• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
CSP 506 Comparative Programming Languages
CSP 506 Comparative Programming Languages

... • Features include: – records – arrays – complex numbers – character strings – powerful I/O capabilities – packages with access control – iterative control statements ...
10~Chapter 10_Functi.. - Programming Assignment 0
10~Chapter 10_Functi.. - Programming Assignment 0

... – The transition function is a list of pairs • the first element of each pair is a pair, whose first element is a state and whose second element in an input symbol • if the current state and next input symbol match the first element of a pair, then the finite automaton enters the state given by the ...
CS-Intro-AI-LISP - Geometric and Intelligent Computing Laboratory
CS-Intro-AI-LISP - Geometric and Intelligent Computing Laboratory

... • Let is the most common way of introducing vars that are not parameters of fns; resist temptation to use a var w/o introducing it (can actually do this in Lisp). • Let introduces a new local variable and binds it to a ...
Drexel-CS-Intro-AI-LISP
Drexel-CS-Intro-AI-LISP

... Develop an intuitive understanding of its data structures (remember: programs and data stored the same way) – forget conventional programming languages w/ which you are familiar (else confusion). – Three notations for Lisp data structures: ...
PPT
PPT

...   captures “essence” of variable binding • Function parameters • Declarations • Bound variables can be renamed ...
functional form
functional form

... list that includes the first parameter as its first element and the second parameter as the remainder of its result ...
Using TEX`s language within a course about functional programming
Using TEX`s language within a course about functional programming

... A second construct, useful for a point of view related to conception, is \global, shown in Fig. 5, because it The central part of our unit aims to emphasise these allows ‘global’ commands to be defined within local enchoices: what are the consequences of a lexical (resp. dy- vironments. There is an ...
Lambda Calculus and Lisp
Lambda Calculus and Lisp

... think of. It has a simple syntax using prefix notation and parentheses. • Scheme is a dialect of Lisp. It has static scope rather than dynamic, uses meaningful identifiers, true and false are #T and #F, predicates end in ? ( so (atom? (x) ) returns #F because x is not an atom (it is a list). Also us ...
ppt - Dave Reed
ppt - Dave Reed

...  separation from the underlying architecture tended to make it less efficient (and usually interpreted) ...
ppt - Dave Reed
ppt - Dave Reed

...  separation from the underlying architecture tended to make it less efficient (and usually interpreted) ...
Functional Languages
Functional Languages

... – Complex syntax – Concurrency is programmer designed Functional Languages: – Inefficient execution – Simple semantics – Simple syntax – Programs can automatically be made concurrent Dr. Muhammed Al-Mulhem ...
Lecture 11 - Nipissing University Word
Lecture 11 - Nipissing University Word

... A lambda expression has the form: (lambda argument-list function-body ) In other words, a lambda expression is somewhat like defun, except that it defines an unnamed function, or it allows the user to define a function with no name. For example, ((lambda (x y) (+ x y)) 2 3) binds x and y to 2 an ...
ppt - Dave Reed
ppt - Dave Reed

...  separation from the underlying architecture tended to make it less efficient (and usually interpreted) ...
CSC 533: Programming Languages Spring 2015
CSC 533: Programming Languages Spring 2015

... §  separation from the underlying architecture tended to make it less efficient (and usually interpreted) ...
Functional Programming
Functional Programming

...  separation from the underlying architecture tended to make it less efficient (and usually interpreted) ...
Lisp and Scheme I
Lisp and Scheme I

... • We can only give you a brief introduction to either language, and at the core, Scheme and Lisp are the same • We’ll point out some differences along the way ...
scheme1
scheme1

... • Lisp is an old language with many variants – Fortran is the only older language still in wide use – Lisp is alive and well today • Most modern versions are based on Common Lisp • Scheme is one of the major variants – We will use Scheme, not Lisp, in this class – Scheme is used for CS 101 in quite ...
LISP
LISP

... 10. The representation of LISP programs as LISP data that can be manipulated by object programs. This has prevented the separation between system programmers and application programmers. Everyone can “improve” his LISP, and many of these improvements have developed into “improvements” to the languag ...
Scheme and functional programming
Scheme and functional programming

... Tail Recursion (1) • In tail recursion, we don't build up a solution, but rather, just return a recursive call on a smaller version of the problem. (define (func x) (cond (end-test-1 end-value-1) ...
Functional Programming Languages (LISP/ Scheme)
Functional Programming Languages (LISP/ Scheme)

... # A purely functional language does not use variables or assignment statements. ...
Functional Programming
Functional Programming

... (α ×): (trans: )= Ip: = (/+): ((α ×): (trans: )) ...
Functional Programming
Functional Programming

... Data structures other than arrays ...
Functional Programming
Functional Programming

... Data structures other than arrays ...
02/06
02/06

...  The objective of the design of a FPL is to mimic mathematical functions to the greatest extent possible  The basic process of computation is fundamentally different in a FPL than in an imperative language  In an imperative language, operations are done and the results are stored in variables for ...
Functional PLs
Functional PLs

... – Complex semantics – Complex syntax – Concurrency is programmer designed • Functional Languages: – Simple semantics – Simple syntax – Inefficient execution – Programs can automatically be made concurrent ...
< 1 2 3 4 >

Common Lisp

Common Lisp (CL) is a dialect of the Lisp programming language, published in ANSI standard document ANSI INCITS 226-1994 (R2004) (formerly X3.226-1994 (R1999)). From the ANSI Common Lisp standard the Common Lisp HyperSpec, a hyperlinked HTML version, has been derived.The Common Lisp language was developed as a standardized and improved successor of Maclisp. Thus it is not an implementation, but rather a language specification. Several implementations of the Common Lisp standard are available, including free and open source software and proprietary products.The first language documentation was published 1984 as Common Lisp the Language, first edition. A second edition, published in 1990, incorporated many changes to the language, made during the ANSI Common Lisp standardization process. The final ANSI Common Lisp standard then was published in 1994. Since then no update to the standard has been published. Various extensions and improvements to Common Lisp (examples are Unicode, Concurrency, CLOS-based IO) have been provided by implementations.Common Lisp is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language. It supports a combination of procedural, functional, and object-oriented programming paradigms. As a dynamic programming language, it facilitates evolutionary and incremental software development, with iterative compilation into efficient run-time programs. This incremental development is often done interactively without interrupting the running application.It also supports optional type annotation and casting, which can be added as necessary at the later profiling and optimization stages, to permit the compiler to generate more efficient code. For instance, fixnum can hold an unboxed integer in a range supported by the hardware and implementation, permitting more efficient arithmetic than on big integers or arbitrary precision types. Similarly, the compiler can be told on a per-module or per-function basis which type safety level is wanted, using optimize declarations.Common Lisp includes CLOS, an object system that supports multimethods and method combinations. It is often implemented with a Metaobject Protocol.Common Lisp is extensible through standard features such as Lisp macros (code transformations) and reader macros (input parsers for characters).Common Lisp provides some backwards compatibility to Maclisp and to John McCarthy's original Lisp. This allows older Lisp software to be ported to Common Lisp.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report