* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download MY views on Indian Journalists:
Survey
Document related concepts
Philanthrojournalism wikipedia , lookup
1988–94 British broadcasting voice restrictions wikipedia , lookup
European Press Prize wikipedia , lookup
Freedom of the press in Ukraine wikipedia , lookup
Ana María Romero de Campero wikipedia , lookup
Free speech in the media during the 2011 Libyan Civil War wikipedia , lookup
History of American journalism wikipedia , lookup
Women in journalism wikipedia , lookup
Journalism school wikipedia , lookup
New Journalism wikipedia , lookup
Comedic journalism wikipedia , lookup
Digital journalism wikipedia , lookup
History of journalism in the United Kingdom wikipedia , lookup
Citizen journalism wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
MY views on Indian Journalists: Since the advent of journalism in India, The present Bunch of journalists are not found to be as dedicated and sincere to their work as they should be. There are several factors for this, but for the time being let us not go through the Intricacies. At The prima facie, an Indian journalist attire is something like this: A Kurta which starts from the top, a pant for the legs and a long bag that stretches until his Knees and a pen in his hand waiting for an opportunity to fill up the notepad in his bag with the things happening around him. They used to write articles with a lot of conviction. I do not say that today’s journalists do not write with conviction, but their motive is different. They take a Prejudice view of the things that are in news. I think that the coercing factors are that they have become more materialistic and the management sways these journalists for their Political Contacts. No matter is bound to be Authentic now. So now we cannot endorse the views of journalists. Suppose there is a Press conference of a political party, the journalists seem to be more inclined to eat those snacks provided there, than to arbiter their performance. They do not Embark their views and prove their mettle in writing irrational articles. The Ardor for writing seems to be lost and they turn a Nelson’s eye for those things that deserve a place in the paper, and their enterprising nature seems to be lost in the wilderness of politics. They do not seem to gauge things correctly and should try to induce their point and get back their eloquence and leave the GAB. Their articles seem to be insipid and vapid. They should salvage their pride. Their detractors have scored here. After the Tehelka Fiasco, the investigative Journalism is a lot talked about. Our country is correct place for trend setting. Now there will be portals popping up on the lines of tehelka, were there will many companies going or trying to make a news of nothing with those hidden cameras. Though tehelka revelation led to political catastrophe, but now there will be a new phase of journalism that will try to evoke the same enthusiasm as the tehelka offered. To be more candid, this also involves a lot of money. Entrepreneurs will have a boom time now. Soon we will have hoardings and advertisements viz. “This part of the Political Fixing brought to you by coca-cola” or TV channels airing their advertisements like “Watch The PM live in a Casino tonight at 21.30 hrs” or may be some minister’s live SEX scandal or affair. Is somebody knocking at our privacy, trying to peep into our life, and making it all public? The ethics seem to be lost. Moral Ethos no more seems to be there. This mad vogue should be put to an end and the plethora of enthusiasm has to retrograde for it is Superfluous. The Journalist has to acquit and extricate himself from this brevity else the repercussions will not be palliative. Journalists seem to mitigate on things that are severe while ponder on petty things. Journalism is rotting and for it to perpetuate, aggressive Journalism is to be brought in. Though all Journalists are not heterogeneous but seem to scotch when it comes to print an authentic article. They do not venture in writing against some people and play safe by staying resolutely aloof from them. The thing is it could be Lethal if they write anything about an influential person who has the support of both the mass and the Police. So they deem not to pay any heed to any of the activities of the influential person. But this could prove venomous. These vitiated Person deserve to be punished. A journalist must be fastidious and omniscient of the things around him, conspicuous I mean. Mayhem should be avoided. Ours is not Anarchy, nor it is Autocracy, Plutocracy, Oligarchy, aristocracy or a monarchy. But is it bureaucracy? Journalism should be considered as a religion, and the blasphemy must be avoided. A. Balsubramanian. JBIET,3rd Year.