• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Incompleteness in the finite domain
Incompleteness in the finite domain

... and bounded arithmetic seem to follow a general pattern. For example, as we noted above, polynomial time computations are associated with the theory S21 by a witnessing theorem. If we take S22 , which we believe is a stronger theory, then the corresponding function class is PNP ,2 which we believe i ...
Principle of Mathematical Induction
Principle of Mathematical Induction

SLD-Resolution And Logic Programming (PROLOG)
SLD-Resolution And Logic Programming (PROLOG)

Sample Questions for Test 2
Sample Questions for Test 2

Proof, Sets, and Logic - Boise State University
Proof, Sets, and Logic - Boise State University

An Overview of Intuitionistic and Linear Logic
An Overview of Intuitionistic and Linear Logic

... Γ ` ∆, A A, Γ ` ∆ cut Γ`∆ It may varies from one system to another, but it is present in all logical systems formalised in sequent calculus. It essentially embodies the principle of modus ponens, the core of any formal logical system. However, notice that the formula A has no structural link with Γ ...
Back to Basics: Revisiting the Incompleteness
Back to Basics: Revisiting the Incompleteness

Here - Dorodnicyn Computing Centre of the Russian Academy of
Here - Dorodnicyn Computing Centre of the Russian Academy of

... However, within the framework of Cantor's diagonal proof, only such one-to-one correspondences, or indexings of reals in (1), are admissible which utilize all elements of N={1,2,3, …}. Any other indexings which utilize not all elements of the set N are forbidden categorically. I would like to underl ...
PhD Thesis First-Order Logic Investigation of Relativity Theory with
PhD Thesis First-Order Logic Investigation of Relativity Theory with

... answer the why-type questions of relativity. For example, we can take the twin paradox theorem and check which axiom of special relativity was and which one was not needed to derive it. The weaker an axiom system is, the better answer it offers to the question: “Why is the twin paradox true?”. The t ...
Reading 2 - UConn Logic Group
Reading 2 - UConn Logic Group

Lecture Notes - Alistair Savage
Lecture Notes - Alistair Savage

Proof, Sets, and Logic - Department of Mathematics
Proof, Sets, and Logic - Department of Mathematics

Set theory and logic
Set theory and logic

... (an axioinatizccl version of) the predicate calculus of first order is a theorem. One of the other two theorems (both obtained by Kurt Godel in 1931) asserts that a sufficiently rich formal system of arithmetic, if consistent, contains a statement which is neither provable nor refutable. The last as ...
Lecture Notes - School of Mathematics
Lecture Notes - School of Mathematics

Effectively Polynomial Simulations
Effectively Polynomial Simulations

Notes on Discrete Mathematics
Notes on Discrete Mathematics

Notes on Discrete Mathematics CS 202: Fall 2013 James Aspnes 2014-10-24 21:23
Notes on Discrete Mathematics CS 202: Fall 2013 James Aspnes 2014-10-24 21:23

Structural Logical Relations
Structural Logical Relations

A Logical Expression of Reasoning
A Logical Expression of Reasoning

Logical Inference and Mathematical Proof
Logical Inference and Mathematical Proof

... Lemma: less important theorem used to prove other theorems. Corollary: theorem that trivially follows another theorem. ...
Nonmonotonic Reasoning - Computer Science Department
Nonmonotonic Reasoning - Computer Science Department

... led to many new applications of classical logic. The logical needs of these subjects outstrip all previously existing developments and present many new challenges which require non-traditional logics tailored to computer science. New problems suggested by computer science and artificial intelligence ...
pdf
pdf

Provability as a Modal Operator with the models of PA as the Worlds
Provability as a Modal Operator with the models of PA as the Worlds

Proof Theory of Finite-valued Logics
Proof Theory of Finite-valued Logics

... and tableaux for classical (and intuitionistic) logic. Several people have, since the 1950’s, proposed ways to generalize such formalisms from the classical to the manyvalued case. One particular method for systematically obtaining calculi for all finite-valued logics was invented independently by s ...
Higher Order Logic - Theory and Logic Group
Higher Order Logic - Theory and Logic Group

... Higher order logics, long considered by many to be an esoteric subject, are increasingly recognized for their foundational importance and practical usefulness, notably in Theoretical Computer Science. In this chapter we try to present a survey of some issues and results, without any pretense of comp ...
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 39 >

Axiom

An axiom or postulate is a premise or starting point of reasoning. As classically conceived, an axiom is a premise so evident as to be accepted as true without controversy.The word comes from the Greek axíōma (ἀξίωμα) 'that which is thought worthy or fit' or 'that which commends itself as evident.' As used in modern logic, an axiom is simply a premise or starting point for reasoning. What it means for an axiom, or any mathematical statement, to be ""true"" is a central question in the philosophy of mathematics, with modern mathematicians holding a multitude of different opinions.In mathematics, the term axiom is used in two related but distinguishable senses: ""logical axioms"" and ""non-logical axioms"". Logical axioms are usually statements that are taken to be true within the system of logic they define (e.g., (A and B) implies A), while non-logical axioms (e.g., a + b = b + a) are actually substantive assertions about the elements of the domain of a specific mathematical theory (such as arithmetic). When used in the latter sense, ""axiom,"" ""postulate"", and ""assumption"" may be used interchangeably. In general, a non-logical axiom is not a self-evident truth, but rather a formal logical expression used in deduction to build a mathematical theory. As modern mathematics admits multiple, equally ""true"" systems of logic, precisely the same thing must be said for logical axioms - they both define and are specific to the particular system of logic that is being invoked. To axiomatize a system of knowledge is to show that its claims can be derived from a small, well-understood set of sentences (the axioms). There are typically multiple ways to axiomatize a given mathematical domain.In both senses, an axiom is any mathematical statement that serves as a starting point from which other statements are logically derived. Within the system they define, axioms (unless redundant) cannot be derived by principles of deduction, nor are they demonstrable by mathematical proofs, simply because they are starting points; there is nothing else from which they logically follow otherwise they would be classified as theorems. However, an axiom in one system may be a theorem in another, and vice versa.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report