• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Distributed Databases
Distributed Databases

... Data models may differ (hierarchical, relational , etc.) Transaction commit protocols may be incompatible Concurrency control may be based on different techniques (locking, timestamping, etc.) System-level details almost certainly are totally incompatible. A multidatabase system is a software layer ...
Document
Document

... Once a transaction has committed, it cannot be aborted.  Thus, if we decide that a committed transaction was a mistake, then we must perform another transaction to reverse it.  On the other hand, an aborted transaction can be restarted later, and depending on the cause of failure, may successfully ...
DPD Table of Contents
DPD Table of Contents

... Written for database administrators (DBAs) responsible for designing and creating automated databases, this booklet provides an introduction to database planning and design. It defines some basic terminology and provides guidance for designing a relational database. A tutorial helps you create a sim ...
database system
database system

... CSCI 150 Database Applications Chapter 1 – Getting Started ...
CSE314 Database Systems
CSE314 Database Systems

...  Atomicity: A transaction is an atomic unit of processing; it is either performed in its entirety or not performed at all.  Consistency preservation: A correct execution of the transaction must take the database from one consistent state to another.  Isolation: A transaction should not make its u ...
SQL_Saturday_511_Redmond_April_2_2016_
SQL_Saturday_511_Redmond_April_2_2016_

... Azure SQL DB Program Management ...
draft proposal for area services manager
draft proposal for area services manager

... Makes recommendations of how the Alms database or processes could be improved or where cost saving might be made ...
Transaction Management - USA School of Computing
Transaction Management - USA School of Computing

... Detection – Periodically test the database for deadlocks. If a deadlock is found, abort / rollback one of the transactions Avoidance – Requires a transaction to obtain all locks needed before it can execute – requires locks to be obtained in succession ...
Transaction processing systems
Transaction processing systems

... Schedules of Transactions (continued) • A schedule S of n transactions T1,T2,..,Tn is said to be a complete schedule if : – The operations in S are exactly those operations in T1,T2,.., Tn , including a commit or abort operation as the last operation for each transaction in the schedule. – For any ...
Database Engines on Multicores Scale
Database Engines on Multicores Scale

... 11-18 of Figure 2. Sessions proceed by interacting with the transaction manager for executing the statement in isolation (line 19 of Figure 2). Both engines provide different isolation levels, offering lock based or multi-version schemes. For simplicity reasons we will focus on lock-based ones. For ...
How to copy SQL Views from Old Database to New
How to copy SQL Views from Old Database to New

... STIDistrict – Copying SQL Views to New Database • 1 ...
Lock-Based Protocols
Lock-Based Protocols

...  Problems with SI  SI does not always give serializable executions  Serializable: among two concurrent txns, one sees the effects of the other  In SI: neither sees the effects of the other  Result: Integrity constraints can be violated ...
distributed database architecture and database link
distributed database architecture and database link

... communicate each other  This communication can be built by means database link  A database link is a pointer that defines a oneway communication path from an Oracle Database server to another database server  The link pointer is actually defined as an entry in a data dictionary table ...
Database-lecture 10
Database-lecture 10

... In this example: the sub query is used in the having clause The example goal: to retrieve the number of projects for each employee who works on at least one project in the works_on table. ...
Teaching Concurrency Control and Recovery in Relational Databases
Teaching Concurrency Control and Recovery in Relational Databases

... manager and recovery manager works. Both components were designed and developed with a basis on the ARIES algorithm. ARIES is a widely used family of algorithms for transaction management and data recovery currently used in the industry. Hence, the students are able to learn modern and original tran ...
Monitoring SQL Server Replication
Monitoring SQL Server Replication

... Presenter : Jim Katsos Copyright © 2006 Quest Software ...
Relational Databases - PersonalWebIWayanSW
Relational Databases - PersonalWebIWayanSW

... Data can be placed in many distributed databases. Databases can be found in the same or different computer systems. ...
Transaction Processing and Recovery
Transaction Processing and Recovery

... This approach assumes a single database server with multiple processes accessing the database All operations are carried out synchronously Today, large IT complexes may delegate parts of a single transaction to multiple servers As long as there is a single lock list, this approach can be used for mu ...
Competency 7.00 Database What is a Database? Advantages of a
Competency 7.00 Database What is a Database? Advantages of a

... •Determine the _______________________ of fields. Step 1−Plan and Design the Database ƒDetermine the ____________________ of the database file. ƒInclude all fields necessary to ensure efficient _____________________- and retrieving of specified data. ƒProject how the fields may be __________________ ...
September 2014 report
September 2014 report

