Download 亞洲政治經濟比較

Asian Political Economy
First Semester 2003, class number: 252813-001
Time and place: Monday 2:10 ~ 5:00，綜 270722
Instructor: Chengtian Kuo
（綜 270737；phone: 2939-3091ex 50737; email: [email protected]; office hours by
appointments, M-F）
Class Objectives：
In this course we will study the interaction between politics and economy in East
and Southeast Asian countries. The focus will be on the attributes of the states and
societies, their relationships, and their interactions with political democratization and
economic development. The Asian countries included in our study are Japan, South
Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and China. In this
semester, we will pay more attention to the impact of the 1997 Asian financial crisis
on these countries and how they have reacted to the crisis under domestic political and
economic constraints.
I.
Outlines:
Theories of Asian Political Economy
II.
Country Studies
Weekly Topics:
Introduction. Liberal Economics and Developmental State. Neo-Statism and Asian
Financial Crisis. New Institutionalism. Japan Number One. Japan in Crisis. South
Korea. Taiwan. The Philippines. Thailand. Malaysia. Indonesia. Chinese Socialism.
Chinese Capitalism. Democratization and Economic Development.
Pedagogy:
This class is taught in English. Taiwanese students are expected to speak English
and write English assignments, although English proficiency is not the major
determinant of your final grade. The pedagogy of this class consists of three parts: the
instructor will start with a brief introduction and answering technical questions about
the required readings, then, a team of students will make an oral presentation,
followed by a discussion from the floor and the instructor's final comments.
Evaluation Criteria：
1.
Group Reports. Four weekly written reports, no more than 3 pages each. Two of
1
the four reports need to be accompanied by oral presentation. These reports
2.
3.
should be results of group discussion, not combinations of independent,
individual reading reports. Total 80 points for undergraduate students, 40 points
for graduate students. Team composition and topic selections will be decided
collectively.
Graduate students need to submit a research proposal, about 10-15 pages. 40
points. The proposal should have a clear causal statement, theoretical framework,
and research methodology. Empirical data need not be completed.
Class participation and discussion, 20 points. Everyone needs to raise at least one
question or comment in each class in order to qualify for the credit.
Weekly Readings
*Required readings for all students.
I、Introduction (9/22)
1.*Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. "Economic Backwardness in Historical
Perspective." In Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of
Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.*Lipset, Martin, Kyoung-Ryung Seong, and John Charles Torres. 1993. "A
Comparative Analysis of the Social Requisites of Democracy." International
Social Science Journal, 45 (May): 155-75.
II、Liberal Economics and Developmental State (9/29)
1.*World Bank. 1998. East Asia: The Road to Recovery. Washington, D.C.: The
World Bank. Pp. Xiii-xv, 1-17, 111-29.
2.*White, Gordon, ed. 1988. Developmental States in East Asia. New York: St.
Martin's Press. Ch. 1.
3.Optional:
3.1 Bhagwati, Jagdish N., and Anne O. Krueger. 1973. "Exchange
Control, Liberalization, and Economic Development." American
Economic Review, 63(2): 419-27.
3.2
3.3
Hasan, Parvez. 1982. Growth and Structural Adjustment in East Asia.
World Bank Staff Working Papers, no. 529. Washington, D.C.:
World Bank. Pp. 5-28.
Balassa, Bela. 1984. "The Policy Experience of Twelve Less
Developed Countries, 1973-1979." In Comparative Development
Perspectives, eds. Gustav Ranis and Cynthia T. Morris. Boulder, CO:
Westview.
2
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
World Bank. 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and
Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp: 1-26, 347-68.
Krugman, Paul. 1994. “The Myth of Asia’s Miracle.” Foreign Affairs,
73(6, Nov/Dec): 62-78.
Johnson, Chalmers. 1987. "Political Institutions and Economic
Performance." In The Political Economy of the New Asian
Industrialism, ed. Frederic C. Deyo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press.
