Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
GUEST ESSAY Institutional Roadblocks Norman Myers Norman Myers is a tropical ecologist and international consultant in environment and development, with emphasis on conservation of wildlife species and tropical forests. His research and consulting have taken him to 80 countries. A leading environmental expert, he has consulted for many development agencies and research organizations, including the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, UN agencies, and the World Resources Institute. Among his many publications are The Primary Source: Tropical Forests and Our Future (1992), Ultimate Security: The Environmental Basis of Political Security (1996), Perverse Subsidies (with Jennifer Kent, 2001), and The New Consumers: The Influence of Affluence on the Environment (with Jennifer Kent, 2004). Government systems are often blighted by "institutional roadblocks" (IRs). The phenomenon applies especially to environmental problems, which are plainly growing worse. After decades of efforts by governments and despite many success stories, we are losing ground faster than ever. How can we get ahead of the game and prevent problems from becoming problems in the first place? A key answer is to tackle the IRs. Example: climate change. Many experts acknowledge that global warming could set us back economically and ecologically by at least fifty years and maybe a good while longer. It is even coming to be regarded as a bigger threat than international terrorism. Climatologists say that if we ever decide we don't want global warming after all, it will take at least one thousand years to restore climate to today's state. Many political leaders confirm that it is surely the biggest issue of our time— yet they do next to nothing about it. An IR in the form of the election cycle with its short-term horizons means it is not in politicians' self-interest to act to prevent fairly rapid climate change. IRs include (1) "perverse" subsidies of $2 trillion a year worldwide, that mobilize taxpayer dollars to trash our environments as well as to deplete our Copyright ©2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning is a trademark used herein under license. economies, (2) using GDP as highly distorted measure of our economies and human wellbeing, and (3) tax systems that penalizes "goods" such as honest work while virtually ignoring "bads" such as environmental degradation. A specially widespread and cryptic form of IR lies with the historic division of government into rigorously defined sectors—a division that is antithetical to the types of changes required to integrate environment into policy throughout government systems. The result is that an Environment Ministry, being a new kid on the block, finds its policies are effectively set by the more powerful and long established ministries that determine patterns of resource exploitation, land use, and pollution that undermine environmental needs. Further: by courtesy of the lobbying by special interests (which spend a whopping $100 million a month in Washington, D.C.), the government fiefdoms of Transport, Agriculture, and Energy often pursue activities that are directly opposed to their official policies. Transport policy encourages the car culture to the detriment of alternative modes of transportation. Agriculture policy promotes unsustainable forms of farming based on over-intensive use of energy. Energy policy amounts to a fragmented approach to energy supply, instead of offering a coherent framework with emphasis on reducing both supply and demand. In addition, transport policy tends to be pursued with indifference to energy policy; agriculture policy with indifference to land conservation; and both with indifference to climate constraints. The aggregate impact of all IRs means that environmentalists find themselves pushing ever-bigger rocks up ever-steeper hills. Critical Thinking If you had the power, what are the three most important things you would do to reduce the influence of institutional roadblocks? Copyright ©2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning is a trademark used herein under license.