back a correcting signal. If output is purely
differential, v op = – v on and the sum will be zero.
An example below uses resistors for summing
Opamp Design: C. Plett
Analog Electronics — 10
Example of Common-Mode Feedback Circuit for Folded-Cascode Amplifier
v bias
v op
M4
M5
v bias
v on
R
bias
von
+
vop
vin
-
R
v ref
vc
CL
M3
M 11
M 10
•
Capacitor C across resistor R improves highfrequency performance
•
Operation:
•
summing: use resistors, switched capacitors,
transistors in linear region, or differential pair.
•
resistors across output, or SC can reduce DC
gain, however, equivalent R can be very high.
-
If both outputs are high, v c will go high
with respect to v ref .
•
-
Note: feedback of the appropriate polarity could
instead be fed back to M 3 or to M 10 and M 11 .
v bias will also go high, since the extra
amplifier is non-inverting
•
Things to watch out for:
-
M 4 and M 5 will have their current reduced
-
The output voltage will be reduced (overall
negative feedback)
Stability of CM loop (Tests open loop, or
with common-mode step)
-
If summing with SC, restricted to timedomain simulations (or replace with R eq )
-
linearity of sum for large diff voltage
Opamp Design: C. Plett
Analog Electronics — 11
Two-stage opamp with pole splitting compensation
M4
M5
M1
v1
v2
x
Cc
CL
I3
VB
v1
M1
x
M2
vi
Cc
v2
vz
Rz
gmivi
M6
vo
Cc
CL
vz
M4
M7
M3
Small Signal Model
M7
IB
M6
vo
M2
M3
VB
vz
Cz
gmovz
Ro
CL
M5
vo
ω p2 ω p2
(– s + z)
Transfer function: ----- ≈ A o -------------------- ----------------------------------------------vi
z
( s + ω p1 ) ( s + ω p2 )
vo vo vz
Low Freq. gain: ----- = ----- ⋅ ---- = A o = g mo R o ⋅ g mi R z
vi vz vi
g mi
UGBW = -------- , Slew Rate =
Cc
I3
------ ,
Cc
Stability
•
g mo
next pole: ω p2 ≈ – --------CL
A normal (LHP) zero would add phase lead to
improve stability, but RHP zero adds phase lag
which reduces stability (45o at ω z ).
•
g mo
RHP zero: ω z ≈ --------Cc
Increased load capacitance reduces stability since
p 2 moves to lower frequency.
•
p 2 and z must be beyond UGBW enough so total
1
dominant pole: ω p1 ≈ – -----------------------------R z g mo R o C c
Where: v i = ( v 1 – v 2 ) , g mo = g m6 ,
g mi = g m1 = g m2 , R z = r o2 || r o5 , R o = r o6 || r o7 ,
C z = parasitic (small) , C L = load capacitance
phase shift due to p 2 and z < 45° .
Rules of thumb: Gregorian and Temes
p 2 = z = 3 UGBW → 53° phase margin
Allen and Holberg z = 10 UGBW ,
p 2 = 2.2 UGBW → 60° phase margin
Opamp Design: C. Plett
Analog Electronics — 12
Additions to Pole Splitting, Offsets, Gain Errors, Buffers
Calculation of Gain Error
The zero in the RHP can result in instability. Can
remove, or compensate for with the following
techniques:
1. Buffer, typically source follower,
to allow feedback only (removing feed forward)
source follower
vo
vz
Cc
Vbias
current source
This removes the zero, and
the system is left with two
poles. These should be
separated by the DC gain,
or more for stability.
vi + +
-
A
B
Cc
Rc
vo
1
Closed loop gain is --- in dB
B
Buffers
1
adds ω p3 = – ------------- , changes
Rc C c
vin
Level
Shift
1
ω z to ω z = ---------------------------------- , this allows one to move
1
 --------– R c C c
g

m6
(or vin)
Source Followers
ω z → ∞ , or bring it into the LHP where it can cancel
out ω p2 approximately
•
Offsets
+
Vo,off
Output referred
Valid for high A.
1
1
Here, desired gain ≈ --- , Gain error ------B
AB
where AB = loop gain → Open loop gain in dB,
2. Series Resistance
vz
vo
1⁄B
1
1
----- = ----------------------------- ≈ ---  1 – -------
1 + 1 ⁄ ( AB ) B 
vi
AB
vo
+
Vi,off
-
+
Input referred
V o, off
V i, off = ---------------A
Level
Shifts
vi
vo
Drain Outputs
Source output has low inpedance, limited swing,
can only get within V T from the rails, (assuming
v in can go all the way to the rails).