Chan, Steve, Cal Clark, and Danny Lam. eds. 1998. Beyond the
Developmental State: East Asia's Political Economies Reconsidered.
NY: St. Martin's Press. Pp. 1-24.
3.8
Dick, William G. 1974. "Authoritarian Versus Non-authoritarian
Approaches to Economic Development." Journal of Political
Economy, 8214: 817-27.
3.9 Levy, Margaret. 1988. The Predatory Rule of the State. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. Chaps. 1-3.
3.10 Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and
the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
3.11 Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial
Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Chaps.
2,10.
3.12 Noble, Gregory W. 1998. Collective Action in East Asia: How Ruling
Parties Shape Industrial Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.13 Woo-Cumings, Meredith. Ed. 1999.The Developmental State. Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University Press.
III、Neo-Statism and Asian Financial Crisis (10/6)
1.*Haggard, Stephan. 2000. The Political Economy of the Asian Financial
Crisis. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. Chs. 1, 6.
2.*Weiss, Linda. 2000. "Developmental States in Transition: Adapting,
Dismantling, Innovating, not 'Normalizing'." The Pacific Review, 13 (1):
21-55.
3.Lukauskas, Arvid. 2002. “Financial Restriction and the Developmental State
in East Asia: Toward a More Complex Political Economy.” Comparative
Political Studies, 35 (4, May): 379-412.
4.Optional:
3
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
Green, Francis, David Ashton, Donna James, Johnny Sung. 1999.
"The Role of the State in Skill Formation: Evidence from the
Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan. Oxford Review of
Economic Policy, 15 (1): 82-96.
Henderson, Jeffrey. 1999. "Uneven Crises: Institutional Foundations
of East Asian Economic Turmoil." Economy and Society, 28, (3,
August): 327-68.
Kim, Byung-Kook, and Hyug-Baeg Im. 2001. “’Crony Capitalism’ in
South Korea, Thailand and Taiwan: Myth and Reality.” Journal of
East Asian Studies, 1 (2, February): 5-52.
Clark, Cal, and Changhoon Jung. 2002. “Implications of the Asian
Flu for Developmental State Theory: The Cases of South Korea and
Taiwan.” Asian Affairs: an American Review, 29 (1, Spring): 16-42.
Heo, Uk, and Alexander C. Tan. 2003. “Political Choices and
Economic Outcomes: A Perspective on the Differential Impact of the
Financial Crisis on South Korea and Taiwan.” Comparative Political
Studies, 36 (6, August): 679-98.
Weiss, Linda. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press. Chaps. 2,3.
Jackson, Karl D. ed. 1999. Asian Contagion: The Causes and
Consequences of a Financial Crisis. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Pempel, T.J. 1999. The Politics of the East Asian Economic Crisis.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
IV、New Institutionalism (10/13)
1.* Kuo, Cheng-Tian. 1995. Global Competitiveness and Industrial Growth in
Taiwan and the Philippines. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, Chap.
2.
2.*Hamilton, Gary. 1999. "Asian Business Networks in Transition: or, What
Alan Greenspan Does not Know about the Asian Business Crisis." In T.J.
Pempel, ed. The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press.
3.*Zhang, Xiaoke. 2002. “Domestic Institutions, Liberalization Patterns, and
Uneven Crises in Korea and Taiwan.” Pacific Review, 15 (3, August): 409-42.
4.Optional:
4.1 Kim, Byung-Kook, and Hyug-Baeg Im. 2001. “’Crony Capitalism’ in
South Korea, Thailand and Taiwan: Myth and Reality. Journal of
East Asian Studies, 1 (1, February): 5-51).
4
4.2
郭承天。2000。「新制度論與政治經濟學」。何思因、吳玉山，
主編。邁入廿一世紀的政治學。政治學報特輯，vol. 31. 台北：中
國政治學會，171-201 頁。
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and
Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parts I and III.
