Democracia y Derecho a Decidir
... Abstract: The political crisis is global. The setup involving citizens, territory and political power is immersed in an accelerating transformation process. In this situation, the demand for sovereignty by Europe’s stateless nations –Scotland, Catalonia, Vasconia (Basque Country)– has been reactivat ...
... Abstract: The political crisis is global. The setup involving citizens, territory and political power is immersed in an accelerating transformation process. In this situation, the demand for sovereignty by Europe’s stateless nations –Scotland, Catalonia, Vasconia (Basque Country)– has been reactivat ...
2.3. Institutions dealing with the state of emergency in Namibia.
... In March1990, the people of Namibia for the first time in their history have their own Constitution,1 as the fundamental legal framework upon which their future was to be built. The Constitution of the Republic of Namibia is regarded as the Supreme Law of the country.2 There were major challenges. O ...
... In March1990, the people of Namibia for the first time in their history have their own Constitution,1 as the fundamental legal framework upon which their future was to be built. The Constitution of the Republic of Namibia is regarded as the Supreme Law of the country.2 There were major challenges. O ...
Rand takes on the Constitution an objectivist perspective
... being distorted by subjective lawmakers. Critics of the originalism interpretation argue that the framers of the Constitution had many different opinions, so the question of which framer’s intent to abide by comes in to play. Another criticism of the originalism perspective is that it is outdated a ...
... being distorted by subjective lawmakers. Critics of the originalism interpretation argue that the framers of the Constitution had many different opinions, so the question of which framer’s intent to abide by comes in to play. Another criticism of the originalism perspective is that it is outdated a ...
Unenumerated Rights Under Popular Constitutionalism
... 494 (1977) (finding-roughly-in favor of a claimed constitutional right of freedom to provide in one's residence a home for members of one's extended family). 10 491 U.S. 397 (1989) (finding in favor of a claimed constitutional right not to be punished or otherwise sanctioned or burdened for burning ...
... 494 (1977) (finding-roughly-in favor of a claimed constitutional right of freedom to provide in one's residence a home for members of one's extended family). 10 491 U.S. 397 (1989) (finding in favor of a claimed constitutional right not to be punished or otherwise sanctioned or burdened for burning ...
States` Rights Apogee, 1760-1840
... as a desirable and proper constitutional remedy. Just as the Supreme Court may interpose via judicial review, the states may justly interpose their authority between their citizens and that of the federal government, whenever the later usurps the rights of the states or the people.12 This much was a ...
... as a desirable and proper constitutional remedy. Just as the Supreme Court may interpose via judicial review, the states may justly interpose their authority between their citizens and that of the federal government, whenever the later usurps the rights of the states or the people.12 This much was a ...
The Living Constitution of Ancient Athens
... valuable evidence, which will be analyzed in this Article, about how the Athenians approached the same fundamental question that faces the members of the Supreme Court: Should the constitution be read narrowly in accordance with its original meaning or should the courts interpret the constitution in ...
... valuable evidence, which will be analyzed in this Article, about how the Athenians approached the same fundamental question that faces the members of the Supreme Court: Should the constitution be read narrowly in accordance with its original meaning or should the courts interpret the constitution in ...
The Constitution Theory of Intention
... The statue is in idol-favourable circumstances and based on the constitution theory necessarily the idol is constituted. The necessary and sufficient conditions for constituting the idol are met; (1) there is a mind; (2) the mind is in a society with Hindu beliefs (required conventions and practices ...
... The statue is in idol-favourable circumstances and based on the constitution theory necessarily the idol is constituted. The necessary and sufficient conditions for constituting the idol are met; (1) there is a mind; (2) the mind is in a society with Hindu beliefs (required conventions and practices ...
a critical analysis of presidential powers under the 1999
... the President,10 and the manner that some of those powers are exercised in general terms. While admitting that the Constitution itself provides for safeguards against the tendency to drift into arbitrariness through violation of its provisions, there are however, a number of core areas which require ...
