• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
AN EXPOSITION ANS DEVELOPMENT OF KANGER`S EARLY
AN EXPOSITION ANS DEVELOPMENT OF KANGER`S EARLY

Equivalent Fractions
Equivalent Fractions

StewartCalc7e_01_07
StewartCalc7e_01_07

... Intuitively, it is clear that when x is close to 3 but x ≠ 3, then f(x) is close to 5, and so limx  3f(x) = 5. To obtain more detailed information about how f(x) varies when x is close to 3, we ask the following question: How close to 3 does x have to be so that f(x) differs from 5 by less than 0.1 ...
Lecture notes for Chapter 1
Lecture notes for Chapter 1

Cardinality
Cardinality

Document
Document

PS10
PS10

term rewriting.
term rewriting.

Computability theoretic classifications for classes of structures
Computability theoretic classifications for classes of structures

Section 4.7 Scientific Notation
Section 4.7 Scientific Notation

Graph the function
Graph the function

Preliminaries()
Preliminaries()

... product of prime numbers. This fact implies that, if there is no prime number greater than 2, any natural number n should be equal to 2i for some integer i. However, we know that there exist natural numbers that are not power of 2, which contradicts to a know fact. It follows that there exists a pri ...
General Education Mathematics MAT 125 Daily Schedule F2014
General Education Mathematics MAT 125 Daily Schedule F2014

101215 Scientific Notation v2
101215 Scientific Notation v2

the origins of the genus concept in quadratic forms
the origins of the genus concept in quadratic forms

Section 4.7 Scientific Notation
Section 4.7 Scientific Notation

Section 2.2 Subsets
Section 2.2 Subsets

... • Finite set: Set A is a finite set if n(A) = 0 ( that is, A is the empty set) or n(A) is a natural number. • Infinite set: A set whose cardinality is not 0 or a natural number. The set of natural numbers is assigned the infinite cardinal number ‫א‬0 read “aleph-null”. • Equal sets: Set A is equal t ...
1.3 Limits and Continuity
1.3 Limits and Continuity

CITS3211 FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING 7. Lazy evaluation and
CITS3211 FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING 7. Lazy evaluation and

Martin-Gay
Martin-Gay

Fractions, Percentages, Ratios, Rates
Fractions, Percentages, Ratios, Rates

... If the index is 2, this is the special case we have met before, called squaring. We also have a special term for when the index is 3: it is called cubing the number. ...
Arizona Study Guide
Arizona Study Guide

... This NES Profile provides information about the test, including the approximate percentage of the total test score derived from each content domain. The complete set of the content domains, the test framework, is provided here and contains all of the competencies and descriptive statements that defi ...
Precalculus 4
Precalculus 4

Mathematics (304) - National Evaluation Series
Mathematics (304) - National Evaluation Series

ACCESS HS ALGEBRA 1B UNIT 5: INTERPRETING FUNCTIONS
ACCESS HS ALGEBRA 1B UNIT 5: INTERPRETING FUNCTIONS

< 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 95 >

Principia Mathematica



The Principia Mathematica is a three-volume work on the foundations of mathematics, written by Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell and published in 1910, 1912, and 1913. In 1927, it appeared in a second edition with an important Introduction To the Second Edition, an Appendix A that replaced ✸9 and an all-new Appendix C.PM, as it is often abbreviated, was an attempt to describe a set of axioms and inference rules in symbolic logic from which all mathematical truths could in principle be proven. As such, this ambitious project is of great importance in the history of mathematics and philosophy, being one of the foremost products of the belief that such an undertaking may be achievable. However, in 1931, Gödel's incompleteness theorem proved definitively that PM, and in fact any other attempt, could never achieve this lofty goal; that is, for any set of axioms and inference rules proposed to encapsulate mathematics, either the system must be inconsistent, or there must in fact be some truths of mathematics which could not be deduced from them.One of the main inspirations and motivations for PM was the earlier work of Gottlob Frege on logic, which Russell discovered allowed for the construction of paradoxical sets. PM sought to avoid this problem by ruling out the unrestricted creation of arbitrary sets. This was achieved by replacing the notion of a general set with the notion of a hierarchy of sets of different 'types', a set of a certain type only allowed to contain sets of strictly lower types. Contemporary mathematics, however, avoids paradoxes such as Russell's in less unwieldy ways, such as the system of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory.PM is not to be confused with Russell's 1903 Principles of Mathematics. PM states: ""The present work was originally intended by us to be comprised in a second volume of Principles of Mathematics... But as we advanced, it became increasingly evident that the subject is a very much larger one than we had supposed; moreover on many fundamental questions which had been left obscure and doubtful in the former work, we have now arrived at what we believe to be satisfactory solutions.""The Modern Library placed it 23rd in a list of the top 100 English-language nonfiction books of the twentieth century.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report