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Introduction. In Small States in World
Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1979. Still the Century of Corporatism? In
Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, eds. Philippe C. Schmitter
and Gerhard Lehmbruch. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lukauskas, Arvid. 2002. “Financial Restriction and the
Developmental State in East Asia: Toward a More Complex Political
Economy.” Comparative Political Studies, 35 (4, May): 379-412.
Khan, Mushtag H., and Jomo K.S. eds. 2000. Rents, Rent-Seeking and
Economic Development: Theory and Evidence in Asia. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Deyo, Frederic, and Richard F. Doner. 2001. “Introduction: Economic
Governance and Flexible Production in East Asia.” In Frederic C.
Deyo, Richard F. Doner, and Eric Hershberg. Eds. Economic
Governance and the Challenge of Flexibility in East Asia. New York:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Gomez, Edmund Terence. Ed. 2002. Political Business in East Asia.
New York: Routledge.
V、Japan Number One (10/20)
1.* Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of
Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Pp.305-24.
2.*Okimoto, Daniel I. 1989. Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial
Policy for High Technology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Pp. 1-54,
229-40.
3.Optional:
3.1 Pempel, T.J., and Keiichi Tsunekawa. 1979. Corporatism Without
Labor? In Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, eds. Philippe C.
Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.2 Dore, Ronald. 1986. Flexible Regidities: Industrial Policy and
Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy 1970-80. Stanford,
5
CA: Stanford University Press.
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
Gerlach, Michael L. 1992. Alliance Capitalism: The Social
Organization of Japanese Business. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press.
Cheng-Tian Kuo and Takuya Yanagisawa.. 1992. "The Politics of
Japan's Rice Trade." Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, Vol. 11, No.
4, pp.19-39.
Vogel, Steven K. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory
Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NJ: Cornell
University Press.
Pempel, T.J. 1998. Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the
Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
George, Aurelia. 2000. The Politics of Agriculture in Japan. New York:
Routledge.
VI、Japan in Crisis (10/27)
1.*Uriu, Robert. 2003. “Japan in 2002: An Up-and-Down Year, but Mostly
Down.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 78-90.
2.*Gao, Bai. 2001. Japan’s Economic Dilemma: The Institutional Origins of
Prosperity and Stagnation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chaps.
1,8.
3.*Robert Boyer, and Toshio Yamada. 2000. Japanese Capitalism in Crisis: A
Regulationist Interpretation. New York: Routledge. Introduction, Conclusion.
4.Optional:
1.1 Morishima, Michio. 2000. Japan at a Deadlock. New York: St.Martin’s
Press, Chaps 1, 8.
1.2 Kuo, Cheng-Tian, and Tzeng-Jia Tsai. 1999. "Differential Impact of the
Exchange Crisis on Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea: A
Politico-Institutional Explanation." Issues and Studies, 34(11/12):
144-80。
1.3 Lincoln, Edward J. 2002. "Japan in 2001: A Depressing Year." Asian
Survey, 42 (1): 67-80.
VII、South Korea (11/3)
1.*Lee, Hong Yung. 2003. “South Korea in 2002: Multiple Political Dramas.”
Asian Survey, 43(1): 64-77.
2.*Amsden, Alice H. 1989. Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late
Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press. Chap.6.
3.*Choi, Jin-Wook. 2002. "Regulatory Forbearance and Financial Crisis in
South Korea." Asian Survey, 42 (2): 251-75.
6
4.Optional:
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
Koo, Hagen, and Eun Mee Kim. 1992. “The Developmental State and
Capital Accumulation in South Korea,” in Richard P. Appelbaum and
Jeffrey Henderson, eds. States and Development in the Asian Pacific
Rim. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rhee, Jong-Chan. 1994. The State and Industry in South Korea: The
Limits of the Authoritarian State. New York: Routledge. Pp. 1-33,
203-27, 229-41.
Hahm, Sung Deuk, and L. Christopher Plein. 1995. “Institutions and
Technological Development in Korea: The Role of the Presidency,”
Comparative Politics, vol.28, no.1, October, pp.55-76.
