Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
*** WRITE YOUR NAME AND COHORT ONLY ON THE LAST PAGE *** UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY Hass School of Business MBA 201A—Economic Analysis for Business Decisions—Fall 2009 Professors Steve Tadelis and Catherine Wolfram FINAL EXAM Instructions: The number in brackets (e.g., [5]) indicates the points for each question. Total: 180 points. Note that you have 180 minutes to do the exam, so you should spend no more than 1 minute per point. Please Write Legibly. Briefly explain your answers (that is, don’t just write “yes” or “no” and don’t just write down a numerical answer without showing how you derived it). Write only on this exam and not on other sheets of paper. Please sign the honor code oath at the bottom of the back page. Short answer questions The following three questions require only short answers (1-3 sentences). Use any graphs that will help your explanation. Be sure to label graphs clearly. 1. [10] Even with a very small number of competitors, firms occasionally get locked in bitter price competition and drive prices down to their marginal costs. Discuss two factors that help firms avoid the “Bertrand Trap.” Full credit given for discussion of two of any of the following factors: Cost leadership on the part of one of the firms, If the two firms manage to limit capacity, Product differentiation, Switching costs, Facilitating practices, such as most-favored customer clauses, and Repeated interactions, as long as firms care about the future. MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final 2. [10] Alice is a contractor bidding in a sealed-bid auction for a job to paint Bob's house. Being an expert painter, Alice knows for sure (and is correct) that it will cost her exactly $5,000 (labor and material) to paint Bob's house. The auction rules state that the lowest bidder gets the job and gets paid the amount of the second lowest bid. Explain to Alice, who does not know economics, why she should bid exactly $5,000. Call the lowest bid by any other bidder besides Alice $X. If Alice bids below $5000 say, $4900 then compared to truthful bidding that i) makes no difference if X > 5000, Alice still gets the job and gets paid X, ii) makes no difference if X < 4900, Alice still doesn’t get the job, iii) hurts Alice if 4900 < X < 5000, because she gets the job but it costs her more to do the job than she receives in payment. If Alice overbids to, say, $5100, then compared to truthful bidding it i) makes no difference if X < 5000, because Alice still doesn’t get the job, ii) if X > 5100 makes no difference, Alice still gets the job and receives X, iii) hurts Alice if 5000 < X < 5100 because now she doesn’t get the job but with a truthful bid she would have won and been paid more than her cost. 3. [10] Two firms have to set their capacity in a market they are about to enter. Their payoffs are described by the following matrix (the lower left number in each cell is the payoff to Row Inc. and the upper right number is the payoff to Column Ltd.): Column Ltd. Small 6 Mid 7 Large 10 Small 7 Row Inc. 5 4 Mid 8 4 6 6 3 5 5 4 2 Large 11 5 3 What is (or are) the Nash equilibrium of this game? Indicate best response of player 1 and indicates best response of player 2. The only Nash Equilibrium (where both firms are at a best response) is Mid-Mid. 2 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final Question 4 You run a photography company that specializes in weddings near your home in Carmel, California. You have two types of clients: the wealthy, who own a single, year-round house in Carmel, and the very wealthy, who own multiple houses, including one in Carmel. You can distinguish between the two types of clients, but you feel that you would lose considerable business, especially from the very wealthy, if you charged different prices to consumers based on their wealth. Your marginal costs are $2000 per wedding regardless of what type of client you’re serving. This includes the cost of film and the cost of labor (either the opportunity cost of your time if you do the wedding yourself, or the wages you pay to your associates). You expect that in 2010 there will be 140 weddings, including 40 to the wealthy and 100 to the very wealthy. In order to try to distinguish the wealthy from the very wealthy, you are thinking of offering two types of services: all black-and-white photos or half black-and-white, half color. Based on your extensive interviews with potential clients, you estimate the following valuations for these two types of services in 2010: Number of weddings Wealthy Very wealthy 40 100 Half black-and-white, half