Download Flavio Burlizzi, Mondimpresa

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Adriatic and Ionian Chambers FORUM
Budva-Bečići 16-18 May 2005
JOINT PROJECT PLANNING IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE NEW EUROPEAN UNION
NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICY
Flavio Burlizzi
Mondimpresa Brussels
I wish to thank specially the organisers for the invitation and the opportunity to analyse the European Community
perspectives in this region with particular emphasis on project planning. My aim is to describe current
developments and direct consequences on this strategic area for the future of the European Union.
The near opening of accession negotiations with Croatia and, in the middle-term, with the FYR of Macedonia,
means that the accelerated process that will lead to a new Europe in the years ahead has already started.
This process, which has been given further political impulse by the 2003 Thessaloniki Agenda and the 2004
adoption of European Partnerships, seems to be orientated towards a more active integration policy post 2007.
By the assessment of steps already taken at European level in this area over the last years an ambiguous scenario is
evinced.
The CARDS program, the principal instrument of technical and financial support at disposal of the European
Union, though still obtaining satisfactory results in some sectors (regional infrastructure network, local
development, environmental policies and, in some cases, market organisation, commerce, promotion of public and
private investment), highlights the need for a reinforced intervention in vital fields such as the public
administration reform, the legislative supremacy, support to democracy and even more specific fields like gender
parity.
In fact, through an overall evaluation we may observe that local beneficiary organisations responsible for
launching the reform process in the region are not taken into consideration by proposed initiatives. This could be
explained by weak management decentralisation and lack of clear strategy of policies. As a consequence, they
result inadequate and not sustainable in the long-term.
The programmes, which were first oriented to the objectives of reconstruction and recovering, are now firmly
committed with a more co-ordinated perspective of supporting administrative reform and institution building.
Therefore, the promotion of economic development becomes the new challenge against which to measure its
success.
Hence it is necessary to think not only about the capacity of different institutional subjects to operate in real
partnership with local beneficiaries, but also about the role to be played by European "territories" in latu sensu in
the context of regional strategy, taking into account available instruments for implementing policies once targeted
at reconstruction and now at economic development.
These two issues are fundamental for examining the perspectives and the role to be played by Chambers which I
believe is central.
The Financial Perspectives 2007-2013, currently under negotiation by the EU's 25 countries, seek to reform all
foreign assistance instruments at disposal of the European Union. From 2007 onwards, the Commission proposes
to support co-operation at land and sea external borders by means of two instruments: the Instrument of
Pre-Access Assistance (IPA) and the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI).
The proposals foresee € 13.4 billion for the new IPA instrument which shall substitute, in a more coherent
framework, several existing programs (PHARE, ISPA, SAPARD, CARDS etc.). Beneficiary countries will be
divided into 2 categories, depending on their status as either candidate countries or potential candidate countries,
but the approach will be extremely flexible in order to quick accommodate alterations and adjustments over the
long period of implementation. In the Balkan region, IPA shall emphasize the stabilisation process, the regional
cooperation, the measures aimed to promote economic development, as well as the progressive alignment of
legislation with the acquis communaitaire in the mutual interest of the EU and the beneficiary country.
ENPI represents the second innovative instrument for the future management of resources by the European Union.
From March 2003 to June 2004, the European Commission and the European Council have set out the guidelines
of the new neighbourhood policy aimed, according to then President Prodi, to create a ring of friends with those
countries around the land and sea borders of the new enlarged EU and which are not yet potential candidates for
membership: Russia, the Western Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States (Ukraine, Moldavia in a
first phase and Belarus, as soon as democracy will be adopted by this country), the 10 countries of the
Mediterranean Basin which participates in the Barcelona process, except Turkey (Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria,
Egypt, Lebanon, Israel, Palestinian Territories, Jordan, Syria and Libya, which is looking forward fully
participation). This project foresees the later involvement of the Southern Caucasus region (Georgia, Azerbaijan,
Armenia).
The objective is to promote political and economic security in an area often distressed by political instability,
economic vulnerability, institutional weaknesses, conflicts, poverty and social exclusion.
With this goal, the European Union has adopted a strategy aimed to promote stability and sustainable development
at external borders so as to allow its neighbours to share progressively the benefits of the enlargement to 25. In
short, the possibility of sharing advantages and opportunities in change of a clear requirement: the implementation
of political, economic and institutional reforms and the sharing of common values, such as the rule of law, good
governance, the respect for human rights, including minority rights, the promotion of good neighbourly relations
and the principles of market economy and sustainable development.
