• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
11. Predicate Logic Syntax and Semantics, Normal Forms, Herbrand
11. Predicate Logic Syntax and Semantics, Normal Forms, Herbrand

... us to determine satisfiability or general validity (by transformation into DNF or CNF). But: we can reduce the satisfiability problem in predicate logic to the satisfiability problem in propositional logic. In general, however, this produces a very large number of propositional formulae (perhaps inf ...
slides
slides

... defined the infinitary version of the logic of here-and-there, defined its nonmonotonic counterpart—the infinitary version of equilibrium logic, verified that stable models of infinitary formulas can be characterized in terms of infinitary equilibrium logic, verified that infinitary propositional fo ...
LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE AS TRUTH-PRESERVATION STEPHEN READ Abstract
LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE AS TRUTH-PRESERVATION STEPHEN READ Abstract

... q is false. But I do not think that . . . the fact that it would be self-contradictory to assert that p is true but q is false is a sufficient condition for its being true that p implies q. ([16], p. 182) Lastly, take Gerhard Schurz’s programme of relevant deduction. In a recent paper, he describes ...
On Rosser sentences and proof predicates
On Rosser sentences and proof predicates

... predicate P r as the necessity operator  in some suitable modal logic, and much work on modal fixed points was done in the seventies by C. Bernardi, D. de Jongh and G. Sambin. It was proven independently by the three that modal fixed points are unique, and de Jongh and Sambin also presented proofs ...
Properties of maximal cliques of a pair-wise compatibility graph for three nonmonotonic reasoning system
Properties of maximal cliques of a pair-wise compatibility graph for three nonmonotonic reasoning system

... Throughout this paper, we refer to maximal cliques as cliques. In the sequel, we consider graphs made of rules (either default theories or rules of normal logic programs and extended logic programs). We consider these concepts familiar and refer the reader to the basic sources on the subject [16] [1 ...
Introduction to Logic
Introduction to Logic

... The term “logic” may be, very roughly and vaguely, associated with something like “correct thinking”. Aristotle defined a syllogism as “discourse in which, certain things being stated something other than what is stated follows of necessity from their being so.” And, in fact, this intuition not only ...
One-dimensional Fragment of First-order Logic
One-dimensional Fragment of First-order Logic

... logic. Decidability properties of several fragments of first-order logic have been investigated after the completion of the program concerning the classical decision problem. Currently perhaps the most important two frameworks studied in this context are the guarded fragment [1] and two-variable log ...
The Logic of Atomic Sentences
The Logic of Atomic Sentences

... since b = d, c is left of d by the Indiscernibility of Identicals. But we are also told that d is left of e, and consequently c is to the left of e, by the textbftransitivity of left of. Done. William Starr — The Logic of Atomic Sentences (Phil 201.02) — Rutgers University ...
First-Order Loop Formulas for Normal Logic Programs
First-Order Loop Formulas for Normal Logic Programs

... gence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. ...
Notes on Modal Logic - Stanford University
Notes on Modal Logic - Stanford University

... • Alethic Reading: 2ϕ means ‘ϕ is necessary’ and 3ϕ means ‘ϕ is possible’. • Deontic Reading: 2ϕ means ‘ϕ is obligatory’ and 3ϕ means ‘ϕ is permitted’. In this literature, typically ‘O’ is used instead of ‘2’ and ‘P ’ instead of ‘3’. • Epistemic Reading: 2ϕ means ‘ϕ is known’ and 3ϕ means ‘ϕ is cons ...
A Generalization of St˚almarck`s Method
A Generalization of St˚almarck`s Method

... Application of simple deductive rules: Stålmarck’s method applies a set of simple deductive rules after each split. In abstract-interpretation terms, the rules perform a semantic reduction [5] by means of a technique called local decreasing iterations [7]. “Intersecting” results: The step of combin ...
What Classical Connectives Mean
What Classical Connectives Mean

... realized  inflexionally),  there  is  some  reason  to   describe  the  'future  tense'  as  partly  modal.    John  Lyons,    Introduc)on  to  Theore)cal  Linguis)cs     A A A ...
Using Modal Logics to Express and Check Global Graph Properties
Using Modal Logics to Express and Check Global Graph Properties

... many efficient algorithmic methods to solve them. However, there is an important distinction between the two sides of this matter. In the “description” side, graphs provide a great level of generality, allowing for the description of very different problems in the same simple framework. But in the “ ...
Introduction to Logic
Introduction to Logic

... without changing its value. In Aristotle this meant simply that the pairs he determined could be exchanged. The intuition might have been that they “essentially mean the same”. In a more abstract, and later formulation, one would say that “not to affect a proposition” is “not to change its truth val ...
GLukG logic and its application for non-monotonic reasoning
GLukG logic and its application for non-monotonic reasoning

... Hilbert style proof systems There are many different approaches that have been used to specify the meaning of logic formulas or, in other words, to define logics. In Hilbert style proof systems, also known as axiomatic systems, a logic is specified by giving a set of axioms (which is usually assumed ...
pdf
pdf