Lee, Yeon-ho. 1996. "Political Aspects of South Korean State
Autonomy: Regulating the Chaebol, 1980-93." Pacific Review, 9(2):
149-79.
Kang, David. 1996. "Regionalism, Democracy, and the Institutional
Foundations of Korean Politics." Paper presented at the annual
meeting of the APSA, August 29-September 1, San Francisco, CA.
Han, J., and LHM, Ling. 1998. "Authoritarianism in the
Hypermasculinized State: Hybridity, Patriarchy, and Capitalism in
Korea." International Studies Quarterly, 42(1): 53-78.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith. 1999. "The State, Democracy, and the
Reform of the Corporate Sector in Korea." In T.J. Pempel, ed. The
Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press.
Lee, Yeon-ho. 2000. "The Failure of the Weak State in Economic
Liberalization: Liberalization, Democratization and the Financial
Crisis in South Korea." The Pacific Review, 13 (1): 115-31.
Heo, Uk, and Sunwoong Kim. 2000. "Financial Crisis in South Korea:
Failure of the Government-led Development Paradigm." Asian Survey,
40 (3): 492-507.
4.10 Koo, Hagen. 2000. "The Dilemmas of Empowered Labor in Korea."
Asian Survey, 40 (2): 227-50.
4.11 Im, Hyug Baeg. 2002. “Between Globalization and Democratization:
Korea’s Rough Road to Tripartis.” Paper presented at the Workshop
on “Crisis of Democratic Governance in East Asia,” sponsored by the
Department of Political Science, Korea University and Institute of
International Relations, National Chengchi University, March 11-13,
Taipei, Taiwan.
7
4.12
Ha, Yong-Chool. 2002. "South Korea in 2001: Frustration and
Continuing Uncertainty." Asian Survey, 42 (1): 56-66.
VIII、Taiwan (11/10)
1.*Rigger, Shelley. 2003. “Taiwan in 2002: Another Year of Political Droughts
and Typhoons.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 41-48.
2.*Cheng-Tian Kuo. 1995。Global Competitiveness and Industrial Growth in
Taiwan and the Philippines. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Parts on Taiwan. Parts on Taiwan.
3.*Shangmao Chen and Chengtian Kuo. 2002. "The Growth of Casino
Capitalism: Mixed Reforms of the Financial Institutions." Paper presented at
the International Workshop on Challenges to Taiwan’s Democracy in the
Post-Hegemonic Era, co-sponsored by Hoover Institution, Stanford University
and the Institute for National Policy Research, Taipei, June 7-8, 2002.
4.Optional:
4.1 Gold, Thomas B. 1986. State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. New
York: M.E. Sharpe.
4.2 Chu, Yun-han. 1999. "Surviving the East Asian Financial Storm: The
Political Foundation of Taiwan's Economic Resilience." In T.J.
Pempel, ed. The Politics of Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca, NY:
4.3
Cornell University Press.
Wu, Yu-shan. 2002. “Taiwan in 2001: Stalemated on All Fronts.”
Asian Survey, 42 (1): 29-38.
IX、The Philippines (11/17)
1.*Montesano, Michael J. 2003. “The Philippines in 2002: Playing Politics,
Facing Deficits, and Embracing Uncle Sam.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 156-66.
2.*Kuo, Cheng-Tian. 1995. Global Competitiveness and Industrial Growth in
Taiwan and the Philippines. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, Chaps.
3-7. The parts on the Philippines
3.*De Dios, Emmanuel S. and Paul Hutchcroft. 2002. "Political Economy:
Examining Current Challenges in Historical Perspective.” In The Philippine
Economy: On the Way to Sustained Growth? Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
4.Optional:
4.1 International Monetary Fund. 2000. Philippines: Toward Sustainable
and Rapid Growth - Recent Developments and the Agenda Ahead.
Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
8
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Noland, Marcus. 2000. "The Philippines in the Asian Financial
Crisis." Asian Survey, 40 (3): 401-12.