For these countries, the main objective of proposals forwarded by the European Commission are the progressive
alignment of legislation to EU standards, so as to allow them access to EU markets, and the promotion of
cooperation in the sectors of energy, transports, information society, environment, research and innovation and
social policies.
In addition to these two new instruments, new initiatives that will foster the relationship between the EU and the
Western Balkans in the next years also include the strategy proposed in the framework of the future New Objective
3 of Structural Funds (European territorial cooperation). This initiative, based on INTERREG experience, will
allocate significant additional resources in a new coherent framework of measures to be shared among European
neighbour countries.
According to the Commission, the specific elements responsible to assure coherence in all programmes of
cross-border cooperation are: active methodology like Structural Funds for the establishment of solid partnerships
at local level, multiyear measures, decentralisation of project selection and joint management with beneficiary
institutions.
I have tried to make it clear enough the perspectives in the middle and long-term. Now I would like to describe
some opportunities offered in the short-term.
In order to assure the coherence of policies, the Commission has decided that, until the end of the 2006, the
Western Balkans shall participate in the pilot phase of implementation of new programmes, even though they are
not included in the neighbouring policy as potential candidates for membership. € 15 million per year shall be
added to CARDS funds foreseen until next year for helping beneficiary countries to participate in ten
neighbourhood programmes active in the area, which will enhance and replace existing programmes of
cross-border cooperation. The first calls for proposals have already been published and the Commission is
intensifying, through its regional delegates and the Agency for Reconstruction, the divulgation of information in
the whole area.
An additional interesting aspect is increased access to several Community programs offered to Balkan countries by
CARDS in the period 2005-2006. Even though access will be restricted to a limited number of programmes at an
initial phase, such initiative is an important step for the establishment of a new framework of procedures and
administrative culture certainly not familiar to beneficiary countries to which they should get used to.
What role can be played by the Chambers operating in this region? In my opinion, Forum commitment with joint
project planning is completely in line with several characteristics of the European Commission efforts towards this
area.
The fostering of administrative reform, decentralisation of programmes and management of resources, together
with the need for promoting economic development call for measures aimed to capacity building and targeted not
only to institutions but also to the local entrepreneurial system, which is the final beneficiary of many of proposed
actions.
The limited commitment of European "territories" in latu sensu in the construction of virtuous processes in the
region requires a consistent effort based on network relationships with the purpose of establishing an atmosphere
of confidence and mutual collaboration necessary for the success of proposed initiatives.
Careful joint monitoring of the region necessities in the context of priorities defined by the Commission will offer
Chambers the opportunity to play an important role, possibly overcoming obstacles to regional cooperation that
programmes like CARDS have had to face over the last years.
Joint project planning has been always a priority to Mondimpresa, Agency of Italian Chambers of Commerce for
the internationalisation. Two concrete examples concern the Balkan region.
Above all, INTEGRA network, operating for almost 3 years and composed of executives from 23 Mediterranean,
Middle-East, Near-East and Balkan countries. Nine structures coming from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia,
FYR of Macedonia, Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro benefit by the opportunity to operate inside one or more
Italian Service Centres; there are 35 such Centres in total, the greater number of which linking up with Chambers,
thus acquiring direct knowledge of technical mechanisms of district/production process and taking advantage of
contacts with most active enterprises potentially interested in cooperation.
Furthermore, the experience that Mondimpresa is starting to acquire through the granting, to economic agents in
some Balkan countries like Serbia, Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of credit lines made available by the
Italian government for the purchase of Italian investment goods, that is, machinery and related services. This
project is coordinated by the intergovernmental international organisation International Management Group
(IMG) and jointly developed by consultancy structures composed of Mondimpresa, SIMEST and Intesa
Formazione. Also in this case the chambers represent the principal vehicle for accessing such an interesting
opportunity.
I wish that, thanks to the contribution by Mondimpresa, which has been operating at its Bruxelles office for more
than 15 years, as well as the experience acquired in project planning and management inside extremely active
networks, like Euro Info Centres, the Chambers of Commerce may confirm their role as territorial points of
reference for the development of EU policies and programmes in this strategic region.