... generated by primitive propositions, that is, an agent is aware of a formula iff he is aware of all primitive propositions occurring in it, and agents know what they are aware of (so that each agent is aware of the same formulas in all worlds that he consider possible). As we pointed out in (Halpern ...
The Expressive Power of Modal Dependence Logic
The Expressive Power of Modal Dependence Logic

... Väänänen [17] introduced modal dependence logic MDL. In the context of modal logic a team is just a set of states in a Kripke model. Modal dependence logic extends standard modal logic with team semantics by modal dependence atoms, =(p1 , . . . , pn , q). The intuitive meaning of the formula =(p1 , ...
preliminary version
preliminary version

... Intuitionism. Proof checkers based on type theory, like for instance Coq, work with intuitionistic logic, sometimes also called constructive logic. This is the logic of the natural deduction proof system discussed so far. The intuition is that truth in intuitionistic logic corresponds to the existen ...
pdf
pdf

... 1.1. Proof Systems Consider the boolean formula satisfiability problem, SAT. For formulas in SAT, there is always a short proof of satisfiability – a satisfying truth assignment – and therefore SAT is trivially in NP. However, for formulas not in SAT, it is not that clear what a proof of unsatisfiab ...
PDF
PDF

... true, false, p, ¬ϕ, ϕ ∨ ψ, ϕ, 3ϕ, eϕ, or ϕU ψ, where p ∈ P , and ϕ and ψ are LTL formulas. The temporal operators  (“always”), 3 (“eventually”), e(“next”), and U (“until”) enable convenient description of time-dependent events. For example, the LTL formula (request → 3grant) states that every req ...
Modal logic and the approximation induction principle
Modal logic and the approximation induction principle

... Hennessy–Milner logic [14] is a modal logic for specifying properties of states in a labelled transition system (LTS). Rob van Glabbeek [11] uses this logic to characterize a wide range of process semantics in terms of observations. That is, a process semantics is captured by means of a sublogic of ...
Introduction to Logic
Introduction to Logic

... The term “logic” may be, very roughly and vaguely, associated with something like “correct thinking”. Aristotle defined a syllogism as “discourse in which, certain things being stated something other than what is stated follows of necessity from their being so.” And, in fact, this intuition not only ...
Completeness in modal logic - Lund University Publications
Completeness in modal logic - Lund University Publications

... That essay was focused on the philosophy of semantics for modal logics, with special attention to completeness results. The purpose of the essay was to exhibit a negative trend in modal logic regarded as a philosophical discipline; the enterprise of completeness proving has become largely “l’art pou ...
Intuitionistic Type Theory
Intuitionistic Type Theory

... (⊥, ⊃, &, ∨, ∀, ∃) and hold to be true are propositions. When we hold a proposition to be true, we make a judgement: ...
Knowledge Representation and Classical Logic
Knowledge Representation and Classical Logic

... clear that F is equivalent to G if and only if F ↔ G is a tautology. A set Γ of formulas is satisfiable if there exists an interpretation satisfying all formulas in Γ. We say that Γ entails a formula F (symbolically, Γ |= F ) if every interpretation satisfying Γ satisfies F .2 To represent knowledge ...
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 26 >

Sequent calculus

Sequent calculus is, in essence, a style of formal logical argumentation where every line of a proof is a conditional tautology (called a sequent by Gerhard Gentzen) instead of an unconditional tautology. Each conditional tautology is inferred from other conditional tautologies on earlier lines in a formal argument according to rules and procedures of inference, giving a better approximation to the style of natural deduction used by mathematicians than David Hilbert's earlier style of formal logic where every line was an unconditional tautology. (This is the essence of the idea, but there are several over-simplifications here. For example, there may be non-logical axioms upon which all propositions are implicitly dependent. Then sequents signify conditional theorems in a first-order language rather than conditional tautologies.)Sequent calculus is one of several extant styles of proof calculus for expressing line-by-line logical arguments. Hilbert style. Every line is an unconditional tautology (or theorem). Gentzen style. Every line is a conditional tautology (or theorem) with zero or more conditions on the left. Natural deduction. Every (conditional) line has exactly one asserted proposition on the right. Sequent calculus. Every (conditional) line has zero or more asserted propositions on the right.In other words, natural deduction and sequent calculus systems are particular distinct kinds of Gentzen-style systems. Hilbert-style systems typically have a very small number of inference rules, relying more on sets of axioms. Gentzen-style systems typically have very few axioms, if any, relying more on sets of rules.Gentzen-style systems have significant practical and theoretical advantages compared to Hilbert-style systems. For example, both natural deduction and sequent calculus systems facilitate the elimination and introduction of universal and existential quantifiers so that unquantified logical expressions can be manipulated according to the much simpler rules of propositional calculus. In a typical argument, quantifiers are eliminated, then propositional calculus is applied to unquantified expressions (which typically contain free variables), and then the quantifiers are reintroduced. This very much parallels the way in which mathematical proofs are carried out in practice by mathematicians. Predicate calculus proofs are generally much easier to discover with this approach, and are often shorter. Natural deduction systems are more suited to practical theorem-proving. Sequent calculus systems are more suited to theoretical analysis.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report