Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Incidence & prevalence 국립암정보센터 Introduction • Localized Disease – Curative intent by either surgery or radiation therapy • Locally or Regionally Advanced Disease – Curative intent combined modality therapy including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy • Recurrent and/or Metastatic Disease – Palliative intent by chemotherapy Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 18e Induction chemotherapy • Induction (or neoadjuvant) chemotherapy for locally advanced SCCHN has shown high overall responses rates Revisiting induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer Oncology (Williston Park) 2005; 19: 759–-770 • Most studies : No survival benefit, but exception of two phase III trials that utilized cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (PF) J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 1714–-1717 Br J Cancer 2000; 83: 1594–-1598 • A EORTC study : Organ preservation in patients with cancer of the hypopharynx found an OS benefit Larynx preservation in pyriform sinus cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 890–-899 Gastric Cancer 2007;10: 1–11 TTF OS Severe toxic effects TPF PF Fewer toxic deaths with TPF versus PF in the Tax 323 study Induction with a docetaxel or paclitaxel triplet : lower rates of severe thrombocytopenia and mucositis compared with PF The toxicity profile for taxane-containing induction seems therefore manageable The superiority of a triplet as induction regimen, with docetaxel or paclitaxel added to PF Gastric Cancer 2007;10: 1–11 Randomized studies to validate the induction therapy approach • Conclusive results with induction therapy improving clinical outcomes over contemporary CRT are still needed to establish induction therapy as standard treatment for locally advanced SCCHN • Four phase III randomized trials, all with induction TPF, are either completed or ongoing TPF + CRT vs CRT Targeted agents into induction therapy Gastric Cancer 2007;10: 1–11 Clinical trials of other targeted therapies in induction • Gefitinib – Selective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor’s tyrosine kinase domain – The survival results overlap with results reported with CRT alone • Lapatinib – A dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor which interrupts the HER2 growth receptor pathway – Unacceptable renal toxic effects • Bevacizumab and Erlotinib – A humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor A – A reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor Selecting patients for induction therapy • Whichever induction strategy is used will not compromise subsequent definitive therapy • As more steps are added to the treatment plan, one of the key concerns is maintaining optimal timing and avoiding delays – Protracted treatment courses with gaps before or during RT administration are known to compromise efficacy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 52: 929–-936 Which patients may be better candidates for induction • Patients who are not likely to tolerate chemotherapy are not good candidates for induction therapy • The choice to use induction could be made based on extent of anatomical involvement – In an analysis of phase II clinical trials with or without induction preceding CRT, the use of induction appeared to have reduced the risk for distant failure – For patients receiving CRT alone, advanced nodal stage (N2c–-N3) predicted risk for distant failure and was associated with worse OS Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1179–-1186 Molecular biomarkers • Low expression levels of the marker B-tubulin II were found to be associated with better OS and PFS b-Tubulin-II expression strongly predicts outcome in patients receiving induction chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck J Clin Oncol 2009 in press • Low baseline levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin (IL)-6 correlated with higher likelihood for CR Serum biomarkers as predictors of clinical outcome after cetuximab-based therapy in patients with locally advanced SCCHN. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(15s): 6035 Abstr HPV? • HPV is an independent prognostic factor in patients with locally advanced SCCHN – The effect of HPV on survival was primarily driven by a marked reduction on the risk for locoregional failure in patients with HPV-positive tumors Summary • Induction TPF in locally advanced SCCHN – Considered a standard induction regimen – platinum/taxane backbone vs 5-FU • Targeted agents – Cetuximab, Bevacizumab and Erlotinib • Selecting patients? – Use the response to induction therapy for patient selection • Biomarker study – The patients with HPV-negative SCCHN may be more suitable regimen