Timberman, David G. 1991. A Changeless Land: Continuity and
Change in Philippine Politics. New York: M.E. Sharpe. Pp. 322-400.
Thompson, Mark R. 1996. “Off the Endangered List: Philippine
Democratization in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Politics,
vol.28, no.2, January, pp.179-205.
Hutchcroft, Paul. 1999. "Neither Dynamo nor Domino: Reforms and
Crises in the Philippine Political Economy." In T.J. Pempel, ed. The
Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press.
Labrador, Mel C. 2002. "The Philippines in 2001: High Drama, A
New President, and Setting the Stage for Recovery." Asian Survey, 42
(1): 141-49.
X、Thailand (11/24)
1.*Mutebi, Alex M. 2003. “Thailand in 2002: Political Consolidation amid
Economic Uncertainties.” Asian Survey, 43(1): 101-12.
2.*Kuo, Chengtian. 2000。"New Financial Politics in Thailand and Malaysia."
Issues and Studies, 36 (6, November/December): 139-76.
3.*Doner, Richard, and Ansil Ramsay. 2003. “The Challenges of Economic
Upgrading in Liberalising Thailand.” In Linda Weiss, ed. States in the Global
Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions back in. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
4.Optional:
4.1 Laothamatas, Anek. 1988. "Business and Politics in Thailand." Asian
Survey, 28(4): 451-70.
4.2 Laothamatas, Anek. 1992. Business Associations and the New
Political Economy of Thailand: From Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal
Corporatism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4.3
4.4
4.5
Fry, Gerald. 1992. “Thailand‘s Political Economy: Change and
Persistence,” in Cal Clark and Steve Chan, eds., The Evolving Pacific
Basin in the Global Political Economy: Domestic and International
Linkages. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Muscat, Robert J. 1994. The Fifth Tiger: A Study of Thai
Development Policy. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Lauridsen, LS. 1998. "The Financial Crisis in Thailand: Causes,
Conduct, and Consequences." World Development, 26(8): 1575-91.
9
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Chris Baker. 2000. Thailand's Crisis.
Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Girling, John. 1996. Interpreting Development: Capitalism,
Democracy, and the Middle Class in Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
Southeast Asia Program Publications.
Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Chris Baker. 2000. Thailand's Crisis.
Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books. Chs. 2, 9, 10.
Montesano, Michael J. 2002. "Thailand in 2001: Learning to Live
with Thaksin?" Asian Survey, 42 (1): 90-99.
XI、Malaysia (12/1)
1.*Ganesan, N. 2003. “Malaysia in 2002: Political Consolidation amid
Change?” Asian Survey, 43(1): 147-55.
2.*Kuo, Chengtian. 2000。"New Financial Politics in Thailand and Malaysia."
Issues and Studies, 36 (6, November/December): 139-76.
3.*Hamilton-Hart, Natasha. 2002. Asian States, Asian Bankers: Central
Banking in Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Chap.5.
4.Optional:
4.1 Bowie, Alasdair. 1991. Crossing the Industrial Divide: State, Society,
and the Politics of Economic Transformation in Malaysia. New York:
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Columbia University Press.
Jomo, K.S. 1998. "Financial Liberalization, Crises, and Malaysian
Policy Responses." World Development, 26(8): 1563-74.
Crouch, Harold. 1996. Government and Society in Malaysia. Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University Press. Pp. 177-248.
Nesadurai, Helen E.S. 2000. "In Defence of National Economic
Autonomy? Malaysia's Response to the Financial Crisis." The Pacific
Review, 13 (1): 73-113.
Martinez, Patricia. 2002. "Malaysia in 2001: An Interlude of
Consolidation." Asian Survey, 42 (1): 133-40.
XII、Indonesia (12/8)
1.*Malley, Michael S. 2003. “Indonesia in 2002: The Rising Cost of Inaction.”
Asian Survey, 43(1): 135-46.
