Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
LYMEC RESOLUTIONS FORM Submitted by: Jeunes MR and FEL (Fédération des Étudiants Libéraux) Resolution spokesperson: Mathieu BIHET, Aurian DELLI PIZZI, Steve DETRY, Balint GYEVAI Title Precautionary principle on shale gas extraction Chapter Chapter 6: “Climate Action, Energy and Natural Resources” Keywords Shale gas – hydraulic fracturing – energy dependence – lack of a common European position – environmental and sanitary impact of shale gas extraction Summary (optional) Whereas, Noting that, Noting that: Stating, Taking into account, Recognising etc. - The EU is the largest energy market in the world. Knowing, Aware of, Considering that etc. Concludes, Stresses out, Urges, Demands, Expresses, Believes that, Welcomes, Condemns etc. LYMEC Calls upon, LYMEC proposes the following etc. - The EU suffers from great energy dependence, importing 57% of its gas and 82% of its oil. - Energy suppliers of Europe such as Russia, several Caucasus countries or other members of the OPEC might be subject to unstable regime, frequently violate human rights and might use the EU energy dependence to establish a position of strength on a geopolitical level. - The Cambridge Energy Research Associated estimated the shale gas reserves in Europe between 3.000 and 12.000 billions of m³ even if those estimations are imprecise. - Many experts have been recently warning politics against the speculation bubble that shale gas extraction has created in the United States, showing that shale gas acreages are less reliable and profitable than planned. - The only efficient method developed so far to extract shale gas is hydraulic fracturing. - Hydraulic fracturing method consists in injecting around 15 000 m3 of water with sand and various chemical additives in the ground, what may represent important ecological and sanitary consequences including waste of water, pollution of groundwater tables, impacts on local population. - European countries are divided on the question of the exploitation of shale gas and more specifically on the position to adopt as regards the potential ecological and sanitary danger of the extraction method of this gas. - Several European countries are considering exploiting shale gas, have begun doing so or are setting up the adequate infrastructure to exploit shale gas (United Kingdom, Poland, Denmark). - Several European countries have either banned the exploitation of shale gas (France, Italy, Spain, Bulgaria) or adopted a precautionary principle not to resort to hydraulic fracturing and, accordingly, to the exploitation of shale gas (Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Austria). - In January 2014, the European Commission allowed the exploitation of shale gas and restrained itself to encouraging the exploiting countries to be careful and to respect some 'minimal common principles' despite the opposition of liberal Commissioner for the Environment, Janez Potocnik and a majority of MEP. Considering that: - Each European country is legitimate to choose its own energy mix as a principle of subsidiarity. - The EU is a territory two and half times smaller than the United States where environmental decisions taken in one Member State can have an impact on another one. - Energetic security and independence should be obtained in the future through the development of renewable energy, to a lesser extent, through ‘traditional’ energy (nuclear, coal, gas), and, when necessary, through an appropriate cooperation between European countries, for example in the field of technological researches, but it should not be a priority to the detriment of ecological aspects. - The real solution to energetic independence lies in a European policy that respects the natural environment and the health of European citizens. Calls upon: - Ban on shale gas extraction in each Member State until a clean alternative to hydraulic fracturing is developed, even if we need affordable energy with lower carbon emission. This ban does not concern the purchasing of gas issued from shale gas from other countries than EU countries (i.e. from the USA) as long as it does not go against international treaties targets that fight against climate change. - Appropriate researches to be conducted in true transparency on the ecological and sanitary consequences of extraction of shale gas through hydraulic fracturing, and the potential alternatives to this mode of extraction, before any actual extraction can happen. - Further interactions and debates to be conducted with the European Parliament, in order to give legitimation and transparency to such decisions and negotiations. - Further negotiations at the European level to establish as soon as possible a true Energy Union that might ensure more energy independence to the EU while providing secure, affordable and sustainable energy to all Europeans. - Better promoting and financing energy efficiency considering that it represents a real alternative in terms of saving energy and money. - Continuing European efforts to reduce greenhouse gases emissions and to include a bigger part for renewables in our energy mixes. Striking down other resolutions - Policy Book Chapters: 01. EU Institutions and Institutional reform 02. Justice and citizens rights 03. Culture, education and youth, Science and technology 04. Business, Economy, finance and tax, Cross-cutting Policies 05. Employment and social rights 06. Climate action, Energy and natural resources 07. Agriculture, fisheries and food 08. Regions and local development, Transport and travel 09. External relations and foreign affairs 10. LYMEC Internal organisation