... number of attributes and comparable attributes are defined over a similar domain. JOIN COMPATIBILITY With the exception of natural joins, the actual names of the attributes are irrelevant. It is the domains that matter. For two or more relations or tables to be joinable they must share at least one ...
Informatica 9.0: Database Requirements
Informatica 9.0: Database Requirements

... Database Configuration Requirements Each database system has its own requirements for the domain configuration and Model repository databases and user accounts. If you do not configure the database with these properties, you can encounter problems such as deployment failures or metadata inconsistenc ...
Moving the SQL 2005 System Databases A typical installation of
Moving the SQL 2005 System Databases A typical installation of

... Mssqlresourcedb - Internal hidden read-only database containing system objects Other databases, such as distribution, may also be included depending upon your configuration. In this article, I refer to only the above five databases. Why would you want to move these databases? A few reasons. Personal ...
WISC & AS3AP
WISC & AS3AP

... • Simulation model is quite detailed, but usually omits some low level details – Model service time, but disregard details of service – E.g. approximate disk read time by using an average disk read time • Experiments can be run on model, and provide an estimate of measures such as average throughput ...
Lecture10-Transactio..
Lecture10-Transactio..

... despite crashes or concurrent access • Isolation – transactions appear indivisible to each other despite concurrent access – If multiple threads execute transactions the effect is the same as if transactions were executed sequentially in some order ...
Lecture07a
Lecture07a

...  Network partition  A network is said to be partitioned when it has been split into two or more subsystems that lack any connection between them – Note: a subsystem may consist of a single node  Network partitioning and site failures are generally ...
< 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 39 >

Global serializability

In concurrency control of databases, transaction processing (transaction management), and other transactional distributed applications, Global serializability (or Modular serializability) is a property of a global schedule of transactions. A global schedule is the unified schedule of all the individual database (and other transactional object) schedules in a multidatabase environment (e.g., federated database). Complying with global serializability means that the global schedule is serializable, has the serializability property, while each component database (module) has a serializable schedule as well. In other words, a collection of serializable components provides overall system serializability, which is usually incorrect. A need in correctness across databases in multidatabase systems makes global serializability a major goal for global concurrency control (or modular concurrency control). With the proliferation of the Internet, Cloud computing, Grid computing, and small, portable, powerful computing devices (e.g., smartphones), as well as increase in systems management sophistication, the need for atomic distributed transactions and thus effective global serializability techniques, to ensure correctness in and among distributed transactional applications, seems to increase.In a federated database system or any other more loosely defined multidatabase system, which are typically distributed in a communication network, transactions span multiple (and possibly distributed) databases. Enforcing global serializability in such system, where different databases may use different types of concurrency control, is problematic. Even if every local schedule of a single database is serializable, the global schedule of a whole system is not necessarily serializable. The massive communication exchanges of conflict information needed between databases to reach conflict serializability globally would lead to unacceptable performance, primarily due to computer and communication latency. Achieving global serializability effectively over different types of concurrency control has been open for several years. Commitment ordering (or Commit ordering; CO), a serializability technique publicly introduced in 1991 by Yoav Raz from Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), provides an effective general solution for global (conflict) serializability across any collection of database systems and other transactional objects, with possibly different concurrency control mechanisms. CO does not need the distribution of conflict information, but rather utilizes the already needed (unmodified) atomic commitment protocol messages without any further communication between databases. It also allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. CO generalizes Strong strict two phase locking (SS2PL), which in conjunction with the Two-phase commit (2PC) protocol is the de facto standard for achieving global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result, CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join existing SS2PL based solutions for global serializability. The same applies also to all other multiple (transactional) object systems that use atomic transactions and need global serializability for correctness (see examples above; nowadays such need is not smaller than with database systems, the origin of atomic transactions).The most significant aspects of CO that make it a uniquely effective general solution for global serializability are the following:Seamless, low overhead integration with any concurrency control mechanism, with neither changing any transaction's operation scheduling or blocking it, nor adding any new operation.Heterogeneity: Global serializability is achieved across multiple transactional objects (e.g., database management systems) with different (any) concurrency control mechanisms, without interfering with the mechanisms' operations.Modularity: Transactional objects can be added and removed transparently.Autonomy of transactional objects: No need of conflict or equivalent information distribution (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets; no object needs other object's information).Scalability: With ""normal"" global transactions, computer network size and number of transactional objects can increase unboundedly with no impact on performance, andAutomatic global deadlock resolution.All these aspects, except the first two, are also possessed by the popular SS2PL, which is a (constrained, blocking) special case of CO and inherits many of CO's qualities.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report