Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
REVIEW OF THE LITHUANIAN ECONOMY IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES 2010 July - November 2011 January Summary The summary shall cover the world, the EU member states and the Lithuanian economy as their main analysis of the indicators. The EU member states economic indicators, statistical analysis are based on the Eurostat database. The General domestic product (GDP) of the European Union member states in the third quarter, compared with the previous quarter, grew by 0.5 percent. Over the years, the final estimate of GDP is in line with the prior data and the analysts' forecasts - growth up to 2.2 per cent. The European Commission (EC) predicts that the EU member states from the Eastern European economies will grow steadily in the 2011 - 2012. It is believed that many post communist countries will not significantly reduce their budgets deficits, so they will not satisfy the requirements of the membership of the euro zone in the near future. According to the EC's view, only in Sweden and in Germany the economy will grow faster than in Poland. It is predicted that the EU's gross domestic product will grow by 1.8 per cent in 2010, 2011 1.7 per cent and 2012 - 2 per cent. The European Commission argues that the economic recovery is stagnating because of the low global demand and high unemployment rate, which the countries are still failed to reduce. Despite the pessimism, the European Commission noted that the positive factor is the fact that the economic recovery is generally fixed. Three famous economists argue that the financial problems will not go away in 2011. Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz and Nouriel Roubini warn the EU governments that their measures are not effective. Professor of London School of Economics and Nobel Prize laureate, P. Krugman argues that the applicable measures adopted so far more harm than benefit as it was for the model in 1937, giving the U.S. economy. That year president Theodore Roosevelt adopted the following measures : spending cuts but it only “helped” the already rising economy to collapse. N. Roubini, the man who predicted the financial crisis in 2008 has not very good opinion about the current situation. He argues that the euro area creates the greatest risk to the global world growth. He believes that the anti-crisis measures in the periphery - the support for the small countries - can only slow down the growth of the large European economies. The economist predicts that much slower growth will be in the economies of Germany, France and Italy in 2011. The other Nobel laureate, J. Stiglitz has published his pessimistic forecasts the same. The countries, which use only the budgetary financial injections, will give not only the risk of growth retardation, but also a new wave of the economic crisis. J Stiglitz considers that the developed countries should focus their attention on the investment, reduction of military spending and reforming of the tax system if they want to recover as quickly as possible their economic development. One of the most serious problems the EU now is a debt crisis, which weakened the euro and frightened the markets. The European Commission forecasts that the total debt of the euro zone countries will rise to 86.5 percent of gross domestic product and far exceed the allowable 60 percent GDP level this year. The euro-zone countries in 2011 will have to refinance more debt than in all previous years, therefore the investors expect that the new debt crisis in the region will be worse. According to the forecast of the Italian bank UniCredit for 2011 the euro-zone countries will have to refinance or cover 560 billions euro – that is 45 billions euro more than in 2010 year and more than in all previous years of the existence of common currency. In response to those risks, the European Union leaders agreed to create a permanent mechanism to secure against the EU member bankruptcy which could threaten 16 countries in the euro zone. The leaders of 27 EU countries agreed that till 2013 a provisional 750 billion euro fund would come to the rescue from the bankruptcy .Then it will be replaced with the European’s permanent mechanism of the financial stability. In addition, the euro zone, trying to get rid of the EU bloc countries' debt problems, took a new step - the first time in history it has spread on its bonds. The bonds were issued through AAA credit rating, which has the EU mechanism of the financial stabilization. It was distributed 5 billions euro for 5 years' term and borrowings at an annual interest rate - 2.59%. According to the European Commission, these funds will be used in the Irish financial rescue package, and their interest rates are 12 basis points higher than the market average. According to the Commission, the demand for bonds was "very strong". Also the European Union finance ministers agreed how to tighten the budget rules with the purpose to prevent the public debt crisis and said that the offenders will be sanctioned after the six months' period after the notice. After this agreement when the country receives the notice of the improper budget’s practices, it should change the situation during the six