Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE LEGENDS Figure S1. RITA is expressed in various tumor cell lines, it coats MTs and affects their structure in vitro. (A) HeLa cells were treated with control siRNA (sicon) or siRNA targeting RITA (siRITA 1) and lysates were prepared for Western blot analysis with RITA antibody. β-actin served as loading control. (B) HeLa cells were transfected with Flag- or GFP-tagged RITA and cellular extracts were prepared for Western blot analysis with RITA antibody. β-actin served as loading control. (C) Western blot analysis of RITA from tumor cell lines. Cells were nontreated (C), treated with a double thymidine block to the G1/S boundary (T) or with nocodazole to prometaphase (N). Cyclin B1 and β-actin served as synchronization and loading control, respectively. (D) HeLa cells were stained for DNA and endogenous RITA (upper panel) or α-tubulin (lower panel). Scale: 5 µm. (E) In vitro depolymerization assay. Stabilized MTs were incubated with 25 nM GST control protein, GST-RITA Δtub or GSTRITA and pictures were taken after 30 seconds. Examples are shown. Scale: 5 µm. Red arrow indicates the box, which is 6-fold amplified and shown as the rightmost panel. (F) Rhodamine-labeled MTs were incubated with wild type GST-RITA and then stained with antibody against RITA. Representatives are depicted. Scale: 5 µm. Red arrows indicate the boxes, which are 6-fold amplified and shown in the rightmost panels. Figure S2. Depletion of RITA increases acetylated α-tubulin and prolongs mitosis. (A) HeLa cells were treated with increased concentrations of control siRNA (sicon) or siRNA against RITA (siRITA 1) and cellular lysates were prepared for Western blot analyses with indicated antibodies. The ratio of acetylated α-tubulin and α-tubulin is shown. β-actin served as loading control. (B) Evaluation of mitotic duration. HeLa cells stably marked with H2B1 tdTomato, treated with control siRNA (sicon), siRITA 1 or siRITA 2 were examined by timelapse imaging at 4 min image intervals. Time (min) for mitosis was evaluated (60 cells for each condition). Non-treated HeLa cells were taken as control (con). The results are presented as mean ± SD and statistically analyzed. ***p < 0.001. (C) The duration of mitotic subphases, namely prophase, prometaphase (prometa), metaphase (meta), anaphase (ana), telophase (telo) and cytokinesis, captured by time-lapse imaging at 4 min image intervals, was evaluated (60 cells for each condition). The results are presented as mean ± SD. ***p < 0.001. (D) Western blot analysis for siRNA treatment control. β-actin served as loading control. (E) Representatives for each condition are shown. White arrow: defective chromosome congression/segregation. Scale: 10 µm. Figure S3. Mitotic defects are observed in RITA depleted HCT116 cells or tubacin treated HeLa cells. (A) HCT116 cells were treated with control siRNA (sicon) or siRNA targeting RITA (siRITA 1) and stained for centromere (ACA, anti-centromere antibody), pericentrin, αtubulin and DNA for confocal laser scanning microscopy. Representatives are shown. White arrows designate misaligned chromosomes or defective segregation. Scale: 5 μm. (B) Control Western blot analysis of HCT116 cells treated with siRNA. β-actin served as loading control. (C and D) Quantification of misaligned chromosomes (C) and failed segregation (D) in HCT116 cells depleted of RITA. The results are from three independent experiments (n = 3, 60 mitotic cells for each condition in each experiment) and presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (E) HeLa cells were treated with either vehicle DMSO or HDAC6 inhibitor tubacin (50 or 100 nM) for 48 h and stained for α-tubulin, acetylated αtubulin and DNA. Metaphase cells with defective chromosome congression or anaphase cells with abnormal chromosome segregation were evaluated by microscopy. The results (n = 2, 60 meta- or anaphase cells for each condition in each experiment) are presented as mean ± SEM. 2 (F) Control Western blot analysis for (E) with indicated antibodies. β-actin served as loading control. Figure S4. Wild type RITA but not RITA ∆tub rescues mitotic defects. HeLa cells were depleted of endogenous RITA with siRNA against the 3’-untranslated region (siRITA 2) and re-transfected with 0.5 µg of wild type GFP-RITA (RITA WT, aa 1-269) or GFP-RITA Δtub (aa 1-257), lacking the last 12 amino acids. 