• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
First-Order Logic, Second-Order Logic, and Completeness
First-Order Logic, Second-Order Logic, and Completeness

... content cannot escape the rigorous logical form.19 This thought can certainly be found in the Begriffsschrift itself already. I take this thought to be of general importance: We are looking for formal systems which axiomatize, characterize, or formalize in some other way some notion, or notions, in s ...
Clausal Logic and Logic Programming in Algebraic Domains*
Clausal Logic and Logic Programming in Algebraic Domains*

Assignment 2 MAT121 Summer 2012 NAME: Directions: Do ALL of
Assignment 2 MAT121 Summer 2012 NAME: Directions: Do ALL of

... Refer to functions y = f(x) and y = g(x) defined as follows: f = { (1,2) (2,3) (3,5) (9,3)} g = { (1,-2) (5,6) (-1,17) (4,-2) (6,4)} 31. Identify the domain of f. 32. Identify the range of g 33. For what value(s) of x is f(x) = 3? 34. For what value(s) of x is g(x) = -2 35. Find f(3) 36. Find g(6) F ...
Functions and Sequences - Cornell Computer Science
Functions and Sequences - Cornell Computer Science

... zeros and ones, cannot be put into a list s1, s2, s3, ... Otherwise, it would be possible by the above process to construct a sequence s0 which would both be in T (because it is a sequence of 0's and 1's which is by the definition of T in T) and at the same time not in T (because we can deliberately ...
Chapter Two: Numbers and Functions Section One: Operations with
Chapter Two: Numbers and Functions Section One: Operations with

Scientific Notation
Scientific Notation

...  Learning Targets:  12. I can determine which numbers in a measurement are significant and use these rules to make precise calculations.  13. I am able to convert values from standard form into scientific notation and vise-versa ...
Concept Hierarchies from a Logical Point of View
Concept Hierarchies from a Logical Point of View

... The characterization of the free extent for other restricted logics and a reformulation of Propositions 3 and 4 by means of closure operators will be given in Section 2.3 below. ...
Lecture 6
Lecture 6

Short Introduction to Elementary Set Theory and Logic
Short Introduction to Elementary Set Theory and Logic

... Showing that two sets are not equal is much easier. For instance, the set of integers Z is not equal to the set of natural numbers N since −1 ∈ Z, while −1 6∈ N. This is enough to establish that Z and N are distinct. We should point out the difference between showing X = Y and X 6= Y for two sets X ...
Detailed Solutions and Concepts - Introduction to Algebra
Detailed Solutions and Concepts - Introduction to Algebra

pre-IB Mathematics syllabus outline
pre-IB Mathematics syllabus outline

Weyl`s Predicative Classical Mathematics as a Logic
Weyl`s Predicative Classical Mathematics as a Logic

... ‘unfreeze’ operations of the λµ-calculus [Parigot 1992]. However, doing so allows new objects to be formed in the datatypes. There have also been several formalisations of classical proofs which used an intuitionistic type theory with additional axioms, such as Gonthier’s proof of the Four Colour Th ...
Inequality - UW
Inequality - UW

... • What would this look like in interval notation? Note that 2 > x is equivalent to x < 2. Writing the inequality with the variable term on the left makes it easier to “see” what the graph and the interval notation should look like. ...
Math review (1 OF 2) 2 equations w 2 unknowns
Math review (1 OF 2) 2 equations w 2 unknowns

... – Second convert your base unit to your desired unit • .58 meters equals how many kilometers • .58 m = .00058 km ...
Basic Concepts of Formal Logic
Basic Concepts of Formal Logic

Supplement 1: Toolkit Functions
Supplement 1: Toolkit Functions

... Inequalities can be used to describe the domain and range of the functions. This is one way to describe intervals of input and output values, but is not the only way. Let us take a moment to discuss notation for domain and range. Using inequalities, such as 0  c  163 , 0  w  3.5 , and 0  h  37 ...
Scientific Notation
Scientific Notation

Chapter 1 Logic
Chapter 1 Logic

What is a Function?
What is a Function?

... information to a function, you can use parameters (also known as arguments)  You can pass zero or several input values  You can pass values of different types  Each parameter has name  Parameters are assigned to particular values when the function is called ...
ON PRESERVING 1. Introduction The
ON PRESERVING 1. Introduction The

chapter1
chapter1

... 1. If A is an infinite subset of some countably infinite set B, then A must be countably infinite. Consider a bijection f : B as a way of listing the elements of B: B = {b0, b1, b2, … } where bi = f(I). A can be listed in the same way, simply by striking out those elements of B that are missing fr ...
Section 1.1: Four Ways to Represent a Function
Section 1.1: Four Ways to Represent a Function

... The domain consists of all real numbers which x can take. In this case, the only restriction we have is that the square root cannot be negative. Thus we must have x + 2 > 0 or x > −2, and in interval notation [−2, ∞). The range consists of all outputs. In this case, a square root can never be negati ...
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO MODAL LOGIC Introduction Consider
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO MODAL LOGIC Introduction Consider

... hirsute woman, yet there is no reason to believe that this is actually true. So while actuality implies possibility, possibility does not imply actuality. It seems, then, that there is more to modality than Kant and Frege suspected; modal statements are not quite equivalent to their nonmodal counter ...
Scientific Notation
Scientific Notation

1 Sets, functions and counting
1 Sets, functions and counting

< 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ... 95 >

Principia Mathematica



The Principia Mathematica is a three-volume work on the foundations of mathematics, written by Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell and published in 1910, 1912, and 1913. In 1927, it appeared in a second edition with an important Introduction To the Second Edition, an Appendix A that replaced ✸9 and an all-new Appendix C.PM, as it is often abbreviated, was an attempt to describe a set of axioms and inference rules in symbolic logic from which all mathematical truths could in principle be proven. As such, this ambitious project is of great importance in the history of mathematics and philosophy, being one of the foremost products of the belief that such an undertaking may be achievable. However, in 1931, Gödel's incompleteness theorem proved definitively that PM, and in fact any other attempt, could never achieve this lofty goal; that is, for any set of axioms and inference rules proposed to encapsulate mathematics, either the system must be inconsistent, or there must in fact be some truths of mathematics which could not be deduced from them.One of the main inspirations and motivations for PM was the earlier work of Gottlob Frege on logic, which Russell discovered allowed for the construction of paradoxical sets. PM sought to avoid this problem by ruling out the unrestricted creation of arbitrary sets. This was achieved by replacing the notion of a general set with the notion of a hierarchy of sets of different 'types', a set of a certain type only allowed to contain sets of strictly lower types. Contemporary mathematics, however, avoids paradoxes such as Russell's in less unwieldy ways, such as the system of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory.PM is not to be confused with Russell's 1903 Principles of Mathematics. PM states: ""The present work was originally intended by us to be comprised in a second volume of Principles of Mathematics... But as we advanced, it became increasingly evident that the subject is a very much larger one than we had supposed; moreover on many fundamental questions which had been left obscure and doubtful in the former work, we have now arrived at what we believe to be satisfactory solutions.""The Modern Library placed it 23rd in a list of the top 100 English-language nonfiction books of the twentieth century.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report