Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Asian Political Economy First Semester 2003, class number: 252813-001 Time and place: Monday 2:10 ~ 5:00,綜 270722 Instructor: Chengtian Kuo (綜 270737;phone: 2939-3091ex 50737; email: [email protected]; office hours by appointments, M-F) Class Objectives: In this course we will study the interaction between politics and economy in East and Southeast Asian countries. The focus will be on the attributes of the states and societies, their relationships, and their interactions with political democratization and economic development. The Asian countries included in our study are Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and China. In this semester, we will pay more attention to the impact of the 1997 Asian financial crisis on these countries and how they have reacted to the crisis under domestic political and economic constraints. I. Outlines: Theories of Asian Political Economy II. Country Studies Weekly Topics: Introduction. Liberal Economics and Developmental State. Neo-Statism and Asian Financial Crisis. New Institutionalism. Japan Number One. Japan in Crisis. South Korea. Taiwan. The Philippines. Thailand. Malaysia. Indonesia. Chinese Socialism. Chinese Capitalism. Democratization and Economic Development. Pedagogy: This class is taught in English. Taiwanese students are expected to speak English and write English assignments, although English proficiency is not the major determinant of your final grade. The pedagogy of this class consists of three parts: the instructor will start with a brief introduction and answering technical questions about the required readings, then, a team of students will make an oral presentation, followed by a discussion from the floor and the instructor's final comments. Evaluation Criteria: 1. Group Reports. Four weekly written reports, no more than 3 pages each. Two of 1 the four reports need to be accompanied by oral presentation. These reports 2. 3. should be results of group discussion, not combinations of independent, individual reading reports. Total 80 points for undergraduate students, 40 points for graduate students. Team composition and topic selections will be decided collectively. Graduate students need to submit a research proposal, about 10-15 pages. 40 points. The proposal should have a clear causal statement, theoretical framework, and research methodology. Empirical data need not be completed. Class participation and discussion, 20 points. Everyone needs to raise at least one question or comment in each class in order to qualify for the credit. Weekly Readings *Required readings for all students. I、Introduction (9/22) 1.*Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. "Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective." In Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2.*Lipset, Martin, Kyoung-Ryung Seong, and John Charles Torres. 1993. "A Comparative Analysis of the Social Requisites of Democracy." International Social Science Journal, 45 (May): 155-75. II、Liberal Economics and Developmental State (9/29) 1.*World Bank. 1998. East Asia: The Road to Recovery. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Pp. Xiii-xv, 1-17, 111-29. 2.*White, Gordon, ed. 1988. Developmental States in East Asia. New York: St. Martin's Press. Ch. 1. 3.Optional: 3.1 Bhagwati, Jagdish N., and Anne O. Krueger. 1973. "Exchange Control, Liberalization, and Economic Development." American Economic Review, 63(2): 419-27. 3.2 3.3 Hasan, Parvez. 1982. Growth and Structural Adjustment in East Asia. World Bank Staff Working Papers, no. 529. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Pp. 5-28. Balassa, Bela. 1984. "The Policy Experience of Twelve Less Developed Countries, 1973-1979." In Comparative Development Perspectives, eds. Gustav Ranis and Cynthia T. Morris. Boulder, CO: Westview. 2 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 World Bank. 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp: 1-26, 347-68. Krugman, Paul. 1994. “The Myth of Asia’s Miracle.” Foreign Affairs, 73(6, Nov/Dec): 62-78. Johnson, Chalmers. 1987. "Political Institutions and Economic Performance." In The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism, ed. Frederic C. Deyo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Chan, Steve, Cal Clark, and Danny Lam. eds. 1998. Beyond the Developmental State: East Asia's Political Economies Reconsidered. NY: St. Martin's Press. Pp. 1-24. 3.8 Dick, William G. 1974. "Authoritarian Versus Non-authoritarian Approaches to Economic Development." Journal of Political Economy, 8214: 817-27. 3.9 Levy, Margaret. 