24 h later cells were stained for microscopy. (A) Representatives are shown. White arrows indicate misaligned chromosomes or failed segregation. Scale: 5 μm. (B and C) Evaluation of defective chromosome congression (B) and segregation (C). The results (n = 2, 60 mitotic cells for each condition in each experiment) are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (D) Control Western blot analysis of siRNA treated and rescued HeLa cells. β-actin served as loading control. (E and F) The rescue experiment was also performed with Flag-tagged RITA and its mutant in HeLa cells. Evaluation of defective chromosome congression (E) and segregation (F) are depicted. The results (n = 2, 50 mitotic cells for each condition in each experiment) are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05. Control Western blotting is shown as Figure 4J. Figure S5. Information of knockout RITA-/- mice. (A) Knockout illustration. RITA wild type allele is shown above illustrating the 4 exons (E2, E2b, E3 and E4) of RITA in black and the coding region in light blue. The targeted allele below contains a -galactosidase gene (purple) and neomycin resistance gene (yellow). The splice acceptor (SA, middle grey) links the transcript of E3 to the -galactosidase transcript and prevents the splicing of E3 and E4 to synthesize functional RITA mRNA for translation. Abbreviations: FRT, FLP recognition target; H, HindIII restriction site; IRES, Internal ribosomal entry site; lac Z, lacZ (-galactosidase) gene; neo, neomycin resistance gene; pA, 3 polyadenylation signal sequence; PGK, mouse phosphoglycerate kinase 1 promotor; X, XbaI restriction site. (B) Genotyping of RITA knockout mice. Primer binding sites are shown in (A) for detection of the wild type allele (wt PCR) and the gene targeting allele (tm PCR), respectively. (C) mRNA levels of RITA measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Total RNA was isolated from wild type (RITA+/+), heterozygous (RITA+/-) and homozygous (RITA-/-) MEFs. After reverse transcription of 1 µg of total RNA, real-time PCR reaction was performed. Expression levels of RITA mRNA were normalized to endogenous -actin mRNA levels (ΔΔ-CT method) and expression levels of mRNA derived from wild type (RITA+/+) MEFs were set as one. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS AND METHODS Reagents and siRNA sequence Cycloheximide (CHX) and tubacin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen) and Selleckchem (Munich), respectively. siRNA against the coding region or the 3’-untranslated region of RITA are GGAAGAAGAACAAAUACAG (siRITA 1) or AGGGAACCCCAGGUAUUAAUU (siRITA 2), respectively. Control siRNA was from Qiagen (Hilden). Antibodies used for Western blot analysis, immunoprecipitation and indirect immunostaining Following antibodies were used for Western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation: mouse monoclonal antibodies against cyclin B1, GST, Plk1 and MCAK (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg), mouse monoclonal antibodies against Flag-tag, β-actin, α-tubulin and acetylated α-tubulin (6-11B1) (Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal antibodies against GAPDH, α-tubulin, Mec-17 and detyrosinated α-tubulin (Abcam, Cambridge), mouse monoclonal antibody against polyglutamylated modifications (GT335, Adipogen, Hamburg), rabbit polyclonal antibody against HDAC6 (Cell Signaling, New England Biolabs GmbH, Frankfurt) and 4 mouse monoclonal antibody against lamin B1 (MBL, Woburn). About 800 µg of lysates from HeLa or HCT116 cells were used for immunoprecipitation. Corresponding primary antibody and 25 µl Protein G SepharoseTM 4 Fast Flow beads (GE Healthcare, Uppsala) or M2 Flagbeads (Sigma Aldrich) were added and incubated overnight on a rotator at 4°C. The beads were washed three times before SDS-PAGE. Cytosolic and nuclear extracts were prepared from HeLa cells for Western blot analysis using Cell Fractionation Kit (Cell Signaling, New England Biolabs GmbH). After testing all available antibodies, we have chosen our own designed and commercially produced RITA antibody (rabbit monoclonal IgG, Epitomics, Burlingame) due to its best specificity (Figures S1A and 1B). Following primary antibodies were used for immunofluorescence staining: mouse monoclonal or rabbit polyclonal antibody against pericentrin (Abcam), human ACA (human anti-centromere antibody, ImmunoVision, Springdale), mouse monoclonal antibody against acetylated α-tubulin (6-11B1) and mouse monoclonal FITC-conjugated antibody against αtubulin (Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal