* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download handout_mac_22p_keynesians
Fei–Ranis model of economic growth wikipedia , lookup
Production for use wikipedia , lookup
Steady-state economy wikipedia , lookup
Chinese economic reform wikipedia , lookup
Nominal rigidity wikipedia , lookup
Circular economy wikipedia , lookup
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Transformation in economics wikipedia , lookup
Rostow's stages of growth wikipedia , lookup
Business cycle wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Gross domestic product wikipedia , lookup
Post-war displacement of Keynesianism wikipedia , lookup
Handout #22P Keynesian View of the Economy Takes a Licking But Won’t Keep Ticking John Maynard Keynes challenged the beliefs of the classicists. Based on the evidence of the Great Depression, he felt that the economy was basically unstable, for a number of reasons. 1) Interest rates do not balance savings and investment—Keynes felt that changes in the interest rate would not necessarily cause changes in saving to be exactly offset by an equal change in investment. In this case, aggregate demand will not automatically equal aggregate supply, a necessary assumption for the classicists. Total Expenditures (TE) = C + I + G + NX. If savings increase, C will fall, ceteris paribus. If lower interest rates from the increased savings do not cause I to rise by the same amount that C dropped, total expenditures will end up lower than before. If output equaled TE at the start, then now aggregate supply is greater than aggregate demand. Keynes believed that savings would not necessarily change if interest rates changed—he felt that savings levels were more responsive to changes in income. Keynes also felt that investment was responsive to interest rates but there were other factors such as expected profits, technology changes and innovations, with even larger impacts on changing investment levels. So if interest rates dropped but profits from a possible investment project were expected to be low, there might not be any increase in investment, even with lower interest rates. 2) Wage rates are inflexible downward—Keynes felt that surpluses in the labor market would not lead to lower wages. He felt that wages were inflexible downward. Without falling wages, the price level would not fall, and no increase in real GDP demanded would be forthcoming. In other words, the economy could not fix itself and can be stuck in an recessionary gap. 3) Prices are not always flexible downward —Keynes felt that anti-competitive forces in the economy could prevent prices from falling. Again, if the price level could not fall sufficiently, no increase in real GDP demanded would be forthcoming and again, the economy could not fix itself. Page 1 of 10 3/26/13 #22P MAC Keynesian or Income-Expenditure (TE-TP) Model of the Economy The Keynesian model applies to the very short run in which firms have fixed the prices of their goods and services. As a result in this model, the price level is fixed and so total expenditures or aggregate demand determines real GDP. Total Expenditures (TE) = C + I + G + NX. Of these components, the consumption function is the most important. Keynes developed a consumption function to analyze how consumption responds to changes. The consumption function is: C = C0 + (MPC)(Yd). Or, in English, consumption equals autonomous consumption plus the marginal propensity to consume times disposable income. The MPC time Yd is called induced consumption because it depends on disposable income. Autonomous consumption (C0) is a constant level of consumption, representing a basic level of consumption that does not depend on disposable income. Autonomous consumption changes from factors other than disposable income. The marginal propensity to consume is a number between zero and one, representing the portion of each additional dollar of disposable income that is spent on consumption. It is the ratio of ∆ in consumption to ∆ in disposable income, or ∆C/∆Yd. And, since disposable income is either spent or saved, 1-MPC is the MPS, or marginal propensity to save. It can be calculated as the ratio of ∆ in saving to ∆ in disposable income. Consumption C Slope=MPC<1 C0 C0 Disposable Income Working through the consumption function, consumption can be increased by increasing any of its components: C0, MPC, or Yd. However, increasing C0 will increase only the level of consumption, while increasing MPC or Yd will also change the level of saving. Page 2 of 10 3/26/13 #22P MAC There is also the average propensity to consume (APC) which shows the portion of total (not additional!) disposable income spent on consumption. It is the ratio of total consumption to total disposable income, or C/Yd. And again, since disposable income is either spent or saved, 1-APC is the APS, or average propensity to save, or S/∆Yd. The simple Keynesian model uses the consumption function to create a total expenditure function and curve, based only on domestic spending, excluding