1988. The Predatory Rule of the State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Chaps. 1-3. 3.10 Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 3.11 Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Chaps. 2,10. 3.12 Noble, Gregory W. 1998. Collective Action in East Asia: How Ruling Parties Shape Industrial Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 3.13 Woo-Cumings, Meredith. Ed. 1999.The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. III、Neo-Statism and Asian Financial Crisis (10/6) 1.*Haggard, Stephan. 2000. The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Chs. 1, 6. 2.*Weiss, Linda. 2000. "Developmental States in Transition: Adapting, Dismantling, Innovating, not 'Normalizing'." The Pacific Review, 13 (1): 21-55. 3.Lukauskas, Arvid. 2002. “Financial Restriction and the Developmental State in East Asia: Toward a More Complex Political Economy.” Comparative Political Studies, 35 (4, May): 379-412. 4.Optional: 3 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 Green, Francis, David Ashton, Donna James, Johnny Sung. 1999. "The Role of the State in Skill Formation: Evidence from the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 15 (1): 82-96. Henderson, Jeffrey. 1999. "Uneven Crises: Institutional Foundations of East Asian Economic Turmoil." Economy and Society, 28, (3, August): 327-68. Kim, Byung-Kook, and Hyug-Baeg Im. 2001. “’Crony Capitalism’ in South Korea, Thailand and Taiwan: Myth and Reality.” Journal of East Asian Studies, 1 (2, February): 5-52. Clark, Cal, and Changhoon Jung. 2002. “Implications of the Asian Flu for Developmental State Theory: The Cases of South Korea and Taiwan.” Asian Affairs: an American Review, 29 (1, Spring): 16-42. Heo, Uk, and Alexander C. Tan. 2003. “Political Choices and Economic Outcomes: A Perspective on the Differential Impact of the Financial Crisis on South Korea and Taiwan.” Comparative Political Studies, 36 (6, August): 679-98. Weiss, Linda. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Chaps. 2,3. Jackson, Karl D. ed. 1999. Asian Contagion: The Causes and Consequences of a Financial Crisis. Boulder, CO: Westview. Pempel, T.J. 1999. The Politics of the East Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. IV、New Institutionalism (10/13) 1.* Kuo, Cheng-Tian. 1995. Global Competitiveness and Industrial Growth in Taiwan and the Philippines. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, Chap. 2. 2.*Hamilton, Gary. 1999. "Asian Business Networks in Transition: or, What Alan Greenspan Does not Know about the Asian Business Crisis." In T.J. Pempel, ed. The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 3.*Zhang, Xiaoke. 2002. “Domestic Institutions, Liberalization Patterns, and Uneven Crises in Korea and Taiwan.” Pacific Review, 15 (3, August): 409-42. 4.Optional: 4.1 Kim, Byung-Kook, and Hyug-Baeg Im. 2001. “’Crony Capitalism’ in South Korea, Thailand and Taiwan: Myth and Reality. Journal of East Asian Studies, 1 (1, February): 5-51). 4 4.2 郭承天。2000。「新制度論與政治經濟學」。何思因、吳玉山, 主編。邁入廿一世紀的政治學。政治學報特輯,vol. 31. 台北:中 國政治學會,171-201 頁。 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Parts I and III. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Introduction. In Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Schmitter, Philippe C. 1979. Still the Century of Corporatism? In Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, eds. Philippe C. Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Lukauskas, Arvid. 2002. “Financial Restriction and the Developmental State in East Asia: Toward a More Complex Political Economy.” Comparative Political Studies, 35 (4, May): 379-412. Khan, Mushtag H., and Jomo K.S. eds. 2000. Rents, Rent-Seeking and Economic Development: Theory and Evidence in Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press. Deyo, Frederic, and Richard F. Doner. 2001. “Introduction: Economic Governance and Flexible Production in East Asia.” In Frederic C. Deyo, Richard F. Doner, and Eric Hershberg. Eds. Economic Governance and the Challenge of Flexibility in East Asia. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Gomez, Edmund Terence. Ed. 2002. Political Business in East Asia. New York: Routledge. V、Japan Number One (10/20) 1.* Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Pp.305-24. 2.*Okimoto, Daniel I. 1989. Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Pp. 1-54, 229-40. 3.Optional: 3.1 Pempel, T.J., and Keiichi Tsunekawa. 1979. Corporatism Without Labor? In Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, eds. Philippe C. Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 3.2 Dore, Ronald. 1986. Flexible Regidities: Industrial Policy and Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy 1970-80. Stanford, 5 CA: Stanford University Press. 