2.*Pangestu, Mari, and Manggi Habir. 2002. “The Boom, Bust, and
Restructuring of Indonesian Banks.” IMF Working Paper, WP/02/66.
3.*Hamilton-Hart, Natasha. 2002. Asian States, Asian Bankers: Central
Banking in Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Chap.3.
10
XIII、Chinese Socialism (12/15)
1.*Selden, Mark. 1993. The Political Economy of Chinese Socialism. Armonk,
NY: M.E. Sharpe. Chap. 1.
2.*Oi, Jean. 1992. "Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundation of Local State
Corporatism." World Politics, 45(1, October): 99-126.
3.*Naughton, Barry. 1996. Growing out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform
1978-1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1-56, 309-26.
4.Optional:
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
Harding, Harry. 1987. China's Second Revolution: Reform After Mao.
Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Solinger, Dorothy J. 1993. China's Transition from Socialism: Statist
Legacies and Market Reforms, 1980-1990. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Oi, Jean C. 1989. State and Peasant in Contemporary China: The
Political Economy of Village Government. Berkeley, CA: University
of California Press.
Reardon, Lawrence C. 1998. "Learning How to Open the Door: A
Reassessment of China's 'Opening' Strategy." China Quarterly,
155(September): 479-511.
XIV、Chinese Capitalism (12/22)
1.*Yang, Dali L. 2003. "China in 2002: Leadership Transition and the Political
Economy of Governance." Asian Survey, 43 (1): 25-40.
2.*Baum, Richard, and Alexei Shevchenko. 1999. "The 'State of the State'." In
Merle Goldman and Roderick MacFarquhar, eds., The Paradox of China's
Post-Mao Reforms. Harvard University Press.
3.*Steinfeld, Edward S. 2002. "Moving beyond Transition in China: Financial
Reform and the Political Economy of Declining Growth." Comparative
Politics, 34 (4, July): 379-98.
4.Optional:
4.1 呂爾浩。2001。中國市場化地方統合主義。政治大學東亞所碩士
論文。
4.2
Yang, Dali L. 1996. "Governing China's Transition to the Market:
Institutional Incentives, Politicians' Choices, and Unintended
Outcomes." World Politics, 48(April): 424-52.
11
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
Montinola, Garbriella, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast. 1995.
"Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success
in China." World Politics, 48(October): 50-81.
Kuo, Cheng-Tian. 1994. "Privatization Within the Chinese State",
Governance, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.387-411.
Whiting, Susan H. 2001. Power and Wealth in Rural China: The
Political Economy of Institutional Change. New York: Cambridge
University Press. Chaps. 1, 7.
Lin, Yi-min. 2001. Between Politics and Markets: Firms,
Competition, and Institutional Change in Post-Mao China. New York:
Cambridge University Press. Chaps. 1, 7.
Yang, Dali L. 2002. "China in 2001: Economic Liberalization and Its
Political Discontents." Asian Survey, 42 (1): 14-28.
XV、Democratization and Economic Development (12/29)
1.*MacIntyre, Andrew. 2001. “Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the
Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia.” International Organization, 55 (1,
Winter): 81-122.
2.*Hood, Steven J. 1998. "The Myth of Asian-Style Democracy." Asian Survey,
38(9, September): 853-66.
3.Optional:
3.1 Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995. The Political
Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press. Pp. 152-82, and parts on Asian countries.
3.2 Bertrand, Jacques. 1998. "Growth and Democracy in Southeast Asia."
Comparative Politics, 30(3, April): 355-75.
Proposals due day: January 12, 5:00pm.
Other References:
1.
2.
3.
Home pages of Asian governments.
Asian Journals: Asian Survey (particularly, the first introductory issue of each
year), Asian Wall Street Journal, Economic Intelligence Unit. Country Reports,
Far Eastern Economic Review, Journal of East Asian Affairs, The Pacific
Review, World Bank/IMF Country Reports.
Comparative Politics Journals: World Politics, Comparative Politics,
Comparative Political Studies.
12