• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Bounded Functional Interpretation
Bounded Functional Interpretation

... urging a shift of attention from the obtaining of precise witnesses to the obtaining of bounds for the witnesses. One of the main advantages of working with the extraction of bounds is that the non-computable mathematical objects whose existence is claimed by various ineffective principles can somet ...
Modal logic and the approximation induction principle
Modal logic and the approximation induction principle

... system (LTS). Rob van Glabbeek [7] uses this logic to characterize a wide range of process semantics in terms of observations. That is, a process semantics is captured by means of a sublogic of HennessyMilner logic; two states in an LTS are equivalent if and only if they make true exactly the same f ...
1. Procedural knowledge Vs Declarative Knowledge - E
1. Procedural knowledge Vs Declarative Knowledge - E

... Step 2. Generate the next level of tree by finding all rules whose left hand side matches against the root node. The right hand side is used to create new configurations. Step3. Generate the next level by considering the nodes in the previous level and applying it to all rules whose left hand side m ...
Elementary Logic
Elementary Logic

... A proposition is also said to be valid if it is a tautology. So, the problem of determining whether a given proposition is valid (a tautology) is also called the validity problem. Note: the notion of a tautology is restricted to propositional logic. In first-order logic, we also speak of valid formu ...
Examples of Natural Deduction
Examples of Natural Deduction

... conclusion, we could construct a new rule – given a rationale link between a premise and an inconsistency, we could construct the negation of the ...
A Nonstandard Approach to the. Logical Omniscience Problem
A Nonstandard Approach to the. Logical Omniscience Problem

... What about logical omniscience? Notice that notions like "validity" and "logical consequence" (which played a prominent part in our informal description of logical omniscience) are not absolute notions; their formal definitions depend on how truth is defined and on the class of worlds being consider ...
Godel`s Incompleteness Theorem
Godel`s Incompleteness Theorem

... • Formal proofs demonstrate consequence, but not non-consequence • Formal proof systems themselves aren’t systematic • But maybe a systematic method can nevertheless be created on the basis of formal logic? – Truth trees are systematic … and can demonstrate consequence as well as non-consequence. Co ...
finite structural axiomatization of every finite
finite structural axiomatization of every finite

... which is not finitely based, i.e., for every consequence C + determined by a finite set of standard rules C 6= C + . In this paper it will be proved that for every strongly finite consequence C there is a consequence C + determined ...
Quantification - Rutgers Philosophy
Quantification - Rutgers Philosophy

... than the existential generalization (∃x)(R(x)∧B(x)) will perhaps be mollified by the observation that the true universal correlate of (∃x)(R(x)∧B(x)) is not (∀x)(R(x)→B(x)) but rather the sentence (∀x)(R(x)∧B(x)), which says that all objects are black ravens. Confining ourselves to non-empty domains ...
Post Systems in Programming Languages Pr ecis 1 Introduction
Post Systems in Programming Languages Pr ecis 1 Introduction

... A term is provable in a Post system if we can nd a proof of it. The set of words provable from a Post system forms the language derived by the system. Sometimes it is necessary to consider the language derived by a Post system to be the set of strings from a subset of the signs which are provable. ...
Logic Review
Logic Review

... Logical Consequence x2 There are two ways of thinking about one formula ‘logically following’ from another: Syntactic Criteria: formula 1 is provable (given the system’s rules) from formula 2. Semantic Criteria: formula 1 evaluates as true whenever formula 2 does. ...
How Does Resolution Works in Propositional Calculus and
How Does Resolution Works in Propositional Calculus and

... A quantifier is a symbol that permits one to declare or identify the range or scope of the variable in a logical expression. There are two basic quantifiers used in logic one is universal quantifier which is denoted by the symbol “” and the other is existential quantifier which is denoted by the sy ...
An admissible second order frame rule in region logic
An admissible second order frame rule in region logic

... The formalization caters for the intended application to Java-like programming languages and specification languages like JML and Spec#, in that we consider typed, first-order objects. To streamline the logic, however, methods are not bound to classes and only a rudimentary module construct is consi ...
Problem_Set_01
Problem_Set_01

... itself, or else have a prime factor greater than n. Write a scheme program to find the smallest n for which Euclid’s proof does not provide an actual prime number. ...
Temporal Here and There - Computational Cognition Lab
Temporal Here and There - Computational Cognition Lab

... and a pair of connections with other logics based on HT [5] are known. In this paper we deal with two problems that remained open in THT. The first problem consists in determining whether modal operators are interdefinable or not while the second problem corresponds to the definition of a sound an comp ...
Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation

... either  or ¬ belongs to B. This maximal consistency property implies the weaker one that B is deductively closed in the same relative sense, i.e., for all  ∈ ∗ , if B⵫, then  ∈ B. It follows in particular that  ∈ B ⇔  ∈ B when ⵫ ↔ , and that  ∈ B when ⵫. Deductive closure and its consequ ...
Deciding Global Partial-Order Properties
Deciding Global Partial-Order Properties