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Gerlach, Michael L. 1992. Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cheng-Tian Kuo and Takuya Yanagisawa.. 1992. "The Politics of Japan's Rice Trade." Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp.19-39. Vogel, Steven K. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press. Pempel, T.J. 1998. Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. George, Aurelia. 2000. The Politics of Agriculture in Japan. New York: Routledge. VI、Japan in Crisis (10/27) 1.*Uriu, Robert. 2003. “Japan in 2002: An Up-and-Down Year, but Mostly Down.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 78-90. 2.*Gao, Bai. 2001. Japan’s Economic Dilemma: The Institutional Origins of Prosperity and Stagnation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chaps. 1,8. 3.*Robert Boyer, and Toshio Yamada. 2000. Japanese Capitalism in Crisis: A Regulationist Interpretation. New York: Routledge. Introduction, Conclusion. 4.Optional: 1.1 Morishima, Michio. 2000. Japan at a Deadlock. New York: St.Martin’s Press, Chaps 1, 8. 1.2 Kuo, Cheng-Tian, and Tzeng-Jia Tsai. 1999. "Differential Impact of the Exchange Crisis on Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea: A Politico-Institutional Explanation." Issues and Studies, 34(11/12): 144-80。 1.3 Lincoln, Edward J. 2002. "Japan in 2001: A Depressing Year." Asian Survey, 42 (1): 67-80. VII、South Korea (11/3) 1.*Lee, Hong Yung. 2003. “South Korea in 2002: Multiple Political Dramas.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 64-77. 2.*Amsden, Alice H. 1989. Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press. Chap.6. 3.*Choi, Jin-Wook. 2002. "Regulatory Forbearance and Financial Crisis in South Korea." Asian Survey, 42 (2): 251-75. 6 4.Optional: 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 Koo, Hagen, and Eun Mee Kim. 1992. “The Developmental State and Capital Accumulation in South Korea,” in Richard P. Appelbaum and Jeffrey Henderson, eds. States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Rhee, Jong-Chan. 1994. The State and Industry in South Korea: The Limits of the Authoritarian State. New York: Routledge. Pp. 1-33, 203-27, 229-41. Hahm, Sung Deuk, and L. Christopher Plein. 1995. “Institutions and Technological Development in Korea: The Role of the Presidency,” Comparative Politics, vol.28, no.1, October, pp.55-76. Lee, Yeon-ho. 1996. "Political Aspects of South Korean State Autonomy: Regulating the Chaebol, 1980-93." Pacific Review, 9(2): 149-79. Kang, David. 1996. "Regionalism, Democracy, and the Institutional Foundations of Korean Politics." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA, August 29-September 1, San Francisco, CA. Han, J., and LHM, Ling. 1998. "Authoritarianism in the Hypermasculinized State: Hybridity, Patriarchy, and Capitalism in Korea." International Studies Quarterly, 42(1): 53-78. Woo-Cumings, Meredith. 1999. "The State, Democracy, and the Reform of the Corporate Sector in Korea." In T.J. Pempel, ed. The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Lee, Yeon-ho. 2000. "The Failure of the Weak State in Economic Liberalization: Liberalization, Democratization and the Financial Crisis in South Korea." The Pacific Review, 13 (1): 115-31. Heo, Uk, and Sunwoong Kim. 2000. "Financial Crisis in South Korea: Failure of the Government-led Development Paradigm." Asian Survey, 40 (3): 492-507. 4.10 Koo, Hagen. 2000. "The Dilemmas of Empowered Labor in Korea." Asian Survey, 40 (2): 227-50. 4.11 Im, Hyug Baeg. 2002. “Between Globalization and Democratization: Korea’s Rough Road to Tripartis.” Paper presented at the Workshop on “Crisis of Democratic Governance in East Asia,” sponsored by the Department of Political Science, Korea University and Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University, March 11-13, Taipei, Taiwan. 7 4.12 Ha, Yong-Chool. 2002. "South Korea in 2001: Frustration and Continuing Uncertainty." Asian Survey, 42 (1): 56-66. VIII、Taiwan (11/10) 1.*Rigger, Shelley. 2003. “Taiwan in 2002: Another Year of Political Droughts and Typhoons.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 41-48. 2.*Cheng-Tian Kuo. 1995。Global Competitiveness and Industrial Growth in Taiwan and the Philippines. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Parts on Taiwan. Parts on Taiwan. 3.*Shangmao Chen and Chengtian Kuo. 2002. "The Growth of Casino Capitalism: Mixed Reforms of the Financial Institutions." Paper presented at the International Workshop on Challenges to Taiwan’s Democracy in the Post-Hegemonic Era, co-sponsored by Hoover Institution, Stanford University and the Institute for National Policy Research, Taipei, June 7-8, 2002. 