... the President,10 and the manner that some of those powers are exercised in general terms. While admitting that the Constitution itself provides for safeguards against the tendency to drift into arbitrariness through violation of its provisions, there are however, a number of core areas which require ...
Document
... regulated by written word, shall not necessarily be regulated by requirements to abide by universal norms of morality. The question then is what are the motives of behaviour of government representative or official if legal norms do not regulate their behaviour in an imperative manner anymore? In ou ...
... regulated by written word, shall not necessarily be regulated by requirements to abide by universal norms of morality. The question then is what are the motives of behaviour of government representative or official if legal norms do not regulate their behaviour in an imperative manner anymore? In ou ...
Understanding the Illinois Constitution
... salt mines located near Shawneetown were the largest industrial operation in the territory. They were worked by slave labor. It was feared that if slavery were not allowed in the state, the salt mines would go out of business. A compromise was reached which prohibited slavery but allowed the practic ...
... salt mines located near Shawneetown were the largest industrial operation in the territory. They were worked by slave labor. It was feared that if slavery were not allowed in the state, the salt mines would go out of business. A compromise was reached which prohibited slavery but allowed the practic ...
Saving Constitutional Rights from Judicial Scrutiny: The Savings
... by law reform initiatives to modernize Caribbean statute law. However, the necessary legislative resources have not been adequately mobilized to affect such an overhaul, and consequently, many of the states still labor under laws received from England during the colonial period. The history of the d ...
... by law reform initiatives to modernize Caribbean statute law. However, the necessary legislative resources have not been adequately mobilized to affect such an overhaul, and consequently, many of the states still labor under laws received from England during the colonial period. The history of the d ...
On Amending the Constitution: A Plea for Patience
... Returning to episodes of amendments, the eleventh and twelfth amendments might be ranked with the first ten because they also responded to initial anxieties about the rights of the states and of the people-at least those of the people who, at that time, enjoyed the franchise.4 9 (The electorate of t ...
... Returning to episodes of amendments, the eleventh and twelfth amendments might be ranked with the first ten because they also responded to initial anxieties about the rights of the states and of the people-at least those of the people who, at that time, enjoyed the franchise.4 9 (The electorate of t ...
constitutional-court-2004-3
... actions envisaged by article 137 (3)(b). He is not stating as a fact that he has a definite right that should be enforced. He is alleging that the conduct of the Law Council has violated his rights guaranteed by specified provisions of the constitution and this court should so declare. In order to d ...
... actions envisaged by article 137 (3)(b). He is not stating as a fact that he has a definite right that should be enforced. He is alleging that the conduct of the Law Council has violated his rights guaranteed by specified provisions of the constitution and this court should so declare. In order to d ...
Word - Personal Websites - Create and Use Your home.uchicago.edu
... reference to the “original understanding” of those who enacted its provisions. This view firstbecame popular in the writings of Robert Bork; and though the Senate rejected his nomination to the Supreme Court, Bork’s enthusiasm for “originalism” is well-represented on that Court by Antonin Scalia and ...
... reference to the “original understanding” of those who enacted its provisions. This view firstbecame popular in the writings of Robert Bork; and though the Senate rejected his nomination to the Supreme Court, Bork’s enthusiasm for “originalism” is well-represented on that Court by Antonin Scalia and ...
pdf Thomas Leviathan Hobbes and Parliamentary Sovereignty in
... 2004 fourth edition of Bridled Power, I was even more puzzled. Not only had MMP come into play (against the wishes of both Labour and National), Leviathan seemed to have disappeared altogether. In this book Sir Geoffrey and Matthew Palmer portray a picture of a government that is significantly check ...
... 2004 fourth edition of Bridled Power, I was even more puzzled. Not only had MMP come into play (against the wishes of both Labour and National), Leviathan seemed to have disappeared altogether. In this book Sir Geoffrey and Matthew Palmer portray a picture of a government that is significantly check ...
The Constitution of the United States: A
... All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the U ...