color $5,000 $6,000 All black-and-white $6,000 $10,000 Assume that the cost difference between color and black-and-white film is negligible, although you might tell your clients otherwise to justify your new pricing scheme. Also assume that couples in Carmel get married no more than once per year, so they will order no more than one photography package. a. [10] In 2010, what would be the profit-maximizing way to price all black-and-white and half black-and-white, half color wedding photos? Consider three options: i) Uniform price, selling all black-and-white to everyone: profits = ($6,000 - $2,000)x140 = $560,000 ii) Uniform price, selling all black-and-white only to the very wealthy: profits = ($10,000 $2,000)x100 = $800,000 iii) Separate prices: profits = ($5,000 - $2,000)x40 + ($9,000 - $2,000)x100 = $820,000 Option iii) yields the most profits, so charge: $5,000 for half-half $9,000 (actually $8,999) for black-white 3 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final b. [15] You learn that the reception location of choice for the wealthy is considering doing a major renovation in 2010. This would drive the number of wealthy clients down to 20. You believe that there’s a 50% chance that they will go through with the renovation, in which case, you would have 20 wealthy clients and 100 very wealthy, still with the same valuations listed in the table above. If they decide to delay their renovation (an event to which you assign probability of 50%), then the number of clients will be exactly as in the table above. You need to print up your new brochure with 2010 prices before you know whether or not the renovation is going to take place. Assuming you are risk neutral, what prices would you choose? In other words, what prices maximize expected profits? If you use the prices found in part a: your profits if there is no renovation will be: $820,000 your profits if there is a renovation will be: ($5,000-$2,000)x20 + ($9,000 $2,000)x100 = $760,000 Your expected profits will be .5x$820,000+.5x$760,000 = $790,000 If you charge $10,000 for black-and-white and sell only to the very wealthy, your profits will be $800,000, and they will be unaffected by the renovation since you now don’t sell to the wealthy. Your expected profits will be $800,000. Since $800,000 > $790,000, the prices that maximize expected profits are charging $10,000 for black-and-white and a price greater than $6,000 for half-and-half. c. [5] Would you choose different prices than you did in part b. if you were risk averse? Why or why not? No, your answer would not change. The choice that maximizes profits also has less risk associated with it. 4 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final d. [10] How much would you be willing to pay to learn whether or not the renovation would take place before you printed your 2010 brochure? You should be willing to pay up to $10,000 for the information. If you learn that the renovation will go forward, you won’t change your pricing strategy—you would still charge $10,000 for black-and-white and only serve the very wealthy. If you learn that the renovation will not happen, however, you would price discriminate and earn $820,000 instead of $800,000. Since the information will make you change your decision 50% of the time, and will earn you $20,000 when it does ($820,000 - $800,000), it is worth up to $10,000 to you. 5 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final Question 5 You are the product manager of Macrohard's new student-targeted software line, Dormroom 2009, which includes two components: Letter 2009, the new word-processor, and Surpass 2009, the new spreadsheet analyzer. Your market research team tells you that there are five student groups that compose the market with the following willingnessto-pays (WTP) for each product: Engineering Majors Econ Majors Poli-Sci Majors Pre-Med Majors Humanities Majors WTP for Letter 2009 ($) 10 40 45 70 55 WTP for Surpass 2009 ($) 55 70 45 40 10 There are an equal number of students in each of the 5 groups listed in the table above. The company’s accountant presents the following table of per unit costs for both of the products: Unit Costs Software development* Promotion* Manual development costs* Manual printing costs Customer Support Website* CDs (each) Total Unit Costs * Letter 2009 $1.00 $0.20 $1.00 $4.60 $0.30 $0.40 $7.50 Surpass 2009 $3.00 $0.20 $1.90 $6.60 $0.40 $0.40 $12.50 Amortized based on expected number of customers. a. [10] What are the marginal costs of selling Letter 2009? Surpass 2009? Explain your answer. The only variable costs are manual printing costs and CDs so marginal costs are equal to MC = $4.60 + $0.40 = $5.00 for Letter and MC = $6.60 + $0.40 = $7.00 for Surpass. 