4.Optional: 4.1 Gold, Thomas B. 1986. State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. New York: M.E. Sharpe. 4.2 Chu, Yun-han. 1999. "Surviving the East Asian Financial Storm: The Political Foundation of Taiwan's Economic Resilience." In T.J. Pempel, ed. The Politics of Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca, NY: 4.3 Cornell University Press. Wu, Yu-shan. 2002. “Taiwan in 2001: Stalemated on All Fronts.” Asian Survey, 42 (1): 29-38. IX、The Philippines (11/17) 1.*Montesano, Michael J. 2003. “The Philippines in 2002: Playing Politics, Facing Deficits, and Embracing Uncle Sam.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 156-66. 2.*Kuo, Cheng-Tian. 1995. Global Competitiveness and Industrial Growth in Taiwan and the Philippines. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, Chaps. 3-7. The parts on the Philippines 3.*De Dios, Emmanuel S. and Paul Hutchcroft. 2002. "Political Economy: Examining Current Challenges in Historical Perspective.” In The Philippine Economy: On the Way to Sustained Growth? Oxford: Oxford University Press. 4.Optional: 4.1 International Monetary Fund. 2000. Philippines: Toward Sustainable and Rapid Growth - Recent Developments and the Agenda Ahead. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund. 8 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Noland, Marcus. 2000. "The Philippines in the Asian Financial Crisis." Asian Survey, 40 (3): 401-12. Timberman, David G. 1991. A Changeless Land: Continuity and Change in Philippine Politics. New York: M.E. Sharpe. Pp. 322-400. Thompson, Mark R. 1996. “Off the Endangered List: Philippine Democratization in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Politics, vol.28, no.2, January, pp.179-205. Hutchcroft, Paul. 1999. "Neither Dynamo nor Domino: Reforms and Crises in the Philippine Political Economy." In T.J. Pempel, ed. The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Labrador, Mel C. 2002. "The Philippines in 2001: High Drama, A New President, and Setting the Stage for Recovery." Asian Survey, 42 (1): 141-49. X、Thailand (11/24) 1.*Mutebi, Alex M. 2003. “Thailand in 2002: Political Consolidation amid Economic Uncertainties.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 101-12. 2.*Kuo, Chengtian. 2000。"New Financial Politics in Thailand and Malaysia." Issues and Studies, 36 (6, November/December): 139-76. 3.*Doner, Richard, and Ansil Ramsay. 2003. “The Challenges of Economic Upgrading in Liberalising Thailand.” In Linda Weiss, ed. States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions back in. New York: Cambridge University Press. 4.Optional: 4.1 Laothamatas, Anek. 1988. "Business and Politics in Thailand." Asian Survey, 28(4): 451-70. 4.2 Laothamatas, Anek. 1992. Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand: From Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal Corporatism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 4.3 4.4 4.5 Fry, Gerald. 1992. “Thailand‘s Political Economy: Change and Persistence,” in Cal Clark and Steve Chan, eds., The Evolving Pacific Basin in the Global Political Economy: Domestic and International Linkages. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Muscat, Robert J. 1994. The Fifth Tiger: A Study of Thai Development Policy. New York: M.E. Sharpe. Lauridsen, LS. 1998. "The Financial Crisis in Thailand: Causes, Conduct, and Consequences." World Development, 26(8): 1575-91. 9 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Chris Baker. 2000. Thailand's Crisis. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Girling, John. 1996. Interpreting Development: Capitalism, Democracy, and the Middle Class in Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications. Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Chris Baker. 2000. Thailand's Crisis. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books. Chs. 2, 9, 10. Montesano, Michael J. 2002. "Thailand in 2001: Learning to Live with Thaksin?" Asian Survey, 42 (1): 90-99. XI、Malaysia (12/1) 1.*Ganesan, N. 2003. “Malaysia in 2002: Political Consolidation amid Change?” Asian Survey, 43(1): 147-55. 2.*Kuo, Chengtian. 2000。"New Financial Politics in Thailand and Malaysia." Issues and Studies, 36 (6, November/December): 139-76. 3.*Hamilton-Hart, Natasha. 2002. Asian States, Asian Bankers: Central Banking in Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Chap.5. 4.Optional: 4.1 Bowie, Alasdair. 