Document
... The no-nilpotents example Integral domain: ring in which xy=0 implies x = 0 or y =0. No nilpotents: xn = 0 implies x = 0. n is a natural number, x is in the ring. Do we need unary predicates N(x) and R(x) to formalize this problem? ...
... The no-nilpotents example Integral domain: ring in which xy=0 implies x = 0 or y =0. No nilpotents: xn = 0 implies x = 0. n is a natural number, x is in the ring. Do we need unary predicates N(x) and R(x) to formalize this problem? ...
hilbert systems - CSA
... Derivation 1: Z1, Z2, ... Zn is a derivation of Y from S U {X}, Zn = Y Derivation 2: Prefix X >. X > Z1, X > Z2, .... X > Y If Zi is an axiom or a member of S, then insert Zi and Zi > (X > Zi) If Zi is the formula X, insert steps of derivation of X > X If Zi comes from MP, then there exists Zj and Z ...
... Derivation 1: Z1, Z2, ... Zn is a derivation of Y from S U {X}, Zn = Y Derivation 2: Prefix X >. X > Z1, X > Z2, .... X > Y If Zi is an axiom or a member of S, then insert Zi and Zi > (X > Zi) If Zi is the formula X, insert steps of derivation of X > X If Zi comes from MP, then there exists Zj and Z ...
pdf
... + is represented by the formula Multiplication ∗ is represented by the formula The constant function ck can be represented by the formula n The projection function π i can be represented by the formula The composition h = g◦f1 , .., fk can be represented by the formula (∃z1 ,..zk )( Rf1 (x1 ,..xn ,z ...
... + is represented by the formula Multiplication ∗ is represented by the formula The constant function ck can be represented by the formula n The projection function π i can be represented by the formula The composition h = g◦f1 , .., fk can be represented by the formula (∃z1 ,..zk )( Rf1 (x1 ,..xn ,z ...
A Brief Introduction to the Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus
... Problem 1 Prove that α ⇒ (β ⇒ γ) `I (α ∧ β) ⇒ γ. Problem 2 Show that α ⇒ β 6`I ¬α ∨ β by demonstrating that there exists a Kripke model K = (W, ≤, |=) and a world w ∈ W such that w |= α ⇒ β, but w 6|= ¬α ∨ β. Problem 3 Show that world w1 in the simple Kripke model in Section 4 does not satisfy Peirc ...
... Problem 1 Prove that α ⇒ (β ⇒ γ) `I (α ∧ β) ⇒ γ. Problem 2 Show that α ⇒ β 6`I ¬α ∨ β by demonstrating that there exists a Kripke model K = (W, ≤, |=) and a world w ∈ W such that w |= α ⇒ β, but w 6|= ¬α ∨ β. Problem 3 Show that world w1 in the simple Kripke model in Section 4 does not satisfy Peirc ...
What is Logic?
... Monotonicity(不受破壞): Can a valid logical proof be made invalid by adding additional premises or assumptions? ...
... Monotonicity(不受破壞): Can a valid logical proof be made invalid by adding additional premises or assumptions? ...
Exam-Computational_Logic-Subjects_2016
... 8. Prove the inconsistency of a set of predicate clauses using: general resolution level saturation strategy lock resolution linear resolution(‘unit’ or ‘input’) 9. The theorems of soundness and completeness of the proof methods: The properties of propositional logic: coherence, non-contradi ...
... 8. Prove the inconsistency of a set of predicate clauses using: general resolution level saturation strategy lock resolution linear resolution(‘unit’ or ‘input’) 9. The theorems of soundness and completeness of the proof methods: The properties of propositional logic: coherence, non-contradi ...
Lecture 10 Notes
... philosophical side we hear phrases such as “mental constructions” and intuition used to account for human knowledge. On the technical side we see that computers are important factors in the technology of knowledge creation. For PC we have a clear computational semantics for understanding the logical ...
... philosophical side we hear phrases such as “mental constructions” and intuition used to account for human knowledge. On the technical side we see that computers are important factors in the technology of knowledge creation. For PC we have a clear computational semantics for understanding the logical ...