antibody against α-tubulin (Abcam), rat antibody against α-tubulin (Biozol, Eching) and rabbit polyclonal antibody against RITA (Atlas Antibodies, Stockholm; homemade). FITC-, Cy3- and Cy5-conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from Jackson Immunoresearch (Newmarket). DNA was stained using DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-dihydrochloride, Roche). MT fraction, soluble and polymerized tubulin preparation and pull down assay For preparing MT fraction, cells were washed with PBS, collected with a scraper in 1 ml PBS and divided in two portions. After centrifugation (1,000 rpm, 3 min), one part of the cell pellet was gently resuspended in 1 ml MT-stabilizing buffer (MSB; 85 mM Pipes, pH 6.93, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 M glycerol) and the other part in 1 ml MSB containing 0.1% TritonX-100. After incubating at 37°C for 5 min and centrifugation (2,500 rpm, 3 min), an equal 5 volume of lysis buffer was added to both pellets containing either whole cellular protein (i.e. extracted in MSB alone) or MT polymer (i.e. extracted in MSB with Triton-X-100). For preparing fractions of soluble and polymerized tubulin, cell pellets were resuspended in soluble tubulin extraction buffer A (137 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1% Triton-X-100, and 10% glycerol) and rotated at 4°C for 4 min. After centrifugation, suspension was removed and saved as soluble fraction. The remained pellet was immediately lysed in RIPA buffer and further incubated on ice for 30 min. For pull down assay, GST-RITA and GST-RITA Δtub were expressed in E.coli (BL21, DE3, Codon Plus). After cell lysis with CelLytic™ B buffer (Sigma Aldrich), recombinant proteins were purified using glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Biosciences). Beadcoupled proteins were then incubated overnight with either soluble or polymerized MT fraction lysates from mitotic HCT116 cells in binding buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % NP-40, 1 mM DTT, 100 μM Na3VO4, 400 μM PMSF, 1x protease inhibitor complete). Beads were washed three times and proteins were loaded on SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot analysis. Time-lapse imaging For time-lapse imaging, HeLa cells were stably transfected with the plasmid pCAG-H2BtdTOMATO-IRES-Puro, coding for a fusion protein of human histone H2B and tdTomato. The cells were then transiently transfected with control siRNA or siRNA targeting RITA (siRITA 1/siRITA 2). Time-lapse imaging was performed with a CellObserver system (Carl Zeiss, Hallbergmoos) at constant 37°C and 5% CO2 for three days. Phase-contrast and fluorescence images were taken every 4 min with a 10× Neofluar objective (Carl Zeiss) and an AxioCam HRm camera at 1388×1040 pixel resolution with Carl Zeiss AxioVision 4.8 software. Data analysis was performed with AxioVision 4.8 software. 6 Tubulin regrowth assay, measurement of polymerized α-tubulin in vivo and depolymerization assay in vitro For tubulin regrowth assay, slides with HeLa cells treated with control siRNA or siRNA targeting RITA were incubated for 45 min on ice to depolymerize MTs. To allow MT regrowth, cells were then incubated with warm medium at 37°C for 0, 2 and 4 min, followed by fixation and permeabilization with 4 % PFA with 0.2 % Triton-X-.100 in PBS. The cells were stained for α-tubulin, pericentrin and DNA. The intensity of α-tubulin in a 4.06 µm diameter circle around the centrosomes was evaluated from background corrected Z-stack images using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica CTR 6500). At least 25 cells per condition were measured and the experiments were independently performed twice. For the measurement of polymerized α-tubulin in vivo, cells were depleted of endogenous RITA using siRITA 1. 24 h later cells were synchronized with nocodazole and prometaphase cells were collected by shake-off. The cells were released for 1 h in fresh medium to reach metaphase for analysis of cellular MT polymer content after extraction, fixation and staining for α-tubulin using FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg). Briefly, cellular soluble tubulin was pre-extracted in a saponin containing MT stabilizing buffer (0.1% saponin, 2 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 M PIPES pH 7.4 and 25 nM paclitaxel). Resuspended cells were then fixed with an equal volume of 4% paraformaldehyde solution at 37°C for 15 min. Cells were then washed and stained for α-tubulin