6 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final [10] Macrohard's CEO insists on offering a single price per product without offering the bundle of both products at a discount. With this restriction, what would be the profit-maximizing prices for Letter 2009 and Surpass 2009? For each of the two products we have the same demand and profit maximization is at a price of $40 per product as can be calculated from the following table (this is done for “Letter” where each student group is counted as 1): Price 10 40 45 55 70 Quantity 5 4 3 2 1 Revenue 50 160 135 110 70 Costs 25 20 15 10 5 Profits 25 140 120 100 65 A similar table for “Surpass” would yield the optimal price to be the same but since MC = 7 then “Surpass” profits are $132 and total profits are therefore $272. b. [10] One of your company’s board members suggests that you should, “do what Microsoft does” and only sell the products as a bundle. If you did as the director suggested, what price would maximize profit? Whose suggestion is better – the CEO’s or the director’s? (Assume that if sold as a bundle, technology prevents customers from separating and reselling the products.) We can use a similar approach to the bundle, but now the willingness to pay is the sum over both products (now the marginal cost per bundle is $12 assuming that each product has its own manual and CD): Price 65 90 110 Quantity 5 3 2 Revenue 325 270 220 Costs 60 36 24 Profits 265 234 196 Total profits are therefore $265 which is less than what the CEO strategy achieves. 7 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final c. [10] Can you develop a pricing strategy that is better than those considered in either b. or c.? What prices would you charge for the bundle? For the individual products? A quick observation suggests that Engineering and Humanities majors really like one product and not the other. The other three majors have a higher willingness to pay for the bundle. In this case we can try to sell the bundle to these three majors and the individual products to the Engineering and Humanities students. For this we can charge $90 for the bundle and $55 for each separate product. The PoliSci majors are willing to buy the bundle but are uninterested in the individual products, while the Engineering and Humanities majors are each willing to buy one product but not the bundle. The Econ and PreMed majors get a surplus of $20 from he bundle and only $15 from the individual product they like best, so each prefers the bundle. Total profits are: 3$90 + 2$55 – 3$12 – $5 – $7 = $332. 8 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final Question 6 Consider the market for printed books in 16th century England. By this time, the Gutenberg press has been in use for over 100 years and countless people have access to the technology and have learned the art of printing. There are many printing companies, and they are all price takers. Also, many people have the necessary income to enjoy reading books. For simplicity, assume that all books have an equal number of pages, thus cost the same to produce. The main inputs to book printing are paper and the printer’s time. (The costs of the printing presses are sunk and the costs of the ink are trivial.) Assume that each book printing company in the market has the following total cost function TC(Q) = 500 + 4Q + 0.05 Q2 where Q is the number of books per year and costs are measured in pounds. Assume that people don’t care which book they read as long as they read a book. The total demand for books in England is reflected by Q= 50,600-50P where Q is measured in books per year and P is measured in pounds per book. People outside of England do not value books printed in English. a. [15] It is 1575 AD and the Queen of England, an avid reader who wants to encourage literacy, would like to fix prices for books. She would like to set a price of 10 pounds per book, but her advisors convince her that this would be a bad idea. What might their reasons be? (Note: A full credit answer will be quantitative as well as qualitative.) At a price of 10 pounds, no book printers can profitably remain in the market (see below). Existing firms that are in the market will gradually exit, and no new firms will enter the market. Eventually, no books will be produced. At a price of 10 pounds, market demand would be QD = 50,100. Since supply will eventually be zero, there will be a shortage of 50,100 books. For an individual firm, P=MC 10=4 + 0.1Q Q=60 R=600 TC=500+240+180=920 Loss of 320 pounds. Alternatively, we can see this by solving for the minimum of the AC and verifying that 10 pounds is below the minAC. 