Logic Logical Concepts Deduction Concepts Resolution
... The interpretation of a function symbol is a function If D consists of integers, a function symbol f /2 can be interpreted as "+" The interpretation of a constant symbol can be simply identified with an object in D An interpretation may assign the value I(c) = 5 Given an interpretation, a predicate ...
... The interpretation of a function symbol is a function If D consists of integers, a function symbol f /2 can be interpreted as "+" The interpretation of a constant symbol can be simply identified with an object in D An interpretation may assign the value I(c) = 5 Given an interpretation, a predicate ...
Document
... This restriction rules out the use of UG within the scope of an assumed premise on a variable free in that assumed premise. The point of this is to make sure that the variable bound in a UG step names an arbitrary individual. ...
... This restriction rules out the use of UG within the scope of an assumed premise on a variable free in that assumed premise. The point of this is to make sure that the variable bound in a UG step names an arbitrary individual. ...
PROVING UNPROVABILITY IN SOME NORMAL MODAL LOGIC
... Definition. Let S be a modal logic and S a be a deductive system for a, including L. An Inference in S a is every finite sequence α1 , . . . , αn such that every αi is either an axiom of S a or is obtained form α1 , . . . , αi−1 , the axioms of S a and the theorems of S, accordingly using some of th ...
... Definition. Let S be a modal logic and S a be a deductive system for a, including L. An Inference in S a is every finite sequence α1 , . . . , αn such that every αi is either an axiom of S a or is obtained form α1 , . . . , αi−1 , the axioms of S a and the theorems of S, accordingly using some of th ...
Notes Predicate Logic II
... (environment) any term t denotes a value in the model, and φ holds for all such values, if ∀xφ holds in the model. In t any function symbols of the logic, as well as variables that are known in the context can be used. Example 1. We shall prove: S(g(john)), ∀x(S(x) → ¬L(x)) ` ¬L(g(john)) ...
... (environment) any term t denotes a value in the model, and φ holds for all such values, if ∀xφ holds in the model. In t any function symbols of the logic, as well as variables that are known in the context can be used. Example 1. We shall prove: S(g(john)), ∀x(S(x) → ¬L(x)) ` ¬L(g(john)) ...
Transistors_FPGAs_ASICs
... • SRAM-based (Memory) • Reconfigurable • Track latest SRAM technology • Volatile • Generally high power • Anti-fuse technique • One-time programmable • Non-volatile – security app. ...
... • SRAM-based (Memory) • Reconfigurable • Track latest SRAM technology • Volatile • Generally high power • Anti-fuse technique • One-time programmable • Non-volatile – security app. ...
Section 6.1 How Do We Reason? We make arguments, where an
... Quiz. How did you learn the modus ponens rule as a child? When a conclusion is made that does not follow from the premises the reasoning is called a non sequitur (it does not follow). Quiz. What is a non sequitur that you have observed? Some dictionary-type definitions of logic: • The study of the p ...
... Quiz. How did you learn the modus ponens rule as a child? When a conclusion is made that does not follow from the premises the reasoning is called a non sequitur (it does not follow). Quiz. What is a non sequitur that you have observed? Some dictionary-type definitions of logic: • The study of the p ...
HISTORY OF LOGIC
... – In his lifetime, he published just one book review, one article, a children's dictionary, and the 75-page Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921) – One of the most influential philosophers of the 20th Century. ...
... – In his lifetime, he published just one book review, one article, a children's dictionary, and the 75-page Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921) – One of the most influential philosophers of the 20th Century. ...
Curry–Howard correspondence
In programming language theory and proof theory, the Curry–Howard correspondence (also known as the Curry–Howard isomorphism or equivalence, or the proofs-as-programs and propositions- or formulae-as-types interpretation) is the direct relationship between computer programs and mathematical proofs. It is a generalization of a syntactic analogy between systems of formal logic and computational calculi that was first discovered by the American mathematician Haskell Curry and logician William Alvin Howard. It is the link between logic and computation that is usually attributed to Curry and Howard, although the idea is related to the operational interpretation of intuitionistic logic given in various formulations by L. E. J. Brouwer, Arend Heyting and Andrey Kolmogorov (see Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation) and Stephen Kleene (see Realizability). The relationship has been extended to include category theory as the three-way Curry–Howard–Lambek correspondence.