... Partial order specifications are also interesting due to their compatibility with the so-called partial order reductions. The partial-order equivalence among sequences can be exploited to reduce the state-space explosion problem: the cost of generating at least one representative per equivalence cla ...
Propositional Logic - faculty.cs.tamu.edu
Propositional Logic - faculty.cs.tamu.edu

... An interpretation of a proposition p in Prop is an assignment of truth values to all variables that occur in p. More generally, an interpretation of a set Y of propositions is an assignment of truth values to all variables that occur in formulas in Y . The previous theorem states that an interpretat ...
Basic Metatheory for Propositional, Predicate, and Modal Logic
Basic Metatheory for Propositional, Predicate, and Modal Logic

... A formal system S consists of a formal language, a formal semantics, or model theory, that defines a notion of meaning for the language, and a proof theory, i.e., a set of syntactic rules for constructing arguments — sequences of formulas — deemed valid by the semantics.1 In this section, we define ...
On presenting monotonicity and on EA=>AE (pdf file)
On presenting monotonicity and on EA=>AE (pdf file)

... Monotonicity properties (1)–(3), as well as metatheorem Monotonicity, are wellknown. They can be found, in one guise or another, in several texts on logic. But the two major books that deal with the calculational approach do a bad job of explaining how monotonicity/antimonotonicity is to be used. On ...
On Linear Inference
On Linear Inference

... yields infinitely many different conclusions. One way to resolve this to allow parametric truths to be asserted, rather than just ground truths. This leads to what is traditionally called resolution, where any clause is parametric in all of its free variables. Saturation and complexity are easier to ...
Logic
Logic

... possible way for all premises to be true and the conclusion false all at the same time. • Showing a scenario in which all premises are true, and in which the conclusion is true as well, does not demonstrate validity, b/c there may still be a different scenario in which all premises are true and the ...
pdf
pdf

... ∀Y ∈ S. U,I|=Y. We prove this by structural induction on formulas, keeping in mind that the cases for γ and δ are straightforward generalizations of those for α and β. base case: If Y is an atomic formula then by definition Y ∈ S 7→ I(Y)=t 7→ U,I|=Y. step case: Assume the the claim holds for all sub ...
Handout for - Wilfrid Hodges
Handout for - Wilfrid Hodges

... In the case where the other [proximate premise] has to be derived [as well], a syllogism with two premises is introduced in order to derive it. Then at one level there are four premises and two conclusions, and at the second level there are two premises and a single conclusion. So the compound [syll ...
Local deduction, deductive interpolation and amalgamation in
Local deduction, deductive interpolation and amalgamation in

... fkA= fA&fA&...&fA with the same oneset of fA, and with the additional property that fAk ≤ fB ...
< 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 26 >

Sequent calculus

Sequent calculus is, in essence, a style of formal logical argumentation where every line of a proof is a conditional tautology (called a sequent by Gerhard Gentzen) instead of an unconditional tautology. Each conditional tautology is inferred from other conditional tautologies on earlier lines in a formal argument according to rules and procedures of inference, giving a better approximation to the style of natural deduction used by mathematicians than David Hilbert's earlier style of formal logic where every line was an unconditional tautology. (This is the essence of the idea, but there are several over-simplifications here. For example, there may be non-logical axioms upon which all propositions are implicitly dependent. Then sequents signify conditional theorems in a first-order language rather than conditional tautologies.)Sequent calculus is one of several extant styles of proof calculus for expressing line-by-line logical arguments. Hilbert style. Every line is an unconditional tautology (or theorem). Gentzen style. Every line is a conditional tautology (or theorem) with zero or more conditions on the left. Natural deduction. Every (conditional) line has exactly one asserted proposition on the right. Sequent calculus. Every (conditional) line has zero or more asserted propositions on the right.In other words, natural deduction and sequent calculus systems are particular distinct kinds of Gentzen-style systems. Hilbert-style systems typically have a very small number of inference rules, relying more on sets of axioms. Gentzen-style systems typically have very few axioms, if any, relying more on sets of rules.Gentzen-style systems have significant practical and theoretical advantages compared to Hilbert-style systems. For example, both natural deduction and sequent calculus systems facilitate the elimination and introduction of universal and existential quantifiers so that unquantified logical expressions can be manipulated according to the much simpler rules of propositional calculus. In a typical argument, quantifiers are eliminated, then propositional calculus is applied to unquantified expressions (which typically contain free variables), and then the quantifiers are reintroduced. This very much parallels the way in which mathematical proofs are carried out in practice by mathematicians. Predicate calculus proofs are generally much easier to discover with this approach, and are often shorter. Natural deduction systems are more suited to practical theorem-proving. Sequent calculus systems are more suited to theoretical analysis.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report