with a specific mouse monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) and FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse antibody (Dako, Hamburg). More than 95% of all cells were included in the acquisition gate and 30,000 to 50,000 cells were examined. Fluorescence intensity was quantified using the Cell Quest software (Becton Dickinson). The polymer content in control siRNA transfected cells was assigned as 100%. The experiments were independently performed two times and each in triplicates. For depolymerization assay in vitro, X-rhodamine labeled bovine brain tubulin heterodimers (Cytoskeleton Inc, Biomol, Hamburg) were polymerized in G-PEM buffer (80 7 mM PIPES pH 6.9, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM dGTP and 10% glycerol) for 20 min at 37°C and then stabilized with 8 µM taxol for 5 min at 37°C. The assay was performed in a 50 µl reaction buffer containing 0.5 µl polymerized MTs, G-PEM buffer with 30% glycerol, 20 µM taxol and 25 nM GST-RITA or its mutant for 15 min at 37°C. After the reaction, 5 µl of the reaction volume was immediately pipetted onto a glass slide, sealed for fluorescence microscopy, and evaluated with the AxioVision SE64 Re. 4.9 software. Information of RITA knockout mice and preparation of embryonic fibroblasts Cryo recovered embryos were derived from clone Rita1tm1e(KOMP)Mbp inheriting a gene targeting allele including a β-galactosidase and neomycin resistance cassette (Figure S7). The RITA+/- mice were mated and wild type (RITA+/+), heterozygous (RITA+/-) and homozygous (RITA-/-) were selected by genotyping using the following primer pairs: RITA_wt_F GGGGAGGAGGGGAACTATTCAAGC and RITA_wt_R CACTTCCCACGATAAAGTAAGGCAGC for detection of RITA wild type allele or RITA_tm_F: CACACCTCCCCCTGAACCTGAAA and RITA_wt_R, respectively. For isolation of mouse embryonic fibroblasts, pregnant females were sacrificed after 14 days post-coitum. The uterine horns were dissected in a tissue culture hood under aseptic conditions. After dissection, the uterine horns were placed into a petri dish containing PBS and each embryo was separated from its placenta and embryonic sac. The head, limbs and red organs were removed and each embryo was placed in one well of a 6 well plate. The heads were used for genotyping. The tissue was minced until proper removal of chunks. 1 ml of 0.05% trypsin/EDTA was added to each well including 100 units of DNaseI (Qiagen) and the tissue was incubated for 10 min at 37°C. After incubation, the cells were dissociated by pipetting thoroughly. The incubation and dissociation step was repeated. The cells were then separated by using a cell strainer ( 70 µm) and the single cell suspensions were centrifuged with low speed (300 g) for 3 min. The supernatants were aspirated and the cell pellets were 8 resuspended in freshly prepared MEF medium containing DMEM with 15% FCS, Lglutamine (200 mM), penicillin (10,000 U/ml) and streptomycin (10,000 µg/ml), nonessential amino acids (100x) (1% (v/v)), sodium pyruvate (1000x) (1% (v/v)) and βmercaptoethanol (1000x) (1% (v/v), Millipore Specialty Media). The reagents for preparation were from Gibco, if not else indicated. Each embryo was plated on a T25 flask and was expanded up to 80-90% of confluence for passaging. The cells were frozen after passage 2 for further usage. Total RNA was isolated from wild type (RITA+/+), heterozygous (RITA+/-) and homozygous (RITA-/-) MEFs by using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). After reverse transcription of 1 µg of total RNA via SuperScriptTM II Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies), real-time PCR reaction (LightCycler 480 II, Roche, Penzberg) was performed by using the QuantiFastTM SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen). Expression levels of RITA mRNA were normalized to endogenous -actin mRNA levels (ΔΔ-CT method) and expression levels of mRNA derived from wild type (RITA+/+) MEFs were set to one. The following primers were used: mRITA-615F, CAA ACC TCA CAC CAA GGA AGA AA; mRITA-689R, ACA GTG ACT CAT CGC AGT AGG ATG; -actin forward and reverse primers: Actb, mouse β-actin, Real-time PCR Primer Set (Biomol). Direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) For this analysis, HeLa cells were plated on fibronectin coated cover slips in 12-well plates (Roth). After 24 h, the cells were transiently transfected with 0.5 µg of pcDNA3-GFP-RITA by using Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technologies). For