... All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the U ...
district level hearing questions
... a. The Constitution does not mention judicial review. How and why has it become an accepted idea? b. In what circumstances, if any, should the national judiciary have the power to declare state laws unconstitutional? c. Should the executive and legislative branches, as well as the judiciary, have th ...
... a. The Constitution does not mention judicial review. How and why has it become an accepted idea? b. In what circumstances, if any, should the national judiciary have the power to declare state laws unconstitutional? c. Should the executive and legislative branches, as well as the judiciary, have th ...
Notes on Democracy
... all else being equal. This means that a society in which a majority of voters can pass laws directly by petition initiative and referendum votes is more democratic, all else being equal. A society in which immediate recall of public officials can be carried out by a majority that wants to do so is m ...
... all else being equal. This means that a society in which a majority of voters can pass laws directly by petition initiative and referendum votes is more democratic, all else being equal. A society in which immediate recall of public officials can be carried out by a majority that wants to do so is m ...
doc - Supreme Law Firm
... Citizens of California and from having the full protection of the State and Federal Constitutions. This was the case even before the famous Dred Scott decision. It is most notable that the California Constitution was altered after the so-called 14th Amendment so as to delete all references to "white ...
... Citizens of California and from having the full protection of the State and Federal Constitutions. This was the case even before the famous Dred Scott decision. It is most notable that the California Constitution was altered after the so-called 14th Amendment so as to delete all references to "white ...
The Constitution of the United States (1776–1800)
... • The candidate with the majority of votes in the electoral college, or group of electors, would become President. • The President was granted enormous powers, including the power to veto acts of Congress and to appoint judges for the federal courts. copyright OwlTeacher.com ...
... • The candidate with the majority of votes in the electoral college, or group of electors, would become President. • The President was granted enormous powers, including the power to veto acts of Congress and to appoint judges for the federal courts. copyright OwlTeacher.com ...
The Rhetoric of Political Conservatism in the Post
... Reform, particularly the notion of using the state as an instrument of reform, appears antithetical to the ideological tenets of traditional conservatism. Traditional conservatives eschew changes in societal, cultural, and political institutions, and the history of political conservativism in the Un ...
... Reform, particularly the notion of using the state as an instrument of reform, appears antithetical to the ideological tenets of traditional conservatism. Traditional conservatives eschew changes in societal, cultural, and political institutions, and the history of political conservativism in the Un ...
the constitutional court of the republic of lithuania
... Department of the Office of the Seimas, approving of the written explanations provided by E. Švilpaitė and V. Račkauskienė, were received. According to the representatives of the party concerned, the impugned provisions of the Law are not in conflict with the Constitution and their position is groun ...
... Department of the Office of the Seimas, approving of the written explanations provided by E. Švilpaitė and V. Račkauskienė, were received. According to the representatives of the party concerned, the impugned provisions of the Law are not in conflict with the Constitution and their position is groun ...
habeas corpus - Bill of Rights Institute
... was already in progress in Supreme Court. Chief Justice Founders’ vision 1797 as the French seized Roger Taney’s strongly worded over 300 American ships. opinion asserted that by Federalists were calling for suspending writs of habeas a formal declaration of war corpus, Lincoln was wrongly assuming ...
... was already in progress in Supreme Court. Chief Justice Founders’ vision 1797 as the French seized Roger Taney’s strongly worded over 300 American ships. opinion asserted that by Federalists were calling for suspending writs of habeas a formal declaration of war corpus, Lincoln was wrongly assuming ...
volume xvii
... capsulized, amounts to, what is broadly called, ‘sufficient interest’. Any person other than an officious intervenor or a wayfarer without any interest or concern beyond what belongs to any of the 120 million people of the country or a person with an oblique motive, having sufficient interest in the ...
... capsulized, amounts to, what is broadly called, ‘sufficient interest’. Any person other than an officious intervenor or a wayfarer without any interest or concern beyond what belongs to any of the 120 million people of the country or a person with an oblique motive, having sufficient interest in the ...
History of the Constitution of Brazil
During its independent political history, Brazil has had seven constitutions. The most recent was ratified on October 5, 1988.