the foreign sector (though your book includes imports in its discussion). The simple model also assumes a constant level of I and G. TE = C0 + (MPC)(Yd) + I + G Graphically, the TE curve is upward sloping to the right. Total Expenditures (TE)* TE* Slope=MPC<1 G I C0 Real GDP *Aggregate planned expenditures (AE) in your book The total production curve in the Keynesian model is a 45o line which represents all the points where TE or AE = Real GDP. Page 3 of 10 3/26/13 #22P MAC Total Expenditures (TE) TP (TE=Real GDP) Slope= 1 45o Real GDP The Three States of the Economy Using the Keynesian model, in this closed economy: total expenditures (TE) can be equal to total production (TP) total expenditures (TE) can be less than total production (TP) total expenditures (TE) can be greater than total production (TP) In the last two states (disequilibrium), the economy would move toward the first state (equilibrium). Business inventories would be the mechanism for the economy’s adjustment. Producers hold some level of business inventory that is optimal. In the state of the economy where TE < TP, firms will notice that their inventories are growing. Since they wish to keep the optimal level of inventory on hand, they will cut back total production. As TP falls, it will become closer to the level of TE. This process will continue until TP = TE, where firms will reach their optimal inventory and maintain TP at that level. No incentive to change will remain, ceteris paribus. In the state of the economy where TE > TP, firms will notice that their inventories are falling. Since they wish to keep the optimal level of inventory on hand, they will increase total production. As TP rises, it will become closer to the level of TE and again, this process will continue until TP = TE, where firms will reach their optimal inventory and maintain TP at that level. No incentive to change will remain, ceteris paribus. Page 4 of 10 3/26/13 #22P MAC Total expenditures (TE) equal to total production (TP) TE, TP $ TP TE TE=TP QE Real GDP Total expenditures (TE) not equal to total production (TP) TP TE, TP $ TE TE=TP Falling inventories, increase output $TE > $TP Page 5 of 10 3/26/13 Rising inventories, decrease output QE $TE=$TP $TE < $TP Real GDP #22P MAC The TE/TP model will only show short run equilibrium unless the level of full employment output is known (include all labels if asked to draw the TE/TP model). TP TE, TP $ TE=C+I+G TE=TP Slope=MPC C0+I+G 45o QE Real GDP Note that there is nothing to relate the equilibrium point of TP=TE to the full-employment real GDP level. In this framework, the economy could easily be in a recessionary gap, at an output less than full employment output, with no automatic force operating to push output higher. Unless you know where QN is, do not draw it on the graph of the TE/TP model. If the economy is in a recessionary gap, Qe is less than Qn – that would show on the TE/TP model graph with the vertical line for Qn drawn to the right of the intersection of TP and TE, like in the graph below. That shows that Qe is less than Qn and which mean that unemployment was greater than Un. Page 6 of 10 3/26/13 #22P MAC TE, TP $ TP TE TE=TP U>UN QE < Q N Real GDP If the economy is in an inflationary gap, Qe is greater than Qn – that would show on the TE/TP model graph with the vertical line for Qn drawn to the left of the intersection of TP and TE, like in the graph below. That shows that Qe is greater than Qn which would mean that unemployment was less than Un. TP TE, TP $ TE TE=TP U<UN QN Page 7 of 10 3/26/13 < QE Real GDP #22P MAC If the economy is in long run equilibrium, Qe is equal to Qn – that would show on the TE/TP model graph with all the lines meeting at the same point. The vertical line for Qn is drawn at the intersection of TP and TE, like in the graph below (include all labels). TP TE, TP $ TE TE=TP U=UN QN = QE Page 8 of 10 3/26/13 Real GDP #22P MAC There is an underlying assumption in the Keynesian model that there are idle resources available at each expenditure round. If there were no idle resources to bring into production, real GDP could not increase. In that case, the autonomous spending increase would only increase prices. Because the Keynesian model assumes prices are constant until full employment output is reached (changes are real, not nominal below QN) and idle resources exist at each expenditure level, any change in aggregate spending changes output only. In the AD/AS model, with the assumption of constant prices and idle resources, Keynes’ theory shows an increase in aggregate demand before full employment output is reached (meaning there are idle resources) increases QE but not price. Price Level AS PE AD1 AD QE QE1 QN Real GDP Natural Real GDP at full employment the economy is already at full employment level of output, an increase in aggregate demand will only increase prices, not output. Page 9 of 10 3/26/13 #22P MAC Price Level AS PE1 PE AD1 AD QN Real GDP Natural Real GDP at full employment Page 10 of 10 3/26/13 #22P MAC