1991. Crossing the Industrial Divide: State, Society, and the Politics of Economic Transformation in Malaysia. New York: 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Columbia University Press. Jomo, K.S. 1998. "Financial Liberalization, Crises, and Malaysian Policy Responses." World Development, 26(8): 1563-74. Crouch, Harold. 1996. Government and Society in Malaysia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Pp. 177-248. Nesadurai, Helen E.S. 2000. "In Defence of National Economic Autonomy? Malaysia's Response to the Financial Crisis." The Pacific Review, 13 (1): 73-113. Martinez, Patricia. 2002. "Malaysia in 2001: An Interlude of Consolidation." Asian Survey, 42 (1): 133-40. XII、Indonesia (12/8) 1.*Malley, Michael S. 2003. “Indonesia in 2002: The Rising Cost of Inaction.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 135-46. 2.*Pangestu, Mari, and Manggi Habir. 2002. “The Boom, Bust, and Restructuring of Indonesian Banks.” IMF Working Paper, WP/02/66. 3.*Hamilton-Hart, Natasha. 2002. Asian States, Asian Bankers: Central Banking in Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Chap.3. 10 XIII、Chinese Socialism (12/15) 1.*Selden, Mark. 1993. The Political Economy of Chinese Socialism. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. Chap. 1. 2.*Oi, Jean. 1992. "Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundation of Local State Corporatism." World Politics, 45(1, October): 99-126. 3.*Naughton, Barry. 1996. Growing out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform 1978-1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1-56, 309-26. 4.Optional: 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Harding, Harry. 1987. China's Second Revolution: Reform After Mao. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. Solinger, Dorothy J. 1993. China's Transition from Socialism: Statist Legacies and Market Reforms, 1980-1990. New York: M.E. Sharpe. Oi, Jean C. 1989. State and Peasant in Contemporary China: The Political Economy of Village Government. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Reardon, Lawrence C. 1998. "Learning How to Open the Door: A Reassessment of China's 'Opening' Strategy." China Quarterly, 155(September): 479-511. XIV、Chinese Capitalism (12/22) 1.*Yang, Dali L. 2003. "China in 2002: Leadership Transition and the Political Economy of Governance." Asian Survey, 43 (1): 25-40. 2.*Baum, Richard, and Alexei Shevchenko. 1999. "The 'State of the State'." In Merle Goldman and Roderick MacFarquhar, eds., The Paradox of China's Post-Mao Reforms. Harvard University Press. 3.*Steinfeld, Edward S. 2002. "Moving beyond Transition in China: Financial Reform and the Political Economy of Declining Growth." Comparative Politics, 34 (4, July): 379-98. 4.Optional: 4.1 呂爾浩。2001。中國市場化地方統合主義。政治大學東亞所碩士 論文。 4.2 Yang, Dali L. 1996. "Governing China's Transition to the Market: Institutional Incentives, Politicians' Choices, and Unintended Outcomes." World Politics, 48(April): 424-52. 11 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 Montinola, Garbriella, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast. 1995. "Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China." World Politics, 48(October): 50-81. Kuo, Cheng-Tian. 1994. "Privatization Within the Chinese State", Governance, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.387-411. Whiting, Susan H. 2001. Power and Wealth in Rural China: The Political Economy of Institutional Change. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chaps. 1, 7. Lin, Yi-min. 2001. Between Politics and Markets: Firms, Competition, and Institutional Change in Post-Mao China. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chaps. 1, 7. Yang, Dali L. 2002. "China in 2001: Economic Liberalization and Its Political Discontents." Asian Survey, 42 (1): 14-28. XV、Democratization and Economic Development (12/29) 1.*MacIntyre, Andrew. 2001. “Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia.” International Organization, 55 (1, Winter): 81-122. 2.*Hood, Steven J. 1998. "The Myth of Asian-Style Democracy." Asian Survey, 38(9, September): 853-66. 3.Optional: 3.1 Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pp. 152-82, and parts on Asian countries. 3.2 Bertrand, Jacques. 1998. "Growth and Democracy in Southeast Asia." Comparative Politics, 30(3, April): 355-75. Proposals due day: January 12, 5:00pm. Other References: 1. 2. 3. Home pages of Asian governments. Asian Journals: Asian Survey (particularly, the first introductory issue of each year), Asian Wall Street Journal, Economic Intelligence Unit. Country Reports, Far Eastern Economic Review, Journal of East Asian Affairs, The Pacific Review, World Bank/IMF Country Reports. Comparative Politics Journals: World Politics, Comparative Politics, Comparative Political Studies. 12