Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SUPPORTING INFORMATION Label-free chemiresistive biosensor for mercury (II) detection based on single-walled carbon nanotubes and structure-switching DNA Ji-Lai Gonga, c, Tapan Sarkara, Sushmee Badhulikab and Ashok Mulchandania* a) Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. b) Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. c) College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China. 1. Fabrication of label-free SWNTs chemiresistive biosensor SWNTs suspension was prepared by dispersing 0.2 mg of carboxylated SWNTs from Carbon Solution Inc., Riverside, CA, USA [P3 SWNT-COOH 80 ~ 90% purity and semiconducting: metallic = 2:1] in 20 ml of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (Sigma Aldrich, Spectral grade) by ultrasonication for 90 minutes followed by centrifugation at 31,000xg for 90 minutes to separate soluble fraction from the aggregates. Gold microelectrodes were fabricated on highly doped p-type silicon substrate by standard lithographic patterning. First, approximately 300 nm SiO2 dielectric layer was deposited on the substrate by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD). Electrodes (200 m x 100 m) separated by a 3 m gap were written on the substrate by photolithography, followed by deposition of 20 nm Cr layer and 180 nm of Au layer by e-beam evaporation. Finally electrodes were defined by using standard lift-off technique. To bridge the gap between the gold electrodes, SWNTs were aligned across the electrode using dielectrophoresis. A 0.1 l of SWNT suspension was dispensed on the top of the electrode gap while applying 3 VP-P at 4 MHz frequency for a predetermined time. After alignment, the device was washed with nanopure water to remove the extra SWNTs and dried by gently blowing dry nitrogen gas. Desirable resistance of the device could be achieved by varying the alignment time. The electrode was then annealed at 300 OC for 90 minutes in reduced environment (5% H2 in N2) to improve the contact between the gold electrode and SWNTs by removing any DMF residues between electrode and SWNTs. 1.1. Non-covalent functionalization of SWNTs with PolyT (Scheme I) Aligned SWNTs network chemiresistor was incubated with 100 nM of oligonucleotide polyT (5’–TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT-3’) [Integrated DNA Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA, USA] in 10 mM pH 7.2 phosphate buffer (PB) for 2 hours at room temperature followed by thorough washing with nanopure water to remove unbound oligos. Further, the gold pads of the electrode were blocked by 6-mercapto-1-hexanol (MCH). MCH blocking was done by incubating the device with 6 mM of MCH solution for 1 hour at room temperature. A monolayer of MCH was formed on exposed gold pads of the electrode due to the interaction between thiol group and gold, which restricts further interaction/accumulation of Hg2+ on the gold surface. 1.2. Covalent functionalization of SWNTs with amino-labeled PolyT followed by hybridization with polyA (Scheme II) First, SWNTs network chemiresistor was modified with 1-Pyrenebutanoic acid succinimidyl ester (PBASE) by incubating with 6 mM of PBASE in dimethylformamide (DMF) for 1 hour at room temperature followed by washing with DMF three times to remove residual ester1. The capture oligonucliotide was then covalently attached to the PBASE-modified SWNTs by incubating overnight at 4 OC with 100 nM amino-labeled polyT (5’-/5AmMC6/TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT -3’) [Intergrated DNA Technologies Inc., San Diago, CA, USA] in 10 mM pH 7.2 PB through the amide bond between the amine at its 5’ end and N-hydrosuccinimide ester of PBASE washed three time to remove excess oligo. The device was further treated with 0.1 mM ethanolamine (EA) for 30 minutes at room temperature to block excessive reactive groups and incubated with 0.1 % (V/V) Tween 20 in 10 mM pH 7.2 PB for 30 minutes at room temperature to prevent nonspecific binding to SWNTs. The device gold pads were blocked by MCH blocking. Finally, the captured oligo (polyT) was hybridized to polyA (5’ – AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA -3’) [Intergrated DNA Technologies Inc., San Diago, CA, USA] by incubating with 100 nM PolyA in 10 nM pH 7.2 PB solutions for 2 hour at room temperature. 2. Sensing measurements: The sensing protocol consisted of 1) monitoring the initial resistance (RO) of the biosensors fabricated using different scheme by measuring the source-drain current (I) as a function of source-drain voltage (V) from -0.5 to +0.5 V using a CHI 1202 (CH Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) electrochemical analyzer and taking the inverse of the slope of the I-V curve from -0.1 V to +0.1 V, 2) incubation for 30 minutes at room temperature with different concentration of Hg2+ ion sample in PB, washing three times with PB and water, drying with nitrogen and recording the new resistance. Figure S1 Schematic illustration of SWNTs chemiresistive label-free biosensor fabrication steps through noncovalent functionalization of SWNTs with polyT (Scheme I) Figure S2 Current versus voltage (I-V) curves of SWNTs chemiresistive label-free biosensor (fabricated via Scheme I) at various stages of fabrication and upon exposure of 1 M of Hg2+ Figure S3 Responses of SWNTs chemiresistive label-free biosensor (fabricated via Scheme I) to various metal ions. The concentrations of all metal ions were fixed at 1 M. Data for each metal ion was obtained from four different sensors at different time and error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. References (1) R. J. Chen, Y. Zhang, D. Wang and H. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 3838.