Download findings on how plants breathe may save water

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Findings on How Plants Breathe May Save Water
By Sindya N. Bhanoo, The New York Times
December 28, 2009
New information on how plants breathe may help scientists engineer plants that require
less water, according to a report published this month in Nature Cell Biology.
While it has been known for half a century that a plant’s pores, called stoma, can open at
varying rates depending on the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air, scientists did
not understand how the process worked until now, said Julian Schroeder, the study’s
lead author and a professor of biology at the University of California, San Diego. Dr.
Schroeder and his colleagues report that they identified the specific sensors in plants
that detect carbon dioxide and prompt a plant’s pores to open and breathe.
The tighter a plant can keep its pores, the less water it loses and the less water it
requires to grow. And since carbon dioxide levels are 40 percent greater than in
preindustrial times, it would seem that plants could now get plenty of carbon dioxide with
out losing too much water — an odd and perhaps beneficial consequence of the
accumulation of greenhouse gases.
“Normally for every CO2 molecule a plant takes in, the plant loses 200 water molecules,”
Dr. Schroeder said. “It’s a huge amount of water.”
The water saving strategy does not work for all plants, and the problem is how well they
detect carbon dioxide. Plants with sensitive sensors can save water. But other plants
with weaker carbon dioxide receptors are not able to detect the increased levels as well
and miss the opportunity to conserve water, Dr. Schroeder said.
His laboratory found that by adding extra copies of the receptor proteins, called carbonic
anhydrases, pores tightened, water efficiency increased and the plants still got enough
carbon dioxide. Dr. Schroeder said genetically manipulating certain plants could provide
farmers with more efficient crops.
“It could be useful in California for instance,” he said. “What we see is that plants can
grow, but they need less water.” In California, 79 percent of water diverted from streams
and rivers and pumped from the ground is used in agriculture, according to the State
Department of Water Resources.
Wolf Frommer, a Stanford biologist who was not involved in the study, said that while
humans found ways to battle growing carbon dioxide emissions and manage a
diminishing water supply, the study offered one way to help plants cope with
environmental changes.
“With increasing global warming, at least we are able to provide potential solutions,” Dr.
Frommer said. “If we understand how this works, we can grow plants using transgenic
approaches.”
There is one problem, though, with helping plants conserve water. When plants release
moisture through their pores, it cools their leaves, in the same way sweating cools
humans. This prevents them from drying out, particularly in desert regions.
But Dr. Frommer explained that bioengineering was a slow tweaking process. He said
there might be another yet undiscovered gene that when manipulated could prompt a
plant to open pores when its leaves were dry.
“We have to think less in terms of turning one gene up or down, but have an integrated
solution,” he said. “It’s what evolution has been doing for billions of years. We have to do
it faster to feed an increasing population.”
2