For gain A ,
0V
vo
•
Drain output is a current output, i.e., higher
impedance compared to source output, but good
swing, can get essentially all the way to the rails.
Opamp Design: C. Plett
Analog Electronics — 13
Layout and Cross Sections of CMOS Transistors (Source - Substrate Connected)
VIN
VSS
VDD
schematic
VOUT
VIN
VDD
VSS
top view
n+ mask
NMOS
B
S
p+
n+
VOUT
p+ mask
G
n+
cross section
PMOS
G
D
D
S
p+
p+
B
n+
n- well
p- substrate
Opamp Design: C. Plett
Analog Electronics — 14
Other Components
Resistors
L
T
L
L - = R ⋅ ---L = ρ -------R = ρ --S WTW
A
W
•
ρ
design information documents often give R S , the sheet resistance in ohms per square R S = --- . e.g., if
T
60µ
100Ω ⁄ then R = 100 × --------- = 600Ω which we see as 6 squares
10µ
60µ
10µ
•
a typical resistor:
-
1
in counting total length, corner square
is about 0.5 square. Result 57
•
5
Absolute tolerance:
-
≈ ± 20% for wide resistors > 10 µm
± 30% for W = 5µm
•
→
1
1
1
3
matching: W = 5µ ± 3 % , W = 10µ ± 1.2 % , W = 25µ ± 0.8 % , W = 50µ ± 0.2 %
Opamp Design: C. Plett
Analog Electronics — 15
Capacitors
•
•
Transistors
Parallel plates of Area A, capacitance per area Co
•
ε R εo
ε
C = C o A where C ox = ------- = ----------- .
t ox
t ox
Often W/L >> 1, so can use multiple contacts for
minimal source or drain series resistance
•
Diagram same for p or n. If PMOS, then in n-well
with p+ mask, NMOS in p-substrate with n+.
•
can have multiple stripes. This can reduce total
drain or source area to minimize capacitance.
•
two gate poly stripes, could be common source,
e.g., diff pair, or common connection or since we
often cannot tell source and drain apart, it might be
a series circuit (for Nand, or cascode).
if t ox = 0.017µm , ε R for SiO2 is 3.9 then
– 12
fF
3.9 × 8.854 ×10 ( F ⁄ m )
C ox = -------------------------------------------------------------- ≈ 2 ---------------- example:
–6
2
0.017 ×10 ( m )
( µm )
transistor estimate C gs ≈ 2--- C ox WL , with W
----- = 150µ
-----------L
1µ
3
2
has C gs = ( 2 ⁄ 3 ) × 150 × 2 ( fF ⁄ µm ) = 0.2 pF .
•
•
•
capacitors can be metal-metal (MIM), poly-poly or
poly-diffusion. (poly-poly shown below)
L
typically design as multiples of a unit capacitor for
best matching, e.g., unit could be 0.5 pF, then could
get accurate 1.5 pF match to 2.5 pF.
D1 D2
D G S
D
ly
de
oxi ap po
c
D1 G1 S G2 D2
metal
y
pla top
te
contacts
W
Otherwise, need to keep area to perimeter ratio the
same.
pol
poly
S
W/L or
G
S
G
G1
G2
W/L
S
D
or
Opamp Design: C. Plett
Analog Electronics — 16
Transistor layout:
G1 D1 G1
D2
G2 D2 G2
D2
G2
Drain connections
are not all shown.
These missing connections are shown
dashed on the schematic below
G1
S
D1
D1
S
D1
S
D2
D1
G1
D1
G1
D2
4(W/L)
G2
D2
2(W/L)
G1
G2
G2
S
S
Differential Pair
•
can minimize drain area and
perimeter of diff pair to minimize capacitance.
•
In an opamp, the second
(parasitic) pole may be at the
drain, so minimum capacitance here can help to
increase freq response.
S
Common Centroid Differential Pair
•
Can interleave two transistors, as in the example above, where there
are a total of eight transistors of which four form M1 and four form M2.
•
This minimizes the effect of process variations and temperature variations across the chip, thus resulting in better matching, and lower offset. This is called the common-centroid topology.
•
Note: the same interleaving technique can be used for two resistors
which need to be matched.
Opamp Design: C. Plett