immunofluorescence staining, the cells were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1 % Triton-X-100, blocked with PBS containing 0.2 % fish skin gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich). The following antibodies and antisera were used: anti α-tubulin, mouse monoclonal IgG, (T9026, Sigma-Aldrich), 9 secondary antibody, Alexa Flour® 532 coupled goat anti-mouse IgG (A11002, Life Technologies), ATTO 647N coupled nanobody GFP-Booster_ATTO647N (gba647N, Chromotek). Experiments were performed on a home built inverted microscope applying an objectivetype total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) or highly inclined and laminated optical sheet (HILO) configuration. Three or four continuous-wave laser sources (640 nm, 490 nm and 402 nm, Toptica Photonics and 532 nm, Cobolt) were combined, controlled in intensity by an acousto-optical tunable filter (AOTF) (TF-525-250-6-3-GH18A, Gooch&Housego) and reflected into an oil-immersion objective (APO TIRF 60x, NA 1.49 Oil, Nikon) by a multiband dichroic (HC545/650, AHF Analysentechnik, Tübingen). Single molecule fluorescence signals were separated into the two detection channels by a dichroic (645dcxr, AHF Analysentechnik), and filtered using two band-pass emission filters (HQ585/80m and HQ710/100m, AHF Analysentechnik). Fluorescence light was finally passed on to two halves of an EMCCD camera (iXon 897, Andor Technology). The magnification of the microscope yielded an effective pixel size of 132 nm. A series of 30,000-50,000 images was acquired for the red channel and followed by another series of 30,000-50,000 images for the green channel if dual color images were acquired, each taken at a frequency of 46 Hz with typical laser intensities of 0.4 - 0.7 kW/cm2 for excitation and 0-3 W/cm2 for activation. In some experiments RITA-GFP was labeled with nanobooster-Atto647N in conjunction with Alexa Fluor 532 staining of α-tubulin; in this case the sample was pre-bleached for 1 min with a high intensity 490 nm laser light to erase the unwanted eGFP signal prior to taking the images for the green channel. Z-drift was automatically corrected during image acquisition by a home built autofocus system. A series of 30,000-50,000 images was acquired for each channel. Prior to imaging, cells were placed in a degassed PBS imaging buffer containing 100 U/ml glucose oxidase, 400 U/ml catalase, 4% (wt/vol) glucose and 100 mM cysteamine (SigmaAldrich) at pH 7.5. 10 The acquired images were analyzed using custom written MATLAB software (MathWorks, Natick). The image series was background corrected by applying a running temporal median filtering1 with a window size of 101 frames. The center position of fluorescent spots above a certain threshold were identified by fitting a Gaussian function and filtered according to intensity, width and asymmetry criteria. The set of fluorophore localizations was reconstructed in a pixel raster of 10 nm and weighted with the intensity of the individual localization. The second channel of a two color image was transformed onto the first channel according to a transformation function obtained by imaging fluorescent beads (TetraSpeck Microspheres, Life Technologies) in both color channels. XY-drift was compensated by applying a redundant cross correlation algorithm to the identified localizations.2 The reconstructed high resolution images were analyzed with ImageJ (NIH). For the analysis of the mean width of microtubules in cells with endogenous expression levels of RITA, 160 line selections with a width of 300 nm were applied perpendicular to the filamentous structures and the resulting intensity profiles along these selections were fitted with a Gaussian function, yielding the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the fitted intensity profiles. Selections were rejected if the corresponding R2-value was below 0.9. All presented super resolution images were processed with a Gaussian blur (sigma = 5 nm) for a smoother rendering. Reference List 1. Hoogendoorn E, Crosby KC, Leyton-Puig D, Breedijk RM, Jalink K, Gadella TW et al. The fidelity of stochastic single-molecule super-resolution reconstructions critically depends upon robust background estimation. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:3854. 2. Wang Y, Schnitzbauer J, Hu Z, Li X, Cheng Y, Huang ZL et al. Localization events-based sample drift correction for localization microscopy with redundant cross-correlation algorithm. Opt Express. 2014; 22(13):15982-15991. 11