months' period before the sanctions are taken. Under the current rules, the financial sanctions for the countries could be applied only after the long process which could take several years. Until that time, the penalty may only exacerbate the situation in the country. The Ministers agreed to adopt the new sanctions against those countries in the euro zone, whose budget deficit exceeds 3 percent gross domestic product and debt is more than 60 percent GDP. In addition, it is proposed that the countries which violate the European Union’s rules of deficit would have to pay up to 0.2 percent their gross domestic product, thus to be ensuring that they reduce their deficits. The European Union lawmakers approved a plan to create a supervisory body for the formal banking sector, securities and insurance regulation. The European Parliament has also given permission to create the European Council of systemic risk to monitor markets and to send warnings to the EU countries about the economic and financial risks. The head of the Council will be the head of the European Central Bank Jean-Claude Trichet. The new supervisors will be operational in 2011. The European Commission has proposed the reforms which aim is to find the next EU budget revenue sources to introduce a common European value-added tax. But the analysts think that the implementation of this idea will be very difficult. This year approximately the three-quarters of the EU budget which is around 123 billions euro, are composed of the Member States' contributions, and the remainder is collected through a special tax from the income of VAT and import duties. The Commission proposes to introduce new ways to collect funds. Among other things it is proposed to pass the part of the revenues from the tax on financial transactions, from the greenhouse gas emission allowance in auctions or from the EU tax on the air transport to the EU budget. It is also proposed to create a separate value-added tax, the EU energy tax or corporation tax. It is necessary that the EU Member States and the European Parliament's proposals be approved. According to the European Commission Europe must focus her attention for the industry to remain a leader in the global economy. The industrial policy for globalization era, adopted by the European Commission is the main problem of the Communication. The Communication, which is a flagship initiative of the 'Europe 2020' strategy, seeks to promote growth and job creation while maintaining and supporting a strong, diversified and competitive industry in which well-paid jobs could be developed and lower-carbon technologies could be used. In this era of globalization, the national sectors and national industry’s concepts are becoming irrelevant. A common European policy response is required. Europe also needs an approach that would encompass the entire value chain – from the infrastructure and raw materials to service after the sales. To promote the development and expansion of the small and medium-sized enterprises should be one of the EU's industrial policy objectives. In addition, the transition to a sustainable economy must be seen as an opportunity to enhance competitiveness. Only in terms of competitiveness and sustainability the European industrial policy can cover all the important developments to ensure the prosperity and the coordination of actions. Most analysts agree that in 2011 Lithuania's gross domestic product will grow faster, but notice that there are many challenges in the economic development. The Lithuanian economic growth is more like 'L' but not 'U' shape script, and the country level before the crisis should be achieved only after 5-6 years. First of all, there is a high unemployment rate, which in the coming year will decline too slowly, especially for the unskilled labor source. The public finances also remain the sensitive point - the budget deficit doesn’t go away yet, and searching of the lacking funds will result in the accumulation of debt in further. Another important aspect is the state of the foreign economies. So far according to the predictions of the analysts their growth outlook is more impressive than in 2010, although it should remain positive. Many Western European countries during the crisis saved their economies but bogged down in the excessive deficit. Now they must be reduced, and hence the significant cost of cutting and fewer incentives for the economic development. In order to maintain growth the growth pattern of economy will be changed by promoting open international trade sectors. The historical experience shows that after the economic downturn the industry is the main engine of the economic growth. Till now the Lithuanian economy recovered because of the promotion of the foreign market factors, but according to the economists we will be able to see more flash in the domestic market this year. This can happen if the tone of the banks on lending will continue to ease. It is true that the impressive development is not expected here, but in 2011 the movement to it should be (more) quicker. The number of bad loans has to be stabilized. It seems likely that the number of profitable enterprises will increase and they can be more proactive for their investment activities.