9 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final b. [15] The Queen’s advisors convince her that she should not regulate prices but instead let the book market achieve a long run competitive equilibrium. What will be the market price, how many books will be produced and how many firms will be in the market once the market achieves a long run competitive equilibrium? At the LR equilibrium, each firm will be making zero economic profits, and P=min(AC). AC(Q)= 500/Q+4+0.05Q MC(Q)=4+0.1Q We can find the min of AC by solving for the point where MC=AC: 0.1Q= 500/Q+0.05Q0.05Q=500/QQ=100 AC(100)=5+4+5=14 Price in the long run will be 14 pounds. At this price quantity demanded will be Q= 50,600-50(14) = 49,900 Since each firm will optimally produce 100, 499 firms will be in the market. c. [10] In the summer of 1582 a fire in Central Europe eradicates a large tract of forest, causing paper input prices to go up. Explain qualitatively what you think will happen to the long run competitive equilibrium price. Will it go up, down or stay the same, or is it impossible to tell? Assume that paper prices are expected to stay high for longer than it takes the book market to achieve a new long run equilibrium. The long run competitive equilibrium price will be higher. To be precise, it will be higher by the change in the price of paper times the amount of paper that it takes to produce a book, assuming that there is no substitute for paper in the book printing process. If the printers are able to substitute, the LRCE price will still be higher, but not by quite as much as the change in the paper costs. 10 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final Question 7 The Hard Rock Café in Merced only sells beer in one-pint glasses. The local demand from adults over the age of 21 is quite accurately described by the following demand function: qA= 1,600 – 100p where qA is measured in pint glasses and p is measured in dollars per pint. The marginal cost of a pint of beer is $2.00. a. [10] What is the profit-maximizing price and quantity of beer sold for the Hard Rock Café? What is its profit? For this demand p = 16 – 0.01qA and MR = 16 – 0.02qA. Equating MR to MC = 2 gives qA = 700, and plugging this back into the demand gives p = 9. Profits are $4,900 (assuming no fixed costs). A new university opens in Merced, and the demand by students (over the age of 21) is quite accurately described by the following demand function: qS=800-100p. b. [10] If Merced city code does not allow the Hard Rock Café to charge separate prices for students or locals, what would be the profit-maximizing price and quantity of beer sold? What is the profit? For the student demand p = 8 – 0.01qs which means that for prices above $8 and below $16 the demand is just the adult demand (as in part (a) above) and for prices below $8 we need to aggregate the two demands which yields Q = 2400 – 200p, or p = 12 – 0.005Q with MR = 12 – 0.01Q. Equating MR of the aggregated demand to MC = 2 gives 2 = 12 – 0.01Q or Q = 1,000. Plugging this back into the aggregate demand gives p = 12 – 0.0051000 = 7, which is in the correct price range to serve both markets. Profits are $5,000 (assuming no fixed costs). 11 MBA 201A c. Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final [10] After the student union successfully lobbies the city council in Merced, the code was changed to allow the Hard Rock Cafe to offer student discounts so that it can charge a standard price, and offer a discount to those who possess a student ID. What is the profit maximizing price and student discount, and how much beer does each group (adults and students) buy? What are the profits? (Local laws prohibit consumers from reselling beer.) Now the monopolist can do group discrimination. From part (a) above we know that the price it charges adults is $9, qA = 700, and from that market alone it makes $4,900. For student demand is p = 8 – 0.01qs and MR = 8 – 0.02qs. Equating MR to MC = 2 for students gives qs = 300, and plugging this back into the demand gives p = 5. Profits from the student market are $900, and hence total profits are $5,800 (assuming no fixed costs). This would be implemented with a $9 price per pint, and a $4 student discount. 12 MBA 201A Professors Tadelis and Wolfram Fall 2009—Final YOUR NAME: ______________________________ YOUR COHORT: ____________________________ Please Sign Honor Code Oath: I understand that this exam is an individual effort exercise. I sweat on my honor that I have not consulted with another person or made use of notes or other materials during the exam. Signature: _________________________________ 13