Download 16271 Co-ordinate a whānau hui in an Iwi/Māori social services

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
16271 version 3
Page 1 of 4
Co-ordinate a whānau hui in an Iwi/Māori social services setting
Level
4
Credits
3
Purpose
People credited with this unit standard are able to: receive and manage a
referral for a whānau hui in an Iwi/Māori social services setting; co-ordinate
planning of a whānau hui; and co-ordinate the mihimihi and hospitality.
Subfield
Social Services
Domain
Iwi/Māori Social Services
Status
Registered
Status date
25 February 2008
Date version published
25 February 2008
Planned review date
31 December 2012
Entry information
Open.
Accreditation
Evaluation of documentation and visit by NZQA and
industry.
Standard setting body (SSB)
Community Support Services ITO Limited (Careerforce)
Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP) reference
0222
This AMAP can be accessed at http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/framework/search/index.do.
Special notes
1
People awarded credit in this unit standard are able to demonstrate knowledge of Te
Tiriti o Waitangi for social service purposes, and are able to apply this competence to
the context of assessment for this unit standard (for further clarification, please refer
to Unit 7926, Explain Te Tiriti o Waitangi for social service purposes).
2
Assessment notes:
This unit standard may be assessed on the basis of evidence of demonstrated
performance in the workplace, or through the use of a simulated workplace situation
that closely approximates the performance required in workplace settings.
Workplace settings can include field education placements.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2017
16271 version 3
Page 2 of 4
People awarded credit in this unit standard demonstrate competence in working with
service users in an holistic manner according to models of practice within te ao
Māori. Service users are responded to in accordance with tikanga practices of te ao
Māori and within the Iwi/Māori social services environment in which assessment for
this unit standard is taking place.
Definitions of Māori words will be those relevant and in common usage in an
Iwi/Māori social services context.
Local iwi or hapū aims and objectives underpin the national standard basis of this
unit standard. The definitions of Māori words and concepts in the local dialect must
be verified by the local iwi and/or hapū.
Performance of the elements must reflect the roles taken by male and female
workers as applicable.
Some social service workers co-ordinate whānau hui under statutory authority.
People credited with this unit standard know all pertinent aspects of legislation that is
relevant to the assessment context. In the context of this unit standard, relevant
legislation may include but is not limited to: Adoption Act 1955, Care of Children Act
2004, Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act 1989, Family Proceedings Act
1980, Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992, Protection
of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988.
3
Glossary:
The term social service worker is used in this unit standard to refer to the person
seeking credit. Social service workers include but are not limited to: community
workers, counsellors, kaiāwhina, social workers, kaitautoko, youth workers, and
others who deliver social services; whether paid or unpaid.
4
All communications with service users are dealt with according to tikanga practices of
te ao Māori and the standards of the Iwi/Māori social services environment in which
assessment for this unit standard is taking place. Confidentiality issues are defined
through negotiation with service users and their informed consent, and criteria
established by service provider guidelines. Other relevant criteria may include but
are not limited to: Adoption Act 1955, Children, Young Persons and Their Families
Act 1989, Criminal Justice Act 1985, Family Proceedings Act 1980, Mental Health
(Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992, Official Information Act 1982,
Privacy Act 1993, Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988, service
provider codes of conduct, codes of practice issued by the Privacy Commissioner,
social service codes of ethics, and service provider staff manuals, strategic plans,
kawa, and tikanga.
Elements and performance criteria
Element 1
Receive and manage a referral for a whānau hui in an Iwi/Māori social services setting.
Performance criteria
1.1
Referrals are received and recorded according to contractual agreements and
service provider guidelines.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2017
16271 version 3
Page 3 of 4
1.2
Members of the whānau and key members for ongoing consultation are
identified according to agreement with the whānau.
1.3
Referrals are assessed for relevance to the Iwi/Māori social service setting and
accepted or diverted according to consultation with the whānau and service
provider guidelines.
1.4
Referrals are processed through organisational systems in the Iwi/Māori social
service setting according to service provider guidelines.
Element 2
Co-ordinate planning of a whānau hui.
Performance criteria
2.1
Co-ordination of planning is carried out according to agreement with key
members of the whānau.
2.2
Any statutory provisions that govern the hui or prescribe any requirements for
task or process are identified and communicated to key members of the
whānau.
2.3
Key factors for the hui are identified.
Range
key factors for the hui – venue, kaupapa, kawa, time, date,
proposed duration for the hui.
2.4
The facilitator for the meeting is identified according to agreement with key
members of the whānau and service provider guidelines.
2.5
The views of those wishing but unable to attend the hui are ascertained and
communicated to the facilitator.
2.6
Members of the hui who have information essential to the kaupapa of the hui
are identified to the facilitator in terms of criteria established by legislation,
ethical practice, and service provider guidelines.
2.7
The plan is notified to members of the whānau who are to attend the hui.
Element 3
Co-ordinate the mihimihi and hospitality.
Performance criteria
3.1
The mihimihi process and responsibility for different aspects of the mihimihi are
established according to agreement with key members of the whānau and the
facilitator.
Range
different aspects of the mihimihi – karanga, mihimihi, karakia, kai.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2017
16271 version 3
Page 4 of 4
3.2
Resources to support the mihimihi and hosting of the whānau are established
and provided.
Range
3.3
resources – fares, kai, kaikōrero, kaikaranga, venue.
Co-ordination is carried out in accordance with criteria established by
legislation, ethical practice, and service provider guidelines.
Please note
Providers must be accredited by NZQA, or an inter-institutional body with delegated
authority for quality assurance, before they can report credits from assessment against
unit standards or deliver courses of study leading to that assessment.
Industry Training Organisations must be accredited by NZQA before they can register
credits from assessment against unit standards.
Accredited providers and Industry Training Organisations assessing against unit standards
must engage with the moderation system that applies to those standards.
Accreditation requirements and an outline of the moderation system that applies to this
standard are outlined in the Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP). The
AMAP also includes useful information about special requirements for organisations
wishing to develop education and training programmes, such as minimum qualifications for
tutors and assessors, and special resource requirements.
Comments on this unit standard
Please contact Community Support Services ITO Limited (Careerforce)
[email protected] if you wish